Subscribe to updates

You'll receive weekly summaries about Cotswold Council every week.

If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“Did "essential need" arguments sway cabin vote?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Cotswold and are not the council. About us

The council meeting focused on planning and licensing issues, with significant discussions on two main planning applications: the erection of five holiday lodges in Cittington and the temporary siting of seven cabins for staff accommodation at Dalesford-Arlstrup. Both applications were contentious and elicited detailed debate among council members, leading to decisions that reflected concerns about policy adherence and local impact.

  1. Temporary Siting of Seven Cabins at Dalesford-Arlstrup: The council refused the application for temporary cabins intended for staff accommodation. Arguments for refusal centered on the lack of essential need, violation of local planning policies, and the ongoing harm to the Cotswold National Landscape's tranquility and aesthetics. The decision underscored the council's commitment to enforcing planning regulations and preserving the area's character, despite the applicant's argument about the necessity for staff accommodation due to local housing costs.

  2. Erection of Five Holiday Lodges in Cittington: This application was also refused. The council members debated the application's alignment with local planning policies, particularly focusing on its location outside the development boundary and the absence of a safe pedestrian access. The historical use of the site as a caravan park was considered but deemed insufficient to outweigh the policy conflicts. The refusal highlighted the council's adherence to current planning frameworks over historical site uses, emphasizing sustainable development and safety.

Additional Information: The meeting was well-attended, with public input reflecting concerns about both applications. The decisions made were indicative of the council's strict stance on policy compliance and community impact in planning permissions.

Attendees

Profile image for Ray Brassington
Ray Brassington Vice Chair of Council Liberal Democrats Four Acres
Profile image for Patrick Coleman
Patrick Coleman Cabinet Member for Finance Liberal Democrats Stratton
Profile image for Dilys Neill
Dilys Neill Chair of Planning and Licensing Committee Liberal Democrats Stow
Profile image for Michael Vann
Michael Vann Liberal Democrats Fairford North
Profile image for Mark Harris
Mark Harris Chair of Council Liberal Democrats Abbey
Profile image for Ian Watson
Ian Watson Vice Chair of Planning and Licensing Committee Liberal Democrats Tetbury Town
Error - page unavailable
Profile image for Julia Judd
Julia Judd Conservative Ermin
Profile image for David Fowles
David Fowles Deputy Leader of the Conservative Group Conservative Coln Valley
Profile image for Daryl Corps
Daryl Corps Conservative Moreton West
Profile image for Andrew Maclean
Andrew Maclean Deputy Leader of the Green Party Group Green Party The Rissingtons
Helen Blundell
James Brain
Charlie Jackson
Profile image for Juliet Layton
Juliet Layton Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning Liberal Democrats South Cerney Village
Andrew Moody
Caleb Harris
Ana Prelici

Topics

No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet 07th-Feb-2024 14.00 Planning and Licensing Committee

Additional Documents

Additional Pages 07th-Feb-2024 14.00 Planning and Licensing Committee
Additional Pages Update 07th-Feb-2024 14.00 Planning and Licensing Committee
Member Question 07th-Feb-2024 14.00 Planning and Licensing Committee
Printed minutes 07th-Feb-2024 14.00 Planning and Licensing Committee
Minutes of Previous Meeting
Planning and Licensing Member Questions 7 February
1 - 23.02370.FUL - Case Officer Report
2 - 23.02370.FUL - Block Plan
3 - 23.02370.FUL - Location Plan
4 - 23.02370.FUL - Elevation Floor Plans
5 - 23.02370.FUL - Photographs
1 - 22.00393.FUL - Case Officer Report
2 - 22.00393.FUL- Site Plan
3 - 22.00393.FUL - Street Scene
4 - 22.00393.FUL - Lodges 1 3 and 5
5 - 22.00393.FUL - Lodges 2 and 4
6 - 22.00393.FUL - 2000 - Aerial Photo