This week in Westminster:

• The Licensing Sub-Committee (1) considered applications from Sainsburys, Tequila Mockingbird on Burleigh Street and a bar on Abbey Road.
• The Licensing Sub-Committee (2) considered licenses for a members club, a vegan takeaway, Le Duke restaurant and 27 Old Compton Street.
• The Audit and Performance Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday 05 September 2024 to discuss the performance and finances of the council.
• The Planning (Major Applications) Sub-Committee discussed a large mixed-use development on Victoria Street and an office and residential development on Eaton Mews West.

Licensing Sub-Committee (1) - Wednesday 04 September 2024

The Licensing Sub-Committee (1) met to consider three applications for new and varied premises licences under the Licensing Act 2003.¹ All three applications relate to premises in Westminster that are scheduled to operate as restaurants or off licences.

Tequila Mockingbird, 3-5 Burleigh Street, London WC2E 7PX

This application was for the variation of a premises licence for Tequila Mockingbird, a cocktail bar in Covent Garden.

The application was made by London Cocktail Bars Limited and requested changes to the existing licence that would allow the premises to:

• sell alcohol for consumption off the premises in open containers after 21:00,
• allow customers to leave the premises with drinks in glass containers after 21:00,
• remove a restriction on the number of customers permitted to leave and re-enter the premises after 21:00,
• remove a condition requiring all customers leaving and re-entering the premises after 21:00 to use the designated smoking area,
• reduce the number of door supervisors required at the premises at certain times,
• require the searching of all bags when door supervisors are on duty,
• change the last entry time to the premises from midnight to 01:00, and
• add an additional hour to their licensed hours on the day when British Summertime commences.

The applicant was requesting to vary a number of the conditions attached to their existing licence. Conditions are added to premises licences to promote the four licensing objectives:

• the prevention of crime and disorder,
• public safety,
• the prevention of public nuisance, and
• the protection of children from harm.

The applicant argued that the variations were necessary to bring the conditions of their licence in line with their operating style, which requires customers to be seated and served by waiters and waitresses. The applicant argued that this approach minimised the risk of crime and disorder and public nuisance.

This echoes similar arguments made in the meeting of 08 August 2024 where Global Partners Bd Limited argued that extending the hours for late night refreshment at their restaurant Wok & Fire would not have a negative impact on the licensing objectives because the premises does not sell alcohol.

The application attracted objections from local residents and an Amenity Society,² Paddington Waterways And Maida Vale Society, on the grounds that the variation would likely increase public nuisance in the area, particularly from noise from customers. They also expressed concern that reducing the number of door supervisors required at the premises may increase public nuisance and may impact on public safety in the area. This is reminiscent of the meeting of 22 August 2024, where the application by Mayfair Rebirth Ltd to vary the licence for Mano Mayfair was also objected to on the grounds that it would lead to an increase in public nuisance.

Sainsburys, 207 Shirland Road, London W9 2EX

This was an application for a new Premises Licence for Sainsburys at 207 Shirland Road, to permit the sale by retail of alcohol for consumption off the premises from 08:00 to 23:00 Monday to Saturday, and from 09:00 to 22:30 on Sunday.

The application received objections from local residents who argued that the presence of another supermarket selling alcohol would threaten existing independent shops in the area, would add nothing to the area, and may increase anti-social behaviour. Some also felt that the shop would attract more traffic and congestion to an already busy road, and that the area would benefit more from a pub, restaurant or other business.

The application was supported by a local resident who argued that the shop would bring a derelict site back into use, would provide a quality and varied food choice to residents and create jobs, would improve the visual appearance of the area, would increase natural surveillance in the area, and that there was a need for this type of supermarket in the area as the nearest alternative was on Harrow Road.

This echoes a debate from the meeting on 29 August 2024, where the committee considered whether to designate Fernhead Road to be suitable for Street Trading.

61 Abbey Road, London NW8 0AD

This was an application for a new Premises Licence for 61 Abbey Road, but the report pack does not indicate the nature of the business that will operate there, or the reasons for the objections that were received. The report pack does indicate that objections from residents were received on the basis that the licence would likely increase noise and anti-social behaviour in the area.

Licensing Sub-Committee (2) - Thursday 05 September 2024

Audit and Performance Committee - Thursday 05 September 2024

Planning (Major Applications) Sub-Committee - Tuesday 03 September 2024

This week in Westminster:

• The Licensing Sub-Committee (6) considered two licensing variations for Mano Mayfair and Marylebone Theatre and one renewal of a sexual entertainment venue license for The Windmill Theatre.
• The Planning Applications Sub-Committee (1) discussed applications to retain the Education Centre on Victoria Tower Gardens until 2030, extend a flat on George's Square, and add a gate on Craven Street.
• The Licensing Sub-Committee (6) considered permitting a new street market Maida Hill Market on Fernhead Road, extending Shawarma N More's licensee until 2am, varying the licenses of Grosvenor Victoria Casino and The Poker Room, and allowing a coworking members club Arboretum at Cavell House on Charing Cross Road.

Licensing Sub-Committee (6) - Thursday 22 August 2024

This meeting was scheduled to consider three licensing applications. Two applications were for variations of existing premises licences, one for a restaurant in Mayfair, and the other for Marylebone Theatre. The third application was for the renewal of a sexual entertainment venue licence for The Windmill Theatre.

Mano Mayfair

Mayfair Rebirth Ltd applied for a variation of the premises licence for Mano Mayfair, a restaurant at 4 Mill Street. They requested to extend their opening hours until 02:00 Sunday to Wednesday, and until 03:00 Thursday to Saturday. They also requested that their licence to sell alcohol and provide late night refreshment¹ be extended to match those hours.

The Metropolitan Police made a representation objecting to the variation. They stated that The provision and the hours requested for Supply of Alcohol will have the likely effect of causing an increase in Public Nuisance within the area and may impact on Public Safety. The police objection was based on the premises being located in the West End Special Consideration Zone.² They later withdrew their objection after the applicant agreed to a number of additional conditions. This is reminiscent of an application considered by the Licensing Sub-Committee (4) on 08 August 2024, where an application to vary the licence of Wok & Fire was also objected to by the Metropolitan Police, but later withdrawn following the acceptance of additional conditions.

Environmental Health also made a representation objecting to the application. They stated that they needed to consider whether the application would comply with building regulations and how noise would be mitigated.

Three members of the public also made representations objecting to the variation. They were concerned that noise from the premises would have a negative impact on them. One of them stated that This business is causing stress to all of [us] and it is affecting us mentally and physically as we can't get proper rest 3/4 days of the week. Another claimed that the premises had previously operated beyond its permitted hours and that there had been cocaine parties held there.

Marylebone Theatre

The Anthroposophical Association, the operators of Marylebone Theatre at 35 Park Road, applied for a variation of their premises licence. They requested to increase the maximum capacity of the venue from 320 to 382. This would be achieved by adding an additional 62 seats to the main auditorium. They also originally requested to extend their licence to perform plays and live music until midnight on Sundays, but later withdrew these requests.

Environmental Health made a representation objecting to the variation. They stated that they needed to consider the fire safety and sanitary implications of the additional capacity, as well as how noise from the larger audience would be mitigated.

Two members of the public also made representations objecting to the application. They were concerned about noise from audiences leaving the theatre late at night. One stated that Currently, there is excessive noise from the crowds who gather outside the Marylebone Theatre (on the street) before, during and after performances.

The Windmill Theatre

Immerse London Ltd applied for the renewal of the sexual entertainment venue licence for The Windmill Theatre at 17-19 Great Windmill Street. The report pack states that The applicant has not requested to change the relevant entertainment or to remove any standard conditions to the licence.

The report pack states that the application was opposed by one interested party. They attached a letter of objection to their report but redacted the details of the objector, and so the grounds for their objection are not known.

Planning Applications Sub-Committee (1) - Tuesday 20 August 2024

This meeting considered three planning applications, including an application for the retention of a temporary structure on the Parliamentary Estate. This echoes an issue discussed in the Cabinet meeting of 15 July 2024, where the North Paddington Programme was discussed, and the associated challenges in securing funding for temporary accommodation for families in need.

