The Planning Applications Committee of Kensington and Chelsea Council convened on Tuesday, 11 August 2026, to discuss and determine a range of planning and advertisement consent applications. Key decisions included the approval of a mixed-use development at Glen House, Old Brompton Road, and the granting of advertisement consent for a temporary shroud at Harrods. Several applications for window replacements and minor alterations were also approved.

Glen House, 125-133 Old Brompton Road

Planning permission was granted for the demolition of the existing building at Glen House and the construction of a new ground-plus-six-storey mixed-use building. The development will comprise a car showroom at ground and basement levels and office space on the upper five floors, with plant equipment at roof level. The decision was made subject to the completion of a legal agreement and the imposition of two additional conditions: one to secure the office floor space for Class E use only, and another to remove permitted development rights under Class M.A. of Schedule II, Part III of the Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 2015, preventing the change of use to a dwelling house without further planning permission.

Objectors raised concerns about the height and bulk of the proposed building, arguing it was not transitional between the adjacent No. 123 Old Brompton Road and the Grade II listed Drayton Terrace. They also expressed worries about access to Eagle Place and Rowland Way, particularly for emergency services, and the placement of additional cycle stands. The agent for the applicant countered that a similar-sized building already had planning permission and that the current application offered a higher quality design with improved public realm and landscaping. They also stated that the footprint had been reduced and that noise from plant installations would comply with council criteria.

Councillors discussed the discrepancy in footprint claims, with the agent clarifying that the ground floor footprint had been reduced and set back. Concerns were raised about the impact of the additional floor, with officers explaining that the sixth floor was a plant enclosure and not considered an additional storey of accommodation for the purpose of measuring building height. The issue of pollinator-friendly planting was also raised, with a condition requiring full details to be submitted if the application was approved.

37 Addisland Court, Holland Villas Road

Planning permission was granted for the addition of a lightweight pergola to the terrace of Flat 37, including associated screening and internal secondary glazing. The decision followed the deferral of a previous application to allow the applicant to provide more detailed elevations. Concerns from objectors regarding the appearance and potential impact on the Art Deco building were addressed by the revised drawings, which showed the pergola set back further and not exceeding the existing building height. The agent argued that the structure would be largely imperceptible from the streetscape and that the materials were powder-coated aluminium, not plastic.

Councillors questioned whether the amended drawings satisfied previous concerns, with objectors reiterating their opposition to a glass box on the roof. The agent clarified that the structure was seven stories up and set back, and that a mobile phone tower on a higher level was more obtrusive. The objector also stated that the freeholders had not been consulted, although the agent claimed they had been. Officers confirmed that the pergola would be discreet from most viewpoints and that the design officer had not raised concerns due to its high position and limited visibility.

10 Pembridge Road

Advertisement consent was granted retrospectively for a fascia sign, door sign, display screens, and projecting signs. Objectors argued that the flashing lights were distracting and garish, contrary to the Notting Hill Gate Action Plan's aim to restore historical features. They also stated that the application was made only after an enforcement notice was served and that the signage was out of keeping with the streetscape. The agent for the applicant highlighted that the application fell under advertisement regulations, with a narrower decision-making process. They stated that the flashing lights would be removed by condition, and that the signage had been in place since 2008.

Councillors discussed the sufficiency of conditions, with objectors requesting further conditions to limit light pollution during daylight hours and reduce illumination levels. The agent confirmed that flashing lights would be removed if the application was approved. Officers explained that retrospective applications were not unusual, but acknowledged that they should not happen in the first place. The committee ultimately granted consent with conditions, including an informative for enforcement officers to monitor compliance.

40 Holland Park

Planning permission and listed building consent were granted for the creation of a basement, installation of an air source heat pump, replacement of the roof, elevational alterations, and rebuilding of a glazed link. The decision was made despite concerns from objectors about the impact on the Art Deco building and the loss of garden area. The agent argued that the structure would be set back and largely invisible, and that the materials were powder-coated aluminium, not plastic.

Councillors questioned the design officer's assessment of the impact on the Art Deco building, with officers stating that they had not consulted a design officer as it was not a listed building. They confirmed that the pergola would be discreet from most viewpoints. The committee granted both planning permission and listed building consent.

123A Queen's Gate

Advertisement consent was granted for a temporary static externally illuminated shroud advertisement. The application was for a limited time only, until February 2027, and was not digital or moving. No questions were raised by councillors, and the recommendation to grant was approved.

Harrods, 87-135 Brompton Road

Advertisement consent was granted for a temporary externally illuminated static display façade wrap. The advertisement was associated with essential repair works to the West Turret of the Grade II* listed Harrods building and would be in place until January 2028. The proposal was considered acceptable due to its temporary nature and the context of the scaffolding required for the repair works. Historic England raised no objection. The committee granted consent with conditions limiting the time period and brightness of the illumination.

188A Fulham Road

Planning permission was granted for the replacement of ancillary plant at the Virgin Active Health Club. The proposal involved the removal of existing plant equipment and the installation of new plant at various levels, including ground floor, first, second, and third floors. Objectors raised concerns about noise, vibration, and the impact on the conservation area. The agent provided an updated noise impact assessment, which concluded that noise levels would not exceed background levels. The council's Environmental Health team raised no objection subject to conditions. The committee granted permission with conditions relating to noise control and anti-vibration mounts.

