Cllr Rowena Hay

Activity Timeline

Meetings Attended Note this may include planned future meetings.

12 meetings ยท Page 1 of 3

City Region Board Committee Member

City Region Board - Monday 11 January 2027 10.00 am

January 11, 2027, 10:00 am
City Region Board Committee Member

City Region Board - Friday, 4 September 2026 - 10.00 am

September 04, 2026, 10:00 am
City Region Board Committee Member

City Region Board - Monday, 13 July 2026 - 1.00 pm

July 13, 2026, 1:00 pm
City Region Board Committee Member

City Region Board - Friday 6 March 2026 10.00 am

The City Region Board meeting scheduled for 6 March 2026 was set to cover a range of economic and strategic planning matters for Gloucestershire. Key discussions were expected to focus on the health of the retail and hospitality sectors, updates on the Transitional Spatial Development Strategy (tSDS), and the financial position of the Business Rate Pool and Strategic Economic Development Fund (SEDF).

March 06, 2026, 10:00 am
City Region Board Committee Member

City Region Board - Friday 30 January 2026 9.30 am

The City Region Board was scheduled to discuss the use of Strategic Economic Development Fund (SEDF) ringfenced funding to support the delivery of Gloucestershire's Transitional Spatial Development Strategy (tSDS). The board was also set to review the business rate pool position and consider future work plan items.

January 30, 2026, 9:30 am

Decisions from Meetings

1 decision

Strategic Economic Development Fund (SEDF)

From: City Region Board - Thursday 6 March 2025 2.00 pm - March 06, 2025

...to approve the allocation of funding from the Strategic Economic Development Fund (SEDF) to support the Together Gloucestershire Project, the Countywide Climate Change Planning Officer, and the Gloucestershire: The Security and Resilience Hub of the UK project, as recommended by the Gloucestershire City Region Board's Senior Officer Group.

Recommendations Approved

Summary

Meetings attended
12
Average per month
0.4
Decisions recorded Not all decisions are recorded, so this may significantly underestimate the number of decisions actually made.
1