The Victoria Tower Gardens, Millbank

The committee voted to grant permission for the retention for a further temporary period, until 31 December 2030, of the existing Education Centre building for the Palace of Westminster. The Education Centre is a single-storey building with a green roof, located at the northern end of the gardens, which opened in July 2015 following the grant of temporary planning permission for 10 years (RN:13/07747/FULL). The building provides learning opportunities for students as part of educational sessions on the Houses of Parliament. It provides five teaching and learning spaces as well supporting ancillary spaces, such as a lunchroom and staff areas. Sessions are offered to students from across the UK and last 1.5 hours, including a tour of the Palace of Westminster and Q&A with the school’s local MP. The Education Centre’s programme of educational visits for schools welcomes over 80,000 children and their teachers each year during term times. Over half a million visitors from across the home nations have visited the Centre’s facilities since opening.

The applicant, The Corporate Officer of the House of Commons, told the Committee that the retention of the Education Centre was necessary because delays to the Palace of Westminster’s restoration and renewal programme meant there was no viable alternative location for the Education Centre to be relocated.

The report, prepared by a planning officer for the benefit of the committee, notes that objections to the scheme had been received from The Thorney Island Society, Historic England, and The Friends of Victoria Tower Gardens, on the grounds that the Education Centre harms the setting of the Grade II* listed Palace of Westminster, the Grade II listed Victoria Tower Gardens, and the Westminster Abbey and Parliament Square Conservation Area. Objections from members of the public echoed these concerns, and also argued that the building is not well used.

The report acknowledges that the proposal would cause harm to the heritage assets, but argues that:

The proposal results in the loss of public open space and harm to heritage assets. However, the Education Centre provides a number of public benefits and its retention for a further temporary period would not cause any increased level of harm.

The report concludes that the benefits of the scheme outweigh any harm caused. It therefore recommends the application for approval, subject to conditions.

Fourth Floor Flat F, 104 St George's Square, London

The committee voted to refuse an application from Mr. Jack Parker for the erection of a mansard roof extension, with a roof terrace and raised chimneys, on the top floor of a Grade II listed building in the Pimlico Conservation Area. The report notes that objections had been received from The St. George’s Square Residents’ Association (SGSRA), on the grounds that:

The proposals would result in the loss of the likely original butterfly roof form, which is strongly characteristic of mid-19 century terraced properties such as this, and which are consistent to main roof level across this group of 6 buildings (nos. 96-106), which in themselves form an integral part of the wider and strongly architecturally harmonised terrace comprising nos. 76-108 on the west side of St Georges Square. The proposals would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, and the special interest of the listed building. It would also harm the setting of the nearby listed buildings around square and the registered garden.

The report acknowledges the letters of support received, but argues that they do not outweigh the harm that would be caused to the heritage assets. It therefore recommends the application for refusal.

34 Craven Street, London

The committee voted to grant permission for the erection of a folding gate between two free-standing posts in the rear yard of a Grade II listed building in the Trafalgar Square Conservation Area. The report notes that objections to the scheme had been received from neighbouring residents and businesses, who argue that the gate would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area, would be detrimental to the amenity³ of neighbouring properties, and would cause an obstruction to Hungerford Lane, which runs alongside the application site.

The report finds that the gate would not be out of keeping with the character of the area, and would not harm the amenity of neighbouring properties. It further finds that, although the gate may cause some obstruction to Hungerford Lane, this would not be significant. The report recommends the application for approval, subject to conditions.

Licensing Sub-Committee (6) - Thursday 29 August 2024

This meeting was scheduled to consider applications for a new street trading designation, variations to 3 premises licences, and an application for a new premises licence. The committee report pack contains objections from the Metropolitan Police to 2 of the applications, and objections from residents and amenity groups to 3 of the applications.

Designation of Fernhead Road

The most significant topic scheduled to be discussed in this meeting was whether to designate a stretch of Fernhead Road to be suitable for Street Trading⁴, to be known as Maida Hill Market.

The Licensing authority will designate and de-designate street trading pitches to ensure that street trading is carried on in suitable locations and not carried on in unsuitable locations.

- City of Westminster Statement of Street Licensing Policy, Policy ST5(9)

The report pack contains the application from the Council for the designation, which contains the proposed layout for the market, details about the history of the market, and the responses from statutory consultees.

At the time of the meeting, only Highways Planning⁵ had responded to the consultation.

Variation of Premises Licence: Shawarma N More

The next most significant topic scheduled to be discussed in this meeting was an application by Shawarma N More Limited, a fast food takeaway at 123 Baker Street, to vary its Premises Licence⁶ in order to:

• extend the hours for late night refreshment⁷ from 23:00 - 23:30 to 23:00 - 02:00 Monday to Sunday; and
• extend the opening hours to 02:00 Monday to Sunday.

The application has been objected to by the Metropolitan Police and Environmental Health, who both feel that it would undermine the licensing objective of the prevention of crime and disorder. The Police raise particular concern about the potential for congregation of customers who may have been drinking.

Fast food premises which are open after 11pm can attract large groups of customers, many of whom have been consuming alcohol in pubs, bars, or night clubs sometimes some distance away. The congregation of people around these premises leads to additional noise and disturbance and further congestion in the area.

- City of Westminster Statement of Licensing Policy

The application has also received a very large number of objections from local residents, who raise similar concerns about public nuisance, crime and disorder, litter and delivery drivers. Many also point out that this appears to be the third application for a Late Night Refreshment licence that has been made by the applicant.

PC David Morgan from the Metropolitan Police Licensing Team writes that he has concerns that the venue is not being managed effectively and that those in charge have little knowledge of the current licence and its conditions.

Variation of Premises Licence: Grosvenor Victoria Casino

The report pack also contains an application by the Grosvenor Victoria Casino at 150-162 Edgware Road to vary its Premises Licence. This variation is to:

• remove a condition from their licence that requires the sale of alcohol to be ancillary to the use of the premises as a casino;
• remove a condition from their licence that requires the sale of alcohol after 02:00 to be through waiter service, and for it only to be served to those who are participating in gaming or taking a table meal; and
• add non standard timings for New Year's Eve and for the commencement of British Summertime.

The application has not received any objections from Responsible Authorities or from members of the public.

Variation of Premises Licence: The Poker Room

The report pack also contains an application by The Poker Room at 150 Edgware Road to vary its Premises Licence. This variation is to:

• extend the hours for the sale of alcohol on Saturday from 10:00 to 04:00 to 10:00 to 06:00;
• remove a condition from their licence that requires the sale of alcohol to be ancillary to the use of the premises for gaming facilities and substantial refreshment;
• remove a condition from their licence that requires the sale of alcohol after 02:00 to be through waiter service, and for it only to be served to those who are participating in gaming or taking a table meal; and
• add non standard timings for New Year's Eve and for the commencement of British Summertime.

This application has been objected to by Environmental Health who believe that the proposal may undermine the Public Nuisance licensing objective. It has also received objections from The Hyde Park Estate Association and the Marylebone Ward Councillors. Both objectors state that:

The application of very late//all night alcohol licenses does not belong in areas next door to a high density of residential homes.

New Premises Licence: Arboretum

The final application to be considered in this meeting was an application by Penway Holdings Ltd for a New Premises Licence for Arboretum, described as a coworking members club, at Cavell House 2A Charing Cross Road. This application is on the same terms as a lapsed licence, but with an updated layout plan.

The application has received an objection from 4 local residents who raise concerns about noise from music and events, public nuisance, and smoking. The objectors point out that they have experienced problems with the previous occupier of the premises. The report pack contains mediation emails from the applicant to the objectors, which seek to assure them that the premises will be operated responsibly and in accordance with the licensing objectives. The objectors appear to not be satisfied by these assurances.

The Licensing Sub-Committee (6) met on Thursday 22 August 2024 to consider three licensing applications for premises in Westminster, two of which were objected to by the Metropolitan Police. The Planning Applications Sub-Committee (1) met on Tuesday 20 August 2024 to determine three planning applications, including an application to retain a temporary structure on the Parliamentary estate.

Licensing Sub-Committee (6) - Thursday 22 August 2024

This meeting was scheduled to consider three licensing applications. Two applications were for variations of existing premises licences, one for a restaurant in Mayfair, and the other for Marylebone Theatre. The third application was for the renewal of a sexual entertainment venue licence for The Windmill Theatre.

