Synergy move to Vendor Hosted Platform
October 14, 2026 Cabinet Member for Business Services (Cabinet member) Key decision Awaiting outcome View on council websiteThis summary is generated by AI from the council’s published record and supporting documents. Check the full council record and source link before relying on it.
Summary
Cabinet Member for LGR and Transformation approved £0.037m from the capital budget and £0.315m of revenue funding for Synergy hosting costs. This decision was made on 5th October 2026 to migrate the Synergy system to a vendor-hosted platform. The decision includes approving the funding for implementation and first-year costs, and for the remaining three years of the contract, subject to a pressure bid approval.
Full council record
Purpose
Report requesting Cabinet Member approval to a contract variation to enable the supply of system hosting facilities for the Synergy system. The system supports the School Admissions Service, Early Years Support , Free Schools Meals, and other Education services.
Reasons for the decision
To ensure Synergy is migrated before supplier support for the locally hosted system ends, reducing operational, security and compliance risks while maintaining statutory Children’s Services.
To provide the funding required to meet hosting costs for the remainder of the contract and maintain continuity of service.
Alternative options considered
One option is to keep Synergy in its current environment and migrate it through the Cloud Migration Project, which is due to complete in summer 2027. This would require one of the following approaches:
a) Negotiate with The Access Group to extend support for the current environment.
Advantages
• Defers immediate capital expenditure.
• Allows more time to align the migration with wider ICT and transformation decisions.
• Reduces delivery risk during the busy admissions and financial periods identified in the project plan.
Disadvantages
• Continues reliance on ageing infrastructure.
• Increases future support and security risks.
• The supplier may not agree to extend support.
• Creates additional revenue costs for extended support.
Or
b) Delay migration to the vendor-hosted platform by a further six months.
Advantages
• Defers immediate capital expenditure.
• Aligns resources with the Cloud Migration Project.
Disadvantages
• Duplicates effort and resources by requiring testing for two platform migrations within 12 months.
• Creates a likely conflict between the delivery timetable and business-critical periods.
• Creates additional complexity and risk of meeting the December 2027 deadline.
Supporting Documents
Details
| Reference | Call-ins0 |
| Outcome | For Determination |
| Decision date | 14 Oct 2026 |
| Effective from | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Subject to call-in | Yes |