Transcript

Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the Licensing Subcommittee. My name is Councillor Shuba Hussein and I am the chair of the Licensing Subcommittee. This meeting is being held in person. Committee members and key participants are present in the meeting room and there may be some joining us online today. This meeting is being filmed for the Council's website for public viewing. I would remind members at the meeting to only speak on my direction and to speak clearly into the microphones to ensure that their contributions can be properly recorded. Can the members introduce themselves, please? Councillor Lilloo Ahmed, my line of work. Councillor Mohamed, please? Could the officers introduce themselves, please? Laveen Miller-Johnson, Licensing. Simi Yasmin, Democratic Services. Jonathan Melnick, Legal Services. Washington Any Licensing Section. Thank you. Do we have any apologies? No chair, no apologies. Do members have any disclosible pecuniary interests? None, chair. Thank you. None for me as well. Members, please note the rules and procedures on page 19 to 18 of the agenda. Can members please note and agree the minutes of the meetings held on 19 and 24 September? Thank you. Simi, could you announce the application, please? Thank you, chair. Item 4.1 is the application for a new premises licence for ZNH One Vice Ltd, 46 Brick Lane, London, E16RF. Chair, for this application we have Zing Zhao Hu, who has joined us virtually today, and those that have made representation, we have Mr Moshen Ali from Licensing Authority, who is joining us in person, and Mr O'Leary, who is the Environmental Health Officer, who has joined us virtually. After the application has been presented, the applicant will be invited to speak and will be given a total of five minutes to make their representation. The objectors will also be given five minutes each to make their representation. I'll let each speaker know when they have one minute remaining. Please note that the sub-committee have read the agenda pack in advance. Thank you, chair. Thank you, Simi. Could I ask Laveen Miller-Johnson, the licensing officer, to introduce the report, please? Thank you, chair. This is an application for a new premises licence for ZNH One Rice Ltd. This is at 46 Brick Lane, E16RF. This premises falls within the Brick Lane Communitive Impact Area. The applicant has described the premises as a restaurant. The hours that have been applied for are for late night refreshment, Monday to Sunday, from 2300 hours to 0400 hours the following day. A reduction of hours has been agreed with the police and amendments have been made as follows. Sunday to Thursday from 700 hours until 0000 hours. Friday and Saturday from 700 hours until 0100 hours the following day. Opening times, Monday to Sunday, from 700 hours until 400 hours the following day. Opening hours that have been agreed with the police are Sunday to Thursday from 700 hours until 0000 hours and Friday and Saturday from 700 hours until 0100 hours the following day. A copy of the application can be found at Appendix 1, which is pages 60 to 76. A site plan of the premises can be found at Appendix 2, which is page 78. Maps of the surrounding area is at Appendix 3, which is page 80. A photograph of the premises can be found at Appendix 4, which is pages 82 to 83. Other licensed venues can be found at Appendix 5, which is pages 85 to 90. Representations that have been received can be found at Appendix 6 to 9. Representations from responsible authorities is Appendix 6 and 7, and that is pages 92 to 99. Other representations are at Appendix 8 to 9, which is pages 101 to 105. Conditions that have been agreed at pages 107 to 117. This is set out clearer on page 53. Guidance can be found for Members at pages 119 to 144, which is Appendices 12 to 18. Diolch yn fawr. A wnaiff y Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog ddarparu cwestiynau i'r NS. Yr un pethau y mae ei gael yw bod y director trafodaeth o'r Mae'r amser arian wedi'i wneud o'r dyfodol diweuddol, Mae'r Amser Jiao Bing Chen. Rwy'n meddwl mai'n neisio, mae'n neisio. Mae'n tynnu, ydych