Mano Mayfair

Mayfair Rebirth Ltd applied for a variation of the premises licence for Mano Mayfair, a restaurant at 4 Mill Street. They requested to extend their opening hours until 02:00 Sunday to Wednesday, and until 03:00 Thursday to Saturday. They also requested that their licence to sell alcohol and provide late night refreshment¹ be extended to match those hours.

The Metropolitan Police made a representation objecting to the variation. They stated that The provision and the hours requested for Supply of Alcohol will have the likely effect of causing an increase in Public Nuisance within the area and may impact on Public Safety. The police objection was based on the premises being located in the West End Special Consideration Zone.² They later withdrew their objection after the applicant agreed to a number of additional conditions. This is reminiscent of an application considered by the Licensing Sub-Committee (4) on 08 August 2024, where an application to vary the licence of Wok & Fire was also objected to by the Metropolitan Police, but later withdrawn following the acceptance of additional conditions.

Environmental Health also made a representation objecting to the application. They stated that they needed to consider whether the application would comply with building regulations and how noise would be mitigated.

Three members of the public also made representations objecting to the variation. They were concerned that noise from the premises would have a negative impact on them. One of them stated that This business is causing stress to all of [us] and it is affecting us mentally and physically as we can't get proper rest 3/4 days of the week. Another claimed that the premises had previously operated beyond its permitted hours and that there had been cocaine parties held there.

Marylebone Theatre

The Anthroposophical Association, the operators of Marylebone Theatre at 35 Park Road, applied for a variation of their premises licence. They requested to increase the maximum capacity of the venue from 320 to 382. This would be achieved by adding an additional 62 seats to the main auditorium. They also originally requested to extend their licence to perform plays and live music until midnight on Sundays, but later withdrew these requests.

Environmental Health made a representation objecting to the variation. They stated that they needed to consider the fire safety and sanitary implications of the additional capacity, as well as how noise from the larger audience would be mitigated.

Two members of the public also made representations objecting to the application. They were concerned about noise from audiences leaving the theatre late at night. One stated that Currently, there is excessive noise from the crowds who gather outside the Marylebone Theatre (on the street) before, during and after performances.

The Windmill Theatre

Immerse London Ltd applied for the renewal of the sexual entertainment venue licence for The Windmill Theatre at 17-19 Great Windmill Street. The report pack states that The applicant has not requested to change the relevant entertainment or to remove any standard conditions to the licence.

The report pack states that the application was opposed by one interested party. They attached a letter of objection to their report but redacted the details of the objector, and so the grounds for their objection are not known.

Planning Applications Sub-Committee (1) - Tuesday 20 August 2024

This meeting considered three planning applications, including an application for the retention of a temporary structure on the Parliamentary Estate. This echoes an issue discussed in the Cabinet meeting of 15 July 2024, where the North Paddington Programme was discussed, and the associated challenges in securing funding for temporary accommodation for families in need.

The Victoria Tower Gardens, Millbank

The committee voted to grant permission for the retention for a further temporary period, until 31 December 2030, of the existing Education Centre building for the Palace of Westminster. The Education Centre is a single-storey building with a green roof, located at the northern end of the gardens, which opened in July 2015 following the grant of temporary planning permission for 10 years (RN:13/07747/FULL). The building provides learning opportunities for students as part of educational sessions on the Houses of Parliament. It provides five teaching and learning spaces as well supporting ancillary spaces, such as a lunchroom and staff areas. Sessions are offered to students from across the UK and last 1.5 hours, including a tour of the Palace of Westminster and Q&A with the school’s local MP. The Education Centre’s programme of educational visits for schools welcomes over 80,000 children and their teachers each year during term times. Over half a million visitors from across the home nations have visited the Centre’s facilities since opening.

The applicant, The Corporate Officer of the House of Commons, told the Committee that the retention of the Education Centre was necessary because delays to the Palace of Westminster’s restoration and renewal programme meant there was no viable alternative location for the Education Centre to be relocated.

The report, prepared by a planning officer for the benefit of the committee, notes that objections to the scheme had been received from The Thorney Island Society, Historic England, and The Friends of Victoria Tower Gardens, on the grounds that the Education Centre harms the setting of the Grade II* listed Palace of Westminster, the Grade II listed Victoria Tower Gardens, and the Westminster Abbey and Parliament Square Conservation Area. Objections from members of the public echoed these concerns, and also argued that the building is not well used.

The report acknowledges that the proposal would cause harm to the heritage assets, but argues that:

The proposal results in the loss of public open space and harm to heritage assets. However, the Education Centre provides a number of public benefits and its retention for a further temporary period would not cause any increased level of harm.

The report concludes that the benefits of the scheme outweigh any harm caused. It therefore recommends the application for approval, subject to conditions.

Fourth Floor Flat F, 104 St George's Square, London

The committee voted to refuse an application from Mr. Jack Parker for the erection of a mansard roof extension, with a roof terrace and raised chimneys, on the top floor of a Grade II listed building in the Pimlico Conservation Area. The report notes that objections had been received from The St. George’s Square Residents’ Association (SGSRA), on the grounds that:

The proposals would result in the loss of the likely original butterfly roof form, which is strongly characteristic of mid-19 century terraced properties such as this, and which are consistent to main roof level across this group of 6 buildings (nos. 96-106), which in themselves form an integral part of the wider and strongly architecturally harmonised terrace comprising nos. 76-108 on the west side of St Georges Square. The proposals would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, and the special interest of the listed building. It would also harm the setting of the nearby listed buildings around square and the registered garden.

The report acknowledges the letters of support received, but argues that they do not outweigh the harm that would be caused to the heritage assets. It therefore recommends the application for refusal.

34 Craven Street, London

The committee voted to grant permission for the erection of a folding gate between two free-standing posts in the rear yard of a Grade II listed building in the Trafalgar Square Conservation Area. The report notes that objections to the scheme had been received from neighbouring residents and businesses, who argue that the gate would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area, would be detrimental to the amenity³ of neighbouring properties, and would cause an obstruction to Hungerford Lane, which runs alongside the application site.

The report finds that the gate would not be out of keeping with the character of the area, and would not harm the amenity of neighbouring properties. It further finds that, although the gate may cause some obstruction to Hungerford Lane, this would not be significant. The report recommends the application for approval, subject to conditions.

The Licensing Sub-Committee (1) met on Monday 12 August 2024 and was scheduled to determine a full review of the premises licence for Concept Club, following an application by the Metropolitan Police. The Licensing Sub-Committee (2) was scheduled to meet on Thursday 15 August 2024 to determine a review of the premises licence of the restaurant Royal China following an application from the Home Office.

Licensing Sub-Committee (1) - Monday 12 August 2024

The Licensing Sub-Committee (1) was scheduled to determine a full review of the premises licence for Concept Club, 37 Duke Street, London, W1U 1LN. This meeting follows an Interim Steps hearing on 18 July 2024 where the sub-committee made the decision to suspend Concept Club's licence. As was the case in the meeting on 18 July 2024, the review was triggered by concerns raised by the Metropolitan Police. In this case, the concerns relate to a fight that took place at the venue in the early hours of Monday 15 July 2024, in which three people were injured, one of whom sustained a stab wound. Representations supporting the review were scheduled to be heard from the Metropolitan Police Service, the Environmental Health Service, the Licensing Authority, and 18 interested parties.

This application is reminiscent of the one that was discussed by the Licensing Sub-Committee (3) on 11 July 2024, in which Sun 13 Cantons had their application for a licence variation refused on the grounds that it was located in a Cumulative Impact Area, and the applicant had not done enough to show that they would not be adding to the problems already being experienced in the area.

Licensing Sub-Committee (2) - Thursday 15 August 2024

This meeting was scheduled to include discussion of an application to revoke the Premises Licence of the restaurant Royal China at 24-26 Baker Street, London. The application was made by the Home Office following a series of raids that resulted in multiple arrests for illegal working. The meeting was scheduled to consider representations from the Home Office, the Metropolitan Police Service, the Council's Environmental Health Service and the Licensing Authority, all of whom supported the revocation of the licence.

