Variation of Premises Licence: Bar A Bar, 133-135 Stoke Newington Road,London, N16 8BT (Ward: Stoke Newington)
July 30, 2026 Licensing Sub Committee A (Committee) Approved View on council websiteThis summary is generated by AI from the council’s published record and supporting documents. Check the full council record and source link before relying on it.
Summary
The Licensing Sub Committee A of Hackney Council decided to approve the variation of the premises licence for Bar A Bar, 133-135 Stoke Newington Road, London, N16 8BT on 30 July 2026. The decision approved the inclusion of plays and films, and extended hours for live music, recorded music, performance of dance, late night refreshment, and the supply of alcohol. This included the implementation of a dispersal policy, strict enforcement of capacity limits, maintenance of firefighting and first aid facilities, regular premise checks, no alcohol consumption in outdoor areas after 2:45, use of noise limiters, and prominent signage requesting patrons to leave quietly.
Full council record
Decision
Application to Vary a Premises Licence – Bar A Bar, 133-135 Stoke Newington Road, London, N16 8BT – REFUSAL
The decision of 30th July 2026
The Licensing Sub-Committee in considering this decision from the information presented to it within the report and at the hearing today has determined that having regard to the promotion of all the licensing objectives:
· The prevention of crime and disorder;
· Public safety;
· Prevention of public nuisance;
· The protection of children from harm;
the application to vary a premises licence has been refused in accordance with Licensing Policies LP1, LP2, LP3, and LP6 within the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy.
Reasons for the decision
The Licensing Sub-Committee, having heard from the Police, and Other Persons (local residents), believed that granting the application would result in the licensing objectives being undermined.
The Sub-Committee heard representations from the Applicant’s Manager that they rely on the hours and conditions set out in the licensing report and that it is a busy venue. The Sub-Committee noted that it is a grassroots venue operating for 20 years and this extension will help sustain the premises going forward. The Sub-Committee noted that the Applicant’s Manager made a representation that they have taken steps to resolve the issues that have been raised. The Sub-Committee noted that they will have 2 - 3 SIA security door staff, a Designated Premises Supervisor and a manager on each night. There will be roughly 6 - 8 members of staff on any given night to run the venue. At the end of the night there is a cleaner to clear litter from outside the premises.
The Sub-Committee heard that the Police had concerns about the management which undermined their confidence in the premises, and issues around alleged incidents where they did not close the premises when agreed previously. The Sub-Committee noted that the Police wanted to see the hours reduced and a dispersal policy at the premises which they currently do not have. The Police also made representations that the premises was hired out as a venue to third-party and it was unclear how the licensee managed this activity. The Police confirmed that they had no communication with the Designated Premises Supervisor.
The Sub-Committee heard from local residents that at least 30 people are outside beyond 01:00 causing noise and the premises fail to manage customers outside although it was also noted that CCTV suggested this number was smaller. The Sub-Committee noted that local residents have no confidence in the management of the premises that they are able to take control of and resolve the issues. They were disappointed by the Premises License Holders lack of concern about public safety and the impact on the area.
The Sub-Committee after hearing the representations felt that the management of the premises was not satisfactory, and they took the representations of local residents very seriously about the unacceptable disturbance and the large number of people permitted in the outside areas late at night.
The Sub-Committee felt that the premises were not able to describe their Management structure and were unable to demonstrate why they should be granted an extension. The Sub-committee felt that some submissions from the Police related to an occasion where there was a band rehearsal so this did not form part of its decision.
The Sub-Committee took into consideration the capacity of the premises, the unacceptable levels of noise late at night that had an impact on local residents, poor management and that there was no dispersal policy, and no evidence of a management structure. The Sub-Committee felt the premises managers did not appear to understand the licensing regime and what was required to comply with the licensing objectives.
The Sub-Committee took into consideration when refusing this application that each case is considered on its merits. The Sub-Committee believed that the licensing objectives could not be promoted by granting this variation application, and as such it decided to refuse the application in its entirety.
Related Meeting
Licensing Sub Committee A - Thursday, 30 July 2026 - 7.00 pm on July 30, 2026
Supporting Documents
Details
| Outcome | Recommendations Approved |
| Decision date | 30 Jul 2026 |