Subscribe to updates

You'll receive weekly summaries about Boston Council every week.

If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.

Planning Committee - Tuesday 4th February 2025 10.00 am

February 4, 2025 at 10:00 am Planning Committee View on council website  Watch video of meeting Read transcript (Professional subscription required)

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“Who will maintain the dike for the housing development?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Boston and are not the council. About us

Boston Borough Council's Planning Committee approved three applications for battery energy storage systems and deferred a decision on a housing development. The committee also decided not to make a Tree Preservation Order for two trees in a conservation area.

Battery Energy Storage Systems Approved

The committee considered three applications for battery energy storage systems (BESS) in the Bicka Fen area, all of which were recommended for approval by officers and subsequently approved by the committee.

B240415 - Battery Energy Storage System, Bicka Fen

This application for a battery energy storage system, associated infrastructure, and biodiversity net gain (BNG) improvements was approved subject to conditions. The site is located to the west of the Bicka Fen substation. Concerns raised by third parties and the parish council included the cumulative impact of multiple BESS developments, construction traffic, and health and safety. Officers confirmed that the local planning authority had no objections to the cumulative impact of all three BESS applications. The Highways Authority also stated there would be no cumulative impact on the highway network. The applicant, FRV PowerTech, highlighted that the scheme would contribute to achieving net zero targets and a clean power grid. The development is for a temporary period of 40 years, after which the site will be restored.

B240363 - Battery Energy Storage System, Bicka Fen

This application for another battery energy storage system, located south-east of the substation, was also approved with conditions. Objections were raised by third parties and the parish council, primarily concerning construction traffic. The applicant, AGR Renewables, stated that construction traffic would be routed via private haul roads to avoid impacting the village of Bicka. The scheme was noted to have minimal impact on the local community and surroundings, with no objections from statutory consultees. The landowner, Mr. John Baxter, spoke in support, highlighting the project's importance for his agricultural business and the region's energy needs, and its contribution to biodiversity.

B240374 - Energy Storage System, Bicka Fen

The third BESS application, located to the north-east of the Bicka Fen substation, was approved subject to conditions. This application also received two third-party objections. A key point of discussion was the construction route, with Highways initially objecting. However, amendments to conditions were proposed to require a new construction route to be submitted and approved prior to development commencement. The applicant, Net Zero 2022 Limited, confirmed that the development would be temporary, with equipment being demountable and works reversible, and the site would be fully restored at the end of its 40-year lifespan. The landowner, Pat Bannon, spoke in support, stating the development would help secure the future of his family farm.

Waynefleet Road Housing Development Deferred

The committee deferred a decision on a full planning application for 200 homes on Waynefleet Road, Boston. The application, which follows previous outline and reserve matters approvals, aims to secure the development as mixed-tenure affordable housing. The applicant, RGMP, stated that the scheme is not financially viable if financial contributions for education and NHS services are levied, and therefore requested planning permission subject to a unilateral undertaking to secure the affordable housing delivery.

Significant concerns were raised by councillors regarding drainage, particularly the maintenance of a dike on the western boundary which is outside the application site. Councillors questioned who would be responsible for its maintenance and how properties on the other side would be protected, especially in light of potential increased surface water runoff from the development. The issue of the nine-metre easement rule for the dike, with the proposed development only allowing for a five-metre access, was also a point of contention.

Further concerns were raised about the standard of the proposed roads within the development, with the Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue Service reportedly requesting a higher standard than what was proposed. The lack of Section 106 contributions towards education and NHS services due to viability issues was also debated, with some councillors feeling that the burden would fall on existing residents.

Councillor Peter Bedford moved for deferral, citing the need to resolve issues regarding the nine-metre easement rule, dike ownership, road standards, and the overall fit of the development with the surrounding area. Councillor Stephen Woodliffe seconded the deferral.

No Tree Preservation Order for Swineshead Trees

The committee decided not to make a Tree Preservation Order for two trees within the Swineshead conservation area, located at West Home, Church Lane, Swineshead. The application was a notification under Section 211 of the Town and Country Planning Act for works to trees within a conservation area.

