Is this you? Claim this page.

Activity Timeline

Meetings Attended Note this may include planned future meetings.

6 meetings ยท Page 1 of 2

Council Committee Member

Council - Thursday, 1 October 2026 - 7.00 pm

October 01, 2026, 7:00 pm
Policy and Project Advisory Board Committee Member

Policy and Project Advisory Board - Tuesday, 22 September 2026 - 7.00 pm

September 22, 2026, 7:00 pm
Council Committee Member

Council - Thursday, 2 July 2026 - 7.00 pm

The Council meeting scheduled for 2nd July 2026 was set to address a range of important matters, including the adoption of a new Statement of Licensing Policy, the appointment of Member Champions, and a notice of motion concerning discounts for the Armed Forces and veterans. The meeting's agenda also included the consideration of recommendations from the Cabinet and various committees, as well as reports from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee and the Policy and Project Advisory Board.

July 02, 2026, 7:00 pm
Council Committee Member

Council - Thursday, 18 June 2026 - 7.00 pm

The Council met to discuss interim warding arrangements for the proposed North Hampshire Unitary Council and to appoint representatives to the North Hampshire Joint Committee. Key decisions included approving a preferred 108-councillor interim warding arrangement, with 88 and 85-councillor options as backstops, and appointing Councillors Gareth Williams and Calum Stewart to the Joint Committee.

June 18, 2026, 7:00 pm
Policy and Project Advisory Board Committee Member

Policy and Project Advisory Board - Tuesday, 9 June 2026 - 7.00 pm

The Policy and Project Advisory Board of Rushmoor Council met on Tuesday 09 June 2026 to discuss a proposed Equalities Policy and Action Plan, and to consider the prioritisation of playground improvements. The Board was also scheduled to review its work plan and discuss appointments to the Elections Group.

June 09, 2026, 7:00 pm

Decisions from Meetings

0 decisions

No decisions found for the selected date range. Not all decisions are recorded, so this may significantly underestimate the number of decisions actually made.