This week in Westminster:

Mental Health Bed Cuts Challenged Amidst Demand Surge

The Inner West London Mental Health Services Reconfiguration Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee convened this week to scrutinise the Integrated Care Board's (ICB) decision to reduce inpatient mental health services across Kensington, Chelsea, and Westminster, despite concerns about rising demand and the impact on vulnerable residents. See the full meeting details here.

• The Decision: The ICB endorsed a plan that includes a reduction in inpatient mental health services, alongside the establishment of five step-up crisis beds and five step-down beds in the south of Westminster, jointly funded by Westminster City Council and the ICB.
• Westminster's Stance: Councillor Iman Les, speaking on behalf of Councillor Butler, reiterated the council's preference for reopening the 51 acute mental health beds at the Gordon Hospital, arguing that the proposed 10 new beds are insufficient to meet current demand.
• Demand Concerns: Councillor Les highlighted challenges in accessing timely inpatient support, increased demand for acute mental health support, and the unsuitability of the community-based model for those experiencing homelessness.
• Grenfell Impact: Councillor Concia Albert raised concerns about the potential impact of the Grenfell Tower demolition on the mental health of the wider community, stressing the need for adequate resources for the Mental Health Crisis Assessment Service (MCAS) at St Charles Hospital.
• Data Doubts: Councillor Mona Ahmed questioned whether any other area in the country had drastically reduced inpatient beds for mental health and severe mental health and then transitioned to community-based care. Gareth Jarvis, Medical Director of Abel Mental Health Services, responded that he was not sure he could answer that.
• Bed Numbers: Councillor Lucy Knight asked how confident the panel felt that the 10 beds are really enough to meet the need, and what the trigger is for increasing that number if it is felt that the need is not being met.
• Financial Pressures: Councillor Knight also inquired about the ICB's commitment to expanding the MCAS service, given current financial pressures. Toby Lambert, Population Health representative for the ICB, responded that the ICB has a medium-term financial strategy that envisages spending an ever-increasing share of its budget on mental health and community services, and a decreasing share on acute sites.
• Timing: Toby Lambert stated that the ICB is still committed to opening the beds by March 2026, and is hopeful that it can be done before that.
• Cost Breakdown: Councillor Lorraine Dean asked about the initial costs of the 10 beds, the running costs per year, and whether these beds will be reserved solely for Westminster residents. Toby Lambert responded that the running costs are about £120,000 per year per bed, and that the initial cost depends on where they go. He confirmed that the beds will be reserved for Westminster residents, but that it would be unethical to deny a patient from somewhere else care if the care was available.
• Health Inequalities: Councillor Anne Cyron raised concerns about the potential impact on health inequalities for black people in particular, and especially for black people with severe and enduring mental illness.
• Committee Dissolved: The chair responded that this committee was set up for a specific purpose, which was to scrutinise the decision that has now been made, and that this is the final meeting of the committee because it has fulfilled its purpose.

This decision follows previous discussions about mental health service provision in Westminster, including concerns raised last year about delays in accessing timely inpatient support.

Frankfort Arms License Suspended After Stabbing

The Licensing Sub-Committee (2) has suspended the license of the Frankfort Arms pub following a stabbing incident and evidence of the premises serving alcohol after hours. Read the full details of the meeting here.

• Police Action: The Metropolitan Police applied for an expedited review of the license, citing the pub's association with serious crime.
• Incident Details: Police were called to the pub after a man was stabbed. CCTV footage revealed that the incident was more serious than initially reported by the manager, and that alcohol was being served after the permitted hours.
• Past Violence: The police also noted four other violence-related offences at the premises in the previous three months, most of which occurred after midnight.
• License Holder Agrees: Alex Green, representing the Craft Union Public Limited, the premises license holder, agreed with the police's request to suspend the license and confirmed that the pub had already closed voluntarily.
• Committee Decision: The committee decided to suspend the license with immediate effect, remove the designated premises supervisor (DPS), and ensure that all sales of alcohol cease immediately.
• Councillor Carman's Statement: Councillor Maggie Carman, Deputy Cabinet Member - Adult Social Care, Supported and Specialist Housing, stated that the suspension would allow sufficient time for the premises license holder to undertake a full investigation and work collaboratively with the police.

This decision was made under section 53A1B of the Licensing Act 2003, which allows for expedited reviews of licenses when premises are associated with serious crime.

Pension Fund Committee Seeks Independent Investment Advisor

The Pension Fund Committee convened an extraordinary meeting this week to interview shortlisted candidates and appoint an independent advisor for the pension fund. More information about the meeting can be found here.

• Key Role: The advisor will play a critical role in overseeing the transition of the Fund’s remaining non-pooled assets to the London Collective Investment Vehicle (LCIV) and provide guidance on investment strategy.
• Responsibilities: The advisor will ensure committee decisions align with fund strategies and policies, strengthen internal controls, and ensure legal compliance.
• Qualifications: The ideal candidate should possess experience in pension fund management, knowledge of governance, risk management, and compliance within institutional investment settings, and demonstrate excellent communication skills.