chi'n cael ymddygiadau o'r afael â'i ymgyrch? Gallwch ddweud unig, dim ond? Gallwch ddweud unig, dim ond? Ydych chi'n dweud yna, ydych chi'n dweud unig, dim ond? Ydych chi'n dweud yna, ydych chi'n dweud unig, dim ond? Mae ydych chi'n dweud yna, ydych chi'n dweud unig, dim ond? Dydyn ni ddim yn unig o'r adeiladur wrth gynllunio'r adeiladur ym mhob o'r gynllunio. Byddwch chi'n niall ymlaen? Ie. Felly dydyn ni ddim yn unig o'r adeiladur wrth gynllunio'r adeiladur ym mhob. Roedd y cyfansoddiad a'i cynllunio o'r adeiladur wedi'i gael amdano. roedden nhw wedi'i ddechrau i fod y diwydiant, ac mae yna diwydiant newydd o Mr. neu Ms. Dongrong Yu. A ydych chi'n gweithio â nhw i ddweud ymlaen â'r company hwn? Ie. Gallwch chi ddweud hynny yn ffaith iawn, Cymru. Ie. Can I now ask the applicant to present the application? You have five minutes. Sorry, you have five minutes. Mr Hu, you can start presenting now. Sorry, just a second. Mr Hu? Mr Hu? Did he? Mr Hu? Mr Hu? Did he? Mr Hu? Sorry. Mr Hu? You have four minutes now to tell us why you want this licence to be... So basically, now we're a Chinese restaurant and we opened about two months already and now we also have the personal licence for selling alcohols. I just applied for like one month ago and it's already passed the exam but the licence is still on the way. And, yeah. Would you like to say anything else? So, yeah, I think that's it. Mr Hu, this is obviously the company's application. The premises is operating in a cumulative impact zone. Can you perhaps address the subcommittee about what you understand by that and how you're not going to adversely impact on that? So basically, I think, as you all know, I already passed the exam for the personal licence. So all the questions I have been answered is through the exam. Mr Hu, congratulations on passing the exam. But could you explain to us what your understanding is of the Brick Lane CIA, the community impact assessment? Could you explain to us what you understand about the CIA, the community impact assessment, the Brick Lane community impact assessment? Sorry, just a second. Mr Hu, this is a license. Sorry, can I suggest that we defer this application into the suggestion that they comment on it? Mr Hu. I think for the moment, if I may, maybe the thing to do for the moment, if we adjourn this application, we can move on to the next one and then we can deal with Mr Hu after. It's not fair to the other people who are here. Mr Hu. I think we'll have to explain that when we come back. Mr Hu. Mr Hu, we're going to adjourn this meeting. We're going to go on to the next agenda and after. Sorry, do you think it's okay to turn the point for another time? Because I think my preparation is not right, as you can see. That's sensible. If I may, obviously there are representations from other peoples before you make a decision on that. Do Mr Ali and Mr O'Leary have any objections to this application coming back on another day, if the committee minded to agree to that? Chair, I wouldn't have any objections to it. It's only fair that he's prepared for the hearing. Yes, some applies to me. I do not have any objections to that. I think we'll be in the interest of him to, we can defer this. Thank you. That being so, you've got the authority to do that under the hearing regs if you think it's necessary in the public interest to consider the representations. Clearly Mr Hu is struggling and I would suggest perhaps you want to, you might wish to direct Mr Hu or whoever represents the company on the next occasion to appear in person so they can give the committee their full attention rather than appearing remotely. Mr Hu, yep, we can, you can come back another time, but next time if you could come in person that would be better. If we can. Would the 12th of December do for you? 12th December might be not, yeah. Is there other dates? Yeah, can we take this offline? I suggest that you maybe contact the applicant and suggest that you liaise around it, because it doesn't need to be now for all of us to hear. If I may, I mean, strictly speaking under the regs you are meant to fix the date on which it comes