Hau-Yu Tam - Councillor for Lewisham (Evelyn)

Councillor Hau-Yu Tam

Lewisham Green Party Group Evelyn Deputy Leader of the Lewisham Green Group

Is this you? Claim this page.

Activity Timeline

Meetings Attended Note this may include planned future meetings.

58 meetings · Page 1 of 12

Council Committee Member

Council - Wednesday, 20 May 2026 - 7.30 pm

May 20, 2026, 7:30 pm
Appointments Committee Committee Member

Appointments Committee - Wednesday, 18th March, 2026 1.00 pm

The Appointments Committee of Lewisham Council met on Wednesday 18 March 2026 and appointed Denise Radley as the new Executive Director of Adult Social Care and Health. The committee also agreed to grant delegated authority to the Head of Employment Services to appoint reserve candidates if the primary appointment did not proceed.

March 18, 2026, 1:00 pm
Appointments Committee Committee Member

Appointments Committee - Monday, 16 March 2026 - 9.30 am

The Appointments Committee of Lewisham Council was scheduled to meet on Monday 16 March 2026. The primary item on the agenda was the appointment of a Director of Property. The committee was also scheduled to consider the minutes from previous meetings and address declarations of interest.

March 16, 2026, 9:30 am
Planning Committee A Committee Member

Planning Committee A - Thursday, 12th March, 2026 7.30 pm

The Planning Committee A meeting on 12 March 2026 considered three planning applications, ultimately granting permission for a new artificial grass pitch at Whitefoot Lane Playing Field and an extension to a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) at 31A Crescent Way. The committee also approved a change of use for a property at 42 St John's Vale to become a children's home.

March 12, 2026, 7:30 pm
Public Accounts Select Committee Committee Member

Public Accounts Select Committee - Tuesday, 10th March, 2026 7.30 pm

The Public Accounts Select Committee met on Tuesday 10 March 2026 to review the council's financial performance for Period 9, discuss the IT and Digital Programme, and reflect on the committee's work over the past four years. Key decisions included noting the Period 9 financial monitoring report, which indicated a £0.7 million overspend primarily in Children's and Young People's Services, and approving the IT and Digital Programme Update report. The committee also reviewed its past scrutiny activities and made suggestions for the incoming committee's work programme.

March 10, 2026, 7:30 pm

Decisions from Meetings

72 decisions · Page 1 of 15

Statement of Accounts 2024-25

From: Council - Wednesday, 26th November, 2025 7.30 pm - November 26, 2025

... to note the contents of the report, approve agreed audit adjustments to the 2024/25 Statement of Accounts and Pension Fund Accounts, approve delegation to the Section 151 Officer to agree changes to audit adjustments, the final Statement of Accounts for publication, and changes to the Auditor’s Annual Report, and note the management representation letters and the Auditor’s Annual Report.

Recommendations Approved

Apologies for absence

From: Public Accounts Select Committee - Thursday, 20th November, 2025 7.30 pm - November 20, 2025

...to approve the recommendations, noting that all committee members were present and no apologies for absence were received.

Recommendations Approved

Declarations of interest

From: Public Accounts Select Committee - Thursday, 20th November, 2025 7.30 pm - November 20, 2025

The Public Accounts Select Committee approved recommendations on 20/11/2025. No declarations of interest were made.

Recommendations Approved

Corporate Resources Risk Register

From: Public Accounts Select Committee - Thursday, 20th November, 2025 7.30 pm - November 20, 2025

The Public Accounts Select Committee noted the Corporate Resources Directorate Risk Register on 20/11/2025. The committee resolved that the Chair, Scrutiny Manager, and officers would discuss integrating the register into the committee's work programme.

Recommendations Approved

Summary

Meetings Attended: 58

Average per Month: 1.5

Decisions Recorded: 72 Not all decisions are recorded, so this may significantly underestimate the number of decisions actually made.