Subscribe to updates
You'll receive weekly summaries about Islington Council every week.
If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.
Health, Wellbeing and Adult Social Care Scrutiny Committee - Monday, 11th November, 2024 7.30 pm
November 11, 2024 View on council website Watch video of meetingSummary
The Health, Wellbeing and Adult Social Care Scrutiny Committee noted a report on Adult Social Care performance for the first quarter of 2024-25, received evidence from witnesses about adult social care accommodation, and noted a report about adult social care accommodation costs.
Adult Social Care Accommodation
The committee received evidence from Jeremy Porteus, the chief executive of the Housing Learning and Improvement Network (Housing LIN),1 and Ian Copeman, the business director at Housing LIN. Councillor Croft asked about the challenges that densely populated areas like Islington face with regards to providing adult social care accommodation. Mr Porteus said that there was a trend towards “vertical living” in high-density areas. He noted that the quality of the accommodation was an important consideration and that proximity to public transport, green space and local amenities was important. Mr Copeman gave the example of Westminster City Council's work to demolish low density sheltered accommodation on prime sites to develop new social housing.
Councillor Bligh asked about the affordability of intergenerational housing, to which Mr Porteus replied that this type of accommodation was being developed for the new town of Barking and Dagenham,2 and that these were not designed to be a care offer in themselves, but rather places where housing was “age-friendly”, in that it could be easily adapted to meet the needs of older adults. Mr Copeman spoke about a scheme being developed by the London Borough of Haringey that would encourage older adults to move from larger social housing properties, by offering attractive multi-generational housing options.
Councillor Burgess noted that while there were limited opportunities to create sheltered housing in the borough, it was important to remember that older people needed to be supported to remain in the community, and asked how this could be achieved. Mr Copeman said that the Better Care Fund could be used to provide Disabled Facilities Grants, enabling older adults to adapt their homes to meet their needs. He added that the role of occupational therapists in assessing people's needs was important. He also noted that by providing attractive alternative housing, councils could release family-sized properties to the wider housing market, relieving pressure on other areas of the housing market, like homelessness services.
Councillor Choudhury asked what the Housing LIN's advice was for providing culturally appropriate housing for people from black and minority ethnic communities in Islington. Mr Copeman said that it was important for providers to ensure that their services were “culturally competent”. For example, frontline staff should understand the needs of different communities, and where food is being provided, it should reflect the dietary needs of residents. He also noted that it was important to understand the demand for multi-occupancy housing amongst people from these communities.
Councillor Choudhury also asked for advice on how to solve the shortage of care homes and supported housing in Islington. Mr Copeman said that the council should undertake a short-term asset review to understand the suitability of the existing housing stock to meet the needs of older adults. In the medium-to-long term, he said that the council should use the government’s five-year plan to understand the type of accommodation that is needed, and that it should not just focus on providing one type of accommodation, but rather a range of options to meet different needs, including those of people living with dementia.
Councillor Croft asked about what should be included in the government's National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Mr Porteus said that the framework should explicitly address the needs of older people. He added that there was a need for clear guidance for local authorities on what planning classifications were most suitable for extra care housing, and what supplementary planning guidance local authorities should produce to ensure that new housing meets the needs of older people.
Quarter One Performance Report - Adult Social Care
The committee noted the Quarter One Performance Report – Adult Social Care. Councillor Croft expressed his concern that the report did not contain much information about budget targets or lines of reporting, making it difficult for the committee to understand how costs were being controlled. He specifically asked about the use of spot placements in adult social care, noting that this could contribute significantly to the council's costs. Jody Pilling, the Director of Strategic Commissioning and Investment at Islington Council, responded that the use of block and spot contracts was a complex issue, and that the council was committed to finding ways to reduce the use of spot placements, but that this was not always possible.
Councillor Croft asked about how the council’s target of 50 new admissions to residential care homes per quarter was set, given that there were only 37 new admissions in Quarter One. Ms Pilling said that the council reviews the targets for admissions to care homes each year, and that the current target reflects the trend in admissions since the start of the COVID19 pandemic.
