Cabinet Member for Children, Families and Lifelong Learning Decisions - Tuesday, 23 July 2024 11.30 am

July 23, 2024 View on council website Watch video of meeting
AI Generated

Summary

Surrey County Council's Cabinet Member for Children, Families and Lifelong learning, Councillor Clare Curran, agreed to the local authority's proposed Fair Access Protocol for the 2024/25 school year. The Fair Access Protocol is a statutory requirement for all councils in England. The protocol exists to ensure that children who are considered vulnerable and do not have a school place are offered a place at a suitable school quickly.

Fair Access Protocol

The meeting heard that the number of children being referred to Surrey County Council because they do not have a school place had increased in the previous academic year. This is thought to be related to a greater number of schools, particularly secondary schools, capping the number of children they will accept. Janet Carlos, from the council's admissions team, explained to the meeting that the majority of children who were referred under the protocol did not have a school place because they had recently moved to the area and all the local schools were full. Councillor Curran highlighted that the Fair Access Protocol gave the council the power to place children in schools that had said they were full. She said:

I also understand that the protocol means that the council can place children over and above a published admissions number in a school camp.

There was some discussion about the costs incurred in placing year 11 pupils in schools at short notice. The meeting was told that the cost of these placements was met by the council's High Needs Block grant from the Department for Education Dedicated Schools Grant.

Councillor Curran said there had been no need to consult on the proposed changes to the protocol, as the only changes were minor rewordings to reflect current practice. The only substantive discussion of the proposals came from a member of the public.

Support for Visually Impaired Children

The meeting had received a written question about the provision of services for visually impaired children in Surrey from Rocio Santa Maria.

Ms Santa Maria attended the meeting and explained that she felt the council was being unrealistic about the level of support available. She said that many qualified teachers had left the service and there was not enough expertise available to support the number of children who needed it. She said that she had personal experience of these problems, as her daughter is blind and had required support from the service for eight years. She went on to say that many parents were forced to battle to get the support their children needed and that this was a waste of public money.

Ms Santa Maria said:

I think the money is going wasted in arguing what people should be able to access and not necessarily on the actual services

She said that the sensory support service, Sight for Surrey, did good work, but there were not enough qualified teachers for the visually impaired, Braille teachers, or habilitation officers. She called for the council to invest in services for blind and disabled children, which she said would save money in the long term.

Councillor Curran acknowledged Ms Santa Maria's testimony, saying that she would make further inquiries about the provision of these services. However, she reminded Ms Santa Maria that Surrey County Council does not run schools in the county. She said that responsibility for the teaching and learning in schools rested with individual schools' governing bodies or academy trusts.