Subscribe to updates

You'll receive weekly summaries about Greenwich Council every week.

If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.

Inclusive Economy and Culture Scrutiny Panel - Tuesday, 8th April, 2025 6.30 pm

April 8, 2025 View on council website  Watch video of meeting or read trancript
AI Generated

Summary

The Inclusive Economy and Culture Scrutiny Panel met to discuss support for local arts and culture organisations, community wealth building, and the night-time economy in Greenwich. The panel agreed to recommend that the council improve communication about available support to arts organisations and explore the creation of a forum for these organisations to connect. Additionally, the panel recommended the creation of designated bays for delivery bikes in Woolwich.

Small and Medium Sized Arts and Cultural Organisations

The panel assessed the current environment for small to medium-sized arts and cultural organisations in the borough and considered ways to better support them. Representatives from several organisations, including Greenwich and Docklands Festivals, Let's All Dance Ballet Company, the Jovencloca Foundation, and a community bread-making project, shared their experiences.

Bradley of Greenwich and Docklands Festivals spoke of the importance of partnership support from the council, especially in a time of reduced public subsidy. He highlighted the need for communication and relationship-building to help the festival thrive.

Maureen Sutton, who runs the Let's All Dance Ballet Company, described the challenges of remaining self-sufficient and the impact of small grants from the council, which enabled her company to take their work into schools. She noted the difficulty in accessing larger funding bodies like the Arts Council.

Helen Sorrell, who ran a community bread-making project with a small grant from Greenwich Council, suggested a lighter touch to paperwork and application processes for small grants, as well as opportunities for cheap insurance and council venues.

Esther from the Jovencloca Foundation highlighted the difficulty small organisations face when competing with larger organisations for funding.

Following the presentations, Councillor Clare Burke-McDonald asked about bid writing support for organisations applying to the Arts Council. Council officers responded by outlining the support that is available, including Grant Finder, a free online tool, and direct assistance from the deputy culture manager. Anne Mullins, Interim Head of Culture, suggested contacting the Arts Council Relationship Manager for mentoring through the bidding process.

Michelle Rankin, Assistant Director, Economy and Skills, mentioned business support programmes, including one delivered by CNT, specifically around supporting co-operatives, community interest companies, and social enterprises. She also mentioned the Greenwich Neighbourhood Growth Funding (GNGF), which could provide funding for projects.

Councillor Burke-McDonald suggested a recommendation to ensure all organisations in the borough are aware of and have access to available support. This was supported by Councillor Issy Cooke, Chair of the Inclusive Economy and Culture Scrutiny Panel, who acknowledged the council could improve its communication about available resources.

Councillor Simon Peirce suggested establishing a forum or surgery where arts organisations can connect and share information regularly. The council responded that a creative network for arts and cultural organisations is being scoped as part of the Cultural Strategy Delivery Plan.

In response to a question about Greenwich Giving, officers said they would take the question away and come back to members.

In a final opportunity for comments, guests reiterated that funding is the number one ask, but also requested a lighter touch on paperwork and more proactive communication from the council.

Community Wealth Building

The panel evaluated the Community Wealth Building Strategy from 2022, based on an evaluation report. Councillor Aidan Smith introduced the report, which provided an in-depth evaluation of the strategy's impact over the past two years, alongside key recommendations for the future.

Councillor Smith noted that the council initially began working with the Centre for Local Economic Strategies (CLES) in 2021 to establish a Greenwich approach to community wealth building, and the strategy itself was adopted in 2022. Anchor Dean Greenwich was established as a delivery partner in September 2022.

Councillor Smith reported that the number of London Living Wage-accredited businesses had increased by 54% since the scheme was launched, benefiting over 24,000 workers and significantly raised wages for almost 7,500 of the lowest-paid workers in the borough. The council has also worked with anchor organisations like the University of Greenwich, the local Chamber of Commerce, and Peabody to host business breakfasts.

Councillor Smith stated that Anchor Partners had spent £3.3 billion, with 6.9% (£228 million) spent with suppliers based in Greenwich, and £1.6 billion spent in London, supporting over 25,000 jobs in the regional economy.

The evaluation highlighted areas for improvement, including recommendations to:

  • Renew the partnership with updated commitments.
  • Invest in a dedicated coordinator to maintain engagement and drive initiatives.
  • Broaden the living wage subgroup to focus on overall employment, especially in deprived areas.
  • Create a new decarbonisation subgroup.
  • Explore collective actions on how the partnership can best use its land and assets.
  • Strengthen procurement processes to enhance local supplier spend and measure social value.

Councillor Smith reported widespread support for members to renew their pledges with updated commitments.

Councillor Clare Burke-McDonald asked about private sector engagement in the Anchored in Greenwich partnership, as membership seemed to lean towards the public and third sectors. She also asked how to increase the number of employers in the borough paying the London Living Wage.

Officers clarified that anchor organisations are typically large employers with significant land, assets, and purchasing power, and are embedded in the community. While private sector companies like AEG actively participate, the focus is on organisations with sticky capital that are not easily extracted from the local economy.

In response to the living wage question, officers stated that the council aims to continue increasing the number of accredited London Living Wage employers in the borough.

Councillor Simon Peirce asked about the definition of anchor institutions and whether it could be widened to include large organisations like Jewelry Coffee in Woolwich. Officers clarified that it is about purchasing power rather than the size of an individual business, and smaller businesses are typically represented via the Chamber of Commerce.

