AI Generated

Weekly updates

London renters' rights & screening gaps

This week in Greater London Authority:

Renters' Rights Act: A New Dawn or More Hurdles for London's Tenants?

The Housing Committee met on Tuesday, 20 January 2026, to scrutinise the implementation of the landmark Renters' Rights Act in London. The Act, which received Royal Assent on 27 October 2025, promises significant protections for private renters, including the abolition of 'no-fault' evictions and the introduction of periodic tenancies. However, the committee heard stark warnings from tenant advocacy groups about potential enforcement gaps and the ongoing affordability crisis.

Niamh Evans of the Renters' Reform Coalition emphasised the Act's potential to empower renters, stating, This will hugely empower renters, not just through providing security for them and removing the fear of being evicted at any time at the whim of a landlord, but it will also empower them through lessening the fear that if they ask for something such as a repair, that they might be evicted as a retaliation. This is particularly crucial in London, which has some of the highest rates of landlord possessions in the country.

However, Paul Williams of ACORN voiced significant concerns about enforcement, warning that landlords and letting agents can just bully people as well, using Section 21. He highlighted that the Act's measures to improve housing standards, such as the Decent Homes Standard, are not due to come into effect until 2035, a timeline he described as ridiculous. The lack of focus on affordability was also a major point of contention, with calls for rent controls and increased social housing.

The committee heard that while the Act aims to provide greater security, vulnerable renters could still face significant challenges. Alva Gottby from the London Renters' Union noted that more vulnerable tenants, tenants who don't have the experience of going to tribunal, will naturally be hesitant to use that system if they don't know how it works. This could lead to a two-tier system where those most in need are least likely to access their new rights. The potential for landlords to exploit loopholes, such as using licence agreements to circumvent assured tenancies, was also raised.

The effectiveness of the Act hinges on robust enforcement, a point repeatedly stressed by the panel. Ben Toomey of Generation Rent stated, The Act will only be as effective as how well it is enforced, and that is our primary concern. He pointed to a stark statistic: over a third of councils didn't prosecute a single landlord in a recent three-year period. Without adequate funding and skilled staff, local authorities may struggle to implement the new duties, leaving renters exposed.

The implications for London's housing market are significant. While the Act aims to create a fairer system, the lack of immediate action on affordability and the potential for weak enforcement could mean that many Londoners continue to struggle with insecure and unaffordable housing.

Breast Cancer Screening: London's Uptake Gap and the Fight for Equity

The Health Committee met on Thursday, 22 January 2026, to confront the persistent issue of low breast cancer screening uptake in London. Despite being a vital tool for early detection and saving lives, London's uptake rate hovers around 63%, falling short of the NHS target of 70%. The committee heard how this disparity disproportionately affects vulnerable groups, including women in more deprived areas, Black women, and transgender individuals.

Helen Dickens from Breast Cancer Now highlighted the multifaceted barriers: Some of that is sort of general across the breast screening program nationally. And some of those factors are compounded in London. These include a lack of awareness, fear of the procedure, and practical issues like transport and accessibility. For Black women, Leanne Graham of Black Women Rising spoke powerfully about historical medical mistrust and a lack of culturally appropriate materials: When I got my diagnosis, I didn't really see any women of colour on the materials that I was receiving, so that didn't let me know that I was welcome in their spaces.

The committee also heard about the specific challenges faced by transgender and non-binary individuals. Lee Dibbon from Outpatients explained that the current invitation system, based on NHS record markers, often excludes transgender men who may still need screening and transgender women who have an increased risk due to hormone therapy. We're seeing a system that isn't quite well designed to manage the nuances of the communities that we now see within London, Dibbon stated.

The impact of these low uptake rates is stark. Dr. Josephine Rowende from NHS London confirmed that lower screening uptake theoretically leads to later diagnoses and potentially worse outcomes. While London has a robust cancer registry, the lack of accurate data due to population churn—people moving addresses frequently—hinders targeted outreach. The committee was told that even affluent areas in London show low uptake, often due to residents being away for extended periods or opting for private screening, which isn't captured in NHS statistics.

The discussion underscored the urgent need for tailored, culturally sensitive approaches and improved data collection. The upcoming National Cancer Plan and the transfer of commissioning powers to Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in April 2027 were identified as crucial opportunities to address these deep-seated inequalities. The real-world impact of these issues means that some Londoners are missing out on potentially life-saving early diagnoses, highlighting the critical need for systemic change.

London's Congestion Conundrum: Balancing Movement and Sustainability

The Transport Committee met on Wednesday, 21 January 2026, to delve into the complex issue of road space, driving, and congestion in London. With London named the most congested city in Europe, the committee questioned how Transport for London (TfL) balances the need for efficient movement with its commitment to reducing traffic and promoting sustainable travel.

