Subscribe to updates

You'll receive weekly summaries about Waltham Forest Council every week.

If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.

Communities Scrutiny Committee - Thursday, 16 May 2024 - 7.30 pm

May 16, 2024 at 7:30 pm Communities Scrutiny Committee View on council website

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“What community issues will be scrutinized?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Waltham Forest and are not the council. About us

The Communities Scrutiny Committee of Waltham Forest Council met on Thursday 16 May 2024 to discuss the Prevent strategy and the Noise Enforcement Policy. The committee resolved to note the reports on both topics.

Prevent

The committee received an update on the Prevent strategy, which is part of the Government's counter-terrorism CONTEST strategy. The Prevent Coordinator, Tom Llewellyn-Jones, explained that the service aims to reduce the risk of individuals being drawn into terrorism by offering voluntary and confidential support, challenging extremist ideologies, and providing training to professionals and the community. Waltham Forest is a priority area for Prevent and has received funding from the Home Office, though this funding is set to be withdrawn in April 2025.

Concerns were raised about the potential impact of reduced funding on the Prevent team in Waltham Forest, with the possibility of posts reducing from four to two. The committee also discussed the negative perception of Prevent within the Muslim community, with the Prevent Coordinator acknowledging that the highest percentage of referrals in the last year had been for associations with far-right extremism, not violent Islamist extremism. It was proposed that there would be an opportunity to rebrand Prevent in Waltham Forest in 2025 to address these perceptions and emphasise the supportive nature of the service.

The committee also discussed the Prevent team's work in reducing permissive environments, where extremist ideologies are espoused without challenge. This includes training for schools and guidance on venue hire. The Independent Review of Prevent (IRP) was also discussed, with the committee noting that many of its recommendations were for central government or already being implemented locally.

Actions agreed included officers exploring the use of social media to raise awareness of the Prevent strategy, reassessing implications for looked-after children, providing clarity on the impact of regional funding, investigating threats and tactics used by extremist groups, and providing a training session for committee members. A recommendation was made for officers to work with stakeholders and community partners when rebranding Prevent in 2025.

Noise Enforcement Policy Update

The committee also reviewed an update on the Noise Enforcement Policy. David Beach, Corporate Director of Regulatory and Contingency Planning Services, explained that Waltham Forest receives around 500 new noise-related service requests annually, which the Environmental Health team investigates. The council has a duty to investigate complaints that may constitute a statutory nuisance.

Concerns were raised about the customer service provided by the noise team, and the difficulty in retaining staff in these roles due to a national shortage of environmental officers. The committee discussed the process for escalating noise complaints, which typically requires six separate incidents to be recorded over a 40-day period. It was noted that while most noise complaints are resolved informally, formal enforcement actions, such as abatement notices, can be issued.

The committee discussed traffic noise as a common issue and enquired about the possibility of installing noise camera technology, which the Corporate Director agreed to explore. The report indicated a decrease in abatement notices issued, which was speculated to be due to most complaints being resolved informally.

An action was agreed for officers to share information on how noise complaints are made and to assess the risk of underreporting. A recommendation was made for officers to consider installing noise cameras in hot spots around the borough.

Attendees

Profile image for Councillor Katy Thompson
Councillor Katy Thompson Labour and Co-operative Party • St James
Profile image for Councillor Andrew Dixon
Councillor Andrew Dixon Portfolio Lead Member - Stronger Communities • Labour and Co-operative Party • Hoe Street
Profile image for Councillor Tom Connor
Councillor Tom Connor Independent • High Street
Profile image for Councillor Catherine Saumarez
Councillor Catherine Saumarez Conservative • Larkswood
Profile image for Councillor Mitchell Goldie
Councillor Mitchell Goldie Conservative • Chingford Green
Profile image for Councillor Shabana Dhedhi
Councillor Shabana Dhedhi Labour • Lea Bridge
Profile image for Councillor Yusuf Patel
Councillor Yusuf Patel Labour and Co-operative Party • Upper Walthamstow

Topics

No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet 16th-May-2024 19.30 Communities Scrutiny Committee.pdf

Reports Pack

Public reports pack 16th-May-2024 19.30 Communities Scrutiny Committee.pdf

Minutes

Printed minutes 16th-May-2024 19.30 Communities Scrutiny Committee.pdf

Additional Documents

1a - Communities - Draft Forward Plan 23-24_V4.pdf
Minutes of Previous Meeting.pdf
1e - Action 27 and 26-combined.pdf
1c - Action 22_merged.pdf
2 - Prevent Scrutiny Report May 2024 Final version.pdf
1 - Action Tracker and Forward Plan.pdf
1b- Committee Action Tracker.pdf
1d - Actions 31 and 32.pdf
3 - Scrutiny Report Noise Enforcement Policy Update final.pdf