Decision Maker:

Outcome: Recommendations Approved

Is Key Decision?: No

Is Callable In?: No

Date of Decision: November 20, 2024

Purpose:

Content: Application 858M northern section   Councillor Mike Caswell proposed the officer’s recommendations, which were seconded by Councillor Philip Ham.   Having been duly proposed and seconded, the Strategic Planning Committee resolved that: ·       the part of the application 858M which sought to upgrade part of footpath WN23/40 to a bridleway from points A1 to A2 to A3 and add a bridleway from points A3 to B, as shown on Appendix 1 to the officer’s report, be refused ·       an Order be made, the effect of which would be to amend the Definitive Map and Statement to upgrade part of footpath WN 23/40 from points A to A1 to a restricted byway, to add a restricted byway from points A1 to I to G to B and to upgrade part of footpath WN 23/38 from points B to C to a restricted byway as shown on Appendix 1. ·       an Order be made to amend the Definitive Statement to record footpath WN 23/40 as running from points X to A3 to A2 to A1 as shown on Appendix 1.   (Vote – 9 For, 2 Against)   Application 859   Councillor Mike Caswell proposed the recommendations, which were seconded by Councillor Edric Hobbs.   Having been duly proposed and seconded, the Strategic Planning Committee resolved that: ·       the part of the application which sought to upgrade footpath WN 23/12 from points CE2 to CE3 to CE4 to a bridleway, as shown on Appendix 1, be refused. ·       an Order be made, the effect of which would be to amend the Definitive Map and Statement to upgrade part of footpath WN 23/38, from points C to CE1 to CE2 to a restricted byway, as shown on Appendix 1. ·       an Order be made, the effect of which would be to amend the Definitive Map and Statement to add a footpath from points CE4 to E2, as shown on Appendix 1. ·       an Order be made, the effect of which would be to amend the Definitive Map and Statement to upgrade part of footpath WN 23/12 from points CE4 to CE5 to a restricted byway and to add a restricted byway from points CE5 to point E, as shown on Appendix 1.     (Vote – Unanimous)