The appointment of an independent advisor is intended to ensure that the pension fund is managed effectively and in accordance with government guidelines.

Other Matters

• The Health & Wellbeing Board discussed a range of issues, including mental health support, the Better Care Fund, and a Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment. Details of the meeting can be found here.
  • The board reviewed mental health support initiatives, noting increased need among young people and rising demand for secondary mental health services.
  • The board reviewed the Better Care Fund end-of-year outturn for 2024/25, noting overspends on Community Equipment Services in both Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea.
  • The board discussed the Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA) for both Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea, agreeing to begin a 60-day statutory consultation.
• The Cabinet discussed the introduction of a private rented sector licensing scheme, allocated funding from the Neighbourhood Community Infrastructure Levy (NCIL) to local projects, and considered the medium-term financial plan. More information about the meeting can be found here.
  • The Cabinet discussed the introduction of a Private Rented Sector (PRS) Selective Licensing Scheme[^1] across 15 of the 18 wards in Westminster.
  • The Cabinet considered a report regarding the allocation of Neighbourhood Community Infrastructure Levy (NCIL) funding to several projects.
  • The Cabinet considered a report outlining the council’s updated financial position over the next three years and the financial framework for delivering key policy objectives.
• The Licensing Sub-Committee (2) considered applications for shadow licenses for premises on Bateman Street, Greek Street and Wellington Street, but deferred their decisions to a later date. Read the full details of the meeting here.
  • The Sub-Committee considered four applications for shadow licenses[^2] in the West End.

Upcoming Meetings

• Strategic Planning Committee on Tuesday 27 May 2025 to discuss planning applications for Ebury Gate, 6 - 10 Bruton Street, and 25 - 27 St George Street.
• Licensing Sub-Committee (6) on Thursday 29 May 2025. Link to the meeting here.
• Licensing Sub-Committee (3) on Wednesday 04 June 2025. Link to the meeting here.
• Overview and Scrutiny Committee on Thursday 05 June 2025. Link to the meeting here.
• Licensing Sub-Committee (2) on Thursday 05 June 2025. Link to the meeting here.

This week in Westminster:

• The Licensing Sub-Committee (3) was cancelled.
• The Licensing Sub-Committee (1) was cancelled.
• At the annual full Council meeting, Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg was elected as the Lord Mayor of Westminster.
• The Planning Sub-Committee (1) reviewed planning applications for Ebury Street, St George's Square, Lower John Street, Brunswick Mews and Bayswater Road.

Council - Wednesday 14 May 2025

At the annual full Council meeting, Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg was elected as the Lord Mayor of Westminster for the ensuing year, and Councillors confirmed committee appointments and approved changes to the council's constitution, including updates to the Procurement Code. Councillor Robert Rigby, the outgoing Lord Mayor, was thanked for his service.

Here's a more detailed look at the key discussions:

Election of the Lord Mayor

Councillor Ruth Bush nominated Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg to be the next Lord Mayor of Westminster, praising his long service, integrity, and commitment to the people of Westminster. Councillor Bush spoke of Councillor Dimoldenberg's work in establishing Queen's Park Community Council¹, his support for the late Councillor Ian Wilder's defence of residents in Soho, and his battle with the Standards Board for England. She also noted his literary contributions, including The Westminster Whistleblowers, and his donations of royalties to food banks. Councillor Hamza Taouzzale seconded the nomination, acknowledging Councillor Dimoldenberg as a role model and praising his family, including his wife Linda Hardman and daughters Amelia Leeds and Zoe.

With no further nominations, Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg was elected Lord Mayor.

Councillor Dimoldenberg addressed the council, expressing his gratitude and outlining his plans for the year, including:

• Visiting all wards in Westminster to celebrate local groups and volunteers.
• Promoting the work of his two chosen charities, the Avenues Youth Project and Hotel School.
• Encouraging walking and appreciation of Westminster's history through themed walks with the Westminster Guides.
• Launching two arts initiatives: inviting local artists to submit landscapes of Westminster and commissioning a musical suite from a student at the Royal Academy of Music.

He also shared his family's history, from Kirch in the Crimea to Manchester, and highlighted the contributions of immigrants to Westminster, mentioning Daniel Amur, a tailor of Algerian and Croatian heritage from Church Street.

Vote of Thanks to the Past Lord Mayor

Councillor Rachel Roberton moved a vote of thanks to the outgoing Lord Mayor, Councillor Robert Rigby, and his Lady Mayoress, Emiko Murai Rigby, for their service. She praised Councillor Rigby's dedication, kindness, and focus on highlighting the work of community groups and charities such as the Cardinal Hume Centre and the MCC Foundation. She also noted his efforts to promote activity in schools and care homes, his support for the military and veteran communities, and his engagement with the Japanese community.

Councillor Paul Swaddle OBE seconded the motion, highlighting Councillor Rigby's numerous engagements and his passion for inspiring activity. He also acknowledged Emiko Murai Rigby's role as an ambassador for the city.

