The Eastbourne Borough Council Conservation Advisory Group meeting on 11 June 2024 focused on energy efficiency in protected settings and considered two significant planning applications. The group expressed concerns about both applications, urging applicants to work with officers to develop more appropriate proposals.

Energy Efficiency and Retrofit in Protected Settings

Alex Moojen, Conservation Officer, presented a briefing on encouraging energy efficiency and managing retrofit considerations for listed buildings and conservation areas. The discussion covered the placement of solar panels, evolving standpoints by bodies such as Historic England, options for window frames and glazing, and the importance of educating the public on these issues. The group also noted the regular public drop-in advice sessions at The Beacon shopping centre and the status of a window audit across conservation areas.

Planning Applications for Consideration

Manor Garden Cottage, 25 Compton Place Road, Eastbourne BN20 8AB – Ref: 230811

Chris Connelley, Conservation Specialist, introduced the proposal for the demolition and alterations, including a two-storey extension, roof terrace, and basement excavation at Manor Garden Cottage. The group unanimously expressed serious concerns about the lack of detail and the proposed three-storey intervention. They felt the application did not preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area or respect the adjacent listed building. The applicant was invited to work with officers to generate a more sensitive proposal.

10 Pevensey Road, Eastbourne, BN21 3HP – Ref: 240025

The proposal involved a full-height extension to the side of 21 Susans Road, excavation to form a courtyard and stairway, and reinstatement of lightwells. The group felt the previously approved scheme was superior and expressed concerns about the loss of railings, deep light wells, and changes to the roof and window design. They noted the over prominence of the front extension and requested that officers liaise with the applicant to reconsider the design.

For more details, you can refer to the Public reports pack and the Printed minutes of the meeting.