The Development and Planning Applications Committee of Merton Council met on Thursday 30 July 2026, granting planning permission for a significant mixed-use development at 1-12 Majestic Way, Mitcham, CR4 2JS. The committee also noted the contents of a report on planning appeal decisions.

1-12 Majestic Way, Mitcham, CR4 2JS

The committee granted planning permission for the demolition of existing buildings and the erection of new buildings comprising flexible commercial and community floorspace, alongside residential accommodation. This decision was subject to conditions and the completion of a Section 106 legal agreement.

The development, application number 25/P2282, located in the Figge's Marsh ward, will provide 249 social rented homes, including a mix of one, two, three, and four-bedroom units. The scheme also includes 1,308 sqm of flexible commercial floorspace (Use Class E) and 423 sqm of dedicated community floorspace (Use Class F1/F2). The buildings will range from six to eleven storeys in height.

Key discussions and decisions regarding this application included:

• Affordable Housing: The scheme will provide 100% social rented housing, with 55% of nominations on first let to Merton Council and 100% on second let. This is a significant public benefit, addressing the borough's identified need for affordable housing.
• Design and Height: While the site is not specifically allocated for tall buildings in the Local Plan, officers considered the proposal acceptable due to its sustainable town centre location, good public transport accessibility (PTAL 5), and the design's response to local context. The tallest elements are located towards the north and east, stepping down towards the west to respect the scale of neighbouring buildings. The use of lighter brick colours and green balconies, referencing Mitcham Library's green roof, were noted as positive design refinements. Concerns were raised by objectors and consultees regarding the height and massing, with some arguing it was out of character with Mitcham Village. However, the committee ultimately accepted the officer's assessment that the design, while introducing height, integrated acceptably and optimised the site's potential.
• Neighbour Amenity: Assessments regarding daylight, sunlight, and overshadowing were considered. While some neighbouring properties and St Mark's Primary School playground would experience reductions in light, these were generally deemed acceptable within an urban context or mitigated by design and conditions. Concerns about overlooking St Mark's Primary School playground were addressed through conditions requiring screening.
• Transport and Parking: The development adopts a car-lite approach, with only 25 residential parking spaces (including 7 disabled bays) and 2 car club bays, reflecting the site's high PTAL rating. All parking spaces are to be allocated to residents forming part of the decant strategy from the Eastfields Estate, and will be secured via the Section 106 agreement. TfL initially raised concerns about bus stand relocation and vehicle movements but were satisfied with amendments. Active Travel Zone improvements, including brighter lighting and public art, will be funded through the Section 106 agreement.
• Community Facilities: An uplift in community floorspace to 423 sqm was secured, with a reasonable endeavours clause to secure a provider within one year of completion. Concerns were raised by objectors about the adequacy and location of this space, with some advocating for a larger, separate community centre.
• Environmental Considerations: The development aims for a 71% reduction in CO2 emissions, with a significant carbon offset contribution secured through the Section 106 agreement. Biodiversity Net Gain is projected to be over 119%, exceeding the statutory requirement. Conditions were imposed regarding air quality management during construction, noise mitigation, and sustainable drainage.
• Heritage: While less than substantial harm was identified to the setting of the Grade I listed Eagle House and nearby locally listed buildings, this was considered to be outweighed by the significant public benefits of the scheme, including the delivery of 100% affordable housing and public realm improvements.
• Section 106 Agreement: The legal agreement will secure a range of contributions and obligations, including 100% affordable housing provision, active travel zone improvements, air quality contributions, car club spaces, a car park management plan, carbon offset contributions, community use provision, cycle hire provision, highway works, local employment commitments, contributions to the Metropolitan Police and NHS, off-site play provision, public liaison, travel plan monitoring, a tree bond, and archaeological mitigation.

Planning Appeal Decisions

The committee noted the contents of a report detailing recent planning appeal decisions. Of particular interest was one appeal that resulted in a split decision, meaning it was allowed in part, which is noted as being rare. The report listed several dismissed appeals and one allowed appeal concerning a high hedge.