This week in Hammersmith and Fulham:

• The Audit Committee reviewed the council's external audit plan and internal audit progress.
• The Pension Fund Committee discussed the triennial valuation results and the funding strategy statement.
• The Health & Wellbeing Board reviewed progress on the Better Care Fund and the Best Start in Life Local Plan.
• The North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee was scheduled to discuss the temporary move of specialist children's heart services.
• The Appointments Panel was scheduled to consider the appointment of the Executive Director of Housing and Neighbourhoods.

Audit Committee - Monday 16 March 2026

The Audit Committee met on Monday 16 March 2026 to scrutinise the council's financial oversight and risk management processes. A key focus was the review of the external audit plan for 2025/26, prepared by Grant Thornton UK LLP. This plan outlines the scope and timing of the statutory audit, identifying significant risks such as management override of controls and the valuation of pension assets and liabilities. The audit fee for the council was set at £483,242. The committee also received an update on internal audit progress, noting that most audits conducted between April 2025 and February 2026 had received positive assurance opinions. However, an audit of St Mary's RC Primary School resulted in limited assurance, with recommendations for improvement, particularly concerning the bank reconciliation process. The committee also reviewed the draft Internal Audit Plan for 2026/27, which prioritises audits based on strategic risks and allows for flexibility in response to emerging issues. Finally, an update on the council's risk management framework was presented, highlighting key risks such as non-compliance with procurement legislation and IT system compromise due to cyber-attacks.

Pension Fund Committee - Tuesday 17 March 2026

The Pension Fund Committee convened on Tuesday 17 March 2026 to discuss the financial health and investment strategies of the Hammersmith & Fulham Pension Fund. A significant item was the introduction to the final results of the 2025 triennial actuarial valuation, which indicated an increase in the Fund's funding level to 113%. This improvement was largely attributed to strong investment returns. The committee also reviewed the draft Funding Strategy Statement (FSS), which sets out a clear and transparent strategy for meeting pension liabilities, aiming for solvency, cost efficiency, and stable employer contribution rates. An Investment Strategy Review was also on the agenda, considering key strategic themes and the current fund position, which shows an improved funding level and higher forward-looking return expectations. The committee was also scheduled to review the London Collective Investment Vehicle (LCIV) Investment Manager Agreement, a crucial step for pooling the fund's assets as of 1st April 2026, in line with the Pensions Schemes Bill. The committee also received the Pension Fund's quarterly performance update for Q4 2025, noting an increase in the market value of assets, although the Fund underperformed its benchmark net of fees over the quarter.

Health & Wellbeing Board - Wednesday 18 March 2026

The Health & Wellbeing Board met on Wednesday 18 March 2026 to address critical public health initiatives across the borough. A key discussion point was the Better Care Fund Quarter 3 report for 2025-2026. While discharge delays and residential admissions were on track, emergency admissions for individuals aged 65 and over were not meeting targets, attributed to winter conditions and flu outbreaks. The Board also focused on the Hammersmith & Fulham Best Start in Life Local Plan 2026-2029, a co-produced plan outlining priorities for supporting young children and their families. This plan aims to improve seamless service integration, healthier children, high-quality early education, and ensure every Reception child gets the right start. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with West London NHS Trust was presented to formalise joint working arrangements for integrated mental health services, aiming for faster access to support and shorter, safer hospital stays. Furthermore, a comprehensive plan to improve vaccination uptake across all age groups was discussed, highlighting that coverage in the borough remained below both London and England averages. The Board also received an update on oral health initiatives, with a focus on children and young people, including progress on the borough's Oral Health Plan and the Targeted Dental Access for Children (TDAC) Pilot.

North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee - Thursday 19 March 2026

The North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday 19 March 2026 to discuss significant health service matters across the region. A major topic was the planned temporary move of specialist children's heart, lung, and critical care inpatient services, currently provided by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. This move is driven by clinical risk escalation and aims to consolidate services to meet national standards. The committee was also set to consider proposals for transforming the Crystal House specialist learning disability (LD) Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) ward. The current inpatient model is considered outdated, and a new community-based approach is being developed to provide earlier support and reduce costly admissions. An update on cancer prevention and early diagnosis initiatives across North West London was also on the agenda, alongside a review of the committee's recommendations tracker and its work programme for 2025/26.

Appointments Panel - Monday 16 March 2026

The Appointments Panel of Hammersmith and Fulham Council was scheduled to meet on Monday 16 March 2026. The primary item on the agenda was the appointment of the Executive Director of Housing and Neighbourhoods. This is a Chief Officer position, and as per the Local Government Act 2000, any such appointment requires the Executive to have the opportunity to make a reasonable objection. The specifics of the information provided to the panel were not publicly disclosed, and the press and public were to be excluded from this part of the meeting due to the likely disclosure of exempt information.