This application is reminiscent of the issues discussed by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee on 25 July 2024 in relation to the Council's Emergency Preparedness, and the use of the Borough Risk Register. Risk registers are used by local authorities to identify and assess potential risks to the authority, and to put in place plans to mitigate these risks. They can be used to consider risks to a wide range of council services and responsibilities, including licensing.

This is the second time in as many weeks that a Licensing Sub-Committee has been asked to consider revoking a licence for a business in Westminster, and echoes a now well-established pattern of the Home Office taking enforcement action against businesses suspected of employing illegal workers. In the previous instance, on 12 August 2024, the Licensing Sub-Committee (1) was asked to consider revoking the licence of Concept Club following a request from the Metropolitan Police.

The Licensing Sub-Committee (4) met on Thursday 08 August 2024 and was scheduled to discuss two applications for licensed premises in Westminster. The Planning (Major Applications) Sub-Committee met on Tuesday 06 August 2024 and was scheduled to consider an application to demolish five buildings at 38-70 Baker Street, 64-66 Blandford Street and 43-45 Dorset Street, and replace them with a new seven-storey building. The Licensing Sub-Committee (6) met on Thursday 08 August 2024, but the meeting was not open to the public.

Licensing Sub-Committee (4) - Thursday 08 August 2024

The Licensing Sub-Committee (4) was scheduled to consider two applications for licensed premises in Westminster: one for a new licence for a restaurant, and the other to vary the licence of a restaurant and takeaway to extend their hours for late night refreshment.

As in the meeting of 03 July 2024, this meeting saw the committee consider an application for a licence to sell alcohol for consumption off the premises for extended hours.

Licensing Committees and Sub-Committees are responsible for considering applications for premises licences, club premises certificates and Temporary Event Notices. They can also review existing licences and impose, remove or vary conditions on them. This could mean anything from changing the hours during which a venue is allowed to sell alcohol, to adding a condition requiring a venue to have security staff on duty at certain times.

The sale and supply of alcohol in England and Wales is governed by the Licensing Act 2003.¹ The Act aims to promote the four licensing objectives:

• The prevention of crime and disorder
• Public safety
• The prevention of public nuisance
• The protection of children from harm

When making decisions about licensing applications, the Licensing Sub-Committee must consider the licensing objectives, as well as any representations made by interested parties. Interested parties can include local residents, businesses, the police and other authorities.

107 Westbourne Grove

An application was received for a new premises licence for a restaurant at 107 Westbourne Grove, London, W2 4UW. The application was submitted by Shack 107, the restaurant at that address.

Appendix 5 of the report pack provides a list of the licensed premises within 75m of 107 Westbourne Grove. There are 12 premises listed, including restaurants, shops, food stores and public houses. All of them have licences that permit them to sell alcohol, and most have licences that permit them to serve late night refreshment.

Wok & Fire, 326 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London, SW1V 1AA

Global Partners Bd Limited submitted an application to vary the premises licence of Wok & Fire, a restaurant and takeaway at 326 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London, SW1V 1AA.

The application seeks to:

• Extend the hours for Late Night Refreshment² by an hour Sunday to Thursday and by 2 hours on Fridays & Saturdays.
• Vary condition 8 on the premises licence.

The current licence permits late night refreshment until 01:00 seven days a week, and the variation seeks to extend this to 02:00 Sunday to Thursday, and to 03:00 on Fridays and Saturdays.

No new admissions or re-admissions shall be allowed to the premises after 02.00 (the following day) on Mondays to Thursdays, after 03.00 (the following day) on Fridays & Saturdays and after 01.00 (the following day) on Sundays. Signage to this effect shall be displayed at the premises.

This variation is sought because, according to the applicant:

The premises has operated for the last 15 months with its existing premises licence without any reported incidents of violence being recorded. The premises does not sell alcohol, so is unlikely to be the driver of violence in the area.

The Metropolitan Police Service objected to the application on the grounds that:

As stated in Westminster Councils Fast Food Policy FFP1, ‘venues which are open after 11pm can attract large groups of customers, many of whom have been consuming alcohol in pubs, bars, or night clubs sometimes some distance away. The congregation of people around these premises leads to additional noise and disturbance and further congestion in the area’.

The Environmental Health Service also objected to the application on the grounds that:

Applicant has to bear in mind that activities in restaurants continue after licensable activities have ended for longer. These include customers finishing their meals and paying the bill, and the clearing up in the kitchen and the public parts of the restaurant. There may also be handling and removal of waste and recyclable materials, but this can also be done the next day. These activities can give rise to public nuisance and public safety concerns.

Two other people also objected to the application, citing noise, smells and anti-social behaviour.

Planning (Major Applications) Sub-Committee - Tuesday 06 August 2024

The Planning (Major Applications) Sub-Committee was scheduled to consider one item for discussion during their meeting, a planning application for the demolition of five buildings at 38-70 Baker Street, 64-66 Blandford Street and 43-45 Dorset Street, and their replacement with a new seven-storey building. This is reminiscent of an application that was scheduled to be considered by the same committee on 25 June 2024, but which was withdrawn from the agenda before the meeting.

Redevelopment of 38-70 Baker Street

The report pack indicates that the committee was scheduled to consider an application to demolish five existing buildings on the application site and replace them with a mixed use building containing retail and restaurant units, offices and 17 flats. The report notes that the proposed building would be considerably larger than the existing buildings, that it would adjoin the Portman Estate Conservation Area and that the impact of the proposed development upon the significance of the conservation area was an important consideration in the assessment of the planning application.

The application has been submitted by Gerald Eve LLP¹ on behalf of Derwent Lazari Baker Street GP Limited, and is for:

Demolition of the existing buildings and redevelopment above a retained basement to create a mixed-use scheme providing Class E commercial space (retail, restaurants, offices), a community space, and 17 residential units within a new building consisting of ground plus 7 storeys plus rooftop amenity for the commercial, and ground plus 7 storeys for the residential element, improvements to the public realm and pedestrian routes around the perimeter of the Site and along Broadstone Place, consolidated servicing, ancillary plant and storage, cycle parking, and other associated works.

The report pack states that the report has been prepared for 'general release', that none of the buildings on the site are listed buildings, and that the site is not in a conservation area.

The report pack notes that the five buildings on the site are:

• Accurist House (Nos. 64-66 Blandford Street and Nos. 38-52 Baker Street)
• Watson House (Nos. 54-60 Baker Street)
• Nos. 62-64 Baker Street
• No. 66-70 Baker Street
• Nos. 43-45 Dorset Street

The report pack notes that there are 13 existing residential maisonettes on the fourth and fifth floors of Accurist House, and that the other buildings are used for offices and retail. The report pack mentions that the headquarters of the Special Operations Executive (SOE)³ were located in Nos. 62-64 Baker Street during World War II, that the building has a City of Westminster green plaque⁴ to commemorate this, and that the applicant has committed to reinstalling the plaque on the new building. The report pack also notes that the applicant intends to include a permanent exhibition about the SOE in a proposed new community space within the building.

The report pack indicates that the most important considerations in the assessment of the planning application were the sustainability credentials of the proposal, the extent to which it provides affordable housing, the impact on the setting of the Portman Estate Conservation Area and the impact on the amenity⁵ of nearby residential properties.

The report pack explains that the applicant's assessment of the sustainability of the proposal showed that retention and refurbishment of the existing buildings would have a comparable carbon impact to demolition and redevelopment. The report also indicates that the applicant had initially committed to reusing 29% of the materials from the existing buildings in the new building. However, it indicates that the applicant later amended this commitment, and had agreed to reuse 59% of the superstructure of Accurist House in the foundations of the new building.

The report pack indicates that the applicant proposed to meet its affordable housing obligations by contributing to an offsite affordable housing scheme at Castle Lane / Palace Street. The report explains that this was to be achieved by purchasing 'affordable housing credits' that were created when planning permission for 86 affordable homes at Castle Lane / Palace Street was granted in 2019. The report explains that the applicant proposed to draw down credits equivalent to 50% of the proposed residential floorspace in the new Baker Street development.

The report pack explains that because the development is near the Portman Estate Conservation Area, the application must be assessed in line with the requirements of The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)² and The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. It notes that the NPPF requires that any harm to a conservation area must be 'clearly and convincingly justified'.

