The Worthing Planning Committee of Adur Council met on Wednesday 19 June 2024 to discuss two significant planning applications. Both applications were approved, with conditions added to address specific concerns.

32-34 Marine Parade

The first application discussed was for the redevelopment of 32-34 Marine Parade. The proposal involved converting the existing building, previously an amusement arcade and snooker club, into a mixed-use development comprising retail, restaurant, and residential units. The committee noted the building's dilapidated state and the positive impact of the proposed refurbishment on the South Street Conservation Area.

Key Points:

• Affordable Housing: Concerns were raised about the provision of affordable housing. The applicant had approached several housing associations, including Worthing Homes, Housing 21, and Southern Housing, but received no positive responses. The committee was reassured that efforts to secure on-site affordable housing would continue, and a financial contribution of £340,000 would be made if on-site provision proved unfeasible.
• Design and Heritage: The design, which includes contemporary rooftop extensions, was praised for its sensitivity to the historic context. The Worthing Society supported the application, highlighting the importance of retaining the building's character.
• Noise and Landscaping: Conditions were added to ensure noise mitigation, particularly concerning the eastern boundary's foliage, which acts as a noise dampener.

The committee approved the application, subject to conditions addressing noise and landscaping concerns.

Greater Brighton Metropolitan College

The second application was for the redevelopment of the Greater Brighton Metropolitan College site. The proposal involved demolishing existing substandard buildings and constructing a new two-storey construction trade centre.

Key Points:

• Educational Need: The new facility aims to cater to the increasing demand for construction courses and apprenticeships. The consolidation of the college's sites from three to two was part of a broader strategy to improve financial sustainability and student experience.
• Sustainability: The project includes renewable technologies such as air source heat pumps and photovoltaic panels, aiming for a BREEAM 'Very Good' rating. A commitment to biodiversity net gain was also highlighted, with plans to enhance on-site habitat by over 34%.
• Noise and Screening: Concerns about noise from the construction workshops were addressed by adding conditions to enhance the screening along the eastern boundary, providing a noise barrier for nearby residents.

The committee approved the application, with conditions to ensure noise mitigation and enhanced landscaping.

Appeal Decisions

Two appeal decisions were noted:

• Ground Floor Flat, 31 Church Walk: The appeal was dismissed, supporting the council's stance on retaining housing stock.
• 31 Gaisford Road: The appeal was dismissed, upholding the council's decision on maintaining the area's character.

Planning Performance Report

The Planning Performance Report highlighted the council's performance in determining applications. Despite a temporary dip in performance due to the pandemic, the council remains committed to positive decision-making and maintaining local democratic control over planning decisions.

The meeting concluded with a unanimous decision to approve both applications, subject to the discussed conditions.