back. I think what we do is, I'd advise you that you fix it for the 12th of December. If that's problematic for the applicant then they can always apply for a further adjournment. Mr Hu, we'll make the next date for the 12th of December. If you have an issue with that you can get in contact and we can change the date if that's alright. Okay. Nice one, Mr Hu, thank you. Okay. Okay, thank you. Can I just suggest that, as we didn't know the identity of Mr Hu at the beginning, if we get some sort of formal letter or something or an email from one of the directors perhaps, authorising him to act on their behalf, it's just a suggestion that might clarify what his position is in relation to the company. Good idea. That's fair. And if you could do that, Mr Hu, if you got that. Yeah, sure. Or ideally, Mr Hu, turn up with whoever the director of the company is at the relevant time. It's Mr or Miss Long Rong Yu. If they're in per person then that should deal with the issue, okay? Okay, thank you, Mr Hu. Thank you. Mr Hu, you're welcome to leave, okay. Now, Simi, could you... Thank you, Chair. Item 4.2 is the application for a variation of a premises licence for Bourbon, Kisses from Nona, 387 Roman Road, London E35QR. Chair, for this application we have Mr Paul Greeno, who'll be representing the applicants, Mr Dominic Gibson and Mr Gareth Jones, who's joining in regards to the applicants. Persons who are making representation, we've got Mr O'Leary, who's joining us virtually, and we also have Mr Ben Preble, who is here as a supporting representation. After the application has been presented, the applicant will be invited to speak and will be given a total of 10 minutes to make their representation. The objectors will also be given 10 minutes each to make their representation. I'll let each speaker know when they have one minute remaining. Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Simi. Can I ask Livin Miller-Johnson, the licensing officer, to introduce the report, please? Thank you, Chair. This is an application for a variation of a premises licence for Bourbon, Kisses from Nona, 387 Roman Road, London E35QR. The applicant has described the variation as to extend the closing time sale of alcohol recorded music at the premises by one hour and add late night refreshments for Friday and Saturday plus New Year's Eve. A copy of the existing premises licence is enclosed at appendix 1, which is pages 152 to 161. A copy of the variation application is enclosed as appendix 2, pages 163 to 182. Maps of the venue are included as appendix 3, pages 184 to 185. Images of the premises can be found at appendix 4, pages 187 to 188. Details of the nearest licensed venues are included at appendix 5, pages 190. Representations have been received by Environmental Health. This can be found at appendix 6 to 9, pages 192 to 223. We've also received supporting representation. This can be found at appendix 10, pages 225 to 226. We also have a supplementary agenda, which is the objectors. Thanks very much. Thank you, Levine. Do members have any questions to the licensing officer? Can I now ask the applicant to present the application? By the way, could I ask the applicant to present the application? You have 10 minutes. Before we do that, is it all right if we can ask you all to introduce yourself? My name is Paul Greenoe and I'm here representing the applicants and will present the representation. My name is Dominic Gibson and I'm the owner operator of The Bourbon. My name is Ben Preble. I'm a local resident who lives within 100 metres or so from the restaurant. My name is Gareth Jones. I'm a local resident on Zeenum Road, which is 50 metres away. Thank you, Chair. As you've heard, the application is for an extension to the existing premises licence, the extension being for one hour on a Friday from 11pm to 12 midnight and a similar extension on a Saturday from 11pm to midnight. There have been four objectors, one being the responsible authority, in this case it's the environmental protection officer. She has made representations and has objected to the grant of the licence, the variation, I should say, full