Subscribe to updates
You'll receive weekly summaries about Lambeth Council every week.
If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.
Council - Wednesday 22 January 2025 7.00 pm
January 22, 2025 View on council website Watch video of meetingTranscript
Good evening, councillors. Please be upstanding for His Worship, the Mayor. Thank you, everybody. Please be seated. As may, I'd like to welcome councillors, guests, members of the public and officers to this meeting of council. Just a reminder that there are no scheduled fire alarms this evening, so if the alarm sounds, please leave the building by the nearest exit. The meeting point is on Buckner Road. Please note that we have a lot of items and speakers to get through tonight, so therefore it would be appreciated if members of council could keep to their allotted time slots for speaking, which I'll highlight during the meeting, in order to ensure that all members get their chance to speak. Now it's time to move on to the first item of business on the agenda tonight, which is declarations of interests. Does any councillor wish to make a declaration of interest on any business before the council meeting tonight? No, thank you. The next item of business is to agree the minutes of the previous meeting. Are the minutes of the annual council meeting held on the 16th of October 2024 agreed as a correct record? Thank you. The minutes from 16th October 2024 are agreed. Apologies for absence have been set out on the order paper. If there are any more, please advise democratic services after the meeting. Before I give my announcements, I'd like to take a moment to reflect on the passing of councillor Rob Hill and councillor Burt Williams. Councillor Hill was a St. Leonard's ward councillor between 2014 and 2018, and during his term he was a member of the overview and scrutiny committee and the accessibility of council services scrutiny commission. Councillor Williams was a bishops ward councillor between 1994 and 1998, before he moved to Fannet and became an independent councillor and was mayor. And I'll call on councillors Ainsley, Curtis and Jaffa for tributes to the past councillors. Councillor Ainsley. Thank you, Mr Mayor, and thanks for giving me this time to speak about. A former ward colleague, Robert Hill. Fellow Scott, very outspoken, a very community-based person. A lifelong community activist, initially for children and then young people, but laterally for adults, but especially over many decades, a passionate and strong advocate for people with disability rights and those with learning difficulties. Robert was instrumental in highlighting how St. Leonard's ward in Streatham has a high number of assisted living accommodation, probably the highest in the borough and one of the highest across London. And although St. Leonard's ward in Streatham does look as though it has some big houses, many of them are run by the third sector in bedsits to help those who need around the clock care. And Robert was passionate about that. In fact, in a meeting that I had or we had with the chief executive just two weeks ago, we both agreed that we would like to continue the work in the ward that Robert started. And I've spoken to his wife, Christina, about this. And that's something that she will happily see us carry on with our other ward colleague as well. And when I spoke to Christina, I found out that she got married to Robert when she was 17 and he was 22 up in Scotland. They've got two amazing children. And in fact, Natasha and Michael are a testament to their parents. He crammed a lot into his life. I mean, if you go into his website, you can see just what he has done and what he's achieved over the years. And it is quite remarkable. He's crammed an awful lot in. And I think he probably would go out saying, you know, it's been great. The life that I had was a life lived to the full. We shared joint passions for Robert Burns poetry. In fact, he probably would have been coming to see me doing another Burns night this year where he looked splendid in his kilt. And we would have had a snifter or two in memory. We also shared passions for rugby. My biggest regret is not going round to his house to sit down, watch a rugby game and enjoy some of his choice whiskey that he kept in the cupboards. He did look very handsome in his kilt and he'll be sorely missed. He was a great credit to not only the work that he was doing for accessibility in the wards, but he was the chair of Safer Neighbourhoods. He was the chair of Stratum Action. He really was community at heart and what a big heart it was. And he'll be sorely missed. And just lots of love to the family. I look forward to celebrating his life with the rest of the Labour colleagues and the rest of the councillors at an event that could be arranged quite soon in London after he had his funeral celebration of his life up in Glasgow. But I didn't know the other councillor, but I'll let those that didn't know him speak more on that. But I just wanted to say a few words about my ward colleague, Robert Hill. Thank you. Thank you, Councillor Ainslie. I now call on Councillor Curtis. Thank you very much indeed, Mr Mayor. And thank you to everybody for granting us the opportunity to speak on this, particularly given that one of the councillors who passed was one of our own. I sadly never knew Robert or Burt, but I've asked some Lib Dem colleagues from across the area to prepare a few words for me. A former councillor and leader of this councillor, Peter Truesdale, told me in great detail of the hard work that Burt Williams put into his time on the council, telling me that he served as a Lib Dem councillor for four years, from 1994 to 1998, in the period of the council having no overall control. And he lived in represented bishops ward in the north of the borough. He was a gentle, amiable and diligent colleague and had friends from across the chamber in all groups. And after losing his seat, he moved to Margate and changed his name to Dean McAstery. He found contentment in a new marriage. And in 2007, he was elected again to Margate Council as an independent councillor, outpolling his conservative opponent by just one vote. And he thus became making history as the first person of colour to be elected to Margate Council. Now, I then went to former councillor Julian Heather, who remarked to me about Robert Hill, who was a fierce advocate for all things Streatham. He told me that Robert stood against him on several occasions in Streatham Wells ward before he was elected in Streatham St. Leonard's. And he always got on very well with him. Robert was always in a good mood when they bumped into each other. He had a fantastic sense of humour and he would always josh with his colleagues and opponents alike. And others told me of his dedication and commitment to the Safe Neighbourhoods team panel down in Streatham St. Leonard's after he finished his stint as a councillor, showcasing his dedication to the area that he so obviously loves. On behalf of the entire Liberal Democrat group and the Wilder-Lambeth party, we express our deepest sympathies with the families of Robert and with Burt. And councillors of all stripes dedicate a portion of their lives for the benefit of the communities they represent. And I hope that constituents and former constituents alike will look back at Robert and Burt fondly. Thank you. Thank you, councillor Curtis. Now call on councillor Jaffa. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Robert and I were the first two Labour councillors to be elected in St. Leonard's ward in 2014. That was our achievement as colleagues, working very hard in that ward to get labour seats. That was my first introduction to Robert, my colleague. We worked very well together in St. Leonard's. As my colleague said, Robert lived in Streatham for 40 years and Robert was very passionate about Streatham, particularly in relation to transport-related matters. He attended all transport-related meetings, whether he was invited or not. He used to go and attend and participate. He played a key role in getting the pedestrian crossing installed at the dangerous pinch point just prior to the St. Leonard Junction. Chair St. Leonard's safer neighbourhood panel established and maintained strong links with local police team. He worked for social care management, especially in learning disability. His passion for his work extended to being a key instigator in setting up LAMBUS Patients Participation Group. Robert and I worked very well together. God give him peace. I miss you, Robert. Thank you, Councillor Jaffa. Our thoughts and prayers are with their friends and families. As the Mayor of LAMBUS, I'll keep it short, I've been very busy with various engagements and events since the last meeting of full council, but there are a few that we thought would be worth highlighting. I attended the Orangebow CIC launch event to support one of LAMBUS's selected Level Up summer projects that aim to divert children and young people away from risk-taking behaviours and antisocial behaviour. I also visited Brixton Donor Centre today on their official opening, been there a couple more times, to encourage the community to donate blood. Less than 1% of the UK are actually blood donors and it takes less than 15 minutes to donate blood, but you can save up to three lives or six babies. So it's well worth it and I would encourage all colleagues to please donate if you're able. And finally, I also attended the Mayor of London's Holocaust Memorial Day ceremony last week. Land of Council will also be holding its own Holocaust Memorial Day event in the Assembly Hall on Sunday the 26th at 3pm. So the event is expected to end at about 4.30, but all are welcome to attend, so I would encourage everybody as well if they're able to. We now turn to the next item on the agenda, which is petitions and deputations. Council will receive three deputations this evening. The first deputation will be on the Palace Road Nature Garden. Please can Sarah Woodlaw, Riaz Dawson, Alice Fogarty, Tariq Sacco and Filippa Cordiano come to the front of the dais, please. Thank you, welcome all. You'll have five minutes to address the council and then once finished, please wait for the cabinet member to respond. We have three basic suggestions on what we can do to make a safer space for our entire community, not just our school. We recently did a walk, talk and do with the police, governors, parents and children, and we've come up with some suggestions which we'd like to present to you today. So I'm going to hand over to our head pupils who will talk a little bit about the suggestions that we've got and the impact that we hope that we'll have on our community. Good afternoon. We are the head pupils from Stresden Wells Primary. My name is Alice. The Palace Road Nature Garden is just a few metres from our school, but unfortunately this is not a space for children. It feels dangerous and unsafe and there are often reports of people using drugs or being inappropriate. As children, we feel this is unfair and this should be a community space for learning and wellbeing, not for illegal activity. We have worked with the police and local counsellors to come up with some suggestions. The first is locking in each garden at night. The impact of this would be stopping illegal activity happening at night, reduce antisocial behaviour, making the space safer for wildlife too. Hi, I'm Phillip. Our second suggestion is to put additional lighting and ink around the park. At the moment, the park is really dark and it makes it feel really unsafe. Mobile lighting will improve safety, make visibility better, be better for community use of the park. For example, children playing in the park, it will also reduce crime. People always feel safer in well-lit areas and it will encourage more people to use the park. Hello, I am Karrick. Our final suggestion to the council is to put CCTV cameras in and around the entrance to the park. This plays an important role in security and would help to identify inappropriate behaviour in the area. It would help to safeguard the area, especially if there are not places around to patrol the space. We know money is always tight. Preventing crime through CCTV would help our company to make the space safer for. Good evening. I am Riaz. It is important to say that these requests would not simply improve our school's use of the park. It is for the whole community. Palace Road is a busy community, including two nurseries, the hive and other groups. Improvements to this space will benefit a large number of people. We are all keen to work together to make the nature garden better, to help rebuild the community space, reduce crime in the area, improve wildlife and give children in the community a space to learn and play. Thank you very much for deputation. Yeah, please stay where you are while a response is provided by Councillor Hashi, Cabinet Member for Safer Communities. Councillor Hashi, you have three minutes. Thank you very much. Thank you very much for that. This is a very serious matter which I thank you guys for raising. I have made community safety aware of this issue which has been escalated and I have been assured that senior colleagues in our education services are fully sighted on this. In addition to this, we have alerted our parks service management and ensure they are sighted on the concerns raised and specific queries around park security, CCTV and lighting that you mentioned. We have also tasked our public protection parks enforcement team to coordinate directed patrols activity with our police partners. I've also inquired with the Safe Enabled team leads whether indecency reports have been received recently in relation to Palace Gardens Nature Reserve and asked them to consider deployment of Nomad cameras, which are mobile cameras in and around the park. This is under their control and it can be fixed or redeployable. We also have our youth outreach team, which is also aware and have requested targeted engagement activity to reassure you guys at the school for your parents, the staff and you guys as pupils. However, whilst we have been sighted, we have sighted all the possible stakeholders, the police are operationally independent. As such, the council is unable to direct police resources as we see fit. However, as outlined, we are working closely with the police to relay all your concerns. The council is very clear on its position that the priority is that the police need to ensure they have a sustained team throughout the borough and commit to expanding this with a permanent and police staff. This is this has been considerably reduced over the years, and as such, I will continue to pressure them to ensure we get the resources we need, although it is not through temporary solutions. Thank you very much. Thank you for your deputation. I just want to say it's great to see young people get involved in issues that they care about. So thank you for commenting and spending the time. Yeah. The second deputation. The second deputation is about sustainable family journeys. Please can Amy Keeler and Sadila Hall come to the front of the dais, please. Welcome. You have five minutes to address the council and once finished, please wait for a response from the cabinet member. Thank you. Thank you. She's about two miles from where we live in West Norwood. The eight year old is a keen and able cyclist and my four year old can also cycle, but it's a bit tricky trying to cycle all the way to Rosendale with three kids. And even if they could, I don't feel it's safe enough for them to do so. Our option is getting into school. So our option in getting to school at the moment is either walking or driving. We walk when we can, but it's about an hour and four. Sorry, excuse me. It is about an hour for my trip. And as a working parent, I often simply don't have the time. When I can't walk, so I rely on my car. I'm really supportive of trying to travel more sustainably and cycling more, but my family needs more options. I see cargo bikes around us all the time, and this would be perfect for my family. For those that don't know, a cargo bike is a bike that the parent cycles whilst the children are carried on the bike. They can carry from one to three children and are often electric, but they can be as simple as a bike trailer attached to a standard bike. This would be perfect for our setup because my younger kids who can't cycle yet would be carried in the bike and my eight year old would cycle herself with me. It would be quick and it would be sustainable and my kids would absolutely love it. However, it is currently not an option for us because we would have nowhere safe to store it. Having a family cargo bike on the kerbside or pavement wouldn't be safe and we can't carry it up two flights of stairs. What we need is a secure bike hanger that has space for cargo bikes or a dedicated assigned space for securing them. We love the school street you have put in place around our school, but now what we really need is to be able to easily bike touring as a family. Thank you. Hi, my name is Amy. I'm a sustainability professional and also a trustee of Solve the School Run. Firstly, I just wanted to add that Sedella's situation is replicated all over the borough. The data that we've collated at Solve the School Run shows that a staggering 65% of primary school journeys in London that are over a mile in length are driven. We estimate that in total there are 5,000 primary people being driven to schools in Lambeth and of these about 4,000 trips of lengths between one and three miles. So there are families just like Sedella's for whom enabling storage and parking infrastructure for family cargo bikes could really help travel more sustainably. I'm about to get a bit choked up because I'm going to go into something slightly personal, so I apologise. I'm going to take a deep breath while I say this. I would also really like to personally ask you to consider infrastructure for those with adapted bikes also. My son has recently been diagnosed with a medical condition which has left him needing a wheelchair. We'd really like for him to have an adapted bike as well. It would give him an element of freedom that all of his peers get to enjoy as a six year old and that he currently doesn't. Unfortunately, we barely have room to store his wheelchair in our house, so having an adapted bike, something which is quite large and bulky, just isn't going to be possible at the minute. We recognise that large modified bikes parked on payments restrict the width. It's something that we're acutely aware of when we have to navigate his wheelchair down the streets. Secure parking for adapted bikes would enable us to pursue his ambition of being able to cycle and allow him to share the kind of freedom that his sister and his peers worry every day. We're therefore asking Lambeth to publish a specific policy and timeline for how they enable safe, secure storage and parking for family cargo bikes and adapted bikes. This infrastructure would enable a shift to sustainable travel of not only existing school run journeys, but all those potential future family journeys which the car may never even be considered a cargo bikes or adapted bikes could be used. Most personally, it would make a massive difference to the quality of life that my son enjoys. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Please remain where you are while our response is provided by Councillor Razina Chowdhury, Cabinet Member for Sustainable Lambeth and Clean Air. Councillor Chowdhury, have three minutes. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Sadella and Amy for coming in today to raise this really, really important issue around sustainable travel, but also kind of, you know, the aims of moving away from driving. As you were saying, Sadella, that you've got the choice of either walking for an hour or so or a quick journey. And as a working mum, that's going to be hard. And, you know, you want to do the right thing, but we need to make it easy for you to do that. And I hear you and it gives me so much joy when around the borough, when I go and visit our various school streets that we have parents using their cargo bikes to pick up kids, a site that we hadn't seen up until five years ago. And it's really good that more and more people do this. And I understand the challenges around storage and secure storage. And that is something that I'm very keen to push forward because, you know, as you know, we're rolling out so many cycle hangers. But that's not that's just the beginning. And we want to do more. We're ambitious in Lambeth when it comes to leading on climate and leading on climate action and active travel. So that is something. So please leave that with me to to take forward because that this is something that I am really passionate about, wanting to make sure that parents aren't prevented from those choices and those good choices about transport to school on bike. So that again is something that, you know, I'm very keen to pursue. So I'm very happy to take this up with you afterwards as well. Amy on on adapted bikes. Yes. Yeah, I hear you. And, you know, and I've seen adapted bikes and I can I can I can understand the challenges around storage and secure storage. And I think it was last summer or the summer before Cycle Hoop provided delivered an adapted cycle hanger. For a family whose young son liked cycling, but he cycled on an adapted bike with his father and we were able to provide storage for that family outside their home so that it's something that we can do. So yeah, please don't lose hope. And again, it's something that I'm very happy to follow up with you afterwards. Thank you for your deputation. You can now turn to us. Thank you. The final deputation is on Tulsa Hill Estate. Please can Diane Skidmore, Jessica Benjamin and Virginie Bellaton come to the front of the dais, please. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Welcome. You have five minutes to address the council. And then once finished, please wait for a response from the cabinet member. You have five minutes. One minute. Issues can be resolved. Just not with short term fixes that allow conditions to worsen further. These issues affect not just the state of our homes, but also our physical and mental wellbeing. The council commissioned a housing stock condition survey costing Tulsa residents over five, sorry, £50,000. But today we still have residents cooking and sleeping to avoid leaks and you are refusing to release the information you hold. We raise these concerns. We are dismissed or ignored. Emails go unanswered. Cases closed without action. And worse, we are told that we are the poor or that the mould we see does not exist. Contractors turn up unannounced, unpaired, doable jobs, wasting everyone's effort and resources. Yet rents and service charges continue to rise and we receive unexplained major work charges. And meanwhile, repairs, even those mandated, remain undone. We want to know where our money is going. This is mismanagement. It has destroyed our trust and is hurting our community. Our children are suffering from asthma and basic living conditions are framed as a luxury. The reality we face is stark. We feel totally disrespected and responses to our questions have even carried thinly veiled threats. We are tired and we will not stop until real progress is made. Our request to Demi Adilapour, Cabinet Lead for Housing, has been clear and simple from the start. We want transparency and accountability. We demand one, an independent environmental inspection of or the release of the Savills Report. Two, an estate improvement plan based on findings. And three, a single point of contact senior enough to be accountable to the plan. These are fair and reasonable demands and they provide a path forward for rebuilding trust. We want to work with the Council, not against it. So we can assure our community thrives. Thank you for listening and we await your positive response. And because our five minutes is done, I'm going to add this. A lot of this was caused by repairs. Either repairs not being done and what Jessica just said. Done badly, people not turning up, turning up without any tools and stuff like that. So that was the bottom line about what we're asking for. Outside, we made a flyer that actually puts the five to three points of what we're actually asking for. So when all the counsellors go outside afterwards, you can pick up a flyer and see specifically in very short, sweet terms what they're asking for. We are. But what I would add is that if you can improve the repair situation, you could bring back many, many empty properties. Lambeth has got a housing problem at the moment and you could get those houses functioning, housing people. So you actually relieve that if you need to. 30 seconds left. If you could have a walk. That's enough. Definitely. Thank you. Please remain where you are while the response is provided by Councillor. Danny Adilapour, cabinet member for housing, investment and new homes. Councillor Adilapour, you have three minutes. Cabinet Member for Housing, Investment and New Homes. Councillor Dilipo you have three minutes. Thank you for your deputation this evening and for sharing your experiences with us. The first thing I want to do is say that I am sorry for the experience that residents have had with repairs over the last few years. I acknowledge this hasn't always been up to the standard we would expect but what I would say by word assurance to you is that I do believe we're on an improvement journey with this. We did install a new management team of council officers to oversee this and since taking over this part of the portfolio earlier this year I've made this a priority for me as well. Things still aren't where we want them to be but we are on an improvement journey which has been reflected in the feedback we've received both from the Housing Ombudsman and the Social Housing Regulator but I do acknowledge this isn't the experience of all residents and there's still a lot of work to do so I thank you for sharing your feedback tonight. In terms of your wider ambitions for the estate and the work that you want to see I can just reiterate we absolutely share those ambitions with you as a council and we're keen to do what we can to ensure that all of our residents across every estate have decent homes to live in. That is what we're committed to politically. The challenge we face is a financial one because we're operating under such severe constraints that limit our ability to act. This is particularly the case with our housing revenue account which is the account that we have to use to fund any repairs and works on our estates. Due to 14 years of austerity we've faced under the previous government and decisions that were taken to limit our ability to raise rents through serious caps that restrict our ability over the next 30 years we have a deficit of £1 billion in the HRA which obviously constrains what we're able to do with the works and repairs that we would like to see. This combined with the fact that we have an ageing housing stock across Lambeth as a whole and there were serious reductions to decent homes grant funding as well mean everything has been stacked against us in terms of taking all of the actions that we would like to take. I don't say that by way of an excuse but it's an explanation for we're not able to do all the things that we would like to do as quickly as we would like to do them. Although all I can say is that we are committed to doing what we can to improve all of our estates to the best of our ability. We are prioritising our emergency works that need to be done and all of the works that need to be done is the reason why we commissioned the stock condition survey that you refer to which will guide the approach we take in the years ahead but this doesn't change the fact that we are constrained in the finance we have to do all of these things. In terms of your engagement points I absolutely agree with you as well. Our estate action plans are meant to be guided by residents so that all our estates are pointed to the improvements they like to see. I completely acknowledge that over the past few years not every estate has got an action plan that's in place and up to date as much as we want it to be. That's why I've tasked one of my deputies Councillor David Bridgson to turbo charge that work and refresh those estate action plans and I'm sure he'd be happy to meet with you to discuss your estates action plan and make sure it reflects the properties of residents there as well and in terms of wider engagement always looking at ways we can improve that journey and those communication channels with residents both in terms of your contact with your local housing officers for our resident assembly with tenants and leaseholders and also politically. My other deputy councillor ISSA is committed to going around our estates to meet residents directly to talk about their experiences and again I'm sure he'd be happy to find a time to sit and talk with you about the challenges you're facing on Tulsa estate and what we can do to seek to improve them. So really all I can say by worth summing up is that I absolutely agree with everything that you're saying tonight and the challenges you're facing on your estate we recognise there's a lot of work to do across Lambeth to ensure all our homes are brought up to a decent standard. That's why both I and Councillor Holland are lobbying really strongly to make sure the government gives the support that we need and make sure we have a fully funded HRA to make the improves that residents deserve. Thank you. Thank you for your deputation. You can now return to your seats. Thank you. So can I ask public attendees to please remain quiet during the meeting? Thank you. So thank you for all the deputations presented this evening. Riften responses will be sent within 10 days. I will now accept petitions from councillors. Please indicate by raising your hand if you have a petition to present. When called on please just state the number of signatures and the petition title no lengthy speeches please. Democratic services will collect the petition so please remain seated. Petitions being received this evening will be verified by Democratic services following the meeting and officers will contact the lead petitioner with further information. Please note if a petition is not received in accordance with the council's petition scheme it will be rejected. So are there any petitions? Hands up? Councillor, it's you. Thank you. I've got a petition from 28 residents in and around Clarence Avenue calling for street bins along Clarence Avenue and a review of street cleaning arrangements to address litter in the local area on top of the community litter pick that they already run. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I've got 199 resident signatures for Agnes Reidy Gardens football pictures to be put back into use ASAP please. Thank you Mr Mayor in room new year greetings to you and members in the chamber. I have gripped in my hands a petition on the Carnegie Library hub and this has been signed by 400 residents both in Lambeth and outside the borough. Thanks very much. Any others? No. Okay, cool. The next item is the Cabinet Statement. Councillor Claire Holland you have five minutes to address council. Thank you Mr Mayor. I'd like to start by remembering and paying tribute to Councillor Rob Hill, my former colleague and friend. Rob served as a councillor as has been said between 2014 and 2018 in St Leonard's ward and was huge community champion for Streatham and for Lambeth. He was, as Councillor Ainslie said, a passionate campaigner for adults with learning disabilities. He worked tirelessly to champion inclusion and support within our community, working for many years for Lambeth Mencap as a carers lead within the borough. Throughout the years, Rob supported countless families and carers in Lambeth and always advocated for those who needed it most. A proud family man, he was fiercely proud of his Scottish and working class roots and this shone through his work as a councillor and his love of a long political discourse over a pint or two. He really was a voice for the people. Our thoughts are with his wife Christina and his family at this difficult time of his untimely passing. Lambeth will miss Rob Hill. He was a big man and had a big impact. Mr Mayor, as you said on Sunday, we will again be bringing communities across Lambeth together to mark Holocaust Memorial Day here at the Town Hall. This is always an incredibly moving and humbling event to come together and humbling event to come together and bear witness. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, the largest of the Nazi concentration camps and the 30th anniversary of the genocide in Bosnia. This year's theme is about learning for a better future. We have witnessed the rise in anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and all forms of hate crime across the capital and continue to work hard to support our communities here in Lambeth. And I'm sure all across the chamber will hope 2025 will be an opportunity for people to come together, learn both from and about the past and take actions to make a better and more peaceful future for all. Yesterday, the Prime Minister spoke about the tragic events that took place in Southport last year. He spoke of a fundamental change in how we protect people from the rise of these threats in our country. And as we see a rise in populism across the globe, we need to reject populism in all its forms on social media and within our borough and stay true to our values. The politics of hate and division are designed to weaken our communities. Some may welcome this. In Lambeth we do not. We in this Labour administration reject hate and division. Our vision for Lambeth 2030 set out in our borough plan is to build on our proud history of radicals and reformers, to create a place of justice and equity, to harness the power of our people and partnerships to make a difference and recognise our diversity is the bedrock of our collective power. This is what drives us. We've all worked tirelessly for the cohesion of our communities alongside our community voluntary and faith groups and we will continue to work together and celebrate our difference and strengthen cohesion across the borough and ensure that we are a council where all feel confident in safe and equal access to our services because it is vital that our residents do. After 14 years of touring with them austerity, these challenges have become even more difficult. The damage runs even deeper, resilience is low and our residents need us now more than ever. We are supporting over 45,000 people through the cost of living crisis. We've built the first council homes for a generation. We are retrofitting existing homes and building homes that are sustainable and fit for the future. We are investing in our libraries and parks. We're leading the way in London with our work on violence against women and girls. We are climate leaders and we are a proud borough of sanctuary. All this and so much more is only possible because of our shared values, the hard work and determination to represent those who need us most. And now, Mr Mayor, we have a government who will work with us and not against us. We know it will take time to rebuild because of the utter mess the Tories left this country in, but we must seize this opportunity. And as we rebuild, we do it together, not divided, with our residents, with our community groups, with our faith groups, with our Labour Mayor and with our Labour Government, because that is how we deliver for our residents and that is how we build a better future for all. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Thank you, Councillor Holland. We will now move on to the majority opposition statement. Councillor Donna Harris, you have three minutes to address Council. Thank you, Mr Mayor. 2024 brought one of the most significant shake-ups in British politics in years. In 2025, we must build on this the momentum to deliver real and lasting seismic change. The Prime Minister, the Mayor of London and Lambeth Labour have been entrusted with the confidence of the people and now it's time for action. As Liberal Democrats, we fully understand the challenges ahead. However, taking responsibility, not shifting blame, must be Labour's priority. Tough decisions lie ahead, but the ball is firmly in Labour's court. Labour must approach 2025 with the urgency and ambition it requires. The Liberal Democrats remain committed to fighting for equity and protecting those most in need. With the cost of living crisis still biting, we vehemently oppose the scrapping of the winter fuel payments for most pensioners and the two-child benefit cap. At the same time, we will continue to push for the reformed NHS, stronger ties to Europe and meaning political reform. The challenges we face are many and grave. Division at home, wars abroad, the rise of the far right and the spread of disinformation. Politicians must work together to confront these threats. Only through collaboration, at both the local and national levels, can we build trust in politics and restore unity in Britain? That is why the Liberal Democrats will keep pushing for political reform to ensure every voice is heard. While we welcome the social care being back on the agenda, the government's decision to launch yet another commission feels like deja vu. Since 1997, we have seen three government commissions, three independent commissions, five white papers and 14 parliamentary inquiries, yet still no meaningful action. It's time to break this cycle of delay and deliver real solutions. The Liberal Democrats have long been at the forefront for calls for social care reform, advocating for a cross-party approach. It is therefore deeply disappointing that the government has failed to consult widely on their remit. This evening we call on the administration to rise to the challenge to give cross-party support to the climate and nation motion. The upcoming second reading of the bill is a matter of great importance. It has already secured significant cross-party support in the Commons, including three of Labour's very own Lambeth MPs, Bell-Ribera Addy, Helen Hayes and Florence Echelomi. We must ensure these serious environmental concerns receive the attention and action they deserve and not watered down for political gain. Thank you very much Mr Mayor. Thank you Councillor Harris. We will now move on to the next item of business which is Councillor questions. 