Council - Wednesday 16 October 2024 7.00 pm

October 16, 2024 View on council website Watch video of meeting
AI Generated

Summary

The Council received a deputation about street cleaning and fly-tipping on Kingscore Road, Streatham, from local residents Juri Peggy Schmidt-Solta and Kizzie Ross. The residents explained that they were frustrated with the lack of street cleaning in the area, and the regularity of fly-tipping on the pavements. The Council noted the issue and pledged to review the street cleaning schedule for the road. Councillors also received and noted a verbal report from the Lambeth Youth Council. The Council then debated and voted to adopt the Capital Programme 2024 to 2028 FINAL which will see £89.485 million invested over the next four years across the Borough. The Constitution Report - Full Council was also debated and adopted, with amendments. The most significant changes to the Constitution include the formal inclusion of the Nolan Principles, and updated powers delegated to the Corporate Director of Finance.

Clean Up Streatham

Two residents of Kingscore Road, Streatham, Juri Peggy Schmidt-Solta and Kizzie Ross, made a deputation to the Council to complain about the level of litter and fly-tipping on their street. Ms Schmidt-Solta described the problem:

We are unhappy with the level of litter, fly tipping, blocked drainage and the street cleaning on Kingscore Road. Being close to the high street and lots of fast food joints specifically KFC which is very popular we get loads of fast food rubbish on the street and this gets blown down the road because Kingscore Road is a kind of a wind tunnel and also people who come to eat in this joint some of them sit in the car, eat inside the car and dump the rubbish on the street.

Ms Ross explained how these issues were affecting her and her neighbours:

Just this morning, I stepped outside to find a discarded mattress on the pavement, blocking me from pushing my child's pram onto the road. These incidents are not only unsightly but demoralising. They undermine the hard work and pride we've invested in our streets, leaving residents feeling discouraged.

Councillor Rosina Chowdhury, Cabinet Member for Sustainable Lambeth and Clean Air responded that the Council takes these matters seriously:

...we have regular street cleaning schedule in place, ensuring that our streets are cleaned routinely. When fly tipping is reported, we aim to respond within 72 hours on residential roads. In the past year alone, we've dealt with over 7,000 fly tipping cases across the borough.

She pledged to arrange for a Council officer to visit Kingscore Road with a contractor to identify improvements.

Separately, Councillor Nicole Griffiths, representing Streatham Wells ward, asked Councillor Chowdhury to confirm what measures were in place to keep the streets and gullies in Streatham clean and weed free, and confirmed that there was no intention to reintroduce the use of the weedkiller glyphosate. Councillor Chowdhury responded that:

...we acknowledge that streets haven't been clean as they could be, but we are taking action. I've asked officers to prepare and implement a performance improvement plan with significant additional scrutiny and support for CERCO since mid-September.

Lambeth Youth Council Annual Report

Councillors received and noted a verbal report from the Lambeth Youth Council. A number of Youth Councillors and Youth Council Coordinators explained the work that they had been doing, including their campaigns to improve access to fitness opportunities for young people, to break down barriers between young people and the police, and to give young people in the Borough a voice on local issues.

Capital Programme 2024 to 2028

The Council debated the Capital Programme 2024 to 2028 FINAL. The Capital Programme, which sets out the capital investments1 the Council will be making over the next four years, was adopted after a vote, with 38 Councillors voting for and 3 against.

Councillor Scott Ainslie, for Streatham St Leonard's ward, expressed concerns about the lack of transparency in the report:

Cabinet members tell us that the southern wards are getting their first share but they haven't told us how this compares to the north or the middle of the borough. When we asked about section 106 investments the learners ward was second last on the list with only £18,000 allocated to a CPZ consultation. Meanwhile 17 out of 25 wards have over a hundred thousand of individual projects allocated and some with millions. This is not reassuring. There is not enough detail in these reports to see where the money is being spent.

He also complained that there was a lack of accountability in relation to section 106 agreements2, and highlighted the amount of unspent section 106 funds being held by the council:

...a report from the home builders federation in 2023 showed that Lambeth was sitting on the second highest value of unspent section 106 funds in London of nearly 50 million. A figure that has been rising for two decades. Why have I also with section 106 projects from 2015 some of them still haven't been spent the balance in 2023. I mean why are these projects taking that long to complete or are we just sitting on money when frontline services are suffering effectively amplifying labour austerity.

Councillor Matthew Bryant, for Clapham Common ward, welcomed the inclusion in the Capital Programme of £8 million of funding for the Lambeth New Homes Programme:

We're pleased to see that the programme includes almost £8 million of funding for the new homes programme and Councillor Adleport confirmed last week that this should finance a minimum of 500 new homes in the borough by 2030.

