Licensing Sub-Committee - Tuesday 18 June 2024 9:45 am

June 18, 2024 View on council website  Watch video of meeting or read trancript
AI Generated

Summary

The Licensing Sub-Committee of Kingston upon Thames Council met to discuss an application by Hyun Jun Kim on behalf of 601 PM Ltd for a variation of the premises licence for 601 PM, located at 38 High Street, New Malden. The application sought to extend the licensable area to include two karaoke rooms on the first floor and to extend the hours for regulated entertainment and the sale of alcohol until 1:30 AM daily. The Sub-Committee decided to refuse the application.

Licensing Application: 601 PM Ltd

The Licensing Officer introduced the application, which sought to extend the licensable area and operating hours of 601 PM Ltd. The proposed changes included adding two karaoke rooms on the first floor and extending the hours for live music and alcohol sales until 1:30 AM from Monday to Sunday. The application had been advertised as required, and 261 addresses were consulted, resulting in seven valid representations from the public.

The Committee Report and Public Reports Pack provided detailed information on the application and the representations received.

Applicant's Submission

Hyun Jun Kim and his colleagues presented their case, emphasizing their efforts to comply with police recommendations, such as displaying 'under 25' stickers and maintaining an underage prevention manual. They argued that most customers were locals who walked or used taxis to get home and expressed a desire to share Korean culture with the community. They also addressed concerns about noise, stating that the karaoke rooms had been soundproofed.

Metropolitan Police Submission

The Metropolitan Police opposed the extension of operating hours, citing concerns about increased noise, public disorder, and public safety. They highlighted issues raised by local residents and the Safer Neighbourhood Policing Team, who described the current operations as just manageable. The police also noted that the road layout made it difficult for customers to be picked up, potentially leading to loitering and anti-social behaviour.

Environmental Protection Officer Submission

Richard Odell, the Council’s Environmental Protection Officer, expressed concerns about noise disturbance to neighbouring residents, particularly those sharing a party wall with the premises. He noted that the proposed hours exceeded the guideline hours in the Council's Statement of Licensing Policy and that the soundproofing measures claimed by the applicant had not been technically verified.

Decision

After considering the merits of the application, the Licensing Sub-Committee decided to refuse the application. The decision was based on concerns about the prevention of crime and disorder, public nuisance, and public safety. The Sub-Committee noted that the proposed hours were not within the guideline hours and that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient evidence of effective soundproofing. The Sub-Committee also expressed concerns about the applicant's compliance with existing conditions and the potential cumulative impact on the town centre.

For further details, you can refer to the Late Material and the Agenda frontsheet of the meeting.