The Council of Essex Council convened to discuss the potential change in the election cycle from elections by thirds to whole council elections. After a detailed debate, the council voted against the change, opting to maintain the current system of elections by thirds.

Election Cycle Change Results

The primary focus of the meeting was the consideration of changing the election cycle. The Report of Executive Director Strategy and Change outlined the case for both election cycles, including the legislative framework, consultation design, and financial implications. Councillor Cowan introduced the proposal, highlighting that the decision followed a recommendation from the Local Government Association's Corporate Peer Challenge.

Arguments for Whole Council Elections

Councillor Courtney supported the move to whole council elections, arguing that it would provide greater stability and allow for longer-term decision-making. He noted that the current system of elections by thirds was quaint and old-fashioned, and that whole council elections would enable better budget planning and reduce the frequency of elections, which often see low voter turnout.

Councillor Moyes echoed these sentiments, emphasizing that partners and businesses supported the stability offered by whole council elections. He argued that the current system led to a focus on short-term political gains rather than long-term planning.

Arguments for Elections by Thirds

Councillor Wakefield and Councillor Aylen opposed the change, citing the risk of losing experienced councillors and the importance of regular engagement with residents. Councillor Aylen stressed that yearly elections keep councillors accountable and in touch with their constituents, while Councillor Wakefield highlighted that residents preferred the current system.

Councillor Hyde and Councillor Collins also argued against the change, pointing out that the current system allows for gradual change and maintains continuity. They noted that frequent elections prevent complacency and ensure that councillors remain responsive to residents' needs.

Youth Engagement

Councillor Faulkner-Hatt made a compelling case for maintaining elections by thirds, emphasizing the importance of engaging young voters. She argued that a four-year election cycle could disenfranchise young people, who might have to wait until they are 22 to cast their first vote, thereby reducing their engagement with local politics.

Decision

After a robust debate, the council voted on the proposal. The result was 10 votes in favour and 35 against, falling short of the two-thirds majority required to change the election cycle. Consequently, the council will continue with elections by thirds.

For more details, you can refer to the Appendix A - Election Cycle Consultation Engagement Plan, Appendix B - Election Cycle Consultation Partner and Staff Results, and Appendix C - Election Cycle Consultation Analysis Final 2024.