Subscribe to updates

You'll receive weekly summaries about Hackney Council every week.

If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.

Audit Committee - Tuesday 14 January 2025 6.30 pm

January 21, 2025 View on council website  Watch video of meeting or read trancript  Watch video of meeting
AI Generated

Summary

The Audit Committee considered reports on the Council's finances, treasury management activity and risk management, and approved the final accounts for 2023/24 and the draft Treasury Management Strategy.

Council Finances

The Interim Group Director of Finance, Jackie Moylan, gave a presentation to the committee on the Council's finances. The presentation covered the following topics:

  • General Fund Forecast The Council is forecasting an overspend of £36.8m on its General Fund for 2024/25. The overspend is driven by cost pressures in Children's and Education services, Adults, Health and Integration services, and Climate, Homes & Economy directorate, in particular a £19.5m overspend on temporary accommodation (TA).
  • Reserves If spending continues at the current rate, the Council will exhaust its reserves in 2-3 years. Ms Moylan stressed that this position is not sustainable.
  • Spend reduction initiatives The Council has introduced a number of spend reduction initiatives in an attempt to mitigate the overspend, including a non-essential spending freeze, a freeze on recruitment, and overtime restrictions.
    The initiatives have to date had a small impact, generating £2.4m in savings, and Ms Moylan acknowledged that more needed to be done, saying:

    if we were to do nothing and we continue to overspend at the rate we are [at]...we would exhaust our current reserves in 2-3 years.

  • Housing Revenue Account The Housing Revenue Account (HRA) is forecast to break even. However, Ms Moylan highlighted the forecast overspend of £10.7m on reactive repairs. She highlighted that this figure represented a significant risk to the Council's financial position, and could prevent the Council from achieving its objective of holding 10% of the HRA's turnover in reserves.

  • Local Government Finance Settlement The provisional Local Government Finance Settlement for 2025/26 was announced just before Christmas. The settlement confirmed a 7.8% increase in Hackney's core spending power, including a £9.7m Recovery Grant. The settlement also confirmed that Councils will be able to increase Council Tax by up to 5%. Whilst the additional funding was welcomed, Ms Moylan warned that there was still considerable uncertainty regarding future funding, particularly from 2026/27 onwards.

    there is still significant uncertainty about the impact of...local government finance funding reforms from 26/27...[and] we might have [only] some kind of indication in the summer.

    She also acknowledged that the one-off Recovery Grant may not be repeated in future years.

  • Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP) The MTFP is being updated to take into account both in-year pressures and the provisional settlement, and will be presented to Cabinet in February. Ms Moylan noted that the Council will still need to draw down on its reserves to balance the budget in 2025/26, but to a lesser extent than previously anticipated.

  • Capital Programme The Council is forecasting a £9m underspend on its Capital Programme for 2024/25. Ms Moylan stated that this is due to a number of factors including:

    economic factors and other external...factors.

    The Committee also noted that delays in the Capital Programme contributed to an increase in demand on revenue budgets for responsive repairs. This was because maintenance work that would have otherwise been funded via the Capital Programme was being funded via revenue budgets.

  • Temporary Accommodation (TA) The Committee discussed the significant cost pressures on TA in detail. Councillor Ben Lucas questioned Rickardo Hyatt, the Group Director of Climate, Homes & Economy, about the work of the TA Transformation Board, which was established to develop solutions to these pressures. Mr Hyatt stated that the Board was exploring a number of options, including:

    acquisitions [of properties] for example...and we're not waiting for certain points...through the year...to pay for those propositions.

    Mr Hyatt said that the Board was also looking at increasing the level of rents charged to Local Housing Allowance claimants to reduce the Council's subsidy losses on TA. The Chair of the Committee, Councillor Anna Lynch, asked if the Board's work would be considered as part of the Deep Dive into the Council's Transformation Programme, which is scheduled for the April Audit Committee meeting. Ms Moylan confirmed that it would be.