The report pack explains that the proposed building would be significantly taller than the existing buildings and would 'detract from the domestic scale of architecture' in the Portman Estate Conservation Area. It assesses the harm to the conservation area as 'less than substantial', and indicates that the report’s author considered that the public benefits of the proposed development, such as the increase in office space, the creation of the new community space, and the commitment to providing a permanent exhibition about the SOE, outweighed the harm to the conservation area.

The report pack states that a number of local residents objected to the application on the grounds that the building would cause a loss of daylight and sunlight to their properties. The report contains a daylight and sunlight assessment and explains that the development would have a significant impact on the daylight received by a number of nearby residential properties. However, the author of the report concluded that the harm caused by the loss of daylight was not sufficient to outweigh the public benefits of the proposal.

The report pack also states that a number of objections were received that related to the design of the building, with many considering it to be out of character with the surrounding area, particularly the properties in the Portman Estate Conservation Area. The report pack includes a number of images that were prepared by the applicant to show what the proposed building would look like in the context of the surrounding buildings.

Licensing Sub-Committee (6) - Thursday 08 August 2024

This meeting of the Licensing Sub-Committee (6) was not open to the public.

The Young People, Learning and Employment Policy and Scrutiny Committee met on Tuesday 30 July 2024 and discussed the North Paddington Programme and the new ActiveWestminster Strategy. The Housing and Regeneration Policy and Scrutiny Committee met on Wednesday 31 July 2024 to discuss the proposed approach to Westminster's Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Strategy, and to review recent developments in the Oxford Street Programme. On Thursday 01 August 2024 the Licensing Sub-Committee (3) met to discuss applications for new premises licences for two businesses: 5 Goslett Yard and W10 Coffee and Deli.

Young People, Learning and Employment Policy and Scrutiny Committee - Tuesday 30 July 2024

The Young People, Learning and Employment Policy and Scrutiny Committee considered two pre-decision scrutiny topics: the North Paddington Programme, and the ActiveWestminster Strategy 2024-2028. The Committee requested more detail on several aspects of both and made a number of recommendations to the Cabinet Member for their consideration. These included a recommendation that the seven key themes of the North Paddington Programme be streamlined as recommended in an independent review, and that the ActiveWestminster strategy should incorporate the reinstatement of previously removed gym equipment in Salisbury Street. This echoes concerns raised in the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting of 25 July 2024 where the committee recommended that the Westminster After Dark engagement strategy should be expanded. This decision reflects a now well-established pattern in this committee of recommending further consultation and engagement with residents.

The North Paddington Programme is a £20 million initiative aimed at reducing socioeconomic and health inequalities in the area. It was first discussed at the Cabinet meeting on 15 July 2024, and this is the second time the topic has come before a committee. The ActiveWestminster Strategy is a new strategy that sets out how the council will support residents to be more physically active.

Housing and Regeneration Policy and Scrutiny Committee - Wednesday 31 July 2024

This meeting included reports on the proposed approach to Westminster’s Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Strategy, as well as on recent developments in the Oxford Street Programme. The committee were also asked to review and approve the work programme for upcoming meetings.

As in previous meetings, such as that of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee on 25 July 2024, the Housing and Regeneration Policy and Scrutiny Committee considered the issue of homelessness in Westminster. The report highlighted the scale of the challenge, with Westminster having the highest number of rough sleepers in London. The report set out a number of measures that the council is taking to address the issue, including increasing the supply of temporary accommodation and providing support services to help people move off the streets. The report also acknowledged the impact of the cost of living crisis on homelessness, with more people being pushed into poverty and struggling to afford housing.

Licensing Sub-Committee (3) - Thursday 01 August 2024

This meeting of the Licensing Sub-Committee (3) was scheduled to include discussion of applications for new premises licences for two businesses: 5 Goslett Yard and W10 Coffee and Deli. This is the third meeting of a licensing sub-committee in as many weeks, and follows a now well-established pattern of late-night alcohol licences being granted over the objections of residents.

As in the meeting of 03 July 2024, this meeting saw the committee consider an application for a 24-hour licence for the sale of alcohol for consumption off the premises. In this case the applicant was Tila Bruton Deli, a delicatessen at 68 Crawford Street, London, W1H 1HS.

This meeting also saw the committee consider an application from Sun 13 Cantons, a new pub, for a licence to sell alcohol until 01:00 seven days a week. This is reminiscent of the application considered by the Licensing Sub-Committee (3) on 11 July 2024 for a new licence for Carbone, a new restaurant. In that case, the committee granted the licence despite objections from local residents who argued that the area was already oversaturated with restaurants and bars.

This is the second time in as many weeks that the committee has considered an application for a licence to sell alcohol at a premises on Wardour Street. In the previous meeting, the committee refused an application from Williams Hirst for a new premises licence for their premises at 24 Wardour Street.

On Monday 22 July 2024 the Shareholder Committee met to receive updates from several council-owned companies, including Westminster Builds, Westminster Community Homes and Westco, and also to appoint two new company directors. Also on Monday 22 July 2024, the Inner West London Mental Health Services Reconfiguration Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee met. The Climate Action, Environment and Highways Policy and Scrutiny Committee and the Planning Applications Sub-Committee (3) both met on Tuesday 23 July 2024. On Thursday 25 July 2024, the Licensing Sub-Committee (2) met to discuss three applications for licences and variations, while the Overview and Scrutiny Committee received updates on emergency preparedness, crime and disorder in Westminster, and the Westminster After Dark initiative.

Climate Action, Environment and Highways Policy and Scrutiny Committee - Tuesday 23 July 2024

The Climate Action, Environment and Highways Policy and Scrutiny Committee made several recommendations on the Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP), following a presentation of air quality data by officers and an expert witness from Imperial College London. The committee also received updates on the work programme, confirming the items to be discussed at its next meeting.

Work Programme

Members raised concerns about the responses given to their previous recommendations on the Pimlico District Heating Undertaking (PDHU). They requested more information on cost assumptions, particularly those relating to the projected cost of electricity and affordability for residents.

The PDHU is a plan to provide low-carbon heat to residents and businesses in the Pimlico area. The Council has been exploring the possibility of using heat from the Battersea Power Station for this purpose. In a previous meeting, the committee had requested further information about the costs of the project, as well as about how the switch to a district heating system would affect residents’ bills.

That the transport Strategy item coming to the Committee in September includes detail of co-design and how these partnerships are formed and determined.

Air Quality Action Plan

The main item on the agenda was a discussion of a new Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP). This followed a presentation of data analysis from a study by Imperial College London, which showed that air pollution in Westminster was projected to remain above guidelines set by the World Health Organisation (WHO) up to 2040.

The data from Imperial College London showed that industrial and commercial emissions were now a more significant contributor to Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) pollution in Westminster than transport. This is contrary to previous assumptions, and will mean the council changes its approach going forward. This may come as a surprise to some, as air pollution is often portrayed as being primarily caused by cars and other vehicles. However, the study suggests that emissions from buildings, such as those from boilers and air conditioning units, are now a bigger problem in Westminster. This is likely due to the high concentration of businesses and other organisations in the borough.

Do the committee members agree with the approach of re-prioritising our focus beyond primarily targeting pollution from transport sources, given our newfound understanding that industrial and commercial activities (e.g. heating and powering commercial buildings) are now the main sources of air pollution?

Commercial cooking, in particular, is a major source of particulate matter, such as PM2.5, which is small enough to be inhaled deep into the lungs and cause significant health problems.

The committee also raised concerns about how residents perceive air quality.

Initial findings of analysis of this information against data produced by single diffusion tubes suggests that resident perception of air quality is similar to the reality of air quality.

The committee were concerned about the significant number of visitors to Westminster.

given that on any given day there can be over three times as many visitors and commuters than there are residents, it was suggested that they be considered as a stakeholder in efforts to improve air quality and attempts to engage them should be made.

There was a great deal of discussion about the use of electric vehicles and whether or not they still produced brake dust.

The Committee recommended that within the Council’s Air Quality Action Plan it is no longer claimed, as fact, that brake-wear from electric vehicles (EVs) is a significant contributor of non-exhaust road transport pollutants, following the implementation, and growing prevalence, of regenerative braking.