start, but has said that if Members are mindful to grant the licence, then she is asking for conditions to be imposed. What I would say with regards to the conditions is that if you are minded to impose conditions, there are three types of conditions that apply to a licence. There's the mandatory conditions, which are those that are the statutory ones. There's the proposed conditions, and they're the conditions that tend to be proposed by the applicant. Then there's the imposed conditions, which are ones that you consider are appropriate after hearing the evidence. There is case law with regards to conditions, and I am going to refer to a case of Bristol City Council v Bristol Magistrates Court and Summerfield Stores Ltd, specifically with regards to the suggested condition 2, that no noise shall emanate from the premises, nor vibration be transmitted through the structure of the premises, which gives rise to a public nuisance. In the Bristol case, the court specifically heard, in relation to noise nuisance, that justices were plainly familiar with the relevant statutory scheme of the Environment Protection Act 1990, and their conclusion that those other provisions seemed perfectly adequate, and that they heard no evidence to justify additional measures, was a conclusion that they were entitled to reach. Essentially, you shouldn't be imposing conditions that are dealt with by other statute, and in this case, the Environment Protection Act 1990 deals with statutory nuisance. It's defined within the Act, whereas the term public nuisance tends to be a bit more subjective, and the purpose of conditions is to make sure that not only the enforcing authority, but also the applicant and any member of the public understand what the condition actually means. The position with the term public nuisance, I would submit, is too vague, in that what is a public nuisance for one person may not be a public nuisance for another person. With regards to her objection generally, what I would say is that she doesn't support the application, because she says that it fails to comply with the Objective Licensing Act 2003 relating to public nuisance, and then she gives the following reasons. Noise breakout from the venue affecting neighbouring residents. Well, the premises has been operating for a number of years. The environment health officer hasn't actually mentioned that they have received any complaints at all regarding the operation of the premises. So it does strike me that there is an issue as to whether noise breakout from the venue will affect neighbouring residents, because there haven't been any complaints made to environment health or indeed any of the responsible authorities that there is a problem with noise emanating from the premises. The next objection is that from Mr Amit Patel. This objection, as you would have read the papers, is quite lengthy, and it does strike me very much that primarily he is asking for the committee to determine that the premises is a bar, not a restaurant. Now, I raise that because earlier this year the landlord tried to increase the rent of the premises, and the rent increase was on the basis that he said the premises was a bar, not a restaurant. That was kicked back. Shortly after that, Mr Patel moved in above the premises. It should be advised that Mr Patel is actually the son of the landlord. I consider that his objection is vexatious. Clearly what he is looking for is a decision from yourselves to say, no, we consider this premises to be a bar, not a restaurant, which will then be used by the landlord to say we want to increase Mr Gibson's rent. The licensing subcommittee should not be used for that purpose. There is guidance in the revised guidance issued under section 182, and your legal advisor will no doubt be able to point you to that, but there are now six paragraphs specifically dealing with relevant, vexatious and frivolous representations. I think that this comes into the category of vexatious. A representation may be considered to be vexatious if it appears to be intended to cause aggravation or annoyance, whether to a competitor or other