Christina Calderato, TfL's Director of Transport Strategy and Policy, explained that TfL uses integrated mapping and modelling to assess road space allocation, prioritising modes like buses and cycling where they offer greater efficiency. However, the committee heard that while overall traffic in London has decreased since pre-pandemic levels, congestion appears to be worsening. This paradox was attributed, in part, to policy decisions like the reallocation of road space for active travel, which, while beneficial for sustainability, can impact general traffic flow.

Carl Edelson, Director of Streets and Network Operations at TfL, highlighted the technological advancements in traffic management, including the Fusion signal optimiser, designed to improve traffic flow. However, the committee expressed concern that these technological solutions might not be enough to counteract the impact of policies that reduce road space for general traffic. Assembly Member Keith Prince questioned the effectiveness of Localised Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs), suggesting they might be pushing traffic onto main roads, leading to increased congestion. While Edelson acknowledged LTNs provide safety and active travel benefits, he admitted that in some locations, they could increase congestion on surrounding roads.

A significant point of discussion was the Mayor's commitment to a 27% traffic reduction target by 2030 as part of the net-zero strategy. However, the Mayor's repudiation of 'pay per mile' road user charging has left a policy gap. While TfL insists it is still working towards net-zero through other means, the committee expressed concern about the lack of a clear, alternative plan to achieve this ambitious target, especially with 2030 rapidly approaching.

The committee also explored the motivations behind private car use, particularly in outer London, where car ownership remains high. While TfL aims to make sustainable modes more attractive, the reality for many outer Londoners, especially families and those with mobility issues, is that cars remain a necessity. The ongoing challenges with bus reliability and the curtailment of routes were also raised, creating a vicious circle where reduced service leads to lower ridership, which in turn can lead to further service cuts.

The discussion underscored the intricate challenges of managing London's transport network. While TfL is implementing new technologies and promoting sustainable travel, the committee's questions highlighted a persistent concern: are these measures sufficient to tackle growing congestion and ensure essential journeys remain feasible for all Londoners, particularly those in outer London and those reliant on public transport?

Other Matters

  • The GLA Oversight Committee met on Wednesday, 21 January 2026. The committee reviewed its work programme, discussed budget performance, and noted actions taken under delegated authority. Key topics included the Assembly's ways of working and the transfer of the former Greater London Council's Coat of Arms to the GLA.

Upcoming Meetings

Met Police Oversight & Housing Crisis

This week in Greater London Authority:

Met Police Culture Under Scrutiny: Are Oversight Bodies Effective?

The Police and Crime Committee met on Wednesday, 14 January 2026, to dissect the effectiveness of the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) in overseeing culture change within the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). The discussion highlighted significant concerns about MOPAC's ability to hold the MPS to account, particularly regarding issues of misconduct, vetting, and performance.

Experts and community representatives voiced worries that MOPAC's close institutional ties with the MPS might be hindering robust independent oversight. David Spencer, Head of Crime and Justice for the Policy Exchange, noted MOPAC's strength in data transparency but pointed to a significant gap in understanding how the MPS engages with stakeholders, which hinders accountability. Diane Vincent, Chair of the Metropolitan Black Police Associations, argued that MOPAC needs to be more robust in challenging the MPS, suggesting that persistent issues like vetting failures wouldn't continue if MOPAC were more assertive.

The committee also grappled with the question of whether MOPAC is the right body for this oversight, given the MPS's national responsibilities. Assembly Member Lord Bailey of Paddington questioned if the current mayoral model is effective, especially when crime performance is a concern. While acknowledging past successes in crime reduction under the mayoral model, David Spencer expressed doubt about the current operation, citing the continued presence of senior leaders responsible for significant failures, as reported in the Casey Review and vetting reviews.

Community monitoring groups shared their challenging experiences. Miriam Gidder, Chair of the Tower Hamlets Community Monitoring Group, described institutional defensiveness from the MPS and significant pushback when providing feedback, particularly on body-worn video footage. She noted that despite giving red ratings for serious issues, there has been a lack of accountability. Colette Hunter, Vice Chair of the Lewisham Safer Neighbourhood Board, offered a more positive perspective, highlighting a platform of transparency with the local MPS team. However, even she noted that MOPAC's support, while present, has been impacted by recent funding cuts.

The discussion also touched upon the pervasive issue of violence against women and girls (VAWG) on public transport. Experts stressed the need for better data collection, a gender-transformative approach, and upskilling within the transport sector. Tricia Hayes CB, Chair of London TravelWatch, described the data as fragmented and inconsistent, and noted that the incidence of sexual offences and harassment is growing faster than passenger numbers.