Concerns were also raised that the ambitious targets set might not be achievable.

given that 99% of the world is breathing poor air, Members asked how realistically achievable the Council’s target were and whether they were setting themselves up to fail.

The committee made a number of recommendations for the AQAP, including that chefs and caterers should receive training on air quality, and that the council should lobby the government to make public health a licensing objective.

Overview and Scrutiny Committee - Thursday 25 July 2024

This meeting included updates on Westminster Council's Emergency Preparedness, a discussion on the committee's work programme for the next municipal year and an overview of the Safer Westminster Partnership. It also included a review of crime and disorder, the Council’s work on the evening and night-time economy initiative Westminster After Dark and a general update from the Leader of the Council.

Crime and Disorder in Westminster

The Overview and Scrutiny Committee was scheduled to be provided with an overview of the Safer Westminster Partnership (SWP), which is the Council’s Community Safety Partnership.¹ The report pack included a Strategic Assessment, which looked at the scale and trends of crime and disorder in Westminster. The report pack indicated that Westminster recorded the highest volume of crime in London, with the majority concentrated in the West End and St James’s wards. The most prevalent offences were theft, with 61% of offences recorded in Westminster classed as theft compared with 30% across the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) area. The report pack also included a new SWP Strategy (2024-27) and Action Plan to tackle crime and disorder in Westminster, with three key priorities;

• Making the West End a safer place for visitors, residents, and businesses;
• Tackling serious violence & exploitation; and
• Creating safer, more confident neighbourhoods. Included in the report pack was a deployment protocol for the new Council CCTV service, which is aimed at tackling anti-social behaviour, crime, fly-tipping, and noise nuisance. The report pack suggests these deployable cameras will be used to complement the existing police CCTV network and will be prioritised to tackle problems in residential areas. The report pack suggested the deployment protocol should be reviewed by the committee and it would also be reviewed after the service had been operational for six months.

Westminster After Dark

The committee was scheduled to be provided with an update on the Westminster After Dark project, which is a project looking at how to develop and enhance Westminster’s evening and night-time economy. The report pack stated that this was a follow-up to a meeting held by the Committee on 13th March 2024 where several key stakeholders, including representatives of The Soho Society, the St James’s and Mayfair Residents Association, the Covent Garden Community Association and the Westminster After Dark Stakeholder Assembly, were invited to make representations about their views on the evening and night-time economy. The report pack suggested that a breakdown of data from the Westminster After Dark consultation process, would be provided, to illustrate local differences across the City. The report pack also included recommendations made by the committee at the previous meeting, including a recommendation that the Westminster After Dark engagement strategy should be expanded to include speaking to those who specifically engage in the evening and night-time economy, as well as those who do not. Other recommendations from the previous meeting, included in the report pack, were;

• That a recommendation that barriers to participation in the evening and night time economy should be investigated, should be taken forward;
• That a Westminster After Dark vision should be clear, and that the Council should continue to keep in mind a balance of interests at all times, should be taken forward; and
• That the Westminster After Dark strategy should consider how different evening and night-time events, particularly cultural events, across the City can be better promoted to broaden participation. The report pack included details on how these recommendations were being implemented.

Emergency Preparedness

The Overview and Scrutiny Committee was scheduled to be provided with a biannual update on the Council’s Emergency Preparedness, including the Council’s response to a major incident or emergency, national risks and the Borough Risk Register, which is informed by the National Risk Register² and the London Risk Register.³ The report pack suggested that the Council was reviewing its emergency communication strategies following recommendations made by the Committee at a meeting in December 2023. In that meeting the committee recommended that “communication strategies are refined as much as possible to ensure promptness, clarity and consistency in all channels, and that Councillors are included in the strategy to recognise the key role they play in disseminating information.” The report pack suggested the Council would be putting greater emphasis on early communication in its response to an emergency, which includes both internal and external communications. The report pack also suggested that pre-prepared communications, to be used in emergencies, would be regularly reviewed.

Work Programme

The Overview and Scrutiny Committee was scheduled to review and discuss its Work Programme for the 2024-2025 municipal year. The report pack suggested that the Committee should give consideration to the vision and purpose of the scrutiny function in Westminster, which is to:

“Champion the best possible outcomes for communities and stakeholders”, “Hold the Council, its partner organisations and external bodies to account for decisions taken and the impacts on our communities”, “Examine Council priorities, actively engaging in policy development and offering constructive challenge prior to decisions being taken”, “Working strategically across the city to focus our efforts on policy and service areas where scrutiny can make the biggest impact”, and “Demonstrating integrity and commitment by adhering to the Nolan Principles of Public Life”. The report pack stated that the committee would be asked to review the Committee Tracker, which records the recommendations, information requests, and actions arising from meetings. The report pack indicated that this would allow the Committee to monitor progress against the recommendations it has made, and information it has requested.

Leader's Update

The Overview and Scrutiny Committee was scheduled to receive a written update from Councillor Adam Hug, the Leader of the Council, on the recent work of the Cabinet. This update would cover a range of topics. The report pack suggested the Leader’s update would include a discussion of the North Paddington Programme which will fund a range of projects in the North Paddington area, such as:

• Improving trust and visibility around crime and safety for residents;
• Improving shop fronts on Harrow Road;
• Activating Maida Hill Market; and
• Building capacity for local organisations. The report pack also suggested that the Leader’s update would include a discussion of the Council's progress on its Oxford Street District Programme⁴. The report pack suggested the update would also cover the Council's Cost of Living strategy, which provides help and support to residents struggling with the cost of living. The update would include the Council’s extension of the Household Support Fund⁵, free school meals in Westminster, and the Council’s lobbying of the Government on issues including short-term lets and e-bikes. The report pack suggested the update would include a commitment to provide the committee with an update on the Council's progress against its environmental objectives, in a future report.

The City Council held 7 meetings this week, all of which went ahead as planned.

Cabinet - Monday 15 July 2024

The Cabinet met to discuss a range of issues, including the North Paddington Programme, the reshaping of Housing Solutions Services, Neighbourhood CIL funding, the Fairer Westminster strategy, and medium-term financial planning. This meeting covered a range of important issues affecting residents. Notably, the Cabinet approved plans for the North Paddington Programme, a £20 million initiative aimed at reducing socioeconomic and health inequalities in the area. The programme will focus on delivering tangible improvements, such as creating affordable workspaces, expanding green spaces, and improving energy efficiency in social housing. This decision reflects the Council's commitment to tackling inequality and improving the lives of residents in deprived areas, as outlined in their manifesto pledge to build a fairer Westminster. The meeting also saw the Cabinet approve a new hybrid model for the delivery of Housing Solutions Services. This decision, driven by a desire to improve service user experience and address backlogs, is expected to result in a 12% cost increase over the next two years.

This decision highlights the financial pressures facing local authorities, particularly in light of increasing demand for housing support following the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017. Additionally, the Cabinet noted the progress made on the Fairer Westminster strategy, a comprehensive plan launched in 2022 to address various social and economic challenges in the borough. While acknowledging achievements in areas like family support, housing, and business support, the report also identified ongoing challenges, such as the need for more temporary accommodation and job opportunities.

Vulnerable Adults, Health and Communities Policy and Scrutiny Committee - Tuesday 16 July 2024

The Vulnerable Adults, Health and Communities Policy and Scrutiny Committee met to discuss a number of reports, including a review of the first year of the Council's Winter hot meal provision pilot scheme. The pilot scheme, which ran from November 2023 to March 2024, provided 2,578 meals to 105 older adults who were living alone and housebound. The committee heard that the scheme had been well-received by residents, who praised the quality of the food and the friendliness of the delivery staff.

The committee also considered a report on the possibility of providing free medication for socially vulnerable residents through local pharmacies. The report highlighted that other London boroughs, such as Barnet and Camden, already offer similar schemes. The committee agreed to explore the issue further and to make recommendations to the NHS. Finally, the committee discussed their work programme for the 2024-25 municipal year. The committee agreed to focus on a number of key areas, including GP access, substance misuse services, and the Community Hubs Programme.