25 minutes is set aside for supplementary questions and answers. Can I remind councillors to keep answers and supplementary questions short and concise to enable us to get through as many questions as possible in the time allocated? The first question is from Councillor Ben Curtis to Councillor Daniel Adilapour. Councillor Curtis, you have a supplementary question. Thank you and thank you very much indeed Councillor Adilapour for your response. As you probably know, thanks to some coverage in the national newspaper, a constituent in my ward was left in the dark about their application to install a heat pump and was then denied planning permission without much in the way of an explanation. Can I suggest that we meet to discuss how to mitigate this in the future and perhaps ensure that a member of the planning team proactively visits and liaises with people who have signalled their intention for a heat pump so they have the best possible chance of passing planning regulations and helping decarbonise our borough. Thank you. Councillor Adilapour, can you please provide a response? Thank you Councillor Curtis for your supplementary question. We are committed to doing what we can to support residents in installing technology such as heat pumps and solar panels because they are an important part of how residents can support us and our ambitions to tackle the climate crisis. With heat pumps, as I said in my original answer, it can be quite complicated due to the specific requirements that need to be met and our planning team do try and guide them through that process as much as possible. If that hasn't happened in this case with your particular resident, I'm happy to learn residents from that and yes, absolutely, if you wish to discuss that with me further or if the resident would like to send further details to me, more than happy to look into it to see how we can improve that process to help of residents in the future. Thank you. Thank you. The second question is from Councillor Nicole Griffiths to Councillor Adilapour. Do you have a supplementary question? No, thank you, Mr Mayor. The response speaks for itself and I have no supplementary. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is from Councillor Gardin to Councillor Chowdhury. Councillor Gardin, do you have a supplementary question? Yes, I have. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Thank you Councillor Chowdhury for your answer. I'm delighted by and appreciate fully the steps you've already taken to improve the safety of Tulls Hill and particularly pleased by the trees planted, the plans for drainage and that you've upgraded sections of the pavement. However, I am concerned that you're only now heading for consultation on more crossings and safer cycling on Tulls Hill and I'm particularly concerned that you do not mention the provision of a safe crossing at the junction of Efra Road and Brixton Water Lane for which I submitted a petition over two years ago. So my supplementary is specifically when will the Council and TfL go to make safe the crossing at that junction? Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Chowdhury, could you please provide a response? Thank you Councillor Gardin for your question. So we're well on track to exceed our target 5,000 trees by 2026. We've recently also invested over £5 million in our roads and pavements as you will be aware and you raise a really important issue around road safety which is at the forefront of everything this Council does. However, as Council Garden and many others in the room tonight will be aware, after 14 years of Conservative and Lib Dem Government, our services have been cut to the bone. Despite this, we're currently undertaking feasibility work for the Efra Road, Brixton Water Lane, Tulls Hill Junction and we've been gathering the necessary data and surveys to inform the design development and depending on the modelling and other design requirements, we hope to have initial designs by June with key stakeholder engagement in early autumn. Implementation of the scheme will, of course, be dependent on costs and funding availability. Thank you. The next question is from Councillor Spencer to Councillor Chowdhury. Do you have a supplementary question? Thank you for your answer, Councillor Chowdhury. We are very passionate about cleanliness on our streets in Gypsy Hill. In the instances where the street cleaning services aren't delivered as they should be, are there financial and other consequences for Serco? Can you please provide a response? Thank you. Thank you, Councillor Spencer. It's no secret that Serco have not been fulfilling their contract the standards we expect them to and I've raised this with them and developed an action plan to tackle some of the issues. I will continue to work with senior officers and Serco officials to address the concerns of residents. So in terms of the contract, it includes a range of penalties for any service failure and these have been levied against Serco in line with the contract and I'm clear that where there are failures that the full worth of the contract is brought to bear and contractors, including Serco, must expect to bear all consequences and I've been clear with the team that they must undertake all contractual mechanisms. Thank you. The next question is from Councillor Bridson to Councillor Cameron. Do you have a supplementary question? I do Mr Mayor, thank you. First I'd like to thank Councillor Cameron for joining me on a walkabout today on Acre Lane, not too far from here, including a side visit to a shop that has been empty for 14 years, causing a huge amount of ASB within the ward. Our new Labour government has given the council powers to take action on empty shops, bring them back to life and auction off their leases. Will the council be taking full action of those powers and putting them into place and what is the timeline attached to that to roll out some pilots? Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Cameron, could you please provide a response? It was a pleasure going on the walkabout with you to have an insight into your issues with empty shops. I can assure you that the government published a non-statutory guidance on the new high street rental auction powers in early December, which is currently being renewed by officers. We are keen to understand how the council can utilise and implement these powers in Lambeth to address challenges around long term vacant units in our town centres. The guidance requires properties to be vacant continuously for 365 days or for at least 366 days within a 20 month period. We have compiled an initial list of long term vacant properties through our business rate data, which we intend to supplement with market information from agents. Engagement with landlords and other data sources to compile an initial list of properties for an audit. Lastly, as there is a new piece of legislation, officers are in the process of renewing the technicalities of the legislation. For example, in addition to being vacant for the required period, eligible units must meet several other conditions before a high street rental auction can take place. Officers will put forward proposals on how the council can maximise the powers available to us within our available resources for consideration by members. Thank you. The next question is from Councillor Meldrum to Councillor Chowdhury. Do you have a supplementary question? I do, Mr Mayor. As a regular user of Freedom Pass, buses are definitely my favourite form of transport in London, but there are only a few opportunities for bus staff to meet policymakers to discuss mitigation options of council policies and explain what does active travel really mean at 3am on your way to work. So I'm asking you, Councillor Chowdhury, are you in a position to use your connections on London Council Tech, very important committee, to ensure the voice of bus staff are heard? For example, you could have, the committee could have reports from the regular tripartite forum between TfL, bus unions and bus operators, no councils on there. And as VAUG is integrating into the work of tech, the tech policy makers could also hear from speakers of the Women in Bus and Coach Network who have formed to help support themselves in a very male-dominated sector and who do have concerns about travelling to work in the middle of the night. Thank you. Thank you, Councillor Chowdhury. Could you please provide a response? Thank you. And apologies to advance because I've got my back to you, Councillor Meldrum, while I respond to you. So I hear your concerns and you raise some really, really important issues here. I'm particularly keen to meet the Women in Bus and Coach Network. I hadn't heard of that organisation before, so thank you very much for enlightening me. I'd be very happy to meet with you, separately, and see how we can take this forward with London councils. As a party of workers' rights, we absolutely champion the rights of our public transport workers, and I know this is something that Councillor Meldrum is very passionate about. Thank you. The next question is a question from Councillor English-Jones to, again, Councillor Chowdhury. Thank you. Councillor Chowdhury, thank you very much for your response to my question. Would it be possible to fix up a date for relevant traffic officers and yourself to come down to the place at the corner of Aberville and Elms to see some of the traffic and the issues raised so we can discuss a resolution and a timeline? Thank you. Councillor Chowdhury, can you please provide a response? Thank you, Councillor English-Jones. Again, you raise a really, really important issue around road safety. I know this is something that's really close to you, so I'd be very happy to visit and listen to your residents' concerns. Thank you. The next question is a question from Councillor Costa to Councillor Manley-Brown. Do you have a supplementary question? Thank you, Mr Mayor. Yes, I do. Thank you, Councillor Cower and Councillor Manley-Brown for your written response. My supplementary is, what work is the Council doing to lobby central government to review the Conservatives' Undemocratic Elections Act of 2022? Thank you. Councillor Manley-Brown, can you please provide a response? Thank you, Councillor Costa for your question. Let me begin by acknowledging the widespread concerns regarding the Conservatives' Elections Act of 2022. Many of us here, and indeed across the country, view this legislation as not just deeply flawed, but as a step backward for democracy, creating unnecessary barriers to participation and disproportionately affecting the most marginalised groups in our society. And as a Council, we are acutely aware of the critical need to safeguard democracy, especially as we emerge from nearly 15 years of austerity, mismanagement and neglect under the previous Conservative government. These years have left public services underfunded, communities also fractured and trust in institutions eroded. And this makes our work to rebuild not just systems, but faith in democracy even more urgent. The Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner confirmed at a Select Committee hearing earlier this month that the government is going to look at whether to scrap the voter ID requirement. We are supportive of this review and actively lobbying for change. By working with other councils, advocacy groups and national bodies, we've amplified our call for a comprehensive review of the Elections Act. We've highlighted the Act's discriminatory implications, making it clear that voter ID requirements are a solution in search of a problem and one that instead creates obstacles for groups already underrepresented in the democratic process. Now, our message to central government is clear. This legislation is at odds with the values of fairness, inclusion and accessibility that must underpin any democracy. And we are demanding action, an urgent review of the Act and evidence-based policies that empower, not exclude citizens. Now, beyond lobbying, we're acting locally. We understand that safeguarding democracy begins at grassroots level. And that's why we've launched public awareness campaigns to ensure that our residents understand the new voter ID requirements. And by putting residents at the heart of our response, we're determined to ensure that no one in our borough is left behind. But we know that protecting democracy doesn't exist in just a vacuum. Our borough, like the rest of the country, is changing. Demographics are shifting, technology is reshaping how we live, work and engage. And the climate crisis demands urgent action. So these challenges intersect with the need to rebuild public trust in a way that is forward-looking, citizen-centered and outcomes-driven. And as we continue to align ourselves with the new Labour government's mission-driven approach, we are committed to fixing what's broken first, whether that's housing, local growth, skills or public safety. And we know that getting the basics right is essential to restoring confidence. Harnessing coalitions of the willing. And this means working across sectors and functions from community organisations to businesses and other councils to create innovative, place-based solutions. And we're also championing digital and decarbonisation. We're committed to adopting to a changing world in an ethical way. And whether that's by using technology to make services more accessible or taking action to decarbonise our borough for a sustainable future. These values are not just buzzwords, but they are building blocks of a democracy that works for everyone. The Elections Act stands in direct opposition to this vision and which is why we will continue fighting it through every channel possible and to protect the fundamental rights of our citizens. But we can't do it alone. And this council's role is to lead, but democracy is a shared responsibility. I urge everyone in here to join us, whether that's by volunteering for local voter outreach initiatives, supporting campaigns to repeal harmful legislation or simply speaking out for a democracy that values every single voice. So that together we can build a borough and a country that's fairer, greener and more inclusive. And we remain deeply rooted in the values of equity and justice. Thanks. Thank you. The next question is from Councillor Bryant to Councillor Chowdhury. Do you have a supplementary question? I do. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Yes, thank Councillor Chowdhury for our answer. I'd be grateful if she could let me know how the Council prioritises streets for the installation of sustainable urban drainage systems. Thank you. Councillor Chowdhury, could you please provide a response? So, thank you Councillor Bryant. We're proud of our record in sustainable urban drainage in Lambeth, and the information is available in terms of prioritising. As you know, that we've had some funding from Thames Water to fund the 30 locations across the borough to ensure that. And these are the areas we tend to focus on are the ones with the highest risk of surface water flooding. So it takes a very scientific and evidential base to select those locations for suds. Thank you. The next question is from Councillor O'Hara to Councillor Anyanwu. Do you have a supplementary question? I do. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Could the Cabinet member tell us how, across the borough, Lambeth is investing in supporting and encouraging sports and activities in the heart of our various communities? Councillor Anyanwu, could you please provide a response? Thank you Councillor O'Hara for your question. Across the borough, Lambeth is supporting and encouraging the the uptake of sports and activities among our various communities. I have already outlined several examples of the council commitments to children and young people on my answer on the other paper. However, sports benefits all our residents and we are keen to ensure there is access for everyone. Lambeth parks and sports facilities play a vital role in encouraging physical activities, attracting over 100,000 visits annually. These facilities have seen steady growth in usage over the past two years. Demonstrating their values to the communities, the council ensures these facilities remain accessible through affordable fees and targeted programmes, including youth football sessions on our grass facilities. Again, Lambeth is committed to making sure all these facilities are there irrespective of the previous 14 years of austerity. We also have multiple youth games areas located across the borough. The council also works closely with sports clubs, national governing bodies and charitable organisations to deliver participation programmes that attract thousands of residents, creating vibrant community hubs for physical activities. Additionally, Lambeth coordinates free or low-cost sports activities during school holidays through the holiday activities and food programmes. This initiative engages 160 groups and provides opportunities for over 5,000 young people to stay active each year. Through the active Lambeth partnership, the council secures inward investment via the Sports England Place Partnerships Initiative. I am absolutely looking forward for this investment that is going to be in Lambeth from this year to 2028. This is very important, sustainable for local sports. The management of community use arrangements for facilities such as Brockway Lauder, Hartfields, Black Prince Tross and Abbott Woods Road further examples exemplifies the council dedication to maximizing access to high quality venues. Cross department collaborations with children and young people service will be absolutely crucial in the river these facilities that we're looking for. Active Lambeth, Active Travelled and other partners also helps integrate fiscal activities into broader community programmes. In addition, I have to thank our world councillors in Clapham Park for what they have done in order to initiate across the borough to support sports among our young people. For instance, thanks to them for the effort they make in Clapham Park councillors, Lambeth has committed the first 55,000 towards the refublishment of the All Weather 3Gs. However, I'm also saying that St. Agla is really guiding watch out because I am absolutely passionate that that that will be delivered, hopefully with our partners in Sports England and our programme, we will see this through. So what I do not want is when this is delivered for the opposition party, claiming it because these world councillors, I thank you very much Verity and Martin for the work you have done. Thank you very much. Thank you. The next question is from Councillor Banson to Councillor Ashie. Do you have a supplementary question? Yes, I do. Last month marked the end of 16 days of activism against gender-based violence and I'm proud that Lambeth is leading the way in this area. However, it is clear much more needs to be done in our borough and across the country to tackle the scrounge of violence against women and girls wherever it is found. With that in mind, what is the Council doing to reach the most vulnerable women and girls in my community of Gypsy Hill and across Lambeth? Thank you. Councillor Ashie, could you please provide a response? Thank you very much. Just on behalf of Councillor Donats, I wanted to include a thanks to Erfan, who's also in Clampon Park. Violence against women and girls is a fundamental human rights violation affecting one in three women and girls across the world. Lambeth has always been at the forefront of tackling violence against women and girls and was one of the first areas to develop a Vogue strike in 2011, 14 years ago. In July 2024, we've launched the new Gaia Centre model delivered by our national charity Refuge with four sub-contracted partners to better meet the needs of victims and survivors of all forms of Vogue. Lambeth continues to lead the way in the approach to preventing and responding to gender-based violence. We know that there's still much to be done, but we have a strong foundation in which to support the government's commitment to halving Vogue over the next decade. Lambeth has one of the best Vogue services in London and a groundbreaking Vogue strategy which we're working hard to deliver. We continue to fund 52 beds, the most in London, alongside specialist support for victims and survivors. We achieved white ribbon accreditation last year, which looks at encouraging men to work towards the eradication of violence against women and girls. We have a youth-led organisation who co-created several campaigns to empower young people to share experiences and promote discussion of Vogue. Throughout every phase of these campaigns, young people were directly engaged and fed into the look, shape and feel to ensure their concerns, desires and needs were accurately reflected. We have also engaged a huge range of young people, which has given us a catalogue of vocabulary and experience to base our campaigns and narratives around. So as you can see, Christine, we are doing a lot and will continue to do lots until this scourge is destroyed, dissipated, eliminated. Thank you. Thank you. The 25 minutes allocated for questions has now expired, so we'll move on to the reports that are listed at item 4. Thank you. Thank you. Councilor Abrams, you have indicated that you wish to raise a point of order. Could you please first specify the rule of procedure or law that you consider has been broken? Mr Mayor, it is Part 4, Section D, Meeting of Procedure Rules 11.2, which states council questions may be asked by any councillor at any ordinary meeting of the council. Mr Mayor, 993 days ago, I was elected to represent the residents and community of St St Leonard's ward as their council and be their voice in this council. But 993 days later, I've still not been permitted to make my maiden speech in this chamber. 993 days later, and I've never been called to ask a supplementary question in this chamber during councillor's question time. And last month, I was told by the Chief Whip that I can no longer even submit written questions to full council due to my ongoing and definite suspension from Lambeth Labour Group. And then last month, I was then removed from my position on corporate committee. Mr Mayor, I was elected to give a voice to St St Leonard's residents in this council, but at every turn, there have been attempts to silence me and by default, the local residents of St St Leonard's. So please can the Mayor advise me that I can ensure that my democratic mandate is approved and the voices of St St Leonard's residents and the councillor's. Thank you, thank you, that's enough time, thank you. So, thank you, councillor Abrams. In my view, the point you raised does not meet the definition of what amounts to a point of order, as set out in the council's constitution, as you do not identify a rule of procedure or law which has actually been broken. You're still a member of the administration and so you can engage with Labour Group again, which coordinates the submission of questions. So that's it. Thank you. The next item is the reports. So the first report this evening is on the appointment of the new chief executive. We will be hearing from Councillor Scott Ainslie, Matthew Bryant and Claire Holland. Councillor Ainslie, you have three minutes. It's difficult for the Green Group to comment on a process we were excluded from. Despite 22% of the residents of Lambeth supporting the Green Party. The Lib Dems had a chance to partake with representing only half of our votes across the borough. The limitations of a hopelessly out of date electoral system. If this was a Green Council, we would have granted a seat on the appointments board for such an important appointment to all party groups, as we'd all as group leaders have to work with this key figure within the council. Looking through the paper trail of decisions leading to the appointment of the chief executive, it consistently has the job description top price of £200,000 a year. That's £10,000 more than the previous chief executive. There's nothing in the papers to explain why the extra £30,000 on top. Was this in the private part of the meeting? It's not disclosed. The Greens, since I was first elected 11 years ago, have always pushed for a 10 to 1 pay ratio than the lowest paid employee. We agreed to this and that is why there was a reduction in pay for previous chief executives. According to the latest pay policy statement, the lowest paid employee is likely to be below the London living wage at £23,960 a year. This is just, this is about 9.6, according to my calculations, very dangerously close to the 10 to 1 ratio. Now, did you keep that in mind during your discussions over how much the chief executive was going to be paid? Also, over the last 11 years, Greens have consistently pushed for far greater transparency and accountability on how this administration can far better provide the evidence that chief executives and executives paid over £100,000, including interim directors on off-the-payroll arrangements such as IR35s, genuinely offer the people of Lambeth value for money. Greens have been asking this question of all senior executives we have had in the revolving door of this administration over the last 11 years. We will have had at least six chief executives in the time I've been a councillor, and we've lost count of the number of senior legal, HR, finance officers, interim or permanent, that we've had in that same period. This is why I have asked the fundamental question on governance of the cabinet member for finance tonight, buried deep down at question 12, while all the filibustering goes on so that we never get to it, because really, that's where the real scrutiny is coming from. I have red flagged to the member for finance that the external auditors have consistently said over the past few years that there are continuing significant weaknesses in governance, year on year, and rather than answer the question with humility, I get a whole bunch of excuses. And my question wasn't even answered, unskillfully avoided, and not chance for a follow-up question because of the fleshing out, the fleshing out that goes on as you stage and manage the timing of these meetings. Is that it? Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Well, put a time later on then, because it's so disrespectful. Thank you. Councillor Bryant, you're up next. You have three minutes. Thank you. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Right now, the role of head of the paid service for a local authority is not one for the faint-hearted. The particular challenges that we face here in Lambeth, both financial and in terms of delivering services, make this chief executive post one of the most demanding. With this in mind, our group endorses this report and its recommendations. In Ian Davis, we have a chief executive with an extensive background in local government and years of experience heading up a London borough. Having myself sat on the appointments committee, and thank you, Scott, but that's the rules. And it's not a party political appointment. This is one about actually getting the best person for the job regardless. It's nothing to do with party politics. I personally can vouch for the rigorous process that was followed in this recruitment. The final shortlist had four very strong candidates, and there was plenty and very lengthy and comprehensive discussion and debate before a final decision was made. For our part, our group looks forward to working with Ian Davis, and we wish him well as he takes up this post and steers the council through the choppy waters that surround us as we head towards our 2030 goals. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Holland, do you have three minutes? Thank you, Councillor Bryant. You saved me a job there. I would like to start, Mr Mayor, by putting on record my huge thanks, our collective thanks, to our acting chief executive Fiona Connolly for her professionalism, hard work, support and focus during this period. Fiona stepped up without hesitation at a time of need, and she has gone above and beyond, not just since July, but in her 11 years of service at the council. Her leadership has set an extraordinary standard for our organisation. She has been a true friend to everyone at the council. It is, as Councillor Bryant said, by no means an easy position to come into, especially after 14 years of austerity, structural underfunding, public services in the state, and with rising need and increasing costs, delivering services across a whole borough and running such a large organisation is complex. Councils are now expected to deliver more for residents with so much less. Nevertheless, that didn't faze Fiona. In fact, the complete opposite. It drove her. Mr Mayor, we are very lucky to have her alongside us. Fiona's focus, like mine and everyone on the side of the chamber and everyone else's across the organisation, is about delivering for residents and the ambitions of our 2030 borough plan. We share a passionate commitment to public service and making a difference. We know that to deliver for our residents, we need to build on our proud history of resident engagement, of innovation and partnerships, not just within our borough, but across London. And we look forward to welcoming our new permanent chief executive, Ian Davis. I welcome Ian to this role and look forward to working with him to build on what we have already achieved here in Lambeth. Ian is a local government leader with significant experience in driving service improvement and delivering better outcomes for residents. His wealth of experience, knowledge and commitment will be crucial to supporting the council to deliver our 2030 ambitions and beyond. We in the administration know the challenges this borough and country faces are very real, as Councillor Bryant said. And our focus now, Fiona's focus, my focus, is to make sure the transition to the new chief executive is as smooth as possible, and that the hard work of the council continues at pace throughout, improving our basic services, building more homes and housing the homeless, safeguarding our children and looking after our care leaders, supporting residents with the cost of living crisis. These are the ambitions and priorities that drive our administration forward. And I look forward to working with Ian and Fiona to continue to serve the residents of Lambeth. Thank you. Thank you, speakers. We will vote on this report later in the meeting. The second report this evening is the Constitution report. We will hear from councillors Nicole Griffiths, Donna Harris and Scala O'Hara. Councillor Griffiths, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Yes, we have no argument with most of the changes in this report, but we have a few caveats. We acknowledge that the removal of the ownership and stewardship panel is part of the transition to bring the disastrous Homes for Lambeth back in house. And we can only hope that the transference of stewardship internally will lead to far better outcomes for the many residents experiencing housing stress. It would be reassuring to hear that all legal obligations have been met in the process of bringing Homes for Lambeth back in house. We note the changes to terms of reference in the name of the EIA panel to the Equity and Justice member panel. We also note that the Liberal Democrats intend to propose further amendments to the wording to the Constitutional Working Group that would reinstate specific reference to the Equality Act 2010 and require the panel to continue to review and monitor individual EIAs. Retaining these functions of the panel is necessary to ensure no erosion of its purpose or authority. Additionally, we acknowledge the removal of reference to a cooperative council and the insertion of Lambeth 2030 strategic goals. While we are pleased to see these commitments written into the Constitution in the hope this brings forward a greener, safer and more equal borough for our residents, we are also careful to monitor the delivery of such commitments. Experience tells us that Lambeth is quick to launch strategies with great fanfare, but little follow through. And we will be carefully reviewing the related outcomes, frameworks and performance reports to keep this council accountable. The Green Group still has no seat on the Constitutional Working Group, yet we're being asked to comment on its decisions. Considering we do actually represent nearly a quarter of Lampus residents, it should be a matter of priority that we invited to represent their views on any constitutional changes at a far earlier stage. So our exclusion is a missed opportunity for political groups to work together for the benefit of the residents we represent. Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Harris, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. As ever, many of today's updates are uncontroversial. It's in the nature of the Constitutional Working Group that a portion of what we do is to change words to reflect realities that have been decided elsewhere. I'd like to note the Constitution is being amended to remove reference to the ownership and stewardship panel. This was, of course, the oversight body for Homes for Lambeth, now redundant that Homes for Lambeth is being wound down. I'm struck by the disparity between the cost and damage to trust that has occurred during the Homes of Lambeth debacle and quiet deletion of a few paragraphs in the Constitution. It's an interesting bureaucratic understatement. We should never forget the real world impact of our words, decisions and actions. Secondly, I wish to address the proposed changes to the Equality Impact Assessment Panel, which is to be renamed the Equity and Justice Member Panel. We have concerns about this and have submitted alternative proposals, which the panel is now considering. The changes move the panel from scrutinising the Council's equity impact assessments to providing a more loosely termed developmental steer on its equity and justice work. The Equality Act is a piece of statute law. Equity and justice is a Council policy, one that we support. However, they are very different things. Given the importance of the equality law, we cannot busk our way through. If you doubt me, take a look at Birmingham and the problems that arose there as a result of a local authority marking its own equality homework. Likewise, we cannot exchange monitoring, reviewing and making recommendations for providing developmental steers. We have proposed restoring the omitted paragraphs that give the existing panel a scrutiny role and spelling out its remit to look at the Equality Act as well as the equity and justice policy. Finally, our proposals would add one opposition member to the panel on such important issues on which we're broadly in agreement about our intentions. It's crucial to add an opposition voice to bring a different point of view, to ask the difficult difficult questions and point out the real dangers of getting it wrong. Fundamentally, in our view, the Council should not function without an Equality Act oversight body, and we hope the Council will take forward our recommendations. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Thank you. Thank you. Councillor O'Hara, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. So there's a correction, an update and a review of three of the Council's many boards and panels and some name changes to reflect those. So the changes to the living document that is the Constitution are removing a panel that is now redundant. That's the Homes for Lambeth Ownership and Stewardship Panel. Incorporating the terms of reference for Lambeth's Adult Safeguarding Panel, which has been in existence since 2015, but inadvertently omitted. And reviewing and updating a panel which is tied and pivotal to our surely laudable ambition to become a borough of equity and justice for 2030. We are replacing the ownership and stewardship panel with stronger governance and more direct accountability of Homes for Lambeth to the Council. The Corporate Director of Climate and Inclusive Growth now has responsibility for acting on behalf of the Council in all matters regarding Homes for Lambeth and is accountable for housing delivery and chairs the new Housing Delivery Board. It is accountable to the Management Board and therefore to Cabinet, reflecting the progress made in transitioning Homes for Lambeth functions into the Council and ensuring strong oversight. But mostly these revisions look forward and demonstrate our ambitions for Lambeth to be a borough of equity and justice. They continue the work to seek opportunities to promote social equity and climate justice, and they clearly set up the targets to show how we intend to do that by becoming a net zero borough. Promoting good health, sustainability and safety, particularly for women and girls. Increasing opportunities for good jobs in our growing industries and opportunities for communities that experience challenge and prejudice. And note that this panel has nine councillor members, just as the EIA panel did before. It invites cabinet members to attend, as the EIA did before. And it considers EIA reports, just as the panel did before. There is no loss of decision making powers. The EIA panel did not have decision making powers. And consequently, that is why there are none of the five opposition councillors sitting on the panel currently. And no plans to change that in the future. Lambeth is one of the most diverse places in the UK. And our Labour members here and on our committees reflect that. And they reflect the communities that we serve. With a broad range of lived experiences and connections across Lambeth. And of that we are rightly proud. Thank you speakers. We will vote on this report later in the meeting. The third report this evening is the use of special urgency report. There are no speakers for this item and the report is for noting. So we'll move on to the final report. The final report this evening is the Corporate Parenting Board annual report. We will hear from councillors Matthew Bryant and Ben Kind. Councillor Bryant, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. I'll keep my comments brief. I know we have a busy agenda. Obviously, we commend the report to full council this evening. I very much hope that every councillor has read the report. I think it's worth remembering that all 63 of us in this chamber are corporate parents. It's not just those who actually sit as members or myself as an observer on the Corporate Parenting Board. In looking at the report, the one particular area I suppose I wanted to flag up. Because I think it's the most valuable bit that comes out of the meetings of the Corporate Parenting Board. And that's actually where we hear from the voice from the, from the Children in Care Council, commonly known as Visions of Success. It must be very intimidating, I would have thought, for these people. If you're on a young, young, young children who are in care coming to a meeting where you've got 20, 25 people, multiple professionals, a whole range of people. And it's really valuable that actually they are able to speak and they speak very eloquently. They actually live the experience and actually are able to speak truth under power and are not intimidated by that environment. I think it's one of the most positive things. I think we need to be encouraging that because the most important thing is that we hear that voice and that they are. actually able to give their opinions and to actually say, not actually feel constrained in what they're actually about to say, about to say to the, to the Corporate Parenting Board. That is one of the most powerful things and long may it continue. And I hope very much in future years it can be encouraged. Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Kind, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Corporate Parenting Board report for 2324 provides vital update on our work to support children who are looked after and care leavers. And unfortunately, sadly, it comes to full council later than planned because we're nearly at the year's end. But this report and the activities containment have already been scrutinised, as Councillor Bryant outlined and done in detail by the Corporate Parenting Board and more broadly by the Children's Scrutiny Committee. And I'd like to thank the officers and members of both the board and the committee for the time that they've given to scrutinising that work. This report reflects our continued commitment to improving outcomes for young people in Lambeth. The year after the period that the report covers has seen even more significant progress as recognised by Ofsted in their recent focus visit. Ofsted commended the strong leadership for children's services within Lambeth. The commitment to listening to children's voices as Councillor O'Brien has just outlined and the way that services are aligned to meet their needs. We also had a Bromley, a peer review by Bromley Council last year where they highlighted the effective work of VOS, Visions of Success, the Children and Care Council and the strengthening of our corporate parenting culture in the council. And these independent assessments are testament to the dedication of our staff, the foster carers and partners in delivering for young people. A Brightspot survey conducted by Corran recently came to Corporate Parenting Board where we heard insights from young people in their voice, 86% of young people reporting that they feel safe where they live higher than the peers nationally in those reports over 90% liking the places that they lived. 78% reporting that they enjoy their schools gain above average. But we know that there are areas for improvement, making sure that young people feel settled in placements and supporting those who feel that they don't sadly have a close friend. You can see in the report there is also some great things. We've had the launch of the Pan London Care Leavers offer, which provides free prescriptions, reduced transport costs and better support. Some fantastic work being done there by our Corporate Director for Children's Services, Andrew Carter and Kath Millington in his team, where they led on London and the development of that Pan London Care Leavers offer. We've got the focus on employment opportunities where we've seen 12 care leavers start apprenticeships in the civil service. We've got the award winning routes to independence housing pathway, which provides specialist accommodation for young people, including young mums and sanctuary seeking young people. We've also got some great work there for again from Voss who co-produced their own app, Mind of My Own, which you can read about in the report. And the reason I highlight those areas is because all of those successes are cross council areas. The officers who worked on getting those young people into those civil services apprenticeships come from the skills and employment team. The housing pathways developed by housing officers. It's adult social care officers who are embedded in the transition service, bringing the 0-25 services to four and leisure services officers who work on giving out free swimming and gym passes. So it's a true one Lambeth effort, as Councillor O'Brien said earlier. Thank you. Thank you, speakers. We will vote on this report later in the meeting. We will now debate the two motions that are listed on the order paper. The first motion is the Liberal Democrats' motion on supporting the climate and nature bill. The speaking order is as listed on the order paper. Councillor Harris, you have five minutes to open the debate. Mr Mayor. Tonight, we stand at a pivotal moment in our collective fight against climate change and biodiversity loss. Our planet faces crises on multiple fronts, climate, nature and pollution. These challenges are not distant threats, but immediate dangers that profoundly impact our lives, our communities and our future generations. Let me begin by reminding us the stark realities. Climate change remains a major concern for the UK, with 80% of people expressing worry about its impacts. The Paris Agreement signed in 2015 set set out a critical goal to limit global warming to just 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. Yet July 2024 marked the 13th consecutive month the world exceeded the 1.5% threshold. This is a red flag and the time for incremental action is over. Adding to this, the UK is one of the most nature depleted countries in the world. Over one in seven of our plants, animals face plants and animals face extinction and more than 40% of species species are in decline. Lambeth MP and Environment Secretary Steve Reid has called this directly stating nature in Britain is dying. These are sobering words that must spur us into action. At the global level, there is momentum. The United Nations, COP29, saw the UK commit to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 81% on 1990 levels by 2035. While the global biodiversity framework adopted at COP15 aims to halt the reverse nature loss by 2030. But commitments on paper are not enough. What we need is meaningful and forcible legislation. That is why the Climate and Nature Bill is so important. Introduced by Dr. Roz Savage in October 24, the Climate and Nature Bill offers a comprehensive and science-based roadmap to address these intertwined crises. It requires the UK government to develop and deliver an integrated climate and nature strategy. The bill prioritises rapid fair emission reductions, reversing biodiversity decline, ending fossil fuel imports and production and ensuring a just transformation that leaves no community behind. The bill also emphasises citizen engagement through a climate and nature assembly. This is not just a token gesture, but a recognition that lasting solutions require widespread public buy-in. Let's not forget that Lambeth has led the way. In January 2019, Lambeth became the first London borough to declare a climate emergency. In 2020, a successful citizen assembly was held on the climate crisis, demonstrating that our residents are ready and willing to take part in shaping a sustainable future. Support for the Climate and Nature Bill aligns with Lambeth's early and ongoing commitments. It also reflects the will of our residents, many of whom have told us repeatedly that climate action is a priority. By endorsing this bill, we affirm our leadership responsibility in tackling these crises head on. The scale of support for this bill is growing. More than 191 MPs from across political parties, as well as the Mayor of London, have expressed their backing. Over 379 councils, including Camden, Hackney, Lewisham and Westminster, have passed motions in support of current or previous versions of the bill. Tonight, Lambeth has the opportunity to join them and add our voice to this crucial movement. Colleagues, this bill is rooted in science and aligned with international agreements. It supports Lambeth's own climate and biodiversity goals and will contribute to a national and global effort to secure a sustainable future. This is not just another vote or another policy. It's a chance to stand on the right side of history and act decisively in the face of a triple planetary crisis. The stakes could not be higher. The time to act is now and the action we must take must be bold, comprehensive and fair. Please, let us seize this opportunity to reaffirm Lambeth's leadership and set an example for others to follow. Together, we can make a difference for our borough, our country and our planet. Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Chaudry, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. I'd like to start by highlighting the fact that this motion does a brilliant job in highlighting all of the things that we're already doing here in Lambeth on the climate. Credit has to go to the opposition parties for doing that for us. And, you know, we've gone further and faster than everything this bill sets out. That's why we're proud of our climate record and will continue to lead the way. So let's go through the bill's asks together. Firstly, the bill states, and I quote, tackling the intertwined crises in climate and nature in a joined up way. Now here in Lambeth, our climate action plan was developed by a range of community groups and businesses across the borough. And we've united the borough's influential public, private, voluntary and community organization to form the Climate Partnership Group to drive delivery. Secondly, Bill asks, reducing emissions fairly and rapidly for the highest chance of meeting the UK's obligation to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees centigrade. Our Labour led Council has committed to ensuring the Council's operations are net zero by 2030 and our Labour Prime Minister announced the UK's new nationally determined contribution to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 81% on 1990 levels by 2035. We are shameless. We are shameless in our ambition to deliver on our environment, environment pledges and bring residents on this journey with us by increasing our energy security and cutting bills for households. Next, the bill focuses on nature and I quote, halting and reversing the decline in biodiversity by setting nature measurably on the path to recovery by 2030. On nature, Lambeth are on track to deliver 5000 trees by 2026 and based on regular transects and surveys undertaken by wildlife organizations such as the RSPB. We know that Lambeth are some of the best locations in South London for birds, butterflies and other wildlife, demonstrating that great cultural experiences and high biodiversity value can exist side by side. We're also committed to halting the decline of British species by 2030, but we are under no illusion about the scale of this task and will continue our hard work in this area. And finally, the bill states ensuring that no one and no community is left behind in the adjustment transition by providing retraining for those currently working in fossil fuel industries. We know that women, younger and older people, multi ethnic groups and disabled people are more likely to be exposed to the impacts of climate change as we implant implement our climate action plan. We understand and consider the impact on different population groups. Everything this Labour led Council does is to ensure we are protecting the most vulnerable, despite the opposition playing politics and opposing common sense approaches to tackling the crime climate crisis. And that's it. So I ask if the Liberal Democrats, if the Liberal Democrats support an ambitious climate agenda, they will support our amended version of the bill because our records speak for itself and it speaks to residents directly through our engagement with them. Everything we do is to protect those who need us most. We've gone further and faster than the bill states and so if the Lib Dems and Greens are serious about tackling climate change locally, they'll support our amended version of this motion. Thank you. Councillor Cavanagh, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. I'd like to start by thanking the Liberal Democrats for going to such lengths in this motion to point out what a difference the leadership of the Labour Council, Labour Government and Labour London Mayor is making in tackling the climate and biodiversity crises. And let's face it, it's easy to do as there is such a list of real life interventions and achievements to applaud that are already being delivered for the residents of the UK, London and right here in Lambeth. With this historic third term win, our London Mayor has been vindicated in leading the drive to reduce air pollution across our capital. Just days after winning a landslide in the general election, the UK government established Great British Energy, reversed the Tory ban on onshore wind and is in the process of securing a record breaking number of projects using renewables. So it is disappointing that the Liberal Democrats, rather than tell us what they would do locally were they ever in a position to lead the Council, have instead sought with this motion to show division where there isn't any between the direction of travel of Labour administrations nationally, regionally and locally. In the past, when they were in coalition with the Conservatives, they gave political cover and support to decisions that wreaked havoc on Council finances and those of its residents. And yet, despite 14 years of Tory and Libden austerity, Labour leadership at the Council, from councillors Claire Holland and Rosina Chowdhury, has still managed to deliver on our bold climate ambitions. We have outlawed the use of glyphosate pesticides across the borough. We are on course to meet our pledge to plant 5000 new trees in Manworth by 2026. We have delivered significant reductions in air pollution through our introduction of cycle lanes, which my own ward of West Dulwich is hugely grateful for. 40 school streets, again West Dulwich thanks to councillor Chowdhury. We're implementing healthy neighbourhoods across the borough and investing in cycle storage and EV charging. All in an effort to enable our residents to actively be part of the solution to tackling climate change. Because we understand the importance of leadership. Because we understand the dangers if the consensus to tackle climate change breaks down. Because we know what happens when political actors seek to sow division. This week, the newly inaugurated Presidents of the United States has pulled his country out of the Paris Climate Treaty, allowing politicians from the right in the UK to be emboldened as they actively campaign against Next Zero. And this can find a voice locally. This is why it's so disheartening that the Liberal Democrats have chosen division over community leadership in this motion and passed up the opportunity to give their political vocal support to our efforts as a borough. At the heart of Lambeth Climate Action Plan, our residents and our labour values of justice and equity. We know that it is the most disadvantaged that suffer disproportionately from the impacts of climate change, despite being the least responsible. And this is why it is so important that this evening we pass an amended motion that brings the focus of all of us in the Chamber on what we can practically do here in Lambeth to deliver climate justice for all our residents. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Armstrong, you have three minutes. Please, can you be quiet in the chamber and gallery, please? Thank you. Can you be quiet, please? Thank you. Oh, then you have to leave if you can't be quiet. You're not leaving. Councillor Armstrong, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. I have to say I'm frustrated by the motions and amendments like the one put forward by the Lib Dems and Greens today. Both are a blatant attempt at political point scoring. But does this really surprise anybody here tonight? Sir, and the point of orders. Can you please specify where in the Constitution you follow the point of order? Yes, OK. It's the point of order is part four, chapter D, rule 13.14 of the Constitution. Yeah, you have one minute. The councillor treats you with disrespect. You can raise a point of order and say it breaches the member's code of conduct. Sorry, could I have a ruling? So if you want to make a code of conduct complaint, you can file it with Raymond. Sorry? If you'd like to make a complaint, a code of conduct complaint, you can make one to Raymond. So there is also the member's code of conduct part six, chapter B says, valuing my colleagues and staff and engaging with them in an appropriate manner and one that underpins the mutual respect between us. Yes. That is a sentence. So currently, you've asked the point of order and I've answered it. So if you'd like to make a complaint, then you can send one to Raymond. Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Armstrong, you have three minutes. You can start then. Thank you. Thank you, Mr Mayor. So as I was saying, the back and forth on the amendment, who put forward the Climate Bill first? Was it Caroline Lucas? Was it Dr Savage in a school playground style? This is mine, not yours. A motion that sits completely out of scope of what this council is for and can do. Calling on the leader of the council to write to MPs and do the media rounds as if the borough of Lambeth is simply a pressure group or protest group. When Labour was an opposition in Westminster, we put forward credible and real policies that would improve the lives of working people up and down the country. Whereas when the Lib Dems are in government with the Tories, they imposed austerity measures that completely wreak havoc on our borough and our country. And the reality is we are still living with this today. With this in mind, I am extremely proud that our Labour Council has delivered real, tangible policies to tackle the threat of climate change here in Lambeth and make a difference for our communities. A climate action plan for Lambeth Council to be climate resilient and net zero compliant by 2030. The formation of the Climate Partnership Group to deliver the change needed to make our borough more climate friendly. We have 3,700 cycle storage centres across our borough so we can lower congestion and clean our air. Labour does these policies because Labour knows the power it can have to change people's lives. In Vauxhall alone, we've seen air pollution drop by 51% since 2017, making our air cleaner for our children. That's what substantive policy delivers. That is what Labour and local government delivers. Real change for the people of Lambeth. And of course, we support the principles of the bill. Climate change is something that affects all of us. It's one of the most pressing issues facing the world and our future. Nobody is disputing that. But a motion that simply instructs the leader of the council to go around talking about a bill, a bill that Labour Council has no control over, is the mere theatre of opposition. Bold speeches, moving of the scenery and nothing more with as much substance as smoke. Labour's amendment to this motion focuses on what we as councillors can and should deliver for the residents of Lambeth. Because that is what they want. That is what they deserve. And in the face of the climate crisis, that is what they need. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Thank you, Councillor Long. Councillor Griffiths, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. And we do, of course, need to act locally. And the Greens will continue to push this Labour administration to be even bolder than you have been already. But it strikes me as narcissism. The Labour group amending the motion as they have. It was directed at central, not local government. And I hope that this Labour group does actually pile on the pressure. It's much needed to ensure that the government acts with courage, vision and resolve and actually supports the Climate and Nature bill. We're in the midst of a biodiversity and climate crisis. And this is our last chance to act without biodiversity. There is no future for humanity. I'm sure we all remember Greta Thunberg telling governments to act on the climate emergency as if their houses were on fire. Yet last year worldwide there continued to be an increase in both nature loss and the burning of fossil fuels and the highest temperatures ever were recorded. We're experiencing experience increasingly extreme and frightening the frightening weather events. Floods and fires are happening across the globe as a direct result of human induced climate change. We have smashed through planetary boundaries and not stop temperatures rising above the 1.5 degree threshold. The World Wildlife Fund Living Planet Report found that wildlife populations have decreased by 70% in the past 50 years. Habitat loss, climate change, pollution, disruption of food chains or disrupt and degrade essential ecosystems. And now there's a climate change denier in the White House who is withdrawn from the Paris Agreement and who will enable the full exploitation of fossil fuel reserves. The US will spend another presidential term backsliding on environmental protection. So this is the time for the UK to take the lead by introducing policy that sets ambitious targets to reach net zero at speed. The Climate and Nature Bill is a legally binding mission statement which will ensure policy and action on climate and nature crisis that is both science led and people orientated. By passing it, UK politicians would help inspire positive action across the world. And I'm very disappointed to hear from Steve Reid that neither he or the government are going to support the bill. Given the UK's current targets are far from sufficient and scientists are warning that the UK is not even on track to meet those. We have no chance of limiting warming to anywhere near safe levels unless we protect and actively restore nature, particularly the critical ecosystems that support life and store huge amounts of carbon such as peatlands, woodlands, seas and wetlands, as well as our rivers and soils. The framework set out in the bill, however, would lock the science into law and ensure the UK is doing its real fair share to maintain a liveable planet. And just to add, acting locally should also include supporting our green motion this evening on clean air night to cut toxic greenhouse gases in the installation of waste. Thank you. Councillor O'Brien, you have five minutes to close the debate. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Obviously, as Councillor Harris said in her introduction to this subject. What we what this motion is about is ensuring that we have meaningful and enforceable framework to make sure that this country honours the commitments it's made at various international conferences. The subject has added poignancy this evening. As one of the first actions taken by President Trump just two days ago was to remove the United States from the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. Now, we acknowledge the Greens, the amendment performed by Councillor Griffiths and the Green Group, and particularly that this bill was first tabled in the House of Commons by former Green MP Caroline Lucas. And indeed, actually on Friday, it's fourth time lucky for the Climate and Nature Bill, because it's worth mentioning that actually two previous versions have also been tabled and put forward by Labour MPs. Labour MPs when they're in opposition. In fact, the Labour Party in opposition supported this bill. Funny how it's changed now, isn't it? And in fact, in putting forward this motion this evening, we hope that all parties in this chamber could unite in support of it. Instead, the Labour amendment effectively eviscerates it, removing all four of the asks that we had in the motion and replacing them with some bland platitude. Now, I have to take exception. I mean, I think Councillor Chowdhury and Councillor Kavanagh seem to have completely missed the point. And they're talking about sewing division and point scoring. The only people doing point scoring this evening are the two of them. I have to say, this motion is not critical. We acknowledge the work this council has done in terms of achieving, moving towards goals of being net zero, of actually trying to improve air quality, of encouraging active travel. And the motion makes no criticism of that. And where you perceive that criticism, I do not know why. But however, instead of standing four square behind this motion and declaring clearly our support for this bill, the Labour amendment just offers some warm platitudes. This motion is all about keeping the government honest and making sure that their actions match their words. We're asking for this particular legislative framework for three reasons. Firstly, is to make sure that the Secretary of State has a strategic clarity in terms of achieving climate and nature targets and milestones to get there. Secondly, that the UK takes account of its global impact here. And finally, that communities are protected from potential negative effects of change. And what we're asking here is for having a strategy that's actually got annual milestones to actually monitor progress against. Now, Councillor Cameron tells us that the Labour government is already delivering on this. Well, it's only six months and I'm not sure there's any evidence to deliver. And the one thing we need to be careful about is actually stopping this government from backsliding. In the week in which we hear the Chancellor Exchequer talking about actually approving the expansion of Heathrow Airport. Again, which the Labour Party opposed in opposition. Now, taking Councillor Armstrong's point, up to July last year, this Council was fully happy to lobby government ministers to take action in areas that concern our residents. We wrote to the Prime Minister, we've lobbied Chancellor's Exchequer on issues of concern. So why the reticence now? But it's good to see that whilst this Labour administration here in the town hall may not be willing to put their full weight behind the climate and nature bill. Three of our local MPs are much more enthusiastic. Two have signified their support through zero hour. And it was good to hear from Florence Eshalomi today that she hopes to speak in the debate on Friday. If made law, this climate and nature bill will make sure that the UK not only halts, but reverses the decline in nature, setting nature measurably on the path to recovery by 2030. It will take responsibility for our overseas footprint, both emissions and ecological. And it prioritises nature as well in decision making and ends fossil fuel production and imports as rapidly as possible. So tonight is a time for action. No shilly shalling. No trying to make your point scoring. By watering down this motion with a nothing amendment, let's reject the amendment and vote for the amendment, vote for the motion as it stands. And let's have some positive action this evening. Thank you. Thank you councillors. We now move on to debate the labour motion on becoming a living wage place. The speaking order is as listed on the order paper. Councillor Mohamed, you have five minutes to open the debate. Thank you Mr Mayor. I'm proud to open this motion and reaffirm Lambeth's commitment to being a living wage place. A borough where workers are respected, where fair pay is a right, not a privilege, and where good work drives the local economy. Since 2012, Lambeth Labour has been at the forefront of the living wage movement and we continue to lead the way in fighting in work poverty, creating inclusive employment and ensuring that every worker has the opportunity to thrive. Which is why we were named as the living wage public sector champion for supporting workers to get better pay. In November, Lambeth hosted its living wage celebration here at Lambeth Town Hall, an event that saw us celebrate local employers who have committed to paying their workers fairly. This was not only a chance to acknowledge hard working businesses, but also a historic milestone because it was the first time five boroughs have come together in solidarity to showcase the importance of fair pay. This is a significant step forward, but also a clear message that our Lambeth Labour-led council is leading the way and making sure that no one is left behind in our community. And it wasn't just an event that made a difference. We lit up Lambeth Town Hall in living wage blue, a visual symbol of our commitment to fair pay and a reminder that we are a borough where workers matter. We are proving that paying a fair wage isn't just the right thing to do, it's the small thing to do and it creates a better future for everyone in Lambeth. Our borough is now home to 300 businesses and organisations that are living wage accredited and this is no small feat. It reflects real action and most importantly businesses and residents in Lambeth feel the benefits. We are showing people that living wage employers are part of a vibrant, inclusive local economy and it's working. The international house in Brixton is a living wage building and we've led the way ensuring that all workers, whether they're in a small business or large organisation, are paid fairly for the work they do. But let's pause here for a moment and ask, where are the Liberal Democrats and the Greens Party in the Fife for Workers? They're nowhere to be found. The Liberal Democrats supported austerity measures when they were part of the coalition government with the Tories. Austerity that gutted public services, froze wages and left working families struggling to make ends meet. They continued with policies that kept wages low, undermined public services and failed to address the real needs of working people. Let's not forget their record in government, a record of betrayal, a record of failure to defend the very people they claim to represent. After 14 years of Conservative and Lib Dem rules, Britain's high streets and town centres have been hollowed out. And then there's the Green Party, who like to tout their progressive ideals, but when it comes to action on fair wages and workers' rights, they have been completely silent. They have failed to present any form of coherent plan that will ensure fair pay for workers in Lambeth. But here's the difference. Lambeth Labour is leading and we continue to lead. We are the ones taking action, fighting for workers and creating fair pay. We have made significant strides and we will continue to do so. We are not here to just talk about fairness. We are here to make it happen and deliver for residents. So today I ask for full support for this motion as we continue to move Lambeth forward, ensuring that we remain a living wage borough, a place where workers are respected and fair pay is guaranteed. Thank you. Thank you, Councillor. Councillor Curtis, you have three minutes. Thank you. Councillor Howard, I'm genuinely shocked and surprised by what you've just said. I was actually going to start this speech by talking about thanking you and thanking you for bringing this motion forward. You know, we think this is something we've been long supportive of and helped to campaign on way back when. So I'm quite surprised by that, I must say. But anyway, I'll continue. The living wage in its London equivalency is good politics done well. And ensuring people are paid fairly to afford the sky high cost of living in our city is of critical importance. Some stats that I found from the living wage foundation so that over 15,000 employers across the UK are now living wage accredited with 4,000 of those based in London. And this commitment has resulted in over 142,000 Londoners receiving a pay rise collectively adding over 1.4 billion to pay packets of low paid Londoners since 2011. We, of course, are going to vote for this motion for these reasons. Our amendment doesn't seek to change the motion substantially, but as members have seen, seeks to bring a national priority of ours and a concern for everybody in this room to the spotlight, which is social care. And fixing social care, of course, needs to be at the heart of any discussion about the future of the NHS. And as councillors in this place will know, there is no singular NHS crisis. It's an NHS and social care crisis that we are in the midst of. Our amendment builds upon the original proposal and calls for Lambeth to press local care providers who do not currently pay the London living wage to apply a £2 per hour boost to care workers' minimum pay to make care a more attractive profession and to improve the shocking rates of staff retention. There are nearly 130,000 vacancies in the sector, which is just over 8% of the entire industry, with a turnover rate at an alarming 25% in 2023 to 2024. Another analysis done by Skills for Care is estimated that real terms pay in the sector has reduced by over 30p an hour since just 2020. While we applaud efforts in the National Employment Rights Bill to be put forward by the incumbent government to create a national body to negotiate fair pay for care workers, we think Lambeth can lead the way, going further and faster, demanding more before national legislation is introduced. We urge you to support our amendment tonight and back the social care sector to thrive and help alleviate pressures on local NHS services. Thank you. Councillor Ainslie, you have three minutes. Councillor Mohamed, I would please do your homework. It was Councillor Thackeray, a Green Councillor, former Green Councillor, who brought forward a motion to support the principle of the living wage in 2009. On a night that we honour the legacy of past councillors, please let us give credit where it's due and acknowledge the work of good people in this borough. Thank you. We totally support this motion and I'm surprised as you are, Councillor Curtis. Fair pay is a necessary component in solving our wealth and equality crisis. However, this motion sits in glaring juxtaposition to a number of decision the council has or is about to make. The medium term financial statement has indicated cuts to frontline children's, adults and other social services, job losses and a pending consultation that reduce council tax support from 100% to 80% for our most vulnerable residents. Decisions to increase temporary accommodation rents and utilities costs have already been taken. And on top of this, many pensioners will sit anxiously in their homes this winter, agonising whether they can turn the heating on after the Labour Party asked the winter fuel payment. Data compiled by Stop the Knock shows that nearly 30,000 households in Lambeth were referred to bailiffs for council tax debt in 2023 financial year. That is a