George Hall - Councillor for Aberdeenshire (Ward 06 - Peterhead South and Cruden)

Councillor George Hall

Independent Ward 06 - Peterhead South and Cruden

Email: cllr.g.hall@aberdeenshire.gov.uk

Council: Aberdeenshire

Council Profile: View on council website

Committees: (Committee Member) (Committee Member) (Committee Member) (Committee Member) (Committee Member) (Committee Member)

Is this you? Claim this page.

Activity Timeline

Meetings Attended Note this may include planned future meetings.

78 meetings · Page 1 of 16

Committee Committee Member

Audit Committee - Thursday, 5th February, 2026 10.15 am

February 05, 2026, 10:15 am
Committee Committee Member

Buchan Area Committee - Tuesday, 3rd February, 2026 10.00 am

February 03, 2026, 10:00 am
Committee Committee Member

Aberdeenshire Council - Thursday, 15th January, 2026 10.15 am

January 15, 2026, 10:15 am
Committee Committee Member

Buchan Area Committee - Tuesday, 13th January, 2026 10.00 am

January 13, 2026, 10:00 am
Committee Committee Member

Audit Committee - Thursday, 11th December, 2025 10.15 am

December 11, 2025

Decisions from Meetings

195 decisions · Page 5 of 39

Assurance Review of Aberdeenshire Responders Care at Home- Audit 2501 Update Report

From: Audit Committee - Wednesday, 24th September, 2025 10.15 am - September 24, 2025

...they agreed that management actions had adequately addressed the audit recommendations regarding the Aberdeenshire Responders Care at Home service, providing sufficient assurance and negating the need for a Stage 1 review process.

Agreed

APP/2025/0404 - Site at Mountheathie, New Pitsligo

From: Buchan Area Committee - Tuesday, 16th September, 2025 10.00 am - September 16, 2025

Following local ward member consultation. The principle of development is in conflict with the development plan. The proposed development would leave to the permanent loss of an area of Ancient Woodland. The application has failed to assess the biodiversity impact and appropriate mitigation and net gain. There are no demonstrable significant public benefits that would outweigh the loss. The scale of the development would result in a large residential plot, failing to show sensitive layout and siting.

Refuse

Summary

Meetings Attended: 78

Average per Month: 3.1

Decisions Recorded: 195