Audit and Performance Committee - Thursday 18 July 2024

The Audit and Performance Committee met this week and discussed a wide range of issues, including the Council's financial position, counter-fraud work, the draft statement of accounts, the external audit plan, and cyber security. The committee heard that the council is reporting a small net overspend of £0.69 million against a revenue budget of £193.6 million. The overspend is attributed to a number of factors including the cost of temporary accommodation. The committee also heard that the council's Corporate Anti-Fraud Service (CAFS) had a successful year, recovering 38 properties that were being illegally sublet. The committee approved the draft statement of accounts for 2023/24 and the external audit plan for the same period. The committee also received a report on cyber security at Westminster and were pleased to hear about the ongoing improvements being made to the service.

Health & Wellbeing Board - Thursday 18 July 2024

The Health & Wellbeing Board met this week to discuss the implementation of the Health & Wellbeing Strategy, the development of Integrated Neighbourhood Teams, and preparations for the next Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment. The Board heard that good progress was being made in implementing the Health & Wellbeing Strategy, with a focus on key areas such as improving the health and wellbeing of young people and developing a more accessible Healthy Lifestyle Service.

The Board also discussed the development of Integrated Neighbourhood Teams (INTs). INTs are groups of professionals from different organisations, such as the NHS and local authorities, who work together to support the health and wellbeing of people in a defined geographical area. The Board was told that three INT leadership teams have been established for North Kensington & Chelsea, Queen's Park & Paddington, and South Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster. The Board agreed to support the continued development of INTs.

The meeting also included a discussion on the Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA). A PNA is a report that assesses the need for pharmaceutical services in a defined geographical area. They are used by NHS England to make decisions about applications from pharmacies to join the list of NHS pharmaceutical providers. The Board heard that a new PNA must be published by October 2025 and that a procurement process will begin shortly to appoint a provider to deliver the next PNA.

Licensing Sub-Committee (4) - Thursday 18 July 2024

The Licensing Sub-Committee (4) met to discuss licensing applications, however, the meeting was not open to the public. No information on the applications or decisions made is available at this time.

Pension Board - Thursday 18 July 2024

The Pension Board convened to discuss a number of important matters related to the Westminster Pension Fund. The Board received updates on several key projects, including the Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) project, the McCloud project, the Pensions Dashboard Programme (PDP), and the development of a new Pension Website.

The Board reviewed the progress made on the GMP project, which aims to rectify historical inequalities in pension payments for men and women. The Board also discussed the McCloud project, which addresses similar issues of pension discrimination based on age. Furthermore, the Board discussed the administration of the Local Government Pension Scheme for the City of Westminster and received a positive report on Hampshire Pension Services' (HPS) performance in managing the scheme. The Board also reviewed the latest financial performance data for the Westminster Pension Fund. They were informed about the Fund's performance over the past quarter, year, and three-year period, noting that the Fund had outperformed its benchmark over the one-year and three-year periods.

Rating Advisory Panel - Tuesday 16 July 2024

The Rating Advisory Panel met to consider applications for hardship relief from local businesses. The meeting was not open to the public, and no minutes are available. This non-public meeting highlights the confidential nature of financial assistance discussions and the need to protect the privacy of businesses seeking support.

This week's meetings demonstrate the diverse range of issues that local authorities grapple with, from social care and community development to financial planning and regulatory oversight. They also underscore the importance of transparency and public engagement in ensuring accountable and effective local governance.

This week, Westminster City Council had 5 meetings on its schedule. Of these, 2 meetings went ahead as planned.

Licensing Sub-Committee (3) - Thursday 11 July 2024

The Licensing Sub-Committee (3) convened to deliberate on three applications for premises licenses. The outcome of the meeting saw the committee granting a new premises license to Carbone, located at 41-43 Old Compton Street, and approving a variation to the license for 22 Baker Street. However, the committee opted to refuse Sun 13 Cantons permission to vend alcohol at their new establishment.

Carbone, 41-43 Old Compton Street, London, W1D 5TQ

Carbone, a soon-to-be-launched restaurant in Soho, London, had submitted an application for a new premises license. Their request sought permission to sell alcohol until midnight from Sunday to Wednesday, extending to 00:30 on Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays. Additionally, they requested an additional hour of operation beyond the stipulated alcohol service times. This application encountered opposition from some residents residing near the restaurant's location. A solicitor representing these residents attended the meeting and presented their case. Their argument centered around the notion that the area was already grappling with an excessive concentration of restaurants and bars, a situation they termed oversaturated. They contended that granting the license would exacerbate the existing challenges posed by noise pollution and antisocial behavior.

I make the point that, as you will have seen from the representations from local residents, that there are concerns of cumulative impact – noise nuisance – in the area.

Councillor Louise Hyams, speaking on behalf of the committee, acknowledged that the residents' concerns had been given due consideration. However, she expressed the committee's satisfaction with Carbone's plans for the restaurant, coupled with the conditions stipulated in the license, as sufficient measures to mitigate potential public nuisance. Consequently, the committee made the decision to grant the license.

Sun 13 Cantons, 21 Great Pulteney Street, London, W1F 9NG

Sun 13 Cantons submitted an application for a variation to the premises license of their newly established pub on Great Pulteney Street. The sought-after variation aimed to allow the sale of alcohol until 01:00 seven days a week. The applicant's legal representative, a solicitor, put forth the argument that their clients possessed a robust business plan and boasted extensive experience as operators. They assured the committee that the pub would be managed in strict adherence to all stipulated license conditions. Furthermore, they posited that the pub would serve as a valuable asset to the neighborhood, offering a welcoming space for social gatherings.

However, both the Metropolitan Police and Environmental Health presented representations opposing the application. The Police articulated their stance, highlighting that the pub fell within a designated Cumulative Impact Area¹. They argued that granting the license would only serve to compound the existing issues of crime and disorder prevalent in the area.

The Metropolitan Police Licensing Team objects to this application as the premises is located within the Soho Cumulative Impact Area where there is a presumption of refusal to new licenses.

The committee's legal advisor provided a concise summary of the application's key points:

The applicant is seeking to vary a premises licence to extend the hours for the sale of alcohol for consumption on and off the premises from 11pm to 1am, Monday to Sunday, with an additional hour to disperse. The representations from the police and Environmental Health were made in a timely manner. Therefore, they are to be considered as part of this process.

The committee expressed their apprehension regarding the pub's proximity to several residential properties. They concluded that the applicant had not effectively demonstrated that the pub's operation would not negatively impact the surrounding area. Based on these concerns, the committee made the decision to refuse the application for the license variation.

22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW

The proprietors of 22 Baker Street submitted an application to vary their existing license. Their proposed variation aimed to facilitate a change in the layout of the restaurant and bar. This application did not encounter any objections, neither from members of the public nor relevant authorities. As a result, the committee reviewed the application in a private session, ultimately granting their approval.

Planning Applications Sub-Committee (1) - Tuesday 09 July 2024

The Planning Applications Sub-Committee (1) convened and reached decisions on 6 planning applications. They granted 5 applications and refused 1. Notably, all applications had undergone site visits by councillors prior to the meeting.

19 South Street, London

The committee reviewed an application for partial demolition, basement excavation, and a roof extension at 19 South Street. The application faced opposition from residents concerned about the potential disruption to their amenity during construction, along with a lack of detailed information regarding the materials intended for use. Conversely, supporters of the proposal argued that the plans harmonized with the existing character of the area and would enhance the visual appeal of the building.

The sub-committee reached a resolution to grant planning permission, subject to the condition that the applicant furnishes more comprehensive details about the materials to be used in the project.

Beaumont, Fletcher and Sheridan Buildings, Martlett Court, London

Councillors engaged in deliberations regarding an application to replace the existing timber windows on the Beaumont, Fletcher and Sheridan Buildings in Covent Garden. The proposal sought to install uPVC windows in their place. Opponents of the scheme, including local resident Susan Kyd, voiced their concerns, contending that the new windows would detract from the character of the conservation area.

It's absurd, they are not in keeping with the building

Gary Nolan, representing the applicant, countered by highlighting the positive impact of the new windows on the building's energy efficiency. He asserted that the change would be visually subtle.

you wouldn't even know they are uPVC, unless you went and touched them

After careful consideration, the sub-committee voted to reject the application based on the arguments presented.