person. I think that Mr Patel has a personal interest to get a determination which will benefit his father, who is the landlord. The next representation is from the business next door, which has been made by... He apparently lives above the business. Because of the nature of the operation and the premises, and I will get the witnesses to give us slightly more detail as to that, there's live music once a week, which finishes at 10.30. That's the time that Mr Gibson has said all live entertainment will finish. The recorded music is purely background music. You can have a conversation and not have to raise your voice. The background music is to provide atmosphere, no more, no less. It's not considered that the noise from recorded music was transmitted in such a way as has been described. The final representation is from a local resident who resides. The address hasn't been cited in the papers, and quite rightly so. I won't actually give, because I don't know where this person lives, save to say that when they sent the representation in, they just gave their address as 360 Roman Road. You'll be able to see this in the map on page 185. You'll see that 360 is actually Daring House. I have no idea where a bouncing Daring House this person lives. They might live at the front, which is diagonally opposite where the premises is, but they might live at the back. I'm kind of unsure how they can say what they did. If I can quickly ask the three people to speak. We'll start with Dominic. So we've got representations from Dominic Gibson and then Gareth Jones. Dominic Gibson is the owner of the premises that he would be entitled to speak. Mr Jones, who's a local resident, he hasn't made a representation. Mr Preble has, but Mr Preble is a separate party anyway, and we'll be able to speak separately, but Mr Jones won't be able to. All right, so you've got two minutes between Dominic and... Yeah, Dominic, you've got two minutes. Just to be clear, he's still got what's left of there, sorry, Mr Preble. Dominic, do you want to say a few words? If I can just quickly run through a couple of questions that he can answer. This was to ask if Dominic's got anything to say. Yes, what I'm going to do is elicit that from him by asking him a series of questions. Yeah, I'm so sorry, that's not how you normally deal with it. Sorry. No, I'm not being funny, but why can't the representative ask his witness a leading question so that that person can give the information? I'm so sorry, because normally we ask the questions. No, I know you're asking the questions, but all I'm doing is asking some basic questions of Mr Gibson to give you information so that I can limit what he says to the salient points. But, Paul, because you only had a minute left, if you can do it within 60 seconds, go for it. Okay, I did ask for more time. Clearly that has not been granted. I can deal with it within 60 seconds. Could you just briefly describe what the nature of the operational premises is? Okay, the Bourbon is a laid-back, stateside style diner, where we've got burgers, buffalo wings, all-American products from American—excuse me—beer, wine, because I'm trying to create a piece of America in East London. Thank you. You can turn your mic off now. Mr O'Leary, you have 10 minutes to make your presentation. Right. Thank you, Chair. Thank you. I'm obviously speaking on behalf of my colleague, Nicola Carso. I'm giving a licence to the chair and committee. I'm reviewing a variation of the premises licence application for cases from Nona, 3S7, Roman Road, E352. Mr O'Leary, can I ask you to put the camera on, please? Thank you. Okay, that's fine. I'm having reviewed a variation of premises licence application for cases from Nona, 3S7, Roman Road, London, E352. We have to consider the impact of the licence and objectives, particularly for environmental protection, the prevention of public nuisance and the prevention of noise generated from within the premises or outside to be causing disturbance to people in the vicinity. The applicant is proposing to extend licenceable hours from 2300 to midnight for Friday and Saturday, to include