phenomenal 22% of households and ranks third worst council in London. As in October, only 4% of referred debt had been collected for the 24-25 financial year. If poor people cannot pay their council tax, there's no point in multiplying their fines and sending bailiffs. Time and again, sorry, I'm getting really angry tonight. Time and again, we ask you to stop this failing policy. The amendment from the Liberal Democrats acknowledges the value of care workers supporting those with additional needs and we agree that any provision to increase their pay is warranted. We would also like to recognise the unpaid care work performed in our borough by a largely feminised informal care economy that we rely on to look after our children, disabled people and the elderly. These people will be severely affected by increased costs and reduced frontline services. We are supportive of all the work officers are doing to ensure the household support fund is being distributed to residents who need it most, including free school meals, holiday provision and targeted emergency support. But this council gives it with one hand and it takes with the other. We must be doing more to address the root causes of the unacceptable poverty and wealth inequality in our borough. Paying residents a living wage is essential, but it is not enough to fill the chasm of lost council housing and diminishing frontline and preventative services provision. In the spirit of this motion, which we support, we ask that the council end the use of bailiffs, retain full 100% council tax support and do everything. Just a final sentence if I may. Wherever possible, to retain people in employment that deliver services to our most vulnerable residents and prevent additional social costs down the line. Thank you. Thank you, Councillor. Councillor English Jones, you have three minutes. Thank you. Thank you. Annie, Ann, not her real name, visited one of our food banks in December. She works nonstop to keep the lights on, but providing for her seven month old baby still sets a massive challenge. She says I work five days in the veterinary surgery, two days and student experience at university. I leave my baby with a friend, other people with more more children. I don't know how they cope. Low paid Londoners who have dependent children are far more likely than those without children to have visited a food bank in the last year. With 63% of low paid workers with dependent children in London having used a food bank compared with 41% of those without. The Living Wage Foundation has showed that low paid workers who earn less than the real living wage are more likely to use food banks. In London, 51% of low paid workers have used a food bank in the past year and 23% visit at least once a week. 36% of low paid workers have skipped meals regularly in the past year. More than two thirds of low paid workers say that earning less than the real living wage is worsening their anxiety levels, affecting their quality of sleep and impacting their physical health. As the motion says, continuing to push for more local employers of all sizes to become living wage accredited and working alongside them to support them in this journey, as well as establishing a local action group to celebrate local businesses that achieve living wage accreditation will significantly address the issue of in work poverty. The mass dependence on food banks across the UK is unacceptable. The Lambeth Food Bank, of which I'm currently chair, is soon to be merged with Oasis Waterloo Food Bank and will be Tulsa Hill based to better streamline and enhance the service to residents across the borough. But frankly, it should not exist at all, but frankly, it should not exist at all. We must end this reliance on food banks as the primary response to food insecurity. It's not right that the word food bank has entered the national lexicon as we are not part of the national furniture and we are not a long term solution to poverty. To what is paying people a living wage for the jobs that they're doing as part of their right to an adequate standard of living? People need to be able to access food that meets their dietary, social and cultural needs. Halving the numbers coming by ensuring a living wage would take the pressure off management and volunteers, start the exit of food banks, and even more importantly, even as inflation easies, it's key to remember that low-paid Londoners continue to face the brunt of persistent high prices. We need to take the pressure off them too, and we need to do it urgently. Ensuring people live well and flourish in this borough is key. Lambeth as a living wage place must be the aim for us all. Thank you, Councillor. Councillor Bailey, you have three minutes. Thank you, Mr Mayor. I rise today to speak in strong support of this motion. Becoming a living wage place is not just a gesture. It is a commitment to fairness and economic justice. It is a step towards ensuring everyone who works in Lambeth, lives in Lambeth, loves Lambeth, can earn enough not only to survive, but to live with dignity and security. In my award in Vauxhall, I've seen the good, the bad and the still trying. I see the incredible organisations like Tonic Housing and Zalermay who have stepped up to become living wage employers. They recognise paying a fair wage isn't just good for their employees, it's good for the community and for their own success. And it's not just small businesses leading the charge. Some of Vauxhall's largest employers like the Met Police and Sainsbury's have also stepped up. Sainsbury's, in fact, only became a living wage employer last year, down to the hard-working, collaborative efforts of the union. Boils to the bad, Intercontinental Hotel Group, who own two hotels in Vauxhall, made a commitment over a decade ago to pay the real living wage. And they have backtracked, installed and reversed their commitment over and over again. We cannot overrule the fact that low pay disproportionately affects certain groups in our community. Women and workers from ethnic minority backgrounds are far more likely to be in low paid and insecure work. And those people on low pay often get stuck in low pay, the cycle of property entrenching itself and creating social inequalities within our communities. Becoming a living wage place, we are standing against these injustices and sending a clear message. We value the contributions of every member of our community. Being by paying living wage is just one piece of the puzzle. It must go hand in hand with security at work. Too many workers face uncertainty about their hours, lack of sick pay and the constant threat of redundancy. A fair wage means little if workers are living in constant fear of losing their livelihoods. And that's why this motion is more than just about pay. It's about creating decent, secure jobs that allow people to plan for a future. As we make Lambert a living wage place, we must also support the work of our trade unions, ensuring workers have access to fair treatment, collective bargaining and the protections they deserve. We should also remember 95% of low paid workers are not saving at a level to deliver an acceptable standard of living in retirement. Just as a living wage ensures that workers can meet their immediate needs, an inclusive economy ensures that they can look forward to secure and dignified retirement too. But we cannot pretend these commitments are easy asks. We are all asking business industry in the third sector to do more with less. Roxwell has a nationally significant LGBT focused night time economy. And like many clubs and pubs and venues across London, margins are being squeezed tight. Operators generally have to balance between paying the real living wage or closing these venues and paying no wages at all. However, according to the TUC, research has shown that low paid workers, firstly, often spend greater proportion locally than more affluent groups. And when they receive a pay rise, they spend all of that increase, whereas more affluent will save a greater proportion. So those extra wages largely go back into helping the local economy. We need thriving local economies. And then we know that ultimately paying the living wage, those benefits will far outweigh the costs. The living wage means improved staff development and productivity. And it means more money spent locally in our shops, communities and cafes and services. Colleagues tonight, in voting for this motion, we affirm that Lambeth is a borough whose priority is inclusion, equity and economic justice. That it is possible, may proven, to be both pro-business and pro-worker. That an inclusive economy is built on the foundations of the good employers in all sectors and they're all welcome here. That we are a Labour council and this is what it means to put our values into action. Making a real difference to ordinary people and building a borough where everyone, everyone thrives. Thank you. Councillor Cameron, you have five minutes to close the debate. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Scott, Scott, Scott. I really wasn't clear if you knew that the motion was about living wage place. You kind of went off in all different directions, but hey ho. I really wasn't clear on that. In 1999, it was a Labour government that took a pivotal step by introducing national minimum wage, a prelude to the living wage that underscored the importance of fair pay. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the Liberal Democrats and the Greens claimed credit for this accomplishment as well. The opposition's claim that they initiated our plans for the living wage place. In my opinion, it's for the birds. We cannot forget the Lib Dems for propping up the Conservatives, which allowed them to leave a £22 billion black hole in the government's finances, bringing the British economy to its knees and creating economic instability in the public finances. This also severely impacted the financial condition of our council. Thank goodness we have a Labour government who acted decisively on the advice of the Low Pay Commission, resulting in significant increases in both the minimum wage to £12.12. This is an increase of 6.7 per cent and the London living wage to £13.85 per hour. Our Chancellor announced a budget focused on safeguarding living standards while laying the groundwork for a more robust economy. This highlights our shared responsibility to foster growth and stability. This Labour administration is committed to achieving the status of living wage borough, despite the previous government's failure to grow and manage the economy. Regardless, regardless of these challenges, 300 of our businesses have chosen to prioritise their employees, even during these tough times, benefiting over 56,000 employees and recognising that well-paid employees feel valued and are more productive. This is an opportunity to take us from the plan to akeditation to provide完成ment. lndlp The London living wage is a core objective of unельiptic of our cost of living strategy. We are making significant strides by partnering with some of the largest employees in the borough to secure living wage accreditation. secure living wage accreditation. Our goal is to lead the way, as one of the first living wage boroughs in London, we commend our major employers such as the Oval, Cricket Ground, local NHS Trust, including the London Ambulance Service and Macmillan Cancer Support for taking decisive steps to raise wages for hundreds of employees. The Living Wage Foundation states, paying a real living wage improves the employer's brand and boosts staff commitment and motivation at work. Our residents deserve access to a decent wage and that will help them escape poverty, reduce their dependents and food banks and enable them to participate in economic growth and productivity. I'll end by saying Nelson Mandela, former President of South Africa, says overcoming poverty is not a gesture of charity. It is an act of justice. It is the protection of a fundamental human right, the right to dignity and a decent life. Mr Mayor, I endorse and fully support this Labour motion. Thank you councillors for a lively debate on each of the debated motions this evening. We will now move to tonight's voting. We will begin with voting on the reports listed on the agenda. If there is no dissent, the recommendations will be carried. If there is dissent, we will move to a vote. You have three choices, voting for, voting against or abstain from voting. Tonight, you will be voting by a show of hands, starting with the appointment of the Chief Executive. Are the recommendations in the report agreed? We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hand if you're voting against. Please raise your hand if you wish to abstain. The recommendations in the report are agreed. The second report is the Constitution. Are the recommendations in the report agreed? We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hand if you're voting against. And please raise your hands if you wish to abstain. Thank you. The recommendations in the report are agreed. The third report is the Corporate Parrington Board Annual Report. Bill, are the recommendations in the report agreed? Theôm, the recommendations in the report are agreed. We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hand if you're voting against. Please raise a hand if you wish to abstain. Thank you. The recommendations in the report are agreed. We now move on to voting on Councils Motions. Council will first consider Motion 1 from the Liberal Democrats on supporting the Climate and Nature Bill. There are two proposed amendments to this motion from the Greens and Labour. We will vote on the amendment from the Greens first. Is the amendment from the Greens agreed? We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hands if you're voting against. Please raise your hands if you wish to abstain. The amendment from the Greens is not carried. We will now vote on the amendment from Labour. Is the amendment from Labour agreed? We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hand if you're voting against. Please raise your hand if you wish to abstain. The amendment from Labour is carried. As a result, we will now vote on the motion from the Lib Dems as amended by Labour. Is the motion as amended by Labour agreed? We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hand if you're voting against. Please raise your hand if you wish to abstain. The motion from the Liberal Democrats as amended by Labour on supporting the Climate and Nature Bill is carried. Council will now consider Motion 2 becoming a living wage place. There are two proposed amendments to this motion from the Greens and the Lib Dems. We will vote on the amendment from the Greens first. Is the amendment from the Greens agreed? We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hands if you're voting for. Please raise your hands if you're voting against. And please raise your hands if you wish to abstain. The amendment from the Greens is not carried. We will now vote on the amendment from the Lib Dems. Is the amendment from the Liberal Democrats agreed? We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hand if you're voting against. Please raise your hand if you wish to abstain. The amendment from the Liberal Democrats is not carried. As a result, we will now vote on the original motion from Labour. Is the original motion agreed? The original motion from Labour on becoming a living wage place is carried. Council will now consider Motion 3 from the Greens to reduce single-use plastic consumption and waste in Lambeth. There is one proposed amendment to this motion from Liberal Democrats. We will vote on the amendment first. Is the amendment from Liberal Democrats agreed? We will move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hand if you're voting against. Please raise your hand if you wish to abstain. The amendment from the Liberal Democrats is not carried. As a result, we will now vote on the original motion from the Greens. Is the original motion agreed? We will now move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hand if you're voting against. Please raise your hand if you wish to abstain. He's a hand if you wish to abstain. The amendment from the Liberal Democrats is not carried. As a result, we will now vote on the original motion from the Greens. Is the original motion agreed? We will now move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for and please raise your hand if you're voting against Please raise your hand if you wish to abstain. you wish to abstain. The original motion to reduce single-use plastic consumption and waste in Lambeth from the Greens is not carried. Council will now consider motion 4 from Labour on defibrillator access and training in Lambeth. There are two proposed amendments to this motion from the Greens and the Liberal Democrats. We'll vote on the Green amendment first. Is the amendment from the Greens agreed? We'll move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hands if you're voting against. Please raise your hands if you wish to abstain. The amendment from the Greens is not carried. We will now move to vote on the Liberal Democrat amendment. Is the amendment from the Liberal Democrats agreed? We'll move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hands if you're voting against. Please raise your hands if you wish to abstain. The amendment from the Liberal Democrats is not carried. As a result, we will now vote on the original motion from Labour. Is the motion from Labour agreed? The motion from Labour on defibrillator access and training in Lambeth is carried. Council will now consider motion 5 from Labour on towards a social mobility social model of disability. There are two proposed amendments to this motion from the Greens and Liberal Democrats. We'll vote on the Green amendment first. Is the amendment from the Greens agreed? We will now move to a vote via a show of hands. Please raise your hand if you're voting for. Please raise your hands if you're voting against. Please raise your hand if you wish to abstain. The amendment from the Greens is not carried. We now move on to a vote on the Liberal Democrat amendment. Is the amendment from the Liberal Democrats agreed? The amendment from the Liberal Democrats is carried. As a result, we will now vote on the motion from Labour as amended by the Liberal Democrats. Is the motion as amended by the Liberal Democrats agreed? The motion on towards a social model of disability from Labour and amended by the Liberal Democrats is carried. So thank you. That concludes the business for this evening's council meeting. Thank you all for your attendance and participation. The next council will be the 5th of March 2025.
