Content

The Assistant Director of Thriving Place and
Investment considered the following applications on 14 June in
accordance with the Planning Committee Scheme of Delegation:
 
 

a)       planning
applications submitted by or on behalf of the Council for
development where representations have been received objecting to
the development on material planning grounds

Application

Reason for submission

Decision

Reason for Decision

2/23/9005

Objection received from adjacent residents
with regards to traffic impact, noise, and potential trespassing of
pupils.

Objection received from adjacent residents
with regards to traffic

Objections received which have
material planning grounds

 

b)       applications
submitted by a Councillor or their spouse/partner, or on behalf of
a Councillor or spouse/partner.

 

c)       Where a senior
officer (Director/Head of Service or equivalent) of the Council has
a pecuniary interest in the outcome of an application;

 

d)       applications on
which a Member of the Council has made representations in writing
to the Head of Service (HoS) within the publicity period and the
HoS in consultation with the Chair and Legal Officer is satisfied
that it has been demonstrated that the application raises
significant material issues;

Application

Reason for submission

Decision

Reason for Decision

HOU/2023/0074

From Councillor:
Planning on this site refused twice,
once upheld by inspector.  On going
issue with this site, this site has been over developed.

Not to submit to Committee

There were no significant material
issues

 

e)         where
the Head of Service considers a planning application, or an
application to create, modify or extinguish a Public Right of Way
or an application to modify the Register of Commons including
registration of a new Town and Village Green, to raise significant
issues such that it is in the public interest for the application
to be considered by committee;
 

Application

Reason for submission

Decision

Reason for Decision

22/0643

The application was called to committee by
Cllr Higgs in Feb 2023.
 
The Parish Council originally objected to the
application but their latest response states:
 
When the original application was received,
there had been no response from Highways. Highways have now
responded to say they are happy with the proposed visibility splays
and access. The committee therefore does not object, provided the
recommendations made by Highways are met.
 
Cllr Dobson has objected to the
application as County Councillor for Corby and Hayton

To be submitted to Committee

Public interest due to proximity to
artery road / highway / junction

f)         planning
applications which are defined as a departure from the adopted
development plan for which the Secretary of State must be consulted
as identified in the Town and Country Planning (Consultation)
(England) Direction 2009 or in any successor document and where it
is intended to recommend approval. (any departure that is of a
certain scale would be picked up under the triggers for the
Strategic Committee)

.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Alternative options considered

All applications were considered, where a
decision has been taken not to take the application to Planning
Committee, the reason is detailed in section 2.