This week in Hammersmith and Fulham:

Council Approves Budget and Council Tax Hike Amidst Financial Strain

Hammersmith and Fulham Council's Cabinet met on Monday 9 March 2026 to make critical decisions on the borough's financial future, approving the revenue budget and council tax levels for the 2026/27 financial year. The meeting also saw the endorsement of a significant four-year capital programme and the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) budget. These decisions come as the council navigates increasing demand for services and national funding pressures, leading to a proposed Council Tax increase.

The Stakes: Balancing Budgets and Protecting Services

The approved revenue budget includes a 2.99% increase in the Hammersmith & Fulham element of Council Tax, alongside an additional 2% social care precept. This combined increase, equating to an additional 92p per week for Band D properties, is projected to generate £4.4 million annually. This funding is deemed essential for maintaining financial resilience, meeting rising demand, and combating inflation, while balancing the impact on local taxpayers. Councillor Rowan Ree, Cabinet Member for Finance and Reform, stated the increase was essential for continuing financial resilience, meeting increasing demand and inflation, while balancing the impact on local taxpayers.

The council's Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) highlights the impact of national funding changes, with the report noting that Hammersmith & Fulham's Council Tax remained the third lowest in the country during 2025/26. The administration has a history of cutting or freezing council tax for several years. The proposed budget aims to protect core services, ensure borough safety, promote prosperity, and maintain financial governance.

• Why this matters: For many households, particularly those on lower incomes or with fixed incomes, any increase in Council Tax can be a significant burden. The council's ability to fund essential services like social care, mental health support, and children's protection is directly tied to its budget. The proposed savings, alongside the tax increase, are intended to prevent cuts to vital services, but the financial strain on residents is a key consideration.

Investing in the Future: Capital Programme and Housing

The Cabinet also approved the Council's four-year Capital Programme for 2026/27 to 2029/30, allocating £452.2 million for asset development and enhancement. Key investments include:

• Housing Stock: £452.2 million over four years, with significant investment in the council's 12,000 housing stock.
• New Homes: Development of 298 dwellings, with 218 designated as affordable.
• Civic Campus: Completion of a new Civic Campus facility.
• School Facilities: Upgrades to school facilities.
• Hammersmith Bridge: Continued pre-restoration works, with expected funding from the Department for Transport and Transport for London.

The Housing Revenue Account (HRA) budget for 2026/27 was also approved, including a national social rents policy of CPI + 1% for 2026/27, resulting in an average weekly increase of £6.69 for tenants. The HRA 10-year Business Plan includes plans for building 198 new homes and a £49 million investment over four years for energy efficiency retrofit projects.

• Why this matters: These capital investments are crucial for improving the borough's infrastructure, providing much-needed affordable housing, and enhancing the quality of life for residents. For tenants, the HRA budget decisions directly impact rent levels and the investment in their homes.

Controlling HMOs: Article 4 Direction

A significant decision was the approval to prepare an Article 4 Direction to control the proliferation of small Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs). This measure aims to address the impact of HMOs on local residential amenity and community cohesion. The council will commission an evidence study to support the direction and delegate authority for making a 'non-immediate' Article 4 Direction to the Chief Planning Officer. Cabinet approval will be required in 12 months to confirm the Direction following statutory consultation.

• Why this matters: The growth of HMOs can significantly alter the character of residential streets, impacting parking, noise levels, and the overall sense of community. This decision signals the council's intent to manage this growth and protect the amenity of existing neighbourhoods.

Link to Cabinet meeting

Planning Committee Considers New Developments Across the Borough

The Planning and Development Control Committee met on Tuesday 10 March 2026 to consider a range of planning applications for new developments and alterations to existing buildings across Hammersmith and Fulham.

Key Applications Discussed:

• Lots Road South, Chelsea Creek Car Pound, Lots Road, and 65-69 and 71-73 Lots Road, London SW10 0RN: This significant application, reference 2025/02928/FUL, was scheduled for discussion. The development at Lots Road South involves multiple addresses and was detailed in associated documents.
• 3 Shortlands, London W6 8DA: Application reference 2025/01723/FUL for this property in the Hammersmith Broadway area was also on the agenda.
• 350 - 358 Uxbridge Road, London W12 7LL: The committee was set to review application reference 2025/03221/FUL for this White City ward site.
• 104 King Street, London W6 0QW: Application reference 2025/00369/FUL for this Hammersmith Broadway location was listed.
• 153 Hurlingham Road, London SW6 3NN: Application reference 2025/03431/FUL for this Palace and Hurlingham ward property was scheduled for review.
• La Reserve Hotel, 422 - 428 Fulham Road, London SW6 1DU: A variation application, reference 2025/03297/VAR, for this Walham Green ward hotel was to be considered.

