Decision Maker: Finance and Resources Committee

Outcome: Recommendations Approved

Is Key Decision?: No

Is Callable In?: No

Date of Decision: February 10, 2026

Purpose:

Content: (1)      Councillor Cooke advised that he had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.1 (Council Financial Performance – Quarter 3, 2025/26) by virtue of him being a Council appointed observer on the Sport Aberdeen Board and also a member of the Integrated Joint Board. Having applied the objective test, he did not consider that he had an interest and would not be withdrawing from the meeting; (2)      Councillor Radley advised that she had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.1 (Council Financial Performance – Quarter 3, 2025/26) by virtue of her being a Council appointed member of the Integrated Joint Board. Having applied the objective test, she did not consider that she had an interest and would not be withdrawing from the meeting; (3)      Councillor Malik, advised that he had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.1 (Council Financial Performance – Quarter 3, 2025/26) by virtue of him being a Council appointed member of the Integrated Joint Board. Having applied the objective test, he did not consider that he had an interest and would not be withdrawing from the meeting; (4)      Councillor Greig, advised that he had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.1 (Council Financial Performance – Quarter 3, 2025/26) by virtue of him being a Council appointed member of the Integrated Joint Board. Having applied the objective test, he did not consider that he had an interest and would not be withdrawing from the meeting; and (5)      Councillor Brooks, advised that he had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.6 (Kincorth Cruyff Court OBC) by virtue of him being oil and gas company utilised as a Decommissioning and Optioneering SME (subject matter expert). Having applied the objective test, he did not consider that he had an interest and would not be withdrawing from the meeting.