Content

(1)      Councillor Cooke advised that he
had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.1 (Council Financial
Performance – Quarter 3, 2025/26) by virtue of him being a
Council appointed observer on the Sport Aberdeen Board and also a
member of the Integrated Joint Board. Having applied the objective
test, he did not consider that he had an interest and would not be
withdrawing from the meeting;
(2)      Councillor Radley advised
that she had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.1 (Council
Financial Performance – Quarter 3, 2025/26) by virtue of her
being a Council appointed member of the Integrated Joint Board.
Having applied the objective test, she did not consider that she
had an interest and would not be withdrawing from the meeting;
(3)      Councillor Malik, advised
that he had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.1 (Council
Financial Performance – Quarter 3, 2025/26) by virtue of him
being a Council appointed member of the Integrated Joint Board.
Having applied the objective test, he did not consider that he had
an interest and would not be withdrawing from the meeting;
(4)      Councillor Greig, advised
that he had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.1 (Council
Financial Performance – Quarter 3, 2025/26) by virtue of him
being a Council appointed member of the Integrated Joint Board.
Having applied the objective test, he did not consider that he had
an interest and would not be withdrawing from the meeting; and
(5)      Councillor Brooks, advised
that he had a connection in relation to agenda item 9.6 (Kincorth
Cruyff Court OBC) by virtue of him being oil and gas company
utilised as a Decommissioning and Optioneering SME (subject matter
expert). Having applied the objective test, he did not consider
that he had an interest and would not be withdrawing from the
meeting.