Licensing (2003 Act) Sub-Committee - Monday 7th October 2024 10.00 a.m.

October 7, 2024 View on council website  Watch video of meeting or read trancript
AI Generated

Summary

The Licensing Sub-Committee granted a licence variation to the off-licence NKS Food Centre in East Ham, allowing the sale of alcohol until 2am on Friday, Saturday and Bank Holidays, but rejected a request to amend existing conditions on the licence relating to the minimum unit size of beers and spirits. The applicant had requested to be allowed to sell single 500ml bottles of beer and 20cl bottles of spirits, to match those being sold in a nearby off-licence, but this was refused. The Sub-Committee also added a condition that a personal licence holder must be on the premises at all times during the sale of alcohol, and required the licence holder to review their bottle marking procedures.

Application to Vary a Premises Licence

The Sub-Committee considered an application to vary a Premises Licence made by Mr Dushanthan Mahendran, the licence holder of NKS Food Centre. The licence variation application, which had been submitted on 13 August 2024, requested permission to:

  • Extend the hours for the sale of alcohol until 2am each day.
  • Remove a condition requiring the sale of a minimum of two cans or bottles of beer, lager, cider or stout, allowing single sales of 500ml bottles of beer.
  • Remove a condition prohibiting the sale of miniatures of spirits under 35cl, allowing the sale of 20cl bottles of spirits.

The applicant's representative argued that the changes would allow Mr Mahendran to better compete with a nearby off-licence, Masila Stores at 101 Burgess Road, which had been granted a licence until 2am and did not have similar restrictions on the minimum unit size of alcohol sales. Mr Mahendran had been losing business to this shop as a result, as customers preferred the convenience of buying all of their groceries and alcohol in one place.

Representations

Representations objecting to the application were received from Newham Council's Licensing Enforcement Team, the Council's Commercial Environmental Health Team, and a local resident represented by a solicitor, Mr David Dadds. The main concerns raised related to the potential for the variation to undermine the licensing objectives of the prevention of crime and disorder and the prevention of public nuisance.

The representations from the Licensing Enforcement Team and Commercial Environmental Health Team focused on the potential impact of extending the licensing hours until 2am, and the amendment of the existing licence conditions relating to minimum unit sizes of beers and spirits. Both teams were concerned that this would increase the risk of street drinking and related anti-social behaviour in the area, including littering, public urination, and noise disturbance for residents.

Mr Dadds, representing a local resident, argued that the existing conditions on the licence, which had been imposed following a review hearing in 2017, were necessary to prevent crime and disorder and public nuisance. He presented photographs as evidence of street drinking in the area, and suggested that relaxing the conditions would only exacerbate the problem.

Mr Dadds' client was particularly concerned about the proposed changes to the minimum unit size for alcohol sales, arguing that this would make cheaper alcohol more readily available to vulnerable individuals. He called for the existing conditions to be retained and enforced more rigorously, and suggested the implementation of additional measures such as bottle marking and improved CCTV.

Applicant's Response

Mr Mahendran argued that the concerns raised were unfounded and based on unfounded suspicions of the involvement of the nearby off-licence. He stated that the photographs presented by Mr Dadds showed the same group of people in different poses, and appeared to be staged, although acknowledged he had no evidence to support that claim. He felt that Mr Dadds was trying to muddy the waters and cast aspersions on his character. He stated that since taking over the business in December 2023, he had made every effort to comply with the licence conditions, and had addressed any breaches identified by the Licensing Authority.

Mr Mahendran argued that the proposed changes would not undermine the licensing objectives, and would in fact promote them by allowing him to better manage the sale of alcohol. He claimed that he regularly challenged individuals who were drinking outside his shop and asked them to move on, and had introduced a policy of refusing to serve alcohol to individuals who appeared to be drunk. He had also recently installed additional CCTV cameras to monitor the area outside his shop.

Mr Mahendran asserted that his primary focus was on selling groceries, which accounted for around 70% of his business, and that he was not reliant on alcohol sales. He was seeking the licence variation simply to create a level playing field with the shop across the road and give customers the freedom of choice.

Decision and Reasons

The Sub-Committee decided to partially grant the application, allowing the sale of alcohol until 2am on Friday, Saturday and Bank Holidays. They reasoned that, as the nearby shop was already licensed until 2am, the extension was unlikely to have a significant impact on crime and disorder or public nuisance.

The Sub-Committee refused the request to amend the conditions relating to the minimum unit size for alcohol sales. They felt that reducing the minimum unit size for beers and spirits would increase the availability of cheaper alcohol and could potentially lead to an increase in street drinking.

In addition to the granted variation, the Sub-Committee also imposed two further conditions on the licence:

  • A personal licence holder must be on the premises at all times during the licensed hours.
  • The premises licence holder should ensure that bottle marking procedures are reviewed and adequate.

The Sub-Committee considered the representation alleging that previous representations made by a resident had been followed by intimidation. Noting that the Licensing Authority has discretion to withhold the personal details of anyone making a representation, the Sub-Committee urged anyone with evidence of witness intimidation to report it to the police.