The Garden Cafe, Brown Hart Gardens, London

The sub-committee discussed an application focused on the refurbishment of The Garden Cafe in Mayfair. The application garnered support from the local residents association, whose representative spoke favorably about the proposed plans.

we actually feel that the plans are very sympathetic to the building and its curtilage.

The sub-committee reached a resolution to grant both planning permission and listed building consent for the refurbishment project.

48 Shirland Mews, London

Councillors reviewed an application detailing the construction of rear extensions at ground and first-floor levels, an upward adjustment to the roof ridge height, the incorporation of a new entrance, and associated works at 48 Shirland Mews. Local residents raised objections to the scheme, citing concerns over potential loss of light and privacy. However, after deliberations, the sub-committee resolved to grant planning permission for the project, albeit subject to certain conditions.

Basement, part ground floor and first to second floor rear, 127 Mount Street, London

The meeting agenda included an application submitted by Tanner Krolle International Limited. The application sought permission to install air conditioning units and carry out other works at their premises situated at 127 Mount Street. After due consideration, the sub-committee resolved to grant both planning permission and listed building consent for the proposed works.

58-60 Lupus Street, London

The sub-committee engaged in discussions regarding an application to site tables and chairs on the pavement area outside 58-60 Lupus Street. Local residents voiced their opposition to the scheme, arguing that it would obstruct pedestrian access and exacerbate existing issues with street furniture.

people already are tripping up on the existing street furniture

Following deliberations, the sub-committee decided to grant planning permission for the placement of tables and chairs but imposed a time restriction, limiting the permission to a temporary period of two years.

Postponed and Cancelled Meetings

This week saw the postponement of three meetings: the Cabinet meeting scheduled for Monday 08 July 2024, the Audit and Performance Committee meeting scheduled for Tuesday 09 July 2024, and the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday 10 July 2024. Additionally, two meetings were cancelled: the Discretionary Housing Payments Review Advisory Panel meeting scheduled for Tuesday 09 July 2024 and the Standards Committee meeting scheduled for Thursday 11 July 2024.

The City Council held 3 meetings this week, of which 1 meeting went ahead as planned.

Licensing Sub-Committee (1) - Wednesday 03 July 2024

The Licensing Sub-Committee (1) met to consider three applications, all of which were granted. The meeting considered one application for a new licence, one for a new premises licence, and one for a variation to an existing licence.

Licensing Committees and Sub-Committees are responsible for considering applications for premises licences, club premises certificates and Temporary Event Notices. They can also review existing licences and impose, remove or vary conditions on them. This could mean anything from changing the hours during which a venue is allowed to sell alcohol, to adding a condition requiring a venue to have security staff on duty at certain times.

The sale and supply of alcohol in England and Wales is governed by the Licensing Act 2003.¹ The Act aims to promote the four licensing objectives:

• The prevention of crime and disorder
• Public safety
• The prevention of public nuisance
• The protection of children from harm

When making decisions about licensing applications, the Licensing Sub-Committee must consider the licensing objectives, as well as any representations made by interested parties. Interested parties can include local residents, businesses, the police and other authorities.

This meeting follows a now well-established pattern of late-night alcohol licences being granted over the objections of residents. This is the second meeting of a Licensing Sub-Committee in as many weeks, and in both cases the committee chose to grant the licence despite the concerns of residents. This decision reflects the content of the Council's Statement of Licensing Policy 2021. The policy makes it clear that the council will generally seek to support businesses that wish to obtain licences, and that objections from residents will not be considered a sufficient reason to refuse an application unless they are supported by evidence. In practice, this means that residents who object to licensing applications have to provide concrete evidence that the application, if granted, would be likely to lead to crime and disorder, public nuisance, or harm to children. This can be difficult for residents to do.

In this case, the Sub-Committee chose to grant a 24-hour licence for the sale of alcohol for consumption off the premises to Tila Bruton Deli, a delicatessen at 68 Crawford Street, London, W1H 1HS. A local resident raised concerns about the potential for crime and disorder and public nuisance, and presented a petition to the committee containing the signatures of 40 residents of 72 Crawford Street, but the committee was satisfied with the applicant's assurances that they would operate the premises responsibly.

The sub-committee also granted a new premises licence to a restaurant at 25 Leinster Terrace, London, W2 3EU. The licence permits the sale of alcohol for consumption on and off the premises between the hours of 10am and 11pm, Monday to Sunday. No representations were received from local residents, businesses or the police.

Finally, the sub-committee considered an application from Ivy Asia at 20 Dover Street, London, W1S 4LX. The restaurant applied to remove a number of outdated and unenforceable conditions from their licence. The sub-committee approved the application in full.

Inner West London Mental Health Services Reconfiguration Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee - Tuesday 02 July 2024

The Inner West London Mental Health Services Reconfiguration Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting scheduled for Tuesday 02 July 2024 has been postponed.

Licensing Committee - Wednesday 03 July 2024

The Licensing Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday 03 July 2024 has been cancelled.

This week, the Westminster City Council held several important meetings, with key decisions made in the Licensing Sub-Committee and the Planning (Major Applications) Sub-Committee.

Licensing Sub-Committee (2) - Thursday 27 June 2024

The Licensing Sub-Committee (2) met to consider two applications for premises licences. The committee granted a licence to 157 Praed Street but refused the application from Williams Hirst.

157 Praed Street, London W2 1RH
The committee first considered an application from 157 Praed Street for a new premises licence to sell alcohol between 10am and 11pm, Monday to Sunday. No objections were received against the application, from either members of the public or responsible authorities. The application was made in accordance with the council's Statement of Licensing Policy, which outlines the council's approach to licensing decisions. Given this, the committee granted the application.

Williams Hirst, 24 Wardour Street, London W1D 6QJ
The second application was from Williams Hirst for a new premises licence for their premises at 24 Wardour Street. They sought to sell alcohol for consumption on and off the premises from 10am to 1am Sunday to Wednesday and 10am to 3am Thursday to Saturday. The Metropolitan Police opposed the application on the grounds that the hours requested were excessive and would lead to crime and disorder.

The hours sought are considered excessive in this location, which is within the Cumulative Impact Zone. Awarding such hours would undermine the licensing objectives, especially the prevention of crime and disorder.

The applicants offered to reduce their opening hours to address these concerns, proposing to close at 12am Sunday to Wednesday and 2am Thursday to Saturday. However, the committee decided to refuse the application due to the persistent concerns about crime and disorder.

Planning (Major Applications) Sub-Committee - Tuesday 25 June 2024

The Planning (Major Applications) Sub-Committee reviewed three significant planning applications, approving two and refusing one.

38-70 Baker Street
The sub-committee approved the redevelopment of a site at 38-70 Baker Street, which includes 64-66 Blandford Street and 43-45 Dorset Street. The proposal involves demolishing the existing buildings and constructing a new building with office space, retail, and restaurant units. The approval is subject to conditions, including a £2,075,000 contribution to the Carbon Offset Fund and the submission of a Construction Logistics Plan.

63-65 Curzon Street
The committee also approved an application for the erection of a building at 63-65 Curzon Street, following the demolition of the existing structure. The mixed-use development includes retail units at basement and ground floor levels, office space, and 39 residential units. Conditions for approval include providing affordable housing units and contributions to the Council's Carbon Offset Fund and a nearby Community Centre. The decision is subject to a Section 106 agreement and the Mayor of London not intervening.

49-50 Berkeley Square
An application to redevelop 49-50 Berkeley Square was refused. The proposal involved demolishing the existing buildings and constructing a new office building with retail units at the ground floor. The committee found that the proposal's excessive height, bulk, and design would negatively impact the Mayfair Conservation Area. Additionally, the proposal did not optimize the site's capacity for mixed-use development, including residential elements, which would support local vitality and viability.

Postponed and Cancelled Meetings

The Young People, Learning and Employment Policy and Scrutiny Committee meeting scheduled for Tuesday 25 June 2024, and the Housing and Regeneration Policy and Scrutiny Committee meeting scheduled for Thursday 27 June 2024, were both postponed. Additionally, the Planning & City Development Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday 26 June 2024 was cancelled.

This week's decisions highlight the council's continued focus on balancing development with community impact and safety.