Licensing (2003 Act) Sub-Committee - Wednesday 2nd October 2024 10.00 a.m.

October 2, 2024 View on council website  Watch video of meeting or read trancript
AI Generated

Summary

The Licensing Sub-Committee suspended the licence of Kay Viva, a restaurant in Stratford, for two weeks so that the licence holder and Designated Premises Supervisor, Vivian Ezeagu, can receive further training in the licensing regime by a reputable training provider. The licence was suspended following complaints about noise and anti-social behaviour in the vicinity of the premises and a compliance visit that found a number of licensing breaches. Further conditions will be imposed on the licence, which will be detailed in a decision notice to be sent to all parties within five working days of the meeting.

Review of the licence for Kay Viva

The sub-committee reviewed the licence for Kay Viva following a review application from a resident who is the spokesperson for the Chopwell Close Residents Association1.

The application was made on the grounds that almost every weekend for the past two months Kay Viva has been operating as a nightclub, with loud music being played from 10pm until 5am, and people shouting and screaming in the street. The resident states that this is leading to a public safety issue with drunk people falling into the road.

The application was supported by a petition with 69 signatories and by the council's licensing team.

The Licensing Team submitted a representation in support of the application on the grounds of crime and disorder, the prevention of public nuisance, and public safety. The representation notes that while Kay Viva has not been subject to previous licensing complaints, it has been operating under a number of Temporary Event Notices (TENs)2 and has exceeded the annual allocation of 15 TENs, or 21 days, that the premises is permitted.

As a result of exceeding its allocation of TENs, the premises can no longer apply for any more TENs this year.

The Licensing Team states that it believes much of the information in the review application relates to events that have been held under TENs. However, they acknowledge that some events may have been held after 2am, which is the latest time permitted under the premises’ current licence.

The Licensing Team also submitted evidence from a visit it had conducted on 16 September. It was noted that on a previous visit on 23 August the Licensing Team had been unable to obtain CCTV footage of events at the premises as the system was only recording seven days of footage. However, on the visit on 16 September the Licensing Officer found that the CCTV was now recording 31 days of footage, as required by the licence conditions.

The Licensing Team states that the premises licence holder, Vivian Ezeagu, appears to be a good person and, along with her colleagues, is keen to try and improve the operation of the premises and adhere to the licensing conditions. It notes, however, that there is a “clear lack of understanding of the public licence conditions and licence objectives”. The Licensing Team states that it will be happy to discuss a variation of the licence with the licence holder at a future date and work with them on this, but that for the time being, the premises must operate in accordance with the existing licence conditions.

The Licensing Team also revealed that Kay Viva had applied for a minor variation3 of the licence in mid-September to remove the condition that requires all alcohol sales to be ancillary to the service of a table meal, but that this application had been refused because the Licensing Team and the Police made representations against it.

A resident submitted a written representation supporting the review application. They reiterated concerns about noise and anti-social behaviour at the premises, adding that some residents feel intimidated by the activity at the premises and are afraid to open their windows or complain to the Police. They also highlighted that many people in the building work night shifts and that the noise is affecting their ability to sleep.

The licence holder was represented at the meeting by Rob Edge of licensing consultancy Licence Leader. Mr Edge admitted that there have been shortcomings in the management of the premises but stated that Vivian Ezeagu is asking for the sub-committee’s understanding of the situation and a chance to rectify the issues.

He also stated that in his opinion the Licensing Authority and the Police must not have any concerns regarding the licensing objectives as they have approved 12 events at the premises that were held under TENs.

Mr Edge stated that the existing licence was originally granted for a restaurant but that the nature of the business has changed and that the licence holder wishes to submit a full variation application in the future. He stated that in the meantime, the licence holder will improve community engagement and staff training at the premises.

In questioning, Vivian Ezeagu stated that she did not understand her responsibilities under the licence and that she had not been aware of the requirement for the CCTV system to record 31 days of footage. She also denied that Kay Viva is responsible for the noise and anti-social behaviour that is being complained about, stating that it is coming from other premises in the area. She did, however, agree to install a noise limiter at the premises if required by the sub-committee.

Decision of the sub-committee

In its deliberations, the sub-committee noted that it was minded to suspend the licence for two weeks so that the licence holder could undergo further training in the licensing regime.

In its decision statement, the Sub-Committee also stated that it would be imposing further conditions on the licence, which would be detailed in a decision notice to be sent to the applicant within five working days of the meeting.


  1. Chopwell Close is a residential street in Stratford in the London Borough of Newham. 

  2. Temporary Event Notices are notices that allow premises that hold a premises licence to hold events that extend the activities or hours that they are normally permitted for a limited number of days. In many cases, the activities at events held under TENs would otherwise require the granting of a full premises licence variation. 

  3. Minor variations are a type of premises licence variation that cannot be refused by a licensing authority if a responsible authority makes a representation against it. Minor variations are therefore very limited in scope.