Summary
The meeting began with tributes to past Councillors Rob Hill and Burt Williams, who had recently died. Councillors then heard deputations from residents on the condition of Palace Road Nature Garden, the need for cycle hangers suitable for cargo bikes, and poor housing conditions and repairs on the Tulse Hill Estate.
Councillors voted to approve the appointment of Ian Davis as the new Chief Executive of the Council. Councillors also approved updates to the Council’s constitution. These included changes made to reflect the bringing of the Council’s housing company, Homes for Lambeth, back in house, the formal inclusion of the Lambeth Adult Safeguarding Panel to the Constitution, and the renaming of the Equality Impact Assessment Panel to the Equity and Justice Member Panel.
Supporting the Climate and Nature Bill
Councillors debated a motion from the Liberal Democrat group calling on the Council to support the Climate and Nature Bill and to lobby Lambeth’s MPs to vote in favour of the bill at its second reading on 24th January 2025.
The Climate and Nature Bill is a Private Members Bill1 introduced by Dr Roz Savage MP on 16 October 2024 that requires the government to set legally binding targets for climate change mitigation and biodiversity protection.
The Liberal Democrats proposed that the Council should:
Support the Climate and Nature Bill. Inform local residents, and inform local press/media, of this decision. Ask the Leader of the Council to write to Lambeth MPs about this Motion, urging them to vote in favour of the Bill at second reading on 24 January 2025. Ask the Leader of the Council to write to Zero Hour, the organisers of the cross-party campaign for the Bill, expressing Lambeth’s support.
The Labour group proposed an amendment that replaced these proposals with one calling on the Council to:
Support the Climate and Nature Bill’s ambitions and principles but focus on delivering Lambeth’s Climate agenda by working with residents, businesses and organisations in Lambeth.
Councillor Donna Harris, for the Liberal Democrats, highlighted the scientific evidence that shows the urgent need for climate change mitigation. She argued that the Climate and Nature Bill provided a “comprehensive and science-based roadmap to address these intertwined crises”.
Councillor Rezina Chowdhury, for Labour, argued that Lambeth Council was already delivering “real, tangible policies to tackle the threat of climate change here in Lambeth” and highlighted the Council’s commitment to reducing its carbon emissions to net-zero by 2030, the planting of trees, the introduction of cycle lanes and School Streets, the expansion of landlord licensing and the investment in electric vehicle charging points.
Councillor Scott Ainslie, for the Greens, argued that the Labour Party was trying to take credit for the work of Green campaigners and politicians, who had been raising awareness of the need for climate change mitigation for many years.
The Labour amendment to the motion was passed and the motion, as amended, was carried.
Becoming a Living Wage Place
Councillors debated a motion from the Labour group reaffirming Lambeth Council’s commitment to becoming a Living Wage Place.
The London Living Wage is a higher minimum wage than the National Living Wage, calculated to be the amount a person needs to earn to be able to afford to live in London.
Labour proposed that the Council should:
Continue to push for more local employers of all sizes to become living wage accredited, and work alongside them to support them in this journey. Establish a Local Action Group: This group would acknowledge local businesses that achieve Living Wage accreditation, addressing the issue of in-work poverty while fostering an equitable economy. Collaborate with the Living Wage Foundation: Formation of a Living Wage Local Action Group, alongside the development of a strategic Action Plan, aimed at increasing Living Wage accreditation throughout Lambeth. Work in partnership with businesses and trade unions to make sure that the Living Wage works for both businesses and employees. Through the implementation of these measures, Lambeth can contribute to the creation of a more equitable community in which all residents have the opportunity to thrive.
The Liberal Democrats proposed an amendment to add an additional bullet to the resolutions:
Press local care providers that do not currently pay the London Living Wage to apply a £2 per hour boost to care workers’ minimum pay in order to make care careers more attractive and to improve staff retention.
Councillor Irfan Mohammed, for Labour, spoke of the council’s commitment to promoting fair pay in the borough. He said that the council was “the ones taking action, fighting for workers and creating fair pay”.
Councillor Ben Curtis, for the Liberal Democrats, expressed support for the Labour motion but pointed out that it did not include proposals to increase the pay of care workers. He argued that care workers were among the poorest paid in the health service and that this was a factor in poor staff retention in the sector.
Councillor Scott Ainslie, for the Greens, argued that Labour was not doing enough to tackle poverty in the borough. He said that increasing the cost of temporary accommodation, cutting council tax support and proposing to cut frontline services contradicted the message of the motion.
The Liberal Democrat amendment was not carried and the original Labour motion was carried.
Reduce Single Use Plastics Consumption and Waste in Lambeth
The Green group proposed a motion calling on the Council to reduce the consumption and disposal of single-use plastics in the borough. The motion was not debated.
The Liberal Democrats proposed an amendment that added an additional bullet to the list of things the council should ask the government to do as part of the motion:
Aiming for the complete elimination of non-recyclable SUPs within three years.
The Liberal Democrat amendment to the Green motion was not carried and the original Green motion was not carried.
Defibrillator Access and Training in Lambeth
Councillors debated a motion from the Labour group calling for improved access to, and training in the use of, defibrillators in the borough.
Defibrillators are devices that can be used to restart the heart of a person who is having a cardiac arrest.
Labour proposed that the council should:
Push for and promote first aid training (including CPR and defibrillator training) in Lambeth, alongside our NHS partners and bodies like the British Heart Foundation and the Resuscitation Council UK. Raise awareness of the location of defibrillators in the borough. Encourage businesses, schools and community groups to register defibrillators with The Circuit and to move to 24/7 public access. Signpost community groups and funds to grant funding for new defibrillators, particularly in areas with poor existing provision. Push housing associations and other public bodies to install new publicly accessible defibs.
The Green group proposed an amendment to add an additional bullet to the list of things the council should do as part of the motion:
Introduce compulsory training sessions in schools to pupils and staff that includes awareness of ‘The Circuit’.
The Liberal Democrats also proposed an amendment, adding two bullets to the list of things the council should do as part of the motion:
Encourage clear signage around their location and developing a dedicated app with automatic location detection to help people find them in an emergency.
Ask The Circuit to create a simple system for the public to report missing or damaged defibrillators, and to reflect this status information in the entry for each defibrillator on its website.
and replacing one:
Push housing associations and other public bodies to install new publicly accessible defibs.
with:
Ensure housing associations and other public bodies to install new, publicly accessible defibs.
and adding a bullet to the list of things the council should ask the government to do:
Ask the Leader of the Council to write to the Government asking for a statutory requirement to register defibrillators with the Circuit.
Councillor David Robson, for Labour, spoke about the importance of defibrillators in saving lives. He said “defibrillators can make the difference between life and death” and that “we must make sure that the public are fully aware of the importance of defibrillators and how to use them”.
Councillor Scott Ainslie, for the Greens, argued that first aid training should be compulsory in schools and that the council should work with housing associations to ensure that all their properties had access to defibrillators. He said that “we need to make sure that everyone in Lambeth has access to a defibrillator in an emergency”.
Councillor Donna Harris, for the Liberal Democrats, supported the motion but pointed out that many of the defibrillators in Lambeth were not properly registered or maintained. She said that “we need to make sure that all defibrillators in Lambeth are registered with The Circuit and that they are regularly checked and maintained”.
The Green amendment to the Labour motion was not carried, the Liberal Democrat amendment to the Labour motion was not carried, and the original Labour motion was carried.
Towards a Social Model of Disability
Councillors debated a motion from the Labour group calling on the Council to follow a social model of disability when delivering services to disabled people in the borough.
The social model of disability is a framework for understanding disability that sees disability as a result of the way society is organised, rather than as a result of a person's impairment.
Labour proposed that the Council should:
Follow the approach requested by people with disabilities, which is to look at how our communities can adapt and include people with disabilities. Continue to work with our disability advisors from groups such as Disability Advice Service Lambeth (DASL) to improve access and remove barriers. Strengthen employment pathways for disabled residents, working with local businesses and trade unions to increase opportunities and encourage disability-confident workplaces. Ensure council communications and services are accessible in multiple formats. Continue to become an Age Friendly borough, becoming the best place to age well by 2030. Equity and inclusion will be central to this effort.
The Greens proposed an amendment that added a new bullet to the list of things the council should do:
That Active Lambeth continue to improve accessibility at their centres through awareness training for staff, upkeep of lifts and other equipment, and adequate signage.
and changed one:
Continue to work with our disability advisors from groups such as (DASL) to improve access and remove barriers.
to:
Continue to work with our disability advisors from groups such as (DASL) to ensure improved awareness, reliability and ease of access and removing barriers of all kinds. Including dropped kerbs, regular pavement repair, and removal of obstructions.
The Liberal Democrats also proposed an amendment that added a new bullet to the list of things the council should do:
That residents with disabilities currently housed in TA, need adapted and accessible social housing as a priority.
and changed one:
Continue to work with our disability advisors from groups such as (DASL) to improve access and remove barriers.
to:
Continue to work with our disability advisors from groups such as (DASL) and Age UK to improve access and remove barriers.
Councillor Tina Valcarcel, for Labour, said that “we need to make sure that we are listening to the needs of disabled people and are doing everything we can to make our borough accessible to everyone”.
Councillor Scott Ainslie, for the Greens, supported the motion but said that Labour needed to do more to promote disability rights in Lambeth. He called for improved access to Active Lambeth leisure centres, including awareness training for staff. He also highlighted the need for improved street accessibility for disabled pedestrians, including the installation of dropped kerbs and the removal of street obstructions.
Councillor Matthew Bryant, for the Liberal Democrats, supported the motion and spoke about the need for better housing for disabled people. He said that “we need to make sure that disabled people have access to suitable accommodation that meets their needs”.
The Green amendment to the Labour motion was not carried, the Liberal Democrat amendment to the Labour motion was carried and the motion, as amended, was carried.
-
A Private Members Bill is a bill introduced into parliament by an MP who is not a government minister. Private Members Bills rarely become law. ↩
Attendees
- Alison Inglis-Jones
- Andrew Collins
- Annie Gallop
- Ben Curtis
- Ben Kind
- Christine Banton
- Claire Holland
- Danial Adilypour
- David Amos
- David Bridson
- David Oxley
- David Robson
- Deepak Sardiwal
- Deputy Mayor, Adrian Garden
- Diogo Costa
- Dominic Armstrong
- Donatus Anyanwu
- Donna Harris
- Dr. Mahamed Hashi
- Emma Nye
- Fred Cowell
- Ibrahim Dogus
- Ibtisam Adem
- Irfan Mohammed
- Isla Wrathmell
- Issa Issa
- Jackie Meldrum
- Jacqui Dyer
- James Bryan
- Jessica Leigh
- Jim Dickson
- Joanne Simpson
- Joe Dharampal-Hornby
- Judith Cavanagh
- Liam Daley
- Linda Bray
- Liz Atkins
- Malcolm Clark
- Marcia Cameron
- Maria Kay
- Marianna Masters
- Martin Abrams
- Martin Bailey
- Martin Tiedemann
- Matthew Bryant
- Mayor, John-Paul Ennis
- Nanda Manley-Browne
- Nicole Griffiths
- Olga FitzRoy
- Paul Gadsby
- Pauline George
- Rebecca Spencer
- Rezina Chowdhury
- Saleha Jaffer
- Sarah Cole
- Sarbaz Barznji
- Sarina Da Silva
- Scarlett O'Hara
- Scott Ainslie
- Timothy Windle
- Tina Valcarcel
- Tom Swaine-Jameson
- Verity McGivern
Documents
- Appendix B parenting strategy v1.2
- Council Motions - 22 January 2025 other
- Agenda frontsheet Wednesday 22-Jan-2025 19.00 Council agenda
- Public reports pack Wednesday 22-Jan-2025 19.00 Council reports pack
- Minutes of Previous Meeting other
- Council Questions - 22 January 2025 other
- Appointment of Chief Executive
- Constitution Report - Full Council
- Appendix 1 - Schedule of Changes
- Appendix 2 - Lambeth Council Constitution 22.01.25 other
- Special Urgency Report
- Corporate Parenting Board Annual Report 2023-24
- Appendix A Lambeth Corporate Parenting Annual Report 2023-24