The committee's deliberations underscore the critical need for effective oversight to ensure public safety and trust in policing. The real-world impact of these discussions is felt by Londoners, particularly vulnerable groups, who rely on a police force that is both accountable and responsive to their concerns.

Housing Crisis Deepens: Developers' Viability vs. Londoners' Needs

At Mayor's Question Time on Thursday, 15 January 2026, Deputy Mayors Jules Pipe CBE and Tom Copley faced tough questions from London Assembly members regarding the city's escalating housing crisis. The discussion revealed a perfect storm of challenges impacting housing development, with viability identified as the primary hurdle.

Deputy Mayor Tom Copley acknowledged that economic conditions, high construction costs, and interest rates, coupled with London's unique reliance on brownfield land and the need for higher densities, are creating significant difficulties. While London was building more homes than at any time since the 1930s before the pandemic, the current landscape is forcing difficult choices.

Assembly Member Zoë Garbett raised concerns about emergency housing measures, questioning whether concessions to private developers and lowered affordable housing thresholds would prioritise profits over those on council waiting lists. Deputy Mayor Copley defended the measures as temporary, stating that 20 per cent of something is better than 35 per cent of nothing, but confirmed the London Plan's 35% affordable housing threshold remains in place. This suggests a potential trade-off between stimulating development and ensuring genuinely affordable homes for those most in need.

Assembly Member Hina Bokhari OBE highlighted a critical shortfall in accessible housing, with fewer than half of new affordable homes meeting basic accessibility standards and only six per cent meeting wheelchair accessibility standards. Deputy Mayor Copley acknowledged data issues but insisted accessible housing is a priority, promising further discussion. This raises concerns for disabled Londoners who may face continued barriers to suitable housing.

The debate also touched upon the quality of proposed developments, particularly on Green Belt land. Deputy Mayor Pipe explained that to meet the government's target of 88,000 homes per year, some Green Belt release is inevitable, necessitating higher densities. This raises questions about the impact on green spaces and the character of outer London communities.

The committee's discussions underscore the complex balancing act between stimulating housing supply and ensuring that new developments meet the diverse needs of Londoners, especially those on lower incomes and with accessibility requirements.

Firefighters' Wellbeing: A Call for Systemic Change

The Fire Committee met on Tuesday, 13 January 2026, to address the critical issue of firefighter wellbeing, revealing significant concerns about the long-term health impacts of their demanding profession. Experts and union representatives highlighted increased rates of stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout, with firefighters being three times more likely to suffer from cancer.

Professor Rowena Hill from Nottingham Trent University noted that while research is ongoing, there's a clear link between firefighting and increased cancer rates. Dr Carolina Campodonico from the University of Lancashire reported that over half of firefighters surveyed experienced mental health consequences from incidents, with many not seeking professional help due to stigma or fear of career repercussions.

The discussion revealed a disconnect between policy and practice regarding contamination control within fire stations. Karl Smith from the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) pointed to issues with training, PPE availability, and the infrastructure of older fire stations. The London Fire Brigade (LFB) acknowledged these challenges and outlined steps being taken, including updating PPE contracts and piloting new technologies.

Financially, the LFB faces a projected budget gap of £12.2 million in 2026/27, impacting its ability to fund essential programmes like the Modern Firefighting Training Programme. The committee expressed concern about the LFB operating without a budget flexibility reserve for two years and having General Fund reserves below target levels, leaving it with limited financial resilience.

The committee's recommendations to the Mayor emphasize the need for greater assurance on progress towards targets for improving staff sickness and recruiting a more diverse workforce. The discussions highlight the profound impact of the job on firefighters' health and the urgent need for systemic changes, including better health monitoring, improved infrastructure, and robust financial planning, to ensure the wellbeing of those who protect London.

Other Matters

  • The Economy, Culture and Skills Committee met on Monday, 12 January 2026. The committee was scheduled to discuss the ongoing support for unpaid carers in London and review its work programme. The meeting agenda also included a review of completed and ongoing actions from previous meetings and declarations of interests.

Upcoming Meetings

Budget and Performance Committee

Budget and Performance Committee - Monday 26 January 2026 10.00 am

The Budget and Performance Committee of the Greater London Authority Council is scheduled to meet on Monday 26 January 2026. The committee's agenda includes a review of the 2026-27 Greater London Authority Group Budget, focusing on the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and Transport for London (TfL). Additionally, the committee will consider payments over £250 and review its work programme.

January 26, 2026
Health Committee

Health Committee - Thursday 22 January 2026 10.00 am

The Health Committee was scheduled to discuss several important public health matters, including breast cancer screening rates in London, the use of the Transport for London network for public health messaging, and the committee's ongoing work programme. The meeting also included standard procedural items such as declarations of interest and the confirmation of previous minutes.