However, he echoed Councillor Ainslie's calls for more transparency in the report:

...we would like to see far more transparency as to how decisions are taken about which schemes are funded and which are not.

Councillor David Amos, Cabinet Member for Finance, presented the Capital Programme. He highlighted the range of projects included in the programme:

This capital investment will contribute to maintaining assets, enhance our youth officer, support vulnerable residents, improve our environment and public realm, develop income generating schemes that support the land of 2030 ambitions, contribute towards the council's financial stability and enable the council to provide the safest most efficient and highest quality services possible for our residents.

He also highlighted the economic challenges facing the Council and explained how these impacted the Capital Programme:

...Brexit, Covid-related trade disruptions, the impact of the war in Ukraine with levels of inflation not seen in over a generation and these have all had substantial implications for our capacity as a council to fund capacity capital programmes and this has come in other ways in terms of higher construction costs, labour costs and a decrease in developer contributions as growth and developments have slowed or even stopped.

Constitution 2024/25

The Council debated and then voted to adopt the Constitution Report - Full Council, with amendments, with 38 Councillors voting for and 3 against.

Councillor Nicole Griffiths, for Streatham Wells Ward, raised concerns about a lack of transparency on the part of the Labour administration, and its approach to scrutiny by the Green Party:

This is reflected at every full council meeting including this evening. Despite green councillors representing nearly a quarter of Lambeth residents the motions we present to council are not debated and blatantly ignored by the ruling group.

Councillor Donna Harris, Liberal Democrat Group Leader, raised concerns about the length of time taken by Cabinet members to answer supplementary questions to the opposition during Council meetings:

...too often the answers are simply far too long-winded. Of course we don't want to restrict cabinet members for explaining the complexities of certain issues and we understand that it can take a moment to gather one's thoughts. However we've all noticed that supplementary answers to questions to opposition members frequently become long-winded and veer totally off topic, while questions from Labour members seem designed to give cabinet members an opportunity to deliver lengthy self-congratulatory speeches. This is not scrutiny, this is grandstanding and frankly a waste of time.

She also raised concerns about how the Council's Interim Chief Executive had proposed changes to how opposition Councillors met with her and Corporate Directors:

My concern is why this proposal wasn't brought to the constitutional working group. There is nothing in the constitution that gives the interim or any other CEO the authority to make this decision unilaterally.

Councillor Scarlett O'Hara, for Herne Hill ward, praised the inclusion of the Nolan Principles in the new Constitution:

...the Nolan principles provide a set of standards for the conduct of people in public office. We wanted to include these ethical guidelines in our constitution to remind us what our residents can expect from all of us as we carry out our duties. These principles underpin everything we do be it dealing with casework on behalf of our residents, scrutinising papers for our work on committees or working alongside our colleagues and council officers.

She also highlighted how opposition Councillors played a key role in the Council's scrutiny committees:

And note that all of our scrutiny committees have members of the opposition parties sitting on them as part of our commitment to the principles of openness and accountability.

The Green Party proposed an amendment to the report, which was carried. The key changes to the Constitution are the formal inclusion of the Nolan Principles, updated Cabinet Member portfolios, and updated procedures for virement.3

Winter Fuel Allowance

The Liberal Democrats proposed a motion on Winter Fuel Payments, calling for the Council to introduce a local payment to compensate those pensioners who have been made ineligible for the Winter Fuel Payment following recent changes made by the Labour Government. They also proposed writing to the Chancellor of the Exchequer to ask for the policy to be reversed.

The motion was not carried, with 38 Councillors voting against and 3 in favour.

Councillor Matthew Bryant, for Clapham Common ward, argued that the Government's decision to restrict the Winter Fuel Payment to those pensioners claiming Pension Credit would lead to many vulnerable pensioners facing hardship:

...the new threshold is far too low. It's clear that the group of pensioner households on low income is far larger than just those on pension credit.

Councillor Tim Windle, for Streatham Hill ward, argued that the motion was hypocritical:

Why would the Lib Dems try to reform such a poorly targeted way of reducing poverty when instead the Lib Dems can cut working tax credits and child tax credits, the Lib Dems can abolish Sure Start and the Lib Dems can cap the local housing allowance?

He also argued that the Council was already supporting those most in need through the Household Support Fund.

Councillor Emma Nye, for Knight's Hill ward, reminded the Liberal Democrats that it was their party's decision to go into coalition with the Conservative party that led to the austerity measures that had caused so much damage to public services:

I say to them this is the legacy of your decision to prop up the Tory's, you're the co-architect of austerity which has caused so much misery to so many.

She also highlighted the success of the Council's Pension Credit uptake programme.

Councillor Fred Cowell, Cabinet Member for Equalities, Governance and Change (job-share), argued that the Government was right to target support at those most in need, and that the previous system of Winter Fuel Payments meant money was given to people who did not need it:

It means cash transfers to the one in four claimants that are millionaires...This is nothing more than asking the Council to directly commit resources to continue a transfer to the most wealthy.