10-12 Bina Gardens

Planning permission was granted for the erection of a double mansard roof extension. The report acknowledged that this would increase the bulk visible to neighbouring properties but concluded that the design was sympathetic to the character of the Courtfield Conservation Area. Objectors raised concerns about the HVAC strategy and its potential impact on noise. Officers confirmed that the HVAC system was subject to separate enforcement action and was not part of the current application. The committee granted planning permission and listed building consent.

100A West Cromwell Road

Advertisement consent was granted for a temporary externally illuminated banner advertisement on Building 2 of a construction site. The banner, measuring 25m by 15m, would be in place until November 2027. The application was considered acceptable due to its temporary nature and the context of the construction site, which was dominated by the highway network and large-scale buildings. No objections were received.

19 Chepstow Crescent

Retrospective planning permission was granted for the erection of trellising on a rear roof terrace. Objectors argued that the trellis was oversized and out of character with the Pembridge Conservation Area, and raised concerns about loss of light. Officers concluded that the trellis was domestic in scale and appearance, with a lightweight lattice design that would integrate appropriately with the varied rear elevations. The proposal was considered to preserve the character of the conservation area and maintain living conditions.

133-137 and 139 Westbourne Grove, and 2 Pembridge Villas

Planning permission was granted to vary condition 17 of a previous permission to allow customers to access internal commercial units 90 minutes earlier, from 6:30 am instead of 8:00 am. This variation was granted for a trial period of 12 months. Objectors expressed concerns about potential disturbance from early morning activity, queuing, and smoking, particularly on the Pembridge Villas frontage. The applicant provided an Operational Management Statement to address these concerns, and a condition was added requiring a more detailed plan to be submitted. The committee noted that existing restrictions on the use of external areas remained in place.

67 Golborne Road

Planning permission was granted for maintenance works, including the replacement of single-glazed timber sash and casement windows with double-glazed units to match existing. The proposal was considered acceptable as it would preserve the character and appearance of the building and streetscape. No objections were received.

64 Golborne Road

Planning permission was granted for maintenance works, including the replacement of single-glazed timber sash windows with double-glazed timber sash units to match existing. Similar to the application at 67 Golborne Road, this was deemed acceptable as it would preserve the character and appearance of the building and streetscape. No objections were received.

66 Barlby Road

Planning permission was granted for the replacement of existing timber sash and casement windows with new triple-glazed timber sash and casement windows. The proposal was considered acceptable as it would preserve the character and appearance of the building, the group it forms part of, and the wider Oxford Gardens Conservation Area. No objections were received.

66 Oxford Gardens

Planning permission was granted to vary condition 2 of a previous permission to include rear and side elevation drawings for complete fenestration works. This application was a minor amendment to an existing permission for window replacements. The proposal was considered acceptable as the materials would preserve the character and appearance of the building and conservation area. No objections were received.

123A Queen's Gate

Advertisement consent was granted for the addition of a temporary static externally illuminated shroud advertisement. The advertisement was for a limited time only, until February 2027, and was associated with repair works to the Grade II* listed Harrods building. The proposal was considered acceptable due to its temporary nature and the context of the scaffolding. No objections were received.

Harrods, 87-135 Brompton Road

Advertisement consent was granted for the installation of a 7.5m x 15m externally illuminated static display façade wrap. This was part of temporary scaffolding for repair works to the West Turret of the Grade II* listed Harrods building and would be in place until January 2028. The proposal was deemed acceptable due to its temporary nature and the context of the scaffolding, which would include a Trompe-l'oeil style wrap. Historic England raised no objection.

188A Fulham Road

Planning permission was granted for the replacement of ancillary plant at the Virgin Active Health Club. The proposal involved the removal of existing plant and the installation of new equipment at various levels. Objectors raised concerns about noise and the impact on the conservation area. An updated noise impact assessment concluded that noise levels would comply with council criteria, and the Environmental Health team raised no objection subject to conditions. The committee granted permission with conditions relating to noise control and anti-vibration mounts.

10-12 Bina Gardens

Planning permission was granted for the erection of a double mansard roof extension. The report acknowledged that this would increase the bulk visible to neighbouring properties but concluded that the design was sympathetic to the character of the Courtfield Conservation Area. Objectors raised concerns about the HVAC strategy and its potential noise impact. Officers confirmed that the HVAC system was subject to separate enforcement action and was not part of the current application. The committee granted planning permission.

67 Golborne Road

Planning permission was granted for maintenance works, including the replacement of single-glazed timber sash and casement windows with double-glazed units to match existing. The proposal was considered acceptable as it would preserve the character and appearance of the building and streetscape. No objections were received.

64 Golborne Road

Planning permission was granted for maintenance works, including the replacement of single-glazed timber sash windows with double-glazed timber sash units to match existing. Similar to the application at 67 Golborne Road, this was deemed acceptable as it would preserve the character and appearance of the building and streetscape. No objections were received.

66 Barlby Road

Planning permission was granted for the replacement of existing timber sash and casement windows with new triple-glazed timber sash and casement windows. The proposal was considered acceptable as it would preserve the character and appearance of the building, the group it forms part of, and the wider Oxford Gardens Conservation Area. No objections were received.

66 Oxford Gardens

Planning permission was granted to vary condition 2 of a previous permission to include rear and side elevation drawings for complete fenestration works. This application was a minor amendment to an existing permission for window replacements. The proposal was considered acceptable as the materials would preserve the character and appearance of the building and conservation area. No objections were received.