Councillor Rigby responded with thanks, acknowledging the support of council members and staff, and highlighting his special memories of community events, visits to care homes, and VE Day celebrations. He also mentioned his efforts to establish a junior park run in Hyde Park and install a commemorative paving stone in Trafalgar Square.

Constitutional Matters

The council approved the allocation of places on the standing committees and confirmed the proportional division of seats on the standing committees.

Changes to the Council's Constitution

The council approved changes to the Procurement Code, as summarised in section four of the report and displayed in appendix A of the Follow On Agenda 14th-May-2025 19.00 Council. The council also approved the council's constitution, inclusive of the changes agreed and as set out in appendix B of the Follow On Agenda 14th-May-2025 19.00 Council.

The changes to the Procurement Code include:

• Removing the wording on 'acceptable' waivers and replacing it with a statement advising that, in exceptional circumstances only, waivers can be requested.
• Changes to wording relating to waivers and breach of the Code to clarify the difference between the two.
• A separate guidance document on waivers has been drafted for officer use to ensure that the implications of using waivers is fully understood and considered.
• Minor wording changes to remove ambiguity, make wording easier for officers to understand, and correct minor editorial errors.

The Procurement Code is designed to ensure that the council:

• Complies with applicable procurement legislation.
• Has regard to the National Procurement Policy Statement.
• Complies with its procurement transparency obligations.
• Delivers appropriate services, social value, and community benefit.
• Ensures responsible procurement and commissioning.
• Achieves value for money.
• Manages risks associated with procurement.

Report on Key Decisions

The council noted the report on the executive decisions taken under special urgency in 2024/25 as detailed in Section 4 of the 24-25 Key Decisions Use of Special Urgency Procedures report.

The report detailed three instances where Special Urgency provisions were used during the 2024/25 municipal year:

• Supply of Energy and Ancillary Services Contract (Supply of Energy 2) Award
• Award of Contract for Cashless Parking Services through the G-Cloud Framework
• Homecare Services – Extension

Planning Sub-Committee (1) - Tuesday 13 May 2025

The Planning Sub-Committee (1) of Westminster Council is scheduled to meet on 13 May 2025 to review several planning applications. These include proposals for hotel amalgamation, residential extensions, and changes of use, with a focus on design, heritage, and amenity impacts. The meeting will also cover standard agenda items such as membership updates and declaration of interests.

Planning Applications

Ebury House Hotel, 102 - 104 Ebury Street

The committee will consider an application for the amalgamation of the Astors (106-112 Ebury Street) and Belgravia (102-104 Ebury Street) hotels into a single entity. The proposal includes internal reconfiguration and refurbishment, extensions to the rear at various levels, a mansard roof enclosure at 106 Ebury Street, and the installation of lifts.

Key considerations include the impact on residential amenity, the design and heritage implications within the Belgravia Conservation Area, and land use acceptability. Objections have been received from the Belgravia Residents Association, the Belgravia Society, the Belgravia Neighbourhood Forum, and local residents, citing concerns over amenity, design, and highways issues.

The report pack notes that the proposed amalgamation aims to improve the quality of hotel accommodation, aligning with Policy 15 of the City Plan 2019-2040. It also mentions the Belgravia Neighbourhood Plan, which acknowledges the importance of commercial activities but resists late-night uses outside designated centres. The applicant anticipates that the dinner service will be from 18:00, with last orders at 21:30 and closing at 23:30. For the bar area, the hours would be 12 noon, with last orders for non-resident guests at 23:00.

The report pack states that the applicant has agreed to remove the previously proposed small outdoor terrace area shown as part of the restaurant extension and to fix all windows (including the rooflight) shut.

The report pack also notes that the proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the Grade II listed buildings² that form part of the application site. The report pack states that the harm would be caused by the partitioning and creation of linking corridors at second and third floor level across the site, the platform lift within the front light-well at 110 Ebury Street and the internal passenger lift also at 110 Ebury Street.

Fourth Floor Flat F, 104 St George's Square

The Planning Sub-Committee (1) will consider an application relating to Fourth Floor Flat F, 104 St George's Square, which seeks permission for an extension to the rear closet wing at fourth floor level. The flat is located within a Grade II listed building in the Pimlico Conservation Area.

Key issues include the impact on the listed building, the character and appearance of the conservation area, and the amenity of neighbouring properties. The report pack notes that the prevailing pattern of rear extensions in the terrace does not rise above the penultimate storey level, contributing to the terrace's historic significance.

The report pack states that the proposed extension to the closet wing would rise above penultimate storey level. The proposals would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, and the special interest of the listed building. It would also harm the setting of the nearby listed buildings around the square.

1 Lower John Street

The committee will review an application for the erection of a mansard roof extension at 1 Lower John Street, along with a change of use of the upper levels from a restaurant to residential units. The proposal includes alterations to the facade, including window replacements, and an increase in the height of a chimney stack shared with the adjacent listed building at 2 Lower John Street.