Councillor Scott Ainslie, for Streatham St Leonard's ward, highlighted the problems with Pension Credit uptake:

...Pensioners who are entitled to pension credit but don't claim it because it requires filling in a needlessly over complicated 20 plus page form with 200 plus questions on it.

He also argued that successive governments, including Labour governments, had failed to properly insulate homes in the UK, leaving many pensioners facing fuel poverty.

Councillor Ben Curtis, for Streatham Hill ward, summed up for the Liberal Democrats:

...cutting the winter fuel payments is not the answer and I think councillors across this chamber actually know this.

He urged Councillors to support the motion and send a message to the Government to reconsider the policy. The Green Party proposed an amendment to the motion, calling for a robust equalities impact assessment to be carried out and for a greater focus on Pension Credit uptake, but this was not carried.

Standing Up For Our Diverse Lambeth Community

Labour proposed a motion calling for the Council to stand up for the Borough's diverse community, in the wake of the riots that took place across the UK in the summer of 2024. The motion was carried, as amended, with 38 Councillors voting for and 3 against.

Councillor Saleha Jaffer, for Streatham St Leonard's ward, highlighted how the riots had affected people in Lambeth, and described a visit to mosques in the Borough following the riots:

On my visits to three mosques in the borough people talked to me about their fears and worries. They were concerned that they would be singled out because of the way they dress or attacked at the place where they prayed.

She praised the Council's response to the riots.

Councillor Donna Harris, Liberal Democrat Group Leader, condemned the violence, but criticised the motion:

This motion gave Lambeth Labour the opportunity to foster dialogue, promote understanding and offer citizen-led solutions to heal our divided society. However, it oversimplifies the issue by reducing our community to rigid categories.

Councillor Nicole Griffiths, for Streatham Wells ward, welcomed the statement of solidarity contained in the motion, but felt it was a missed opportunity to properly challenge the status quo:

Whilst the motion receives our full support, I also see a wasted opportunity to challenge the status quo, to call out an openly right-wing press, politicians who purposefully use language to drive division, to name fascism when we witness it and to question any stereotyping that feeds prejudice.

She argued that it was important to understand that the riots were driven by fascists.

Councillor Sarbaz Barzinji, for Thornton ward, highlighted the impact of dehumanising language on vulnerable communities, particularly refugees and asylum seekers:

Every use of dehumanising language has a long-term negative impact whether it is visible or not, especially when you are already vulnerable.

Councillor Ibrahim Dogus, for Vassall ward, described some of the work the Council was doing to support refugees and asylum seekers, and promote an inclusive Borough.

Councillor Dr Mahamed Hashi, Cabinet Member for Safer Communities, described his experiences of growing up in Lambeth, and argued that:

...we have more in common than the differences that separate us and that is what we must remind ourselves every single day in the face of those who want to take it away from us.

He called for kindness and compassion. The Green Party proposed an amendment to the motion, calling for Councillors to support and attend events that bring communities together, and to recognise that all residents had an equal right to access opportunities. This amendment was carried.

Extending Local Voting Rights

Labour proposed a motion on extending local voting rights to all residents, regardless of their nationality. The motion was carried, as amended, with 38 Councillors voting for and 3 against.

The Green Party proposed an amendment to the motion, adding that all residents had an equal right to access opportunities, and that the Council should work to mitigate the negative impacts of the Elections Act 2022, including the requirement for voters to show photographic identification at polling stations. This amendment was carried.

The Liberal Democrats proposed an amendment to the motion, noting that all residents pay tax, not just Council Tax, but this was not carried.

Giving Lambeth Control on Speeding Enforcement in our Borough

Labour proposed a motion calling for the Government to give Lambeth Council control on speeding enforcement in the Borough. The motion was carried, as amended, with 38 Councillors voting for and 3 against.

The Green Party proposed an amendment to the motion, noting that casualties from walking, wheeling and cycling were still increasing, and resolving that the Council should invest in routes that enable people to walk, wheel and cycle safely. This amendment was carried.

The Liberal Democrats proposed an amendment to the motion, requiring that funds raised from speeding fines should be earmarked for road danger reduction schemes. This amendment was not carried.


  1. A capital investment is spending on assets like buildings, land and equipment that can be used for a number of years. Capital investments are distinct from revenue spending, which is spending on the day-to-day running of services. 

  2. A section 106 agreement is a legal agreement between a developer and a local planning authority, which is used to mitigate the impact of a development. They are often used to secure contributions from developers towards affordable housing, public open space, education, and other community facilities. 

  3. Virement is the process of transferring budgeted funds from one budget head to another.