• 81 Blythe Road, London W14 0HP: Application reference 2025/02206/FUL for this Brook Green ward property was also on the agenda.

• Why this matters: Planning decisions directly shape our neighbourhoods, influencing everything from the availability of housing and local amenities to traffic flow and the character of our streets. These applications represent potential changes to the built environment that can have long-term impacts on residents' quality of life.

Link to Planning and Development Control Committee meeting

Licensing Sub-Committee Considers New Premises Licence Application

The Licensing Sub-Committee met on Wednesday 11 March 2026 to consider a new premises licence application for 2 Vanston Place, London, SW6 1AY.

Balancing Business and Resident Concerns

The application, submitted by Mr Mohamed Abdelghany Gabr ElMansoury, sought to permit late-night refreshment hours extending into the early morning on weekends. The committee reviewed 18 objections from local residents and groups, who raised concerns about potential increases in noise, litter, and anti-social behaviour.

While the applicant and the Metropolitan Police had agreed on revised conditions and reduced hours, the potential impact on the local community remained a key consideration. The committee also reviewed the premises' enforcement history, which included past complaints related to noise and behaviour.

• Why this matters: Licensing decisions are crucial for maintaining a balance between supporting local businesses and ensuring the peace and safety of residential areas. For residents, these decisions can directly affect their quality of life, while for businesses, a licence is vital for their operation.

Link to Licensing Sub-Committee meeting

This week in Hammersmith and Fulham:

Council Approves Budget and Council Tax Hike Amidst Financial Strain

Hammersmith and Fulham Council's Full Council met on Wednesday 25 February 2026 to make critical decisions on the borough's financial future, approving the revenue budget and council tax levels for the 2026/27 financial year. The meeting also saw the endorsement of a significant four-year capital programme and the treasury management strategy. These decisions come as the council navigates increasing demand for services and national funding pressures, leading to a proposed Council Tax increase.

The Stakes: Balancing Budgets and Protecting Services

The approved revenue budget includes a 2.99% increase in the Hammersmith & Fulham element of Council Tax, alongside an additional 2% social care precept. This combined increase, equating to an additional 92p per week for Band D properties, is projected to generate £4.4 million annually. This funding is deemed essential for maintaining financial resilience, meeting rising demand, and combating inflation, while balancing the impact on local taxpayers. Councillor Stephen Cowan, Leader of the Council, stated that these decisions were necessary to protect vital services for residents.

The council's Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) highlights the impact of national funding changes, with the report noting that Hammersmith & Fulham's Council Tax remained the third lowest in the country during 2025/26. The administration has a history of cutting or freezing council tax for several years. The proposed budget aims to protect core services, ensure borough safety, promote prosperity, and maintain financial governance.

• Why this matters: For many households, particularly those on lower incomes or with fixed incomes, any increase in Council Tax can be a significant burden. The council's ability to fund essential services like social care, mental health support, and children's protection is directly tied to its budget. The proposed savings, alongside the tax increase, are intended to prevent cuts to vital services, but the financial strain on residents is a key consideration.

The meeting also included a review of the council's constitution and a discussion on a joint venture for managed service temporary and interim staffing services.

Link to Full Council meeting

Licensing Decisions: Balancing Business Needs with Community Concerns

The Licensing Sub-Committee met on Tuesday 24 February 2026 to consider two significant applications that highlight the council's role in balancing the needs of local businesses with the concerns of residents. The decisions made can directly impact the vibrancy of our high streets and the quality of life in our neighbourhoods.

The Hurlingham Club: Extended Hours Granted with Conditions

The committee reviewed an application for a premises licence for The Hurlingham Club. The application sought to permit the sale of alcohol and the provision of regulated entertainment, including live and recorded music, dancing, and film screenings, until 01:00 on Fridays and Saturdays, and until 00:30 on other days. The club also applied for permission to operate as a hotel, with services available to residents and their guests.

Representations were received from a number of interested parties, including residents concerned about potential noise disturbance and increased traffic. The club's representatives argued that the proposed operating hours and activities were in keeping with the club's status as a private members' establishment and would not significantly impact the local community. They highlighted existing noise mitigation measures and proposed further controls to address concerns.