The key considerations involve land use, design, heritage, and residential amenity. The site is located within the Soho Conservation Area, the Central Activities Zone³, and the West End Retail and Leisure Special Policy Area. The report pack notes an objection from the Soho Society, citing concerns over the bulk of the proposed extension, its visibility from Air Street, and potential harm to the amenity of 2 Lower John Street.

The report pack also notes that the alterations to No.2 Lower John Street relate to the party wall and chimney stack. The changes are minor and typical of buildings in the surrounding conservation area where there is a height difference. The chimney stack will not appear excessively tall, and the party wall is raised in a manner sympathetic to the building and its surroundings. There is no harm to the characterand appearance of the conservation area, or to the listed building.

3 Brunswick Mews

The committee will discuss an application for a new mansard roof extension at 3 Brunswick Mews, to enlarge the existing dwellinghouse.

Key considerations include the impact on the character and appearance of the Portman Estate Conservation Area and the amenity of neighbouring properties.

The report pack notes that the application site forms part of an attractive late 19th-century terrace that maintains a considerable amount of its uniformity. The report pack also notes that the building is marked within the Portman Estate Conservation Area Audit as one where roof extensions will not be acceptable without proper justification.

Caroline House, 135 Bayswater Road

The committee will consider an application for the erection of a single-storey extension at first-floor level at Caroline House, 135 Bayswater Road, to create a residential unit. The proposal includes a green roof, PV panels, and external waste storage.

Key considerations include the acceptability of the residential accommodation, the design and heritage implications within the Bayswater Conservation Area, and the impact on residential amenity.

The report pack notes that objections have been raised by residents and the Bayswater Residents Association, citing concerns over design, residential amenity, trees, and highways issues.

The report pack also notes that the Environmental Health Officer has identified that the kitchen is the most likely place for a fire to start and occupiers of the bedrooms are not adequately protected in the event of fire as they will have to escape via the living/kitchen area.

Licensing Sub-Committee (3) - Wednesday 14 May 2025

The Licensing Sub-Committee (3) of Westminster Council met, but no video was provided.

Licensing Sub-Committee (1) - Thursday 15 May 2025

The Licensing Sub-Committee (1) of Westminster Council met, but no video was provided.

Appointments Sub-Committee - Thursday 15 May 2025

The Appointments Sub-Committee of Westminster Council met on Thursday 15 May 2025 to discuss changes to membership, declarations of interest, and the appointment to the post of Bi-Borough Director of Health Partnerships and Mental Health.

Appointment of Bi-Borough Director of Health Partnerships and Mental Health

The committee was scheduled to discuss the appointment to the post of Bi-Borough Director of Health Partnerships and Mental Health. The public reports pack included documentation pertaining to this appointment.

Appointments Sub-Committee - Thursday 15 May 2025

The Appointments Sub-Committee of Westminster Council met on Thursday 15 May 2025 to discuss changes to membership, declarations of interest, and the appointment to the post of Bi-Borough Director of Learning Disabilities and Provider Services.

Appointment to the Post of Bi-Borough Director of Learning Disabilities and Provider Services

The committee was scheduled to discuss the appointment to the post of Bi-Borough Director of Learning Disabilities and Provider Services. The agenda stated that the reports pack contained information on this matter.

This week in Westminster:

• The Licensing Sub-Committee (4) discussed licensing applications for premises on Churton Street, Welbeck Street, and Harrow Road, focusing on resident concerns and potential antisocial behaviour.

Licensing Sub-Committee (4) - Thursday 08 May 2025

The Westminster Council Licensing Sub-Committee (4) convened to discuss licensing applications for three locations: 24 Churton Street, Space Made, Hahnemann House, 32 Welbeck Street, and Jaegos House, RB Building, 557 Harrow Road. The committee heard arguments for and against each application, focusing on concerns raised by residents, councillors, and responsible authorities¹. No decisions were made at the meeting, with the committee adjourning to deliberate and announce their decisions within five working days.

24 Churton Street, London, SW1V 2LP

This application was for a new premises licence for a shop at 24 Churton Street. The applicant, Mr Sathimi Dopinath, represented by Abi Rami from ALA Law Solicitors, sought to sell alcohol for consumption off the premises.

Several residents objected to the application, fearing it would exacerbate antisocial behaviour and street drinking in the area. Councillor Glenn, representing the ward, echoed these concerns, noting the proximity of Tatchbrook Market and a problem premises already causing issues with early morning alcohol sales. One resident, Mr Jay, stated that the business as it currently exists is not representative of what was put in the application.

Concerns were raised about the shop's emphasis on alcohol and vapes, as indicated by the shopfront signage: Lord's Express City Store off-licence grocery confectionery...off-licence groceries, soft drinks and vapes.

In response to the concerns, the applicant offered to start alcohol sales later in the day, suggesting 11:00 am, and then agreeing to 12:00 pm following residents' concerns. They also highlighted staff training, CCTV installation, and a willingness to work with the police and neighbours to prevent crime and antisocial behaviour. The applicant also stated that they would remove advertising for 'flying spirits, waves and all of that'.

