Decision

The Assistant Director of Thriving Place and Investment considered the following applications on 14 June in accordance with the Planning Committee Scheme of Delegation:

a)       planning applications submitted by or on behalf of the Council for development where representations have been received objecting to the development on material planning grounds

Application

Reason for submission

Decision

Reason for Decision

2/23/9005

Objection received from adjacent residents with regards to traffic impact, noise, and potential trespassing of pupils.

Objection received from adjacent residents with regards to traffic

Objections received which have material planning grounds

b)       applications submitted by a Councillor or their spouse/partner, or on behalf of a Councillor or spouse/partner.

c)       Where a senior officer (Director/Head of Service or equivalent) of the Council has a pecuniary interest in the outcome of an application;

d)       applications on which a Member of the Council has made representations in writing to the Head of Service (HoS) within the publicity period and the HoS in consultation with the Chair and Legal Officer is satisfied that it has been demonstrated that the application raises significant material issues;

Application

Reason for submission

Decision

Reason for Decision

HOU/2023/0074

From Councillor:

Planning on this site refused twice, once upheld by inspector.  On going issue with this site, this site has been over developed.

Not to submit to Committee

There were no significant material issues

e)         where the Head of Service considers a planning application, or an application to create, modify or extinguish a Public Right of Way or an application to modify the Register of Commons including registration of a new Town and Village Green, to raise significant issues such that it is in the public interest for the application to be considered by committee;

Application

Reason for submission

Decision

Reason for Decision

22/0643

The application was called to committee by Cllr Higgs in Feb 2023.

The Parish Council originally objected to the application but their latest response states:

When the original application was received, there had been no response from Highways. Highways have now responded to say they are happy with the proposed visibility splays and access. The committee therefore does not object, provided the recommendations made by Highways are met.

Cllr Dobson has objected to the application as County Councillor for Corby and Hayton

To be submitted to Committee

Public interest due to proximity to artery road / highway / junction

f)         planning applications which are defined as a departure from the adopted development plan for which the Secretary of State must be consulted as identified in the Town and Country Planning (Consultation) (England) Direction 2009 or in any successor document and where it is intended to recommend approval. (any departure that is of a certain scale would be picked up under the triggers for the Strategic Committee)

.

Alternative options considered

All applications were considered, where a decision has been taken not to take the application to Planning Committee, the reason is detailed in section 2.