late night refreshments until midnight. While the extension is still within council framework hours, there is insufficient noise conditions in applicants' existing licence to promote the licence and objective for the prevention of public nuisance when extending the hours. For regulated entertainment, beyond 2300 hours. Hence, my colleague contacted the applicant's listo with the following conditions. Mr O'Leary, you can actually turn your camera off because you're breaking up. Okay. Can you hear me? Yeah, better. Noise sensitive premises. Residential premises in the enclosed proximity, including residential property, are both at 3S7A, Roman Road, and a large number of residential properties directly opposite Crane House, Roman Road. In my colleagues' view, the application assistant fails to comply with the objective of the licence and act 2003 relating to public nuisance for the following reasons. Noises break out from the venue affecting the residents, access and egress to and from the venue, including patrons outside the premises to smoke while the premises is in operation, hours of operation. Conclusion. Environmental protection does not support the application for cases from nona, 3S7, Roman Road, London, E35QR. For the following reason, there is a great likelihood of disturbance to residential premises from the impact of extending the hours for regulated entertainment. Recorded music beyond 2300 hours. The applicant has not provided sufficient information to show how they will promote the licence and objective for the prevention of public nuisance and noise condition we wish had not been agreed. If the committee is minded to grant this application, I will ask for the following condition to be considered. All windows and external doors shall be kept closed when regulated entertainment takes place except for the immediate access and egress of persons. No noise shall emanate from the premises. No vibration be transmitted through the structure of the premises. We will give rise to public nuisance. For us, we are required to consider potential nuisance and our aim is to prevent it. That's why these conditions were put forward by my colleague. Thank you. Rwy'n gobeithio am ben. Ben, rwy'n ymwneud ymlaen ac rwy'n mynd i'r diner. Rwy'n mynd ymlaen iawn. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Rwy'n mynd i ddiddordeb. Beth gallwch chi ddweud? Mae'n dweud nad oes un ffactor sy'n cael rhywbeth i'w wneud gyda'r brestrwm sy'n cael ymlaen o'u llysiau ar eu llysiau. Yn oed... Rwy'n gallu meddwl am unrhyw rheswm y mae hynny'n cael rhywbeth i'w wneud gyda'r ffordd yn y cyfle dda, yn y cyfle dda, yn y cyfle dda, yn y cyfle dda, yn y cyfle dda, a nesaf. ach, dyma, roedd! Byd reporter a bod wedi gatebu yn y cy bleidydd. Rwyf wedi dweud wrthynw, OVERLORD Shengleigh , drwch ogystal â'r an nailurt hyfforddiol diwygaethol. I'm struggling, you said Bristol City Council and? I finished with the case. Well, have you got a site out? I'm trying to find it on Westlaw without success, but if you've got a copy that'll be even better. Yes. The section I read of Frydman County in London. Is this your only copy? Oh, I'm sorry. Thank you. Thanks, Jenn. I baen ? Roedd Ysb可愛f ddweud cymeradon 7 ar Ùl hyn, ond mae o hyd i chikok yr Rydw i wedi'i ddweud y bydd yr aelod yn gweithio â'r prifysgol, felly mae hynny'n bwysig, wrth gwrs, ond os ydych chi'n mynd i'r cwestiwn a ydych chi'n mynd i'w ddweud, ond y pwynt ydych chi wedi'i wneud yw bod hynny'n rhan o'r ffordd y byddwch chi'n credu ei fod yn ffwrdd, y byddwch chi'n credu ei fod yn ffwrdd, felly mae'n ffwrdd i'r un peth, ond byddwn i'n gweithio â'r cwestiwn mets yna o'ddi ar yr un prifysgol, y peth 2 mawr ar y stra Danish. A all barsam, gall efallai i chi ddweud y gallwn i agoredi fod e'th fod yn ffwrdd? Nid. Yn ystodiedig o'r dydd, nid yn yau… nid amddiff rằngwyd hynny, mae'n ysgolbwynou pwbiliauEC Mae'n rhaid i chi ddysgu a ydych chi'n bwysig y byddai'r ymddygiad yn ddaethol. Allwn i'n ddweud y byddai'r ymddygiad, a byddai'r ymddygiad yn gwybod, mae'n gwybod'r ymddygiad ac mae'n gwybod'r ymddygiad'n ddaethol, felly gallai'n gwybod y pethau