The committee also discussed conditions relating to the types of alcohol sold, specifically regarding premium beers and ciders, and the accuracy of the premises plan, which Councillor Glenn suggested showed alcohol being 'much more dominant in your shop than it actually is'.

Space Made, Hahnemann House, 32 Welbeck Street, W1G 8EU

This application was for a new premises licence for Space Made, a co-working space at Hahnemann House, 32 Welbeck Street. The applicant, SpaceMaid Group Limited, represented by Christopher Brunner from John Gall and Partners and Bradley Dixon of the applicant company, sought to sell alcohol for consumption on the premises, late night refreshment, and films Monday to Sunday.

The presenting officer noted that representations from interested parties, the Metropolitan Police Service, and Environmental Health had been received, but the latter two were withdrawn following agreement of conditions.

Christopher Brunner described Space Made as a workspace provider with a focus on smaller businesses and start-ups. He explained that the premises does not operate with hot desks², but instead offers individual offices and meeting rooms for its approximately 5,000 members. He also detailed the use of a former chapel at the rear of the building for events, with a maximum capacity of 70 people.

Concerns from residents, as outlined in a letter invited by the West Kingston Lab, focused on the fire exit at the rear of the chapel potentially becoming a main entrance or smoking area, and on refuge disposal. Mr Brunner clarified that the fire exit would only be used for disabled access and emergencies, smoking would be at the front of the premises, and refuge disposal would also be at the front.

Councillor Tim Mitchell asked about the membership scheme and pre-booking requirements, and Mr Brunner confirmed that all attendees would be pre-registered. He also acknowledged the need for increased monitoring and staff presence at events finishing after 10 pm to ensure people disperse gradually and without causing a disturbance.

Amendments to the proposed conditions were discussed, including clarifying the designated smoking area as Welbeck Street and updating conditions related to waste collection times.

Jaegos House, RB Building, 557 Harrow Road, London, W10 4RH

This application concerned a variation of the premises licence for Jaegos House, a family-friendly members club at RB Building, 557 Harrow Road. The applicant, the Middle House's group limited, represented by Chris Brunner from Longall and Partners and Johnny Ramsey of the applicant committee, sought to vary the layout of the premises to include the lodge within the licensed area.

Mr Brunner explained that Jaegos House is a members club with facilities for children and adults, including soft play areas, a cinema, exercise studios, and a cafe/restaurant. He stated that the purpose of the variation was to allow the storage of alcohol in the lodge, a separate building used for events, rather than transporting it from the main building across a private car park.

Deidre McArdle, a local resident, objected to the application, raising concerns about the overall management of the site, noise levels, lighting, and the impact on the local community. She expressed a belief that the sale of alcohol would exacerbate existing problems.

Ms McArdle also raised concerns about the impact of lighting on wildlife along the Grand Union Canal, referencing advice from the Bat Conservation Trust.

In response, Mr Brunner acknowledged Ms McArdle's concerns but argued that they were not directly relevant to the licensing objectives. He emphasised that the application was primarily for the storage of alcohol and that the existing licence already allowed for off-sales. He also highlighted the absence of representations from responsible authorities.

Subject: Pimlico District Heating Future Decided, Baker Street Development Management Plans, and More

This week in Westminster:

• The Climate Action, Environment and Highways Policy and Scrutiny Committee reviewed the Pimlico District Heating Undertaking (PDHU) decision, but ultimately took no further action.
• The Rating Advisory Panel was scheduled to discuss Non-Domestic Rates (NNDR) Discretionary and Hardship Relief Applications.
• The Planning Sub-Committee (2) was scheduled to discuss management plans for the Baker Street development.
• The Licensing Sub-Committee (2) met, but no video was provided.
• The North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee discussed community-based specialist palliative care and the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre.

Climate Action, Environment and Highways Policy and Scrutiny Committee - Monday 28 April 2025

The Climate Action, Environment and Highways Policy and Scrutiny Committee met to review a call-in regarding the Cabinet Member Decision on the future of the Pimlico District Heating Undertaking (PDHU). The committee voted to take no further action, allowing the Cabinet Member Decision to be implemented.

The main item under discussion was a review of the Cabinet Member Decision concerning the future of the Pimlico District Heating Undertaking (PDHU). Councillors Jim Glen, Tim Mitchell and Ed Pitt Ford had requested the call-in to examine the progress on the initial outline business case.

Councillor Liza Begum, Cabinet Member for Housing Services, introduced the report, emphasising the need for investment and clarifying that funding would come from the strategic community infrastructure levy (SCIL) and not be charged to residents. Councillor Ryan Jude, Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Ecology, Culture and Air Quality, added that the funding would enable the next stage of the programme, allowing further analysis and statutory consultations.