Councillor Choudhury asked if the council’s reablement service was run in-house, and if this was the best model for providing the service. Ms Pilling responded that the service was run in-house and that it was achieving good outcomes for the residents who used it.
Councillor Choudhury asked if the council preferred to undertake reviews of care plans face-to-face or virtually. Ms Pilling said that face-to-face reviews were always preferred, as they enabled assessors to understand a person’s environment, but that virtual reviews were also undertaken. The choice of review method was informed by an assessment of risk.
Councillor Choudhury asked why more people were not opting to manage their own care through direct payments. Ms Pilling said that many people felt overwhelmed by the prospect of becoming an employer, and that there were difficulties in recruiting and retaining personal assistants.
Adult Social Care Accommodation Costs
The committee noted the report on Adult Social Care Accommodation Costs. Councillor Croft asked about the trend in accommodation costs, and if they had increased in line with inflation. Ms Pilling said that she did not have information about trends readily available, but would provide this to the committee. She noted that the council had a robust approach to agreeing cost uplifts with care providers and that the council was committed to providing a budget for this. She said that a complicated process was used to assess the costs of services, in consultation with other councils in North Central London, and that efforts were made to ensure that councils were not competing with each other for placements. She added that the council has a duty to ensure that care providers are paid a fair amount, in line with inflation, so that there is a sustainable care market that offers choice to residents. She noted that the council’s duty to ensure a sustainable market must also be balanced with the responsibility to manage the council’s finances.
Councillor Croft asked if the council had identified any trends with regards to hedge funds acquiring care homes and if this was contributing to increased costs. Ms Pilling said that the council had observed a trend in changing ownership amongst care providers, but that this was not contributing to increased prices in the same way it was in the children’s care market.
Councillor Choudhury noted that spot purchase placements were more expensive than the council’s block contracts. Ms Pilling said that spot purchase placements were not always more expensive than in-house provision, but that they were almost always more expensive than the council’s block contracts. She said that the cost of a spot purchase depended on the complexity of a person’s needs.
Councillor Choudhury asked about the possibility of using existing buildings, run by housing associations, to create new accommodation for older people. She cited the example of Cutbush, where several housing association-owned buildings were located. Ms Pilling said that the council talked to care providers regularly and was willing to explore all options. She said that the council was looking for “innovative solutions” to the lack of accommodation.
Councillor Croft asked about how the council’s Adult Social Care Accommodation Strategy related to the scrutiny review of adult social care accommodation. Ms Pilling said that the council was committed to ensuring that the strategy was a “live document”, and that any recommendations from the scrutiny review would be used to update the strategy. She added that she hoped the review would provide ideas about how to implement the ambitions contained in the strategy, given the challenges faced by the council.
Councillor Croft said that the strategy did not appear to address the issue of over-55s accommodation, citing the example of Crowfield House.3 Ms Pilling said that she would take this as an action point and that the council would review the strategy.
Councillor Croft said that he was struck by the example of Haringey’s work to create intergenerational housing, and said that it would be useful to understand how this might be incorporated into the strategy, given the need to release family-sized properties from “under occupation”.
Councillor Burgess noted that there had been a “drastic increase” in demand for housing for people with learning disabilities and asked about the council’s long-term plan for meeting this need. Ms Pilling said that the council was mindful of the growing demand and that it was important to think about developing a range of accommodation options, including supported housing. She said that the council was working with other councils in North Central London to develop appropriate options, and that it was important to understand the challenges involved in meeting the needs of a relatively small population.
Attendees
Documents
- Agenda frontsheet 11th-Nov-2024 19.30 Health Wellbeing and Adult Social Care Scrutiny Committee agenda
- Printed minutes 15102024 1930 Hea other
- Public reports pack 11th-Nov-2024 19.30 Health Wellbeing and Adult Social Care Scrutiny Committee reports pack
- Appendix 2 Accommodation Needs Assessment. Exec Final
- Appendix 1 ASC Accommodation Strategy. Exec Final
- LBIslington_ASC_Scrutiny_HousingLIN FINAL 111124 other
- ASC Accommodation Scrutiny - Accommodation costs
- ASCPerformance_Q1_2425 other
- Workplan 24 -25 - HWASC Scrutiny other