Content

The decision
 
The Licensing sub-committee, in considering
this decision from the information presented to it within the
report and at the hearing, has determined that having regard to the
promotion of the licensing objectives:
· 
The prevention of crime and disorder;
· 
Public safety;
· 
Prevention of public nuisance; and
· 
The protection of children from harm
 
And in particular upon consideration of the
objection notice given by the Metropolitan Police is satisfied that
the proposed event would undermine the licensing objectives.
Therefore, the Sub-Committee has served a counter notice.
 
Reasons for the
decision
 
The Licensing Sub-Committee took into
consideration the objection received from the Metropolitan Police
(“the Police”) to the Temporary Event Notice for the
period on 06/09/2025 from 00:01 finishing on 07/09/2025 at
03:00.
 
The Sub-Committee took into account the
Police’s representations regarding alleged breaches on 23rd
and 24th August 2025 in the Rivington Street area. The
Sub-Committee heard that Police witnessed the premises operating at
02:45 under a Temporary Event Notice which specifically described
the event as featuring live performers and that all conditions
would be followed in line with the premises licence. However, the
Police found the front doors were open with considerable noise
escaping. The music was being played by DJ’s.
 
The Sub-Committee heard allegations that this
was not the first time that these failures have been observed at
the premises, and this has been documented in previous warning
letters, objection emails and in meetings with the Premises
User.
 
The Sub-Committee took into consideration
representations from the Police about the open front doors,
excessive noise, and more than 30 people standing outside in excess
of the stipulated eight-person smoking area limit. The Police
stated that these issues have been documented, and despite
assurances from the premises that it would not happen again, it
consistently has. The Police made representations that the Police
are no longer willing to support any extension of hours until the
premises demonstrate that the premises can operate within its
current licensed hours.
 
The Sub-Committee heard from the Police that
if music can be heard in the street, it constitutes a noise
nuisance regardless of specific conditions. The Police also
confirmed that the premises sound-limiting device did not seem to
be working effectively, as evidenced by noise complaints from
neighbouring premises. The Police made representations that the
premises failed to comply with the requirements under the alfresco
trial. The Police witnessed 30 people were observed standing
outside with drinks during times outside the trial hours, despite
conditions requiring all patrons to be seated.
 
The Sub-Committee took into consideration the
Premises Users representations that they have hosted hundreds of
events with no issues and very few neighbour complaints, despite
acknowledging some initial errors, especially concerning the
alfresco dining. The Premises User made representations that they
are a young, growing brand trying to promote their business, and
have always adapted to feedback after meetings with the Police.
 
The Sub-Committee took into account the Police
concerns about the operation of the premises that would undermine
the licensing objectives and would have an impact on the area if
the event was permitted.
 
The Sub-Committee felt the Police evidence was
strong on why this temporary event should not take place. The
Sub-Committee therefore considered that allowing this event to take
place in accordance with the Temporary Event Notice would undermine
the licensing objectives. The Sub-Committee decided that it was
necessary and proportionate to issue a counter notice.