After deliberation, the committee decided to grant the premises licence for The Hurlingham Club. However, certain conditions were imposed, including restrictions on the hours for live music and amplified sound, and a requirement for a comprehensive noise management plan to be implemented and adhered to. The decision was made in line with the council's licensing objectives, particularly the prevention of public nuisance.

• Why this matters: For residents living near licensed premises, decisions about operating hours and activities can directly affect their peace and quiet. For businesses, a licence is essential for their survival and ability to contribute to the local economy. The committee's decision will determine the operating parameters for The Hurlingham Club and what measures will be in place to mitigate any negative impacts on the surrounding community.

Pick N Save Licence Review: Conditions Imposed to Ensure Compliance

The committee also reviewed the premises licence for Pick N Save, an off-licence located at 123 High Street, Fulham. This review was prompted by representations from the Metropolitan Police concerning alleged breaches of licensing conditions, specifically related to the sale of alcohol to intoxicated persons and the prevention of crime and disorder.

The police presented evidence detailing several incidents that they believed demonstrated a failure by the premises to uphold its licensing objectives. They argued for the revocation of the licence to prevent further issues.

The owner of Pick N Save, represented by their legal counsel, contested the allegations. They presented arguments and evidence to demonstrate that they had taken steps to comply with their licence conditions and that the incidents cited by the police were either isolated or misrepresented. They proposed a series of additional measures, including enhanced staff training and improved CCTV coverage, to address the concerns raised.

The Licensing Sub-Committee considered the representations from both the police and the premises. They acknowledged the seriousness of the concerns raised by the police but also took into account the proposed remedial actions by Pick N Save. The committee decided not to revoke the licence. Instead, they imposed a number of additional conditions on the licence, including a requirement for all staff to undergo refresher training on responsible alcohol sales, the installation of a new CCTV system, and a commitment to maintain a log of all alcohol sales to known intoxicated individuals. These conditions were aimed at reinforcing the licensing objectives and ensuring better compliance moving forward.

• Why this matters: For residents, the consistent failure of a business to adhere to its licence conditions can lead to a decline in local amenity, with issues like street drinking and loitering impacting their sense of safety and well-being. The council's action here is about ensuring that licensed premises operate responsibly and do not contribute to crime or disorder. The imposed conditions aim to prevent future issues and ensure the premises operates in line with its licence.

Link to Licensing Sub-Committee meeting

This week in Hammersmith and Fulham:

Licensing Decisions: Balancing Business Needs with Community Concerns

The Licensing Sub-Committee met on Tuesday 17 February 2026 to consider two significant applications that highlight the council's role in balancing the needs of local businesses with the concerns of residents. The decisions made can directly impact the vibrancy of our high streets and the quality of life in our neighbourhoods.

The Brown Cow: A Pub's Future Hangs in the Balance

The committee reviewed an application for a premises licence for The Brown Cow, a public house at 676 and 678-680 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5SA. The applicant sought to merge two existing premises into a single licensed establishment, with proposed hours extending into the early morning.

Representations from residents and Councillor Liam Downer-Sanderson raised concerns about potential noise, anti-social behaviour, and the impact on pavement accessibility. These concerns are central to the council's licensing objectives, particularly the prevention of public nuisance. The report detailed the council's Statement of Licensing Policy (SLP)[^1], which guides decisions to ensure a safe licensing environment.

• Why this matters: For residents living near licensed premises, decisions about operating hours and activities can directly affect their peace and quiet. For businesses, a licence is essential for their survival and ability to contribute to the local economy. The committee's decision will determine whether The Brown Cow can expand its operations and what measures will be in place to mitigate any negative impacts on the surrounding community.

Co-Op Licence Review: Addressing Persistent Issues

The committee also considered a review of the premises licence for the Co-Op at 54 Uxbridge Road, London, W12 8LP. This review was initiated by the council's Licensing Authority due to ongoing concerns about the prevention of crime and disorder, and public nuisance.

The report detailed a history of licensing breaches, including issues with the sale of alcohol above specified strengths and the sale of single cans. The Metropolitan Police and local residents have raised concerns about anti-social behaviour linked to the premises' operation.

• Why this matters: For residents, the consistent failure of a business to adhere to its licence conditions can lead to a decline in local amenity, with issues like street drinking and loitering impacting their sense of safety and well-being. The council's action here is about ensuring that licensed premises operate responsibly and do not contribute to crime or disorder. The potential outcomes for the Co-Op range from no further action to the revocation of its licence, a decision that would have significant consequences for the business and its customers.

Link to Licensing Sub-Committee meeting