  • Hackney Green Investment Initiative The Council has raised £600,000 via its Hackney Green Investment Initiative1 in 2024/25. The money has been raised via a crowd-funding platform, and will be used to fund climate-related projects. Ms Moylan confirmed that the Council was planning to raise a further £400,000 via the scheme in the next quarter, and was aiming to raise £5m in total by 2030.

  • National Insurance Compensation Councillor Lucas asked when the Council would receive details about its allocation from the £515m National Insurance compensation grant, which was announced in the Budget but has not yet been allocated. Ms Moylan stated that the Council was expecting to receive approximately £4m from the grant, which would be less than its additional costs.

    we always have a relatively fair idea [of our allocation] but...we think we'll get about four million, which is short of what we need.

    She also noted that, unlike in previous years, Councils will be able to use the compensation grant to cover increases in HRA costs.

  • Send Overspend The Committee discussed the ongoing overspend on Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) services. Councillor Ian Rathbone asked if there was any indication that the Council would receive more funding to cover the £20.3m historic deficit. Ms Moylan replied that she expected the government to provide more funding or extend the statutory override, but that this would be unlikely to cover the full amount.

    i expect they [the government] would have to do something about it [the SEND overspend]...whether that is just extending the override...or not...i don't expect...there'll be...funding...that deficit.

  • Council Tax Relief Councillor Zoë Garbett asked if the Council had plans to change the level of Council Tax relief that is available to residents. Councillor Robert Chapman, the Cabinet Lead for Finance, Insourcing and Customer Service, said that the Council had no plans to do so.

  • Non-essential Spending Councillor Garbett asked for more detail on the non-essential spending freeze, and asked if there was a list of the services that were affected. Ms Moylan replied that there was no list and that the spend freeze was being implemented on a case-by-case basis by Group Directors.

    they're [cuts to non-essential spending are] made within [each] directorate...and they really are sort of a case-by-case basis.

Treasury Management

  • External Borrowing The Committee discussed the increase in the Council's external borrowing, which was not anticipated at the start of the financial year. Ms Moylan stated that the increase was due to the Council's ambitious Capital Programme, and that the Council was now moving towards a more borrowing-led approach to finance its capital spending, in part due to the reduction in the Council's reserves and the continued pressure on revenue budgets.

    the council is moving towards more borrowing to meet...capital financial requirements as cash reserves decline.

  • Treasury Management Strategy The Committee noted the Treasury Management Update and approved the draft Treasury Management Strategy 2025/26 to 2027/28. The Strategy sets out how the Council will manage its cash flow, borrowing, and investments over the next three years. It includes a number of prudential indicators, which are designed to ensure that the Council's borrowing is affordable and sustainable. Councillor Lucas asked about the Council's plans to issue bonds and other similar financial instruments, as noted in the strategy document. Ms Moylan stated that these plans were primarily in relation to the Hackney Green Investment Initiative and that the Council would be reviewing this area and providing more detail at the next meeting.

  • Investment Portfolio The Committee noted that the average rate of interest earned on the Council's investments had fallen from 5.31% in December 2023 to 4.74% in December 2024. Ms Moylan said that this was due to a number of factors including the Council’s cautious approach to investment, the reduced cash balances available to invest, and the fall in interest rates.

Risk Management

  • Climate, Homes and Economy Directorate The Committee discussed the Climate, Homes and Economy Directorate Risk Register. The Register includes a number of high-rated risks, including:

    • Budget pressures
    • Building safety
    • Customer satisfaction
    • Council property repairs
    • Failure of ICT infrastructure
    • Temporary accommodation. Councillor Selman asked Mr Hyatt to explain the risk relating to institutional policy sources, which was included in the register. The risk related to a lack of capacity within the Council to respond to policy consultations, which had led to the Council having to externalise work, for example a public spaces protection order (PSPO) relating to dog control.

    we [the Council] do...run a lot of consultations...and...we have to be mindful of...the capacity and resource that we have in order to undertake those consultations.