Members raised several concerns and questions:

• Consultant Spending: Councillors questioned the continued commissioning of consultants, the high consultant spend per flat, and whether using SCIL funds for consultants represented a good use of public money. They asked if the Cabinet was satisfied with the quality of the consultants' work and whether doubling the spend would still provide value for money.
• Option Considerations: The committee sought to understand why options like ground source heat pumps had been ruled out and the role of consultants in the decision-making process.
• Future Proofing: Concerns were raised about the level of confidence in spending more money with the same consultants regarding future delivery and programme development.
• Public Knowledge: Councillors questioned why the work and interest of AECOM in Mobile Heat Batteries and the SWAN options had not been declared, and whether alternative consultants could be considered.
• Consultant Delivery: Clarity was sought on the council’s assessment of consultant delivery against the initial scope, how the scope had been redefined since 2023, and why some key delivery targets had not been met despite the funding to date.
• Quality of Analysis: Given unclear assumptions, disputed claims about grid connections, and the inability to justify some qualitative analysis in public meetings, councillors questioned extending the current consultant contract.
• Breakdown of Spending: Confusion arose regarding the figures provided in the paper, with discrepancies in total spends and potential unspent sums.
• Information for Decision Makers: Members asked whether the Cabinet should reconsider the decision, given that some details were not included in the initial paper.
• Duplication of Effort: Concerns were raised that additional funds would duplicate existing efforts.
• Resident Understanding: Councillors questioned how important further consultant analysis and materials would be for wider resident understanding and assurance, considering that many residents are technically minded and engaged.
• Consequences of Deferral: The committee asked about the repercussions of not spending the £1.2 million on further consultant analysis and the assurance on the quality of outcomes from this spending.
• Electric Options: The importance of considering electric options for heating at various scales was discussed, along with potential funding sources to support the project.
• Alternative Decision Options: Members inquired whether the Cabinet could review the decision in terms of a different funding amount or conditions on awards to consultants based on performance.
• Grid Capacity: Clarity was sought on assumptions regarding peak marginal cost for grid capacity and whether grid upgrades would even be required.

The committee requested a detailed breakdown of smaller spends, amounting to approximately £140,000, including spending on the resident technical advisor and feasibility studies.

A vote was held, resulting in 4 votes to note the report and take no further action, and 3 votes to refer the decision back to the decision maker. As a result, the committee resolved to take no further action and allow the Cabinet Member Decision to be implemented.

Councillor Ed Pitt Ford declared that he had investments in Octopus Energy and Octopus Investments, which could potentially be relevant to some possible outcomes of the PDHU project.

Councillors Jason Williams, Jim Glen, Ed Pitt Ford and Liza Begum declared that they were ward councillors in areas serviced by PDHU, making it a subject of high interest and regular meetings with their residents.

Rating Advisory Panel - Tuesday 29 April 2025

The Rating Advisory Panel of Westminster Council was scheduled to meet on Tuesday 29 April 2025. Councillor Concia Albert, Chair of the Rating Advisory Panel, along with Councillor Robert Eagleton, Deputy Cabinet Member - Finance and Fairer Working, Councillor Patrick Lilley, Deputy Cabinet Member for Economic Development, Lead Member for Soho and LGBTQ+ Champion, and Councillor Selina Short were listed as the attendees. The main item on the agenda was the consideration of NNDR Discretionary and Hardship Relief Applications.

The panel was scheduled to discuss Non-Domestic Rates (NNDR) Discretionary and Hardship Relief Applications¹. The report pack included detailed information on these applications, spanning nearly 520 pages.

Planning Sub-Committee (2) - Tuesday 29 April 2025

The Planning Sub-Committee (2) of Westminster Council scheduled a meeting to discuss several planning applications and related matters. Councillor Jason Williams, Chair of Planning, and Councillors Barbara Arzymanow, Hannah Galley, Patrick Lilley (Deputy Cabinet Member for Economic Development, Lead Member for Soho and LGBTQ+ Champion), and James Small-Edwards (Deputy Cabinet Member - Regeneration) were expected to be in attendance. The meeting was scheduled to cover a range of applications, including alterations to a maisonette, a roof extension, and a change of use for commercial premises, as well as management plans for a major development.

The committee was scheduled to discuss details related to the large development at 19-35 Baker Street, 88-110 George Street, 69-71 Blandford Street and 30 Gloucester Place. This related to applications for the approval of details relating to conditions attached to the planning permission granted on 1 October 2021.

The applications included:

• A servicing management plan, which was required to include processes, internal storage locations, scheduling of deliveries and staffing. The plan was expected to consider restricting deliveries to vehicles that fit within the delivery bay and managing arrivals to avoid congestion.
• Details of gates allowing access into the central courtyard.
• A management plan detailing how the 10th floor room and terrace would be used.

The report pack noted that objections to all three applications had been received from residents of Blandford Street, raising concerns about the adequacy of the servicing bay, potential noise nuisance, and security.

The report pack included a summary of the proposed operational management plan (OMP) for the 10th floor rooftop room and south-facing terrace, stating that the space was intended for use by office occupiers and their visitors for activities such as:

café/bar with seating, meetings, seminars and occasional booked events. The hours of operation will be 0700-2100 Monday -Friday.

