Limited support for High Peak
We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for High Peak Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.
You can still subscribe!
If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.
If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.
If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.
Planning Applications Committee - Thursday, 20th June, 2024 2.15 pm
June 20, 2024 View on council website Watch video of meeting Read transcript (Professional subscription required)Summary
The Planning Applications Committee of High Peak Council met on Thursday, 20 June 2024, to discuss several significant planning applications. Key decisions were made on various proposals, including the approval, deferral, and refusal of planning permissions.
Springfield Farm, Hume Lane, Warrington
The committee discussed the application for a change of use of an agricultural building to a café and tea room at Springfield Farm. The proposal was approved despite concerns from local residents about environmental impacts and noise. The committee noted that the café would not significantly increase vehicle movements and that the development complied with Green Belt policy. Conditions were imposed to mitigate potential environmental impacts.
Sycamore Tree at 1 Bank End, Brown Edge
An application to fell a mature sycamore tree at 1 Bank End, Brown Edge was refused. The committee considered the tree's significant public amenity value and the lack of sufficient justification for its removal. Despite the applicant's concerns about safety and shading, the tree was deemed to be in good condition and not posing a significant risk.
Cheadle Equestrian Centre
The committee refused an application for retrospective consent for a garage and extensions at Cheadle Equestrian Centre. The proposal was considered to have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the area. The committee noted that the original approval was for a more modest dwelling, and the new proposal would undo the size reductions and design improvements previously secured.
Park Lane, Cheadle
An outline application for residential development at Park Lane, Cheadle was refused. The committee concluded that the site did not qualify as limited infilling within a village and that the development would have a detrimental impact on the Green Belt and the rural character of the area. The personal circumstances of the applicant were not considered sufficient to outweigh the planning policy considerations.
Clough House, Oakamoor
The committee deferred a decision on an application for an extension at Clough House, Oakamoor. The proposal included a flat roof and a dormer window, which were considered inappropriate for the conservation area. The deferral allows for further dialogue between the applicant and planning officers to reach a more acceptable design.
Greenacres Farm, Biddulph
An application to replace a stable with a single dwelling at Greenacres Farm, Biddulph was refused. The committee raised concerns about the impact on the living conditions of future occupants due to the proximity of a skip-hire business. Despite the applicant's assurances that the skip-hire business would cease, the committee could not guarantee that the site would remain under the applicant's control.
For more detailed information, you can refer to the Public reports pack and the Late Representations Report.
Attendees














Topics
No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.
Meeting Documents
Agenda
Additional Documents