    Mr Hyatt said that the risk was likely to remain high given the ongoing pressure on Council resources. Councillor Garbett asked Mr Hyatt about the lack of reference to the new repairs contract in the risk register, particularly given that there was a risk relating to the delay in the planned maintenance contract. Steve Waddington, the Strategic Director of Housing, stated that the delay in the planned maintenance contract had led to an increase in the number of responsive repairs that the Council was having to undertake.

    the main challenge on the delay on the capital contracts is that...it places additional demand on the revenue...to carry out...repairs...because obviously...it is carrying out...the plan...so...the delay in the capital program is part of the reason for the increased [demand] in...repairs.

    Mr Waddington confirmed that the change in the repairs contract had also contributed to delays in the repairs service. He said that the Council had moved from one main contractor to four contractors, and that this had caused some disruption. However, he said that the new contracts would eventually lead to a more efficient service.

    we have gone from one contractor to four contractors...which gives us a greater spread of...capacity...we have two main contractors and two small contractors...one of the main contractors is now fully mobilised...[and] the second one we expect to be...mobilised soon.

    Councillor Rathbone raised concerns about the impact of the 2020 cyberattack on Housing services. Mr Hyatt responded that Housing services had been particularly badly affected by the attack, and that the Council had been forced to implement a number of workarounds in the interim. He said that the Council had recently signed a contract for a new integrated housing system, which would be implemented in phases, and that this would help to improve the service in the long term.

    it is right to say that...housing services...have been...more so impacted...by [the cyber attack] than many others...the council...prior to the cyber attack had a strategy of building its own system...[but] when...the cyber attack happened the system that the council was using...the supplier of that...system determined that it would no longer be updating it...so the council would have had to replace this system anyway.

  • Corporate Risk Register The Committee discussed the Corporate Risk Register. The register includes a number of high-rated risks including:

    • The Council’s financial position
    • Cyber security
    • Workforce and skills
    • Information assets
    • Corporate resilience
    • Person suffers significant harm, injury or death
    • Risks posed to children not in school
    • SEND funding
    • Surplus school places
    • Adult Social Care budgets
    • Council property repairs
    • Setting up Council owned companies
    • Climate change. Councillor Garbett questioned why the risk relating to the Council's financial position was rated as catastrophic, given the additional funding that had been announced in the provisional settlement. Ms Moylan responded that the catastrophic rating reflected the level of uncertainty surrounding the Council's long term funding position, particularly from 2026/27 onwards.

    i think it's really important to understand that we're sort of completely...in that period of real sort of...a lot of uncertainty and a lot of pressure on...demand.

    Councillor Lucas asked about the Council's approach to using artificial intelligence (AI), and the risks associated with it. Rahina Ramash, the Director of Customer Services, Digital & Data, gave a detailed presentation on the Council's approach to using AI. She said that the Council was committed to using AI safely and effectively, and was working with a number of partners to ensure that it was doing so. She also highlighted that poor data quality was a major barrier to the effective use of AI.

    AI is the topic right now and actually it has been the topic across local government...for the last two to three years...it's not just about...a policy [for] our workforce...it's about making sensible decisions as to when we would be building our own AI...when we would work with suppliers...[and] we are doing all of those [things].

    Ms Ramash said that the Council was currently focusing on using AI to improve productivity and efficiency in areas such as summarising meetings, supporting social workers, and processing parking fines. Councillor Lynch commended Ms Ramash for her presentation, and said that it was important for the Committee to be kept updated on the Council's work in this area.

Work Programme

The Committee noted the proposed Work Programme for 2025/26. The Chair stated that she would be inviting the Cabinet leads to attend meetings where their portfolios were being discussed, and asked the Committee to prioritise these meetings in their diaries. The meeting closed with a presentation of a gift and card to Ms Moylan. Councillor Chapman paid tribute to her work.

i couldn't...resist just pointing out...she actually does leave...at the end of February and...there's quite a lot to do between now and then...i completely endorse...[Councillor Lynch's] words...thank you very much [Ms Moylan].


  1. The Hackney Green Investment Initiative is a scheme that allows residents to invest in climate-related projects in the borough, with the promise of a return on their investment.