LED Retrofit, Acceptance of Additional Funding from LCRCA
December 17, 2025 Corporate Director Neighbourhoods and Housing - Nicki Butterworth (Officer) Key decision Approved View on council websiteThis summary is generated by AI from the council’s published record and supporting documents. Check the full council record and source link before relying on it.
Summary
...accept additional grant funding of £568,372.52 from the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA) to cover increased traffic management costs and additional pole upgrades for the LED Retrofit Programme, and to enter into a Short Form Grant Funding Agreement with LCRCA.
Full council record
Purpose
Report for acceptance of GFA from
LCRCA.
Decision
For the reasons set out in this report, the
Corporate Director has decided to:
1)
Accept additional grant funding provided by Liverpool City Region
Combined Authority (LCRCA) to cover increased traffic management
costs and additional pole upgrades. The additional funding has a
value of £568,372.52.
2)
Enter into a Short
Form Grant Funding Agreement with LCRCA in letter format
recording the terms and conditions on which LCRCA makes the grant
of additional funding of £568,372.52 to the Council.
Alternative options considered
The option of seeking an alternative source of
funding was discounted, as it was not considered cost-effective for
Liverpool City Council (LCC). Exploring external funding
opportunities would have required significant time, resources, and
administrative effort, with no guarantee of success. In addition,
many alternative funding streams include restrictive eligibility
criteria, lengthy application processes, or conditions that may not
have aligned with the objectives of the RetroLED Upgrade Programme.
As such, the potential costs and delays outweighed any financial
benefit, making this option unsuitable for LCC.
The option to ‘do nothing’ was
also discounted, as the Council has already incurred the additional
expenditure and the works have been completed. Choosing not to
proceed at the time would have resulted
in continued operation of obsolete halogen equipment, escalating
maintenance costs, and reduced reliability of the city’s
traffic signal network. In addition, the Council would have risked
non-compliance with Government energy efficiency objectives and
lost the opportunity to benefit from the long-term cost savings
delivered by the LED upgrade programme.
Supporting Documents
Details
| Outcome | Recommendations Approved |
| Decision date | 17 Dec 2025 |