The first tree, a pine on the eastern boundary, is proposed for general maintenance, including removing deadwood and ivy, and thinning the canopy by approximately 30%. The second tree, a lime tree in the rear garden, requires more significant works, including the removal of ivy and growth at the base. In both cases, officers concluded that the proposed works would not result in harm that is significantly impactful on the public amenity value of the trees, and therefore a Tree Preservation Order was not warranted.

Attendees

Attendees

Abbie Marwood
Charlie Parry
Paul Stonebridge
Profile image for Councillor David Middleton
Councillor David Middleton Boston Independent Kirton and Frampton
Profile image for Councillor David Scoot
Councillor David Scoot Progressive Independents Boston Fishtoft
Profile image for Councillor Peter Bedford
Councillor Peter Bedford 20-20 Independent Group Coastal
Profile image for Councillor Alison Austin
Councillor Alison Austin Independent St Thomas'
Profile image for Councillor Dale Broughton
Councillor Dale Broughton Leader Progressive Independents Boston Coastal
Profile image for Councillor James Cantwell
Councillor James Cantwell Deputy Mayor Conservative Five Villages
Profile image for Councillor Anton Dani
Councillor Anton Dani Progressive Independents Boston Fenside
Lisa Davies
Phil Norman
Megan Epton
Karen Rist
Profile image for Councillor David Brown
Councillor David Brown Conservative Five Villages
Profile image for Councillor Barrie Pierpoint
Councillor Barrie Pierpoint Progressive Independents Boston Staniland
Profile image for Councillor Lina Savickiene
Councillor Lina Savickiene Progressive Independents Boston Station
Profile image for Councillor Anne Dorrian
Councillor Anne Dorrian Boston Independent Skirbeck
Profile image for Councillor Claire Rylott
Councillor Claire Rylott Portfolio Holder - Green Spaces and Travel Conservative Kirton and Frampton
Profile image for Councillor Sarah Sharpe
Councillor Sarah Sharpe Portfolio Holder - Heritage, Culture and Tourism Progressive Independents Boston Fishtoft
Profile image for Councillor Suzanne Welberry
Councillor Suzanne Welberry Progressive Independents Boston Swineshead and Holland Fen
Profile image for Councillor Stephen Woodliffe
Councillor Stephen Woodliffe Independent West
Profile image for Councillor Stuart Evans
Councillor Stuart Evans Conservative Swineshead and Holland Fen
Lewis Humphreys
Profile image for Councillor John Baxter
Councillor John Baxter Portfolio Holder - Housing Progressive Independents Boston Old Leake and Wrangle

Topics

Energy Storage System, Bicka Fen biodiversity net gain Affordable housing Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) Battery Energy Storage System, Bicka Fen Battery Energy Storage System, Bicka Fen FRV PowerTech Net Zero 2022 Limited AGR Renewables RGMP battery energy storage systems Waynefleet Road Housing Development

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet 04th-Feb-2025 10.00 Planning Committee.pdf

Reports Pack

Public reports pack 04th-Feb-2025 10.00 Planning Committee.pdf

Additional Documents

Supplementary report 04th-Feb-2025 10.00 Planning Committee.pdf
Amended pDF 0415.pdf
1. B.24.0415 - Committee Report - Land off Vicarage Drove Bicker Fen Bicker Boston.pdf
amended pdf 363.pdf
2. B.24.0363 - Committee Report - Land to the south east of Vicarage Drove Bicker Bar Boston - check.pdf
2nd amend pfs 0374.pdf
3. B.24.0374 - Comittee Report - Land North of Bicker Drove Boston PE20 3BQ - checked.pdf
pdf.0516.pdf
pdf.515.pdf
4a. Supplementary report B.24.0515.pdf
4. Committee Report B.24.0515.pdf
Minutes of Previous Meeting.pdf
Printed minutes 04th-Feb-2025 10.00 Planning Committee.pdf
5. Committee Report Header B 24 0516 S211 checked.pdf