Subscribe to updates

You'll receive weekly summaries about County Durham Council every week.

If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.

Statutory Licensing Sub-Committee - Monday, 24 August 2026 - 1.00 pm

August 24, 2026 at 1:00 pm Statutory Licensing Sub-Committee View on council website

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“What licenses are on the agenda?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on County Durham and are not the council. About us

The Statutory Licensing Sub-Committee of Durham County Council was scheduled to consider an application for the review of a premises licence for The Kings Head public house in Cockfield. The meeting's agenda indicated that the primary business would be the discussion of this licence review, with supporting documents detailing the application and representations from various parties.

Application for the Review of a Premises Licence: The Kings Head, Cockfield

The main item scheduled for discussion was an application to review the premises licence for The Kings Head, located at 53 Front Street, Cockfield, Bishop Auckland, Co Durham, DL13 5DS. This review was initiated by Durham Constabulary on 28 July 2026, under Section 53A of the Licensing Act 2003, following an incident on 25 July 2026. The report pack indicated that the police believed the premises were associated with serious crime and/or serious disorder.

An interim hearing had already taken place on 30 July 2026. The report pack detailed that additional information was provided by the licence holder, FB Taverns FH Limited, on 12 August 2026. This included plans for reopening, such as appointing a new designated premises supervisor, installing CCTV, and introducing an operating policy.

During the consultation period for the review, 18 representations were received in support of the premises licence holder. However, Public Health, the Durham Safeguarding Children Partnership, and Cockfield Parish Council submitted representations in support of the review. Environmental Health, the Home Office, and the Planning Authority responded with no representations.

The Sub-Committee was asked to determine the review application with a view to promoting the licensing objectives: the prevention of crime and disorder, public safety, the protection of children from harm, and the prevention of public nuisance. The report recommended that the Sub-Committee give appropriate weight to the steps to promote these objectives, the representations from all parties, Durham County Council's Statement of Licensing Policy, and the Guidance issued under Section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003.

The report outlined the options available to the Sub-Committee, which included taking no further action, modifying or adding conditions to the licence, excluding a licensable activity, removing the Designated Premises Supervisor, suspending the licence for up to three months, or revoking the licence entirely.

The report also referenced legal implications, noting that the Sub-Committee must have regard to guidance issued by the Secretary of State under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003, and that any conditions attached to a licence should be necessary, proportionate, and enforceable, as established in cases such as Daniel Thwaites Plc v Wirral Borough Magistrates' Court1 and R v Bristol Magistrates' Court2.

The report pack included appendices containing a location plan and street view images of The Kings Head, the notice of determination from the interim steps hearing, a copy of the premises licence, the review application and certificate from Durham Constabulary, and additional information provided by the premises licence holder, including their operating standards manual. It also contained representations from various individuals and organisations, both in support of and in opposition to the review.


  1. Daniel Thwaites Plc v Wirral Borough Magistrates' Court [2008] EWHC 838 (Admin). This case established that licensing authorities must consider guidance issued under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003 and provide full reasons if they depart from it. It also stated that licence conditions should only be imposed to promote licensing objectives and must be supported by real evidence

  2. R v Bristol Magistrates' Court [2009] EWHC 625 (Admin). This case further supported the principle that licensing authorities should only impose necessary and proportionate conditions to promote licensing objectives, and that such conditions must be enforceable. 

Attendees

Profile image for Councillor Amanda Hopgood
Councillor Amanda Hopgood Deputy Mayor of Durham, Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group Liberal Democrat Framwellgate and Newton Hall
Profile image for Councillor Gary Hutchinson
Councillor Gary Hutchinson Mayor of Durham Independent Bowburn and Coxhoe
Profile image for Councillor Louise Penders
Councillor Louise Penders Reform UK Easington and Shotton
Profile image for Councillor Tim Robson
Councillor Tim Robson Reform UK Sacriston and Witton Gilbert
Profile image for Councillor Robbie Rodiss
Councillor Robbie Rodiss Chair of Durham County Council Reform UK Crook

Topics

Cockfield Parish Council FB Taverns FH Limited Durham County Council's Statement of Licensing Policy Guidance issued under Section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003 Review of a premises licence for The Kings Head, Cockfield Durham Constabulary Durham Safeguarding Children Partnership Environmental Health Home Office Planning Authority Daniel Thwaites PLC Wirral Borough Magistrates' Court Bristol Magistrates' Court

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet Monday 24-Aug-2026 13.00 Statutory Licensing Sub-Committee.pdf

Reports Pack

Public reports pack Monday 24-Aug-2026 13.00 Statutory Licensing Sub-Committee.pdf

Additional Documents

REDACTED Report.pdf