Limited support for West Sussex

We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for West Sussex Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.

You can still subscribe!

If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.

If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.

If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“What legal technicalities blocked the Horsham village green?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on West Sussex and are not the council. About us

The council meeting focused on planning and rights of way issues, particularly concerning applications for village green status and public rights of way. Decisions were made on two main items: the registration of land as a town or village green in Horsham and a definitive map modification order in Stenning.

  1. Collingwood Road Green, Horsham: The application to register the land as a village green was denied. Supporters argued that the green had been used by the community for over 20 years, contributing to local well-being and social activities. Opponents, including the landowner, cited legal technicalities regarding the land's status as a highway, which legally allowed public use, thus negating the as of right usage required for village green status. The decision prevents the land from being developed but maintains its status as a highway, keeping it open for public use.

  2. Definitive Map Modification Order, Stenning: The council approved the addition of a footpath linking Mouse Lane to other public rights of way. Proponents, including local residents and the parish council, highlighted long-standing use and the path's importance for community access and connectivity to nature. The landowner opposed, citing concerns about potential conflicts with land management and conservation efforts. The approval formalizes the path, ensuring public access and potentially preventing future access disputes.

The meeting was marked by detailed legal discussions, particularly on the technical aspects of public rights and land use, reflecting the complexity of balancing private land rights with public access and community benefits.

Attendees

No attendees have been recorded for this meeting.

Topics

No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet Tuesday 19-Mar-2024 10.30 Planning and Rights of Way Committee
Plng_RoW_19.03.24_To_Follow_Item_Plus_Agenda_Update_Sheet Tuesday 19-Mar-2024 10.30 Planning and

Additional Documents

Plng_RoW_Minutes of_09.01.24_FINAL
WSCC04623_WSCC04723_Report
Plng_RoW_Minutes_of_05.12.23_FINAL
WSCC04623_WSCC04723_Appendix_3
Printed minutes Tuesday 19-Mar-2024 10.30 Planning and Rights of Way Committee
TVG 30.53 Collingwood Report
TVG 30.53 Collingwood Appendix 1a
TVG 30.53 Collingwood Appendix 1b
WSCC04623_WSCC04723_Appendix_6
Committee Presentation WSCC04623 and WSCC04723
DMMO 4_21 Steyning Report
DMMO 4_21 Steyning Appendix 1
DMMO 4_21 Steyning Appendix 3
DMMO 4_21 Steyning Appendix 2
Plng_RoW_19.03.23_Business_Planning_Report
WSCC04623_WSCC04723_Appendix_4
WSCC04623_WSCC04723_Appendix_5
TVG 30.53 Collingwood Appendix 3a
TVG 30.53 Collingwood Appendix 2
TVG 30.53 Collingwood Appendix 3b
Committee Presentation DMMO 421 Presentation