Subscribe to updates
You'll receive weekly summaries about Bexley Council every week.
If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.
Planning Committee - Thursday, 11 June 2026 - 7.00 pm
June 11, 2026 at 7:00 pm Planning Committee View on council website Watch video of meeting Read transcript (Professional subscription required)Summary
Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Bexley and are not the council. About us
The Bexley Council Planning Committee convened on Thursday, 11 June 2026, to discuss several town planning applications. Key decisions included the refusal of an application for a development on Old Manor Way due to unresolved highway safety concerns, and the approval of a ropes course installation in Danson Park, despite objections regarding its impact on ancient woodland and the park's heritage. The committee also approved several residential development applications, including a pair of semi-detached dwellings on Woodside Lane and a three-storey building on Blackfen Road, among others.
Old Manor Way Development Refused
The committee refused planning permission for a development at the Former Tennis Courts, Old Manor Way, Bexleyheath, which proposed the erection of two buildings comprising 12 self-contained flats. Councillors Thomas Clapperton and Larry Ferguson moved and seconded the refusal on the grounds of unresolved highway safety concerns. Concerns were raised about the proximity of the access road to a railway bridge, the potential for accidents, and the impact on pedestrian safety, particularly near a children's playground. Despite officers' assurances regarding visibility splays and proposed traffic calming measures, the committee ultimately voted to refuse the application.
Danson Park Ropes Course Approved
An application for the installation of a ropes course and associated infrastructure in Danson Park was approved, despite significant public objection. Concerns were raised about the impact on ancient woodland, mature trees, biodiversity, and the potential for over-commercialisation of public space. Objectors also highlighted security risks and potential legal implications regarding noise nuisance. Supporters, including Mr. Stafford from Go Ape, emphasised the environmental benefits, job creation, and the positive impact on youth development. Councillor Larry Ferguson, despite acknowledging some concerns, ultimately supported the officers' recommendation for approval, citing the less than substantial harm
and the reversibility of the structures. The application was approved, with conditions to manage noise, tree protection, and ecological improvements.
Other Residential Developments Approved
Several other residential development applications were approved:
- Earlswood Court, 14A Albert Road, Belvedere: A vertical extension to create one self-contained residential unit was approved.
- Land to the Rear of 41 Church Road, Bexleyheath: The erection of seven dwellinghouses following the demolition of existing commercial units was approved. This application was a revised proposal addressing previous refusal reasons.
- 51 Blackfen Road, Sidcup: The demolition of an existing bungalow and erection of a three-storey building to provide six self-contained residential units was approved.
- 129 Raeburn Road, Sidcup: An application for a two-storey dwelling with accommodation at roof level, including a dormer extension and rooflight, was approved. This was a slight alteration to a previously approved scheme.
- 2 Parkhurst Road, Bexley: The erection of a two-storey detached dwelling following the demolition of an existing garage was approved. This decision was made despite previous refusals and concerns raised about its impact on the Parkhurst Conservation Area, with the committee noting the updated policy context and design improvements.
- Garages rear of 145-175 Woodside Lane, Bexley: The erection of a pair of five-bedroom semi-detached dwellings was approved. This application was brought to committee due to the planning agent being a council employee.
The meeting concluded with Councillor Christopher Readers, the committee chairman, thanking members and officers for their perseverance in determining the applications.
Attendees
Topics
Meeting Documents
Additional Documents