The OMP also stated that Building Management would control the operation, ensure responsible use, and maintain a 24-hour security and CCTV presence. It also specified limits to the number of people allowed in the rooftop room and on the 10th floor terrace, and stated that amplified music would be played inside the room at a modest sound level with the doors closed.

The Planning Sub-Committee was scheduled to discuss an application concerning 35 Whitehall, which sought permission for a roof extension to create an additional floor for the fourth-floor flat. The application also included plans for:

• Enlarging the lightwell down to the second and third floors.
• Installing a lift to the rear of the building.
• Reconfiguring the existing flats on the first, second, and third floors.
• Partially infilling the rear courtyard.
• Installing plant equipment within the infilled rear courtyard.

The report pack noted that objections had been received from occupiers of Craigs Court House, 25 Whitehall, primarily on amenity grounds, including concerns about loss of light and privacy, and noise.

The committee was scheduled to consider an application for 95 - 97 Dean Street, seeking permission for a change of use of the ground and mezzanine floors to a restaurant. The ground floor was currently vacant, and the upper floors were in residential use.

The report pack noted that the Soho Society had objected to the application on amenity grounds and over the potential over-concentration of food and drink uses in the area. The Soho Society stated that the proposal conflicted with the Soho Neighbourhood Plan, which aims to maintain the retail function of the area and avoid further erosion of retail provision.

The committee was scheduled to discuss an application for alterations to a lower maisonette at 104 Star Street. The application sought permission for:

• Installing a stair within the front basement lightwell, along with a new door and infill extension.
• Altering the rear patio area.
• Replacing windows.
• Associated external alterations.
• Internal alterations, including changes to the plan form.

The report pack noted that objections had been raised by residents and a local councillor, Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg, citing potential harm to the Grade II listed building and the Bayswater Conservation Area², as well as concerns about structural integrity, security, and neighbouring amenity.

Licensing Sub-Committee (2) - Thursday 01 May 2025

The Licensing Sub-Committee (2) of Westminster Council met, but no video was provided.

North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee - Thursday 01 May 2025

The North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee (NWL JHOSC) met to discuss community-based specialist palliative care, the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, and NHS involvement strategies. The committee heard that a decision had been made not to reopen beds at the Gordon Hospital. Members expressed concerns about the closure of the Pembridge unit, travel costs for low-income families, and the need for culturally competent care.

Claire Murdoch, Graham Cole and Rose Graves from Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) provided an update on the services at Gordon Hospital. They confirmed that the Integrated Care Board (ICB) had made a formal decision on 8 April to support the proposal not to reopen the beds.

Claire Murdoch stated that the ICB and Westminster City Council are working on joint funding for potential further provision of crisis and step-down beds, but a location and operating model are still needed.

Ross and Graham added that the decision was part of a larger transformation programme, including the Northwest London mental health strategy and CNWL's transformation. They welcomed the commitment to creating further crisis and step-down beds.

Councillor Concia Albert reiterated the importance of engaging in a way that leads to a better place, but was unsure if they were there yet.

In response to a question from Councillor Lucy Knight about the location of the six inpatient and six step-down beds, Graham Cole said that a proposed solution for crisis beds was in place, and progress was being made on a location for step-down beds in South Westminster, but nothing was 100% confirmed yet.

Dr. Lindsay Williams and Robin Duran led a discussion on community-based specialist palliative care, focusing on the consultation that closed on 15 May. The aim is to deliver a consistent, equitable, high-quality, culturally competent service across all boroughs.

The consultation tested support for two options:

• Option One (preferred): Delivering the new model of care, including 46 new enhanced end-of-life care beds, without reopening the Pembridge inpatient unit, costing $27.6 million.
• Option Two: Delivering the model of care and reopening the Pembridge unit, which would lead to a reduction in the number of beds in other hospices, costing $29.7 million.

Dr. Lindsay Williams highlighted the importance of equity of service, cultural competency, and keeping people at home. The new model includes:

• Increased community specialist palliative care teams (12 hours a day)
• New enhanced end-of-life care beds (total of 54)
• 24/7 telephone advice
• Hospice at home
• Outpatient appointments and psychology support

Cathy Walker discussed local delivery and the Pembridge update, noting that CLCH has been offering enhanced hospice at home provision. She stated that Pembridge is an option for the enhanced end-of-life care beds.

Dr. Samantha Lund spoke about the role of hospices, emphasising the importance of stabilising the community offer.

During questions, Councillor Lucy Knight raised concerns about the location of the enhanced end-of-life beds for RBKC, specialist consultant input, and whether existing care home beds would be repurposed. She also asked about the future of the Pembridge facility and whether the new model would meet future demand.

Dr. Lindsay Williams clarified that the enhanced beds would have a weekly consultant specialist palliative care ward round and 24/7 care by nurses with specialist knowledge. Navneet Willoughby added that existing NHS estate was being looked at, and Pembridge was an option.

Catherine Shaw, chief executive of Healthwatch, noted concerns about the closure of the Pembridge and the move of services away from a central hub.

