Limited support for West Sussex
We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for West Sussex Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.
You can still subscribe!
If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.
If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.
If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.
Planning and Rights of Way Committee - Tuesday, 19 March 2024 10.30 am
March 19, 2024 Planning and Rights of Way Committee View on council website Watch video of meeting Read transcript (Professional subscription required)Summary
Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on West Sussex and are not the council. About us
The council meeting focused on planning and rights of way issues, particularly concerning applications for village green status and public rights of way. Decisions were made on two main items: the registration of land as a town or village green in Horsham and a definitive map modification order in Stenning.
Collingwood Road Green, Horsham: The application to register the land as a village green was denied. Supporters argued that the green had been used by the community for over 20 years, contributing to local well-being and social activities. Opponents, including the landowner, cited legal technicalities regarding the land's status as a highway, which legally allowed public use, thus negating the
as of right
usage required for village green status. The decision prevents the land from being developed but maintains its status as a highway, keeping it open for public use.Definitive Map Modification Order, Stenning: The council approved the addition of a footpath linking Mouse Lane to other public rights of way. Proponents, including local residents and the parish council, highlighted long-standing use and the path's importance for community access and connectivity to nature. The landowner opposed, citing concerns about potential conflicts with land management and conservation efforts. The approval formalizes the path, ensuring public access and potentially preventing future access disputes.
The meeting was marked by detailed legal discussions, particularly on the technical aspects of public rights and land use, reflecting the complexity of balancing private land rights with public access and community benefits.
Attendees
No attendees have been recorded for this meeting.
Topics
No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.
Meeting Documents
Agenda
Additional Documents