Content

8.1

To provide an update on the
progress made by the Rose Garden Café Partnership on the
following recommendations approved by the Charity Trustee
Sub-Committee on 18 October 2023:
 
1.    
The proposal for Sheffield City Council, in
partnership with stakeholders, to develop a strategy for the
restoration of the Rose Garden Café building (options 2A and
2B), pausing work on a replacement building approach (design
options 3 and 4) and a limited works approach (design options 1 and
5).

 
2.    
That the Rose Garden Café Partnership, once
established, creates an action plan to develop the strategy for
restoration, which will include defining the following:
 
·      
A framework for a proportionate public consultation
on the Rose Garden Café.

 
·      
Establish funding sources to meet the structural
remediation and building refurbishment works.
 
·      
Agree a strategy for public communication
 
and
then proceeding to carry out the agreed consultation and implement
the agreed public communication strategy in
order to inform the strategy for restoration that will be
brought back to the Committee in due course.
 
This
is the third progress report provided since October 2023 committee
approval and provides an update on progress made from 16 February
2024 to 5 July 2024.

8.2

RESOLVED
UNANIMOUSLY: That the Charity Trustee
Sub-Committee:
 
1.    
notes the progress made towards the actions agreed
in the October 2023 report;

 
2.    
agrees to receive a further report in September 2024
on progress towards the recommendations agreed in the October 2023
report; and

 
3.    
notes that further updates and decisions will be
taken to the appropriate Committee as required.

8.3

Reasons for Decision

8.3.1

To ensure Members are informed
of the progress made by the Rose Garden Café
Partnership.

8.4

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

8.4.1

This report was produced to
provide an update on progress made towards the recommendations made
in the Rose Garden Café (18 October 2023) report. The only
alternative option would have been to not produce an update report
in July and wait for the next committee meeting, which was
discounted by Officers.