Leslie Watts, chief executive of Chelsea and Westminster in Hillingdon, supported the paper, noting that it addresses the issue of patients dying in acute units. She also highlighted the need to ensure specialist care is available for all patients.

In response to concerns about travel access and support, Melissa Mellett said that some hospices provide free transport based on criteria, and free parking is available at all hospices.

Councillor Chetna Halai raised concerns about whether there would be enough beds for the ageing population in Harrow and other boroughs. She also asked about mechanisms for culturally competent care.

Councillor Natalia Perez questioned how closing the NHS bedded unit at Pembridge could be considered levelling up, and whether the enhanced beds would add to pressures for care beds within local authority areas. She also asked if workforce was a concern.

Councillor Concia Albert asked about staffing at the Pembridge and what would happen to the beds going forward. She also asked what was unstable about option B.

Councillor Andy Hale echoed concerns about the ageing population and transport costs.

Councillor Lucy Knight asked whether the council was in a comfortable position to meet the demand for elderly people with dementia, which was expected to double by 2040.

Melissa Mellett stressed that the $2.1 million was an investment, not a saving.

Councillor Chetna Halai recommended having a plan or strategy, maybe borough by borough, with graphics or stats, and the impact of all the decisions.

Councillor Ketan Sheth suggested ensuring there is opportunity for parking at the locations, and better comms or engagement with residents.

Jessamice Battersby, Head of Partnerships and Engagement at NHS England, and Leslie Watts provided an update on the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre (MVCC).

Jessamice Battersby explained that the clinicians had expressed concerns about the long-term sustainability of the service. An independent clinical review recommended immediate actions, a change in management to UCLH, and reprovision on an acute hospital site.

The proposal is to relocate to Watford General Hospital, with additional chemotherapy services at Hillingdon Hospital and Northwick Park Hospital. A transport working group has been set up.

Leslie Watts stated that the way care is currently provided at Mount Vernon is not acceptable. She asked for the committee's support to get a decision made and capital allocated.

During questions, Councillor Ben Wesson asked for an update on securing capital funding and how to show support. He also asked about consultation events and addressing travel issues.

Jessamice Battersby said that they did not have an update on finances, but were confident they had support to fund the move. She added that the consultation planning was going well, and they were looking to do more pre-consultation engagement.

Councillor Chetna Halai expressed disappointment at the delays and stressed the need to push the plans along. She asked about figures for additional chemotherapy services and benchmark figures for engagement.

Catherine Shaw asked how Healthwatch would be engaged.

Leslie Watts challenged what was actually being consulted on, as the choice of continuing services at Mount Vernon was not an option.

Councillor Chetna Halai said that what she was hearing was ultimately death if provisions were not put in place.

Councillor Concia Albert asked about the radiotherapy department and if the closest one was still in Luton-Stevenage.

Councillor Andy Hale echoed the commentary about ageing and transport costs.

Councillor Lucy Knight asked if the council was in a comfortable position for the demand for elderly people with dementia.

Sam said that dementia is a core component of specialist palliative care provision.

Melissa Mellett reiterated that the $2.1 million was an investment, not a saving.

Councillor Chetna Halai recommended having some sort of plan or strategy, maybe borough by borough, and the impact of all the decisions.

Councillor Ketan Sheth suggested ensuring there is opportunity for parking at the locations.

Jessamice Battersby said that they were looking for a date in June for the next Joint Scrutiny Committee for Mount Vernon.

Rory Hegarty presented the NHS involvement strategy, explaining that it was based on talking to people to find out their experiences. The strategy includes an involvement charter and focuses on reaching excluded communities.

The strategy includes:

• In-reach programme
• Co-design advisory body
• Quarterly residents' forum
• Resident voices on programmes
• Citizens panel
• Commissioning VCS organisations

During questions, Councillor Ben Wesson asked about the approach moving forward given the changes, and resources for supporting ongoing work.

Rob Hurd said that there would be a reduction in people involved in involvement, and they would need to work closely with local authorities and provider partners.

Councillor Chetna Halai wanted to make sure that each individual council's priorities were taken into consideration.

Councillor Natalia Perez asked how recommendations around working more closely with local authorities to deliver messaging about accessing the ambulance service were being taken forward.

Councillor Chetna Halai asked to see proposals for partnership working.

Rob Hurd provided an update on the ICB landscape, noting that the ICB delivered on its key performance targets at the end of March. However, there is a need to radically reduce support staff. He said that the ICB currently employs 700 people, likely going down to around 350.

Leslie Watts added that the cuts would mean changing the way services are provided.

Councillor Concia Albert suggested having a written update before the meeting.

Councillor Ketan Sheth suggested having a committee briefing to understand what is being proposed, and what is on the forward plan of the providers and the ICB.

Councillor Chetna Halai asked what was being done on the other committee and if there were any dates in place.

Councillor Ketan Sheth asked Rob Hurd to extend the committee's gratitude to all the individual colleagues for their work.

The committee then moved on to the work programme tracker.