cyntaf. Gallai hefyd yn canolbwyntio y byddai'r ymddygiad wedi mynd yn ymddygiad, nid yn ymddygiad y byddai'r ymddygiad wedi gallu gweithio'r ymddygiad. Ac yn y pethau hynny, rydw i wedi gwneud ymddygiad, nid wedi mynd yn ymddygiad fel y byddai'r ymddygiad. Mae'n gwybod y byddai'r ymddygiad yn gwybod y pethau cyntaf yn ymddygiad, ac mae'n gwybod hynny'n dweud ymddygiad yn un pwynt, lle mae'n gwybod y pethau cyntaf i ddeall a yw'r ymddygiad yw'r bar yn ymddygiad. Dyna llawer. Gwnaed fan hynny, mae'i bassio'r ymddygiad yn unrhyw ganddo am hoe esasoddiad y son ni o'r bar. Felly, o es yea'n penancem 7,��고 206,.. Rydw i ddim yn gweld yn y fflym但, ond byddai'n ما dormir yn poeni yn ymgwybod y tîm ep blanket yr 11. Ie, mae hynny'n g Sulga 500 gа ashoud, ac rydw i'n dalu o gael ei hbHH fall Genedla---- Mae hynny'n daol i fаith i niلام. Rwy'n credu bod pobl byddai'n mynd i'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'n mynd i'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Byddai'r ffenu ar 11.00 p.m. Mae unrhyw un o'r bobl yn ystod ymlaen. Rwy'n meddwl bod nid oes rhywbeth i'w ddangos bod y bobl wedi'i ddangos i'r ystod, neu, yn oed, wedi'i ddangos i'r ystod. Mae pobl yn mynd i'r Rhomond Rhywbeth. A byddai'n rhaid i'r bobl... Felly, dwi'n credu eich bod chi'n gwybod fy modd. Gyda fis raise yn gallu iftב׏ tiddd â'r pobl r deutlichedd, a wel, ond yn ddangos ag at 중rwydd i'w hoffi, ond mae cyflawr iawn felbl. Rwy'n ceisio tadiud감 sy'n ceisio t金 sem sail i ni i gyd am grebu newidau rowt fwy o lantern sy'n dangos gyda phobl ar yno. Felly hynny'n offers yn referring a democrat depresoedd i. Roeddwn ni'n cydweithio er mwyn amdaneb jaf. Mae'n pont 50 neu un ag y pl aesthetics? a dwi'n meddwl y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r polis a dwi'n meddwl y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r syniad sy'n gallu cymryd rhywbeth yno, felly byddwn yn ymwneud â hynny'n bwysig iawn. Nid yw i'n ymwneud â'r polis, ond rwy'n meddwl y byddwn yn dweud y byddwch chi'n mynd i'w ddefnyddio gynhyrch, mae'r gynhyrch hwnnw'n rhaid i fod yn ymwneud â'r polis. Yn ddiweddol, mae'r gynhyrch hwnnw yn gallu cymryd â phan o'r gynhyrch. Mae'r gynhyrch hwnnw'n oedd, roedden nhw eisiau gyrfa ddwylo sy'n ymwneud â'r prynhau o 2100, felly o 9.00. Mae'r gynhyrch yn oed. Yn ymwneud â'r polis, mae'r gynhyrch hwn yn rhan o ddwylo. Mae'r gynhyrch hwn yn ymwneud â'r polis. Mae'r gynhyrch hwnnw'n dweud, y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r prynhau o daith. Mae'r gynhyrch hwnnw'n gweithio fod yn oedol, ond dywedodd o ran y ddwylo. Maent yn y ffordd y mae'r gofodau wedi'i ddweud ei fod wedi cael un penderfyniad gyda'r penderfyniadau. Mae'r gofodau wedi cael un penderfyniad yma. Mae'r gofodau wedi cael un penderfyniad o'r gofodau y'n byw. Y penderfyniad yma yn gwybod oedd P.C. Mark Perry. Felly, rydym yn mynd yn ôl am fwyaf mlynedd. roedd Mr Perry wedi'i ddweud, oedd, rwy'n meddwl, y byddwch chi'n gweithio'n cymryd yn ymwneud â phobl i ddod yn dda. Roedd Mr Gibson wedi'i gweithio'n cymryd. Felly, dim ond mae'r polisi wedi'i wneud cysylltiadau'n rhaid, roedd hynny wedi'i cymryd. Ond, yn y ffordd o ddau, mae hynny'n gysylltiadau'n niferol, a'r gysylltiad hefyd oedd y gysylltiad sy'n mynd i'r gysylltiad yng Nghymru ac nid unrhyw gysylltiad. Ond gallwn ddweud y byddai Mr Gibson yn ymwneud bod nid oes polisi yn ymwneud â phobl i ddod pan oedd PC Perry wedi'i cymryd fel bod y gysylltiadau'n rhaid. Felly, os ydych chi'n gallu... Mae'n rhaid. Yn oed, yn ddiwylliannol, anc blwyddyn hanesau yn ymchwil i sicrhwyddiadٍ oeden gyda diwylliannol. Felly, mae'n siwgr ifanc y could rydym yn gysylltu i ni etholiad wedi'i gysylltu, ac rydych chi'n meddwl na amser. D 싶은 i'r plentý o byrdd. Mae bod cyngor Cymru 30 munud o amser sy'n bwysig, fel y bydd angen i ffwrdd bob un i'r ystrad ymlaen. Rwy'n dechrau i hynny, felly mae'n rhaid i bobl yn ymlaen, oherwydd byddwn yn allan nhw amser sy'n bwysig i wneud yr hyn y maen nhw wedi cael ei gyrraedd a'i gyrraedd ymlaen ymlaen y 30 munud. Rwy'n dechrau i hynny. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. Mae'n rhaid i chi ymlaen. A allwn i ddysgu rhywbeth? Mae'n dweud y bydd unrhyw ddaeth ddaeth ddaeth ddaeth yn cael ei chwarae. Mae'n dweud y bydd unrhyw ddaeth ddaeth yn cael ei chwarae. Mae'n dweud y bydd unrhyw ddaeth ddaeth yn cael ei chwarae. Mae'n dweud y bydd unrhyw ddaeth ddaeth yn cael ei chwarae. Mae'n dweud y bydd unrhyw ddaeth ddaeth yn cael ei chwarae. Mae'n dweud y bydd unrhyw ddaeth ddaeth yn cael ei chwarae. Mae'n dweud y bydd unrhyw ddaeth yn cael ei chwarae. Beth y groes muywfa dechrau llw sex y tro crossing lin ffan Nhwegwrig feeding. Mae'n dweud y bydd unrhyw ddaeth ddaeth ddaeth yn cael ei chwarae. Mae'n answooad cyhoeddf yn ddaeth ffan scrape eu hasfu. Mae'r llw tinyl yn bwyd i gyrraedd ein tro Gruffydd fod e. Mae'n geryd mamoriant yn ddaeth. Mae'n angen i fath o'' tubes o'r gofnod, editor Hoginoe, Mi fyddai'n Boynладdodd. Mae'n rhannau'n lletu Merrynyws, Ac mae hynny'n ymlaen 171 pwynt ff o'r ffom sy'n ymwneud yn ymwneud y byddwch chi'n ymwneud i ddynnu cerddoriaeth. Mae'r ffaith y bydd cerddoriaeth yn ymwneud i fod yn cerddoriaeth bach, gallwch chi weld pam fydd unrhyw un yn ymwneud, a bydd yn ymwneud yn ymwneud y bydd y Llyfrgell Genedlaethol yn ymwneud y bydd yn ymwneud, chymharu hyifyn ac varsatterwch. See diogelu sy'n archwilio i ddweud nad oes bach ar y cyfr Because we see the amount of applications we see where people have applied for regulated entertainment where they don't onet edrych ar rồi hwnnw onet constructive fun, onet negative fun let off the sky. eel ''Would it be fair to say you could in fact withdraw the regulated entertainment application because you're only playing music at the background level? Totally fine in that, as I said, just that it was transparent about what was happening, but yes, we're happy to withdraw the commence statement statement part so it is purely supply of alcohol and late night refreshments. All right, thank you, any more questions for me anyone? So now moving on to concluding remarks. Can I get the supporter? You have one minute if you have anything to say. Am I allowed to say anything I want this time? It should obviously relate to what's being said and what your representation is about. I was only allowed to make the representation on that basis when I first made a general application and said it had to be related to Christ. So if you have anything on that to add on maybe or the last remarks? So what I said before that there's never been any kind of trouble there of any kind. So you can't reduce something that doesn't already exist, that doesn't exist in the first place. It's a kind of moot point, right? The restaurant is peaceful, quiet, calm and a great benefit to the local residents. Nice one, thank you. And to the objector, Mr O'Leary. Thank you, Chair. I just want to say licensing authorities like ourselves representing environmental protection are required to consider potential public news and when reviewing an application. This is to ensure that establishments are pro-responsibly and do not disrupt the lives of people living nearby or their neighbourhood. It's a relaxed committee if you're minded to grant application to the conditions we propose should be applied. Thank you. And lastly, the applicant, you have one minute. The issue with the noise nuisance raised by both environmental protection and Karen Shoemaker in her representation, I would say, is the distinct possibility of a possible maybe. In fact, Karen Shoemaker says this extended license may increase the possibility of public nuisance and I would say you have to go further than may increase the possibility. Thank you. Now, I thank you for everyone's contributions today. Could you turn the mic off please? And the subcommittee would deliberate in a private session after this meeting ends and Simi from Democratic Services will write to you in five days with the decision. Thank you, guys. Thank you, Chair. Extensions of decision deadline. Simi, could you announce those, please? Thank you, Chair. Can I please ask members of the subcommittee to please extend the decision deadlines for the following application. Thank you all for your contributions today. The meeting is now closed.