Procurement Strategy and Contract Award for Planned Voids Contracts
October 7, 2026 Cabinet Member for Housing and Homelessness (Cabinet member) Key decision Awaiting outcome View on council websiteThis summary is generated by AI from the council’s published record and supporting documents. Check the full council record and source link before relying on it.
Summary
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Homelessness approved the procurement strategy and contract awards for planned voids contracts on 07/10/2026. Two contracts were approved to provide additional capacity for planned void works. The decision included approving contract awards to Preferred Supplier 1 and Preferred Supplier 2 for a period of 16 months.
Full council record
Purpose
Planned void works for both minor and major voids within the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham social housing properties
Decision
- Appendices 1, 2, and 3 are not for publication on the basis that they contain information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information) as set out in paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended).
- To approve the procurement strategies in line with the recommended Procurement Route included in this report.
- To approve a contract award to Preferred Supplier 1 for the maximum estimated Contract Award Value for a contract period of 16 months, using Lot 16 – London region of the Framework. The Council aims to incept the contract as soon as allowable.
- To approve a contract award to the Preferred Supplier 2 for the maximum estimated Contract Award Value for a contract period of 16 months, using Lot 16 – London region of the Framework. The Council aims to incept the contract as soon as allowable.
Supporting Documents
Details
| Reference | Call-ins0 |
| Outcome | For Determination |
| Decision date | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Effective from | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Expected date | 27 Aug 2026 |
| Originally due | 27 Aug 2026 |
| Lead officer | Gavin Duncumb |
| Subject to call-in | Yes |