January 22, 2026
GLA Oversight Committee

GLA Oversight Committee - Wednesday 21 January 2026 2.00 pm

The GLA Oversight Committee met on Wednesday 21 January 2026 to discuss a range of operational and strategic matters concerning the Greater London Authority (GLA). Key topics included the Assembly's ways of working, budget performance, and actions taken under delegated authority. The committee also reviewed its work programme and considered reports on declarations of interest and previous meeting minutes.

January 21, 2026
Transport Committee

Transport Committee - Wednesday 21 January 2026 10.00 am

The Transport Committee met to discuss its work programme, review actions taken under delegated authority, and consider reports on declarations of interest and minutes from previous meetings. A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to a discussion on road space, driving, and congestion in London, examining how these factors impact the city's transport network.

January 21, 2026
Housing Committee

Housing Committee - Tuesday 20 January 2026 10.00 am

The Housing Committee of the Greater London Authority Council met on Tuesday 20 January 2026 to discuss the implementation of the Renters' Rights Act and the council's work programme. The meeting also included the noting of outstanding actions from previous meetings and the confirmation of minutes.

January 20, 2026
London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time)

London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) - Thursday 15 January 2026 10.00 am

The London Assembly convened for Mayor's Question Time, addressing a wide array of issues including housing, transport, policing, and environmental concerns. Key decisions included the confirmation of Keith Morgan CBE as the Chair of the London Legacy Development Corporation and the agreement to accept written answers for future questions to allow more time for budget discussions.

January 15, 2026
Police and Crime Committee

Police and Crime Committee - Wednesday 14 January 2026 10.00 am

The Police and Crime Committee met on Wednesday 14 January 2026 to discuss the effectiveness of the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) in overseeing culture change within the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). The committee heard from two panels of guests, including representatives from think tanks, police associations, and community monitoring groups, who provided insights into MOPAC's oversight, the challenges faced by community scrutiny groups, and the effectiveness of various policing strategies.

January 14, 2026
Fire Committee

Fire Committee - Tuesday 13 January 2026 10.00 am

The Fire Committee discussed the wellbeing of London's firefighters, noting concerns about the impact of contaminants and the need for improved health monitoring and PPE. The Committee also reviewed the London Fire Brigade's financial strategies, including the draft Reserves Strategy and Medium-Term Financial Strategy for 2026/27, and the draft Statement of Assurance for 2024/25, making recommendations to the Mayor on these matters.

January 13, 2026
Economy, Culture and Skills Committee

Economy, Culture and Skills Committee - Monday 12 January 2026 3.20 pm

The Economy, Culture and Skills Committee met on Monday 12 January 2026 to discuss the challenges and support for unpaid carers in London. The committee heard from representatives of Barnet Carers, Enfield Carers Centre, and Bromley Well, who detailed the difficulties faced by carers, including financial strain, lack of awareness of entitlements, and the impact on their wellbeing and employment prospects. The discussion also covered the role of local carer organisations in supporting unpaid carers and the need for greater identification and tailored support services.

January 12, 2026
Environment Committee

Environment Committee - Thursday 8 January 2026 10.00 am

The Environment Committee met on Thursday 8 January 2026 to discuss the expansion of heat networks in London. The committee heard from consumer advocates, housing associations, and government officials about the challenges and opportunities associated with heat networks, with a particular focus on consumer protection, pricing, and the implementation of zoning policies. Decisions were made to note the completed and ongoing actions from previous meetings and to note recent actions taken under delegated authority.

January 08, 2026
Planning and Regeneration Committee

Planning and Regeneration Committee - Wednesday 28 January 2026 2.00 pm

January 28, 2026
Police and Crime Committee

Police and Crime Committee - Wednesday 28 January 2026 10.00 am

January 28, 2026
London Assembly (Plenary)

Draft Budget, London Assembly (Plenary) - Thursday 29 January 2026 10.00 am

January 29, 2026
Environment Committee

Environment Committee - Tuesday 3 February 2026 12.15 pm

February 03, 2026
Economy, Culture and Skills Committee

Economy, Culture and Skills Committee - Wednesday 4 February 2026 10.00 am

February 04, 2026
London Assembly (Plenary)

London Assembly (Plenary) - Thursday 5 February 2026 10.00 am

February 05, 2026
Housing Committee

Housing Committee - Monday 9 February 2026 2.00 pm

February 09, 2026
GLA Oversight Committee

GLA Oversight Committee - Tuesday 10 February 2026 10.00 am

February 10, 2026
Police and Crime Committee

Police and Crime Committee - Wednesday 11 February 2026 10.00 am

February 11, 2026
Planning and Regeneration Committee

Planning and Regeneration Committee - Wednesday 11 February 2026 2.00 pm

February 11, 2026