Limited support for Carmarthenshire
We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for Carmarthenshire Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.
You can still subscribe!
If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.
If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.
If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.
Planning Committee - Tuesday, 12th March, 2024 1.00 pm
March 12, 2024 View on council website Watch video of meeting Read transcript (Professional subscription required)Summary
The council meeting primarily focused on two planning applications: the retention of a wooden structure and a touring caravan at a rural property, and a retrospective application for an extension and decking at a residential development. Both applications were approved despite some objections.
Retention of Wooden Structure and Touring Caravan: The council approved the retention of a wooden structure and a touring caravan used for ancillary domestic purposes. Proponents argued that removing the structures would be unsustainable and unnecessary since they could be replaced by similar structures under permitted development rights. Objectors were concerned about the precedent set by allowing deviations from initial conditions. The decision allows the property owner to maintain the current setup, which supports their horticultural activities.
Retrospective Application for Extension and Decking: The council approved a retrospective application for an extension and decking that had already been constructed, differing from originally approved plans. The developer argued that the changes were minor and did not adversely affect neighboring properties due to existing vegetation and distance. Objectors felt their privacy was compromised and expressed frustration over the developer's non-compliance with initial plans. The approval was granted with conditions to ensure no further privacy infringement, such as the installation of privacy screens and restrictions against using the roof as a balcony.
An interesting point in the meeting was the discussion about the lack of a prior site visit for the second application, which had been promised but not conducted due to COVID-19 restrictions. This issue highlighted procedural lapses and the impact of the pandemic on council operations.
Attendees
















Topics
No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.