Councillor Smith added that the purpose of the anchor organisations is to keep as much of the billions of spending power within the borough as possible, ensuring that local organisations can bid for contracts and grow their businesses.

Councillor Burke-McDonald inquired about the inclusion of developers in the partnership, and officers explained that developers are not typically included due to their impermanence. However, construction companies are invited to events like the Meet the Buyer event to connect with the supply chain.

Councillor Aidan Smith suggested that to make the partnerships sustainable over the long term, the council should show private companies that these partnerships improve their commercial sustainability or bottom line. Officers responded that the council is an equal partner in the initiative, and there are conversations about anchor partners contributing towards the cost of a dedicated coordinator.

Night Time Economy

The panel considered a report on the impact of activities and initiatives supporting the borough’s evening and night-time economy. Councillor Aidan Smith introduced the report, noting the challenges in engaging the police due to their focus on nightclubs when discussing the night-time economy.

Councillor Smith clarified that the report focuses on venues like restaurants, cafes, pubs, cinemas, and theatres that provide activities for people to do in the evening, particularly on weekends. About 50% of workers in the borough work during these hours.

Councillor Smith highlighted successful initiatives like the High Streets for All in Greenwich Town Centre and the night-time enterprise zone in Woolwich, which have boosted the local economy and supported night workers. The report emphasizes balancing economic growth with residents' quality of life and the need for ongoing partnership working, particularly with the police.

Councillor Smith also noted the significant amount of student and co-living accommodation being built in Woolwich, which will shift the demographic to a much younger population. She stressed the need to provide activities for these residents and encourage them to spend time and money in Woolwich rather than traveling to central London.

Councillor Simon Peirce raised concerns about the business mix in Woolwich, particularly the high percentage of takeaways, which can lead to issues with delivery bikes and pedestrian safety. He suggested focusing on attracting more cafes, restaurants, and bars.

Marcus, Interim Head of Business, stated that the council is looking at enhanced town centre management in Woolwich, Eltham and Greenwich town centres, which will address the management of takeaway courier bikes and other uses in the town centre.

Councillor Burke-McDonald asked about engaging the community and police in Eltham, as the council is looking to expand the night-time economy there. Marcus responded that the council is forming an Eltham Town Center marketing and events partnership group and will ensure businesses utilizing the night-time economy are present at those meetings. He also stated that the council will be developing a night-time strategy for the whole borough and will engage with businesses, community members, residents, young people, and night workers in the process.

Councillor Smith added that the council is working with Safer Spaces colleagues to invest in a nighttime shift in town centres to provide a uniformed presence and generate a sense of safety. She also noted that the council cannot control the police, as they are often abstracted to major central London events.

Councillor Aidan Smith raised concerns about the licensing department, citing an example of a respectable premises being refused a license to sell wine to take away in the evening. Councillor Smith responded that the licensing policy needs to be aligned with the night-time economy strategy and that resident concerns need to be considered.

Councillor Peirce suggested outdoor dining in enclosed gazebos to contain noise and allow people to go out. Councillor Smith responded that the council is looking at using igloo-type pods for outdoor dining.

Councillor Peirce also suggested meanwhile use for empty units, such as the old Borough Hall, and asked about Woolwich Market. Councillor Smith responded that the electrics and plumbing in Woolwich Market are in poor condition. She also stated that the council needs to go higher up the chain to talk to British Land about the empty New Look unit in Woolwich.

Councillor Burke-McDonald stated that she and Councillor Obermuller have been asking transport to put in bays in Greenwich Town Centre for delivery riders, but they have been told they don't have the staffing capacity to do it. Councillor Smith offered to have that conversation with them. She also stated that the council is looking at a designated area off Powis Street for delivery riders and may need to put in a Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) to enforce it.

Councillor Smith also mentioned issues with line bikes being dumped inconsiderately in Greenwich Town Centre and stated that the council needs to work with them to ensure they are not littered across the town centre.

Councillor Peirce noted that there are no business improvement districts (BIDs) in Greenwich and asked why. Officers responded that the business rate base is the answer.

The panel agreed to recommend the creation of designated bays for delivery bikes in Woolwich.

Commissioning of Future Reports

The panel noted the work items scheduled for the next meeting on 23 April 2025, including an update on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) programme and a Cabinet Member Update (Equality, Culture & Communities).

Attendees

Profile image for Councillor Issy Cooke
Councillor Issy Cooke  Reform UK
Profile image for Councillor Rowshan Hannan
Councillor Rowshan Hannan  Labour •  East Greenwich
Profile image for Councillor Sam Littlewood
Councillor Sam Littlewood  Labour and Co-operative •  Woolwich Arsenal
Profile image for Councillor Simon Peirce
Councillor Simon Peirce  Labour and Co-operative •  Eltham Park and Progress
Profile image for Councillor Sandra Thomas
Councillor Sandra Thomas  Labour and Co-operative •  Plumstead and Glyndon
Profile image for Councillor Aidan Smith
Councillor Aidan Smith  Labour •  Greenwich Park
Profile image for Councillor Charlie Davis
Councillor Charlie Davis  Deputy Leader of the Opposition •  Conservative •  Eltham Town and Avery Hill
Maya Yasunaga

Meeting Documents