This week in Hertfordshire:

Nursing Home Provision: Council Backs Social Investment Model to Tackle Bed Shortage

Hertfordshire County Council is set to significantly boost its nursing home capacity by endorsing a new Social Investment Model (SIM). The Resources and Performance Cabinet Panel and the Adult Care Services Cabinet Panel both met this week to discuss the growing demand for nursing care, driven by an ageing population and increasing complex needs, particularly dementia.

A Growing Crisis in Care

Hertfordshire faces a projected shortfall of approximately 839 nursing beds by 2032, leading to an estimated £18 million annual cost pressure. This deficit results in increased reliance on costly out-of-area placements and poorer outcomes for residents. The council's traditional methods of directly developing or commissioning care homes are no longer sufficient due to rising borrowing costs and construction inflation.

A New Model for Investment

The approved Social Investment Model will attract institutional investors to fund and develop new nursing homes. Hertfordshire County Council will then enter into long-term lease arrangements, sub-leasing the properties to care providers. This approach allows the council to retain strategic oversight, ensure quality and affordability, and share risks with partners.

The programme aims to deliver six to eight new nursing homes, creating around 600 additional beds, with 150-200 secured for council-supported residents. The first homes are expected to open from 2028.

• Why this matters: This innovative model promises to address a critical shortage of nursing beds, ensuring more residents can receive high-quality care closer to home. It also aims to reduce long-term financial pressures on the council by attracting private investment and managing costs more effectively. For families, this means better access to care for their loved ones, reducing the stress and cost associated with out-of-area placements.

• Learn more: Read the details from the Resources and Performance Cabinet Panel meeting on 02 June 2026 and the Adult Care Services Cabinet Panel meeting on 03 June 2026.

County Hall and Leaohue House Sale: City & Country Selected as Preferred Bidder

Hertfordshire County Council's Resources and Performance Cabinet Panel has selected City & Country as the preferred bidder for the sale of County Hall and Leaohue House & Gardens in Hertford. This decision marks a significant step towards generating capital receipts and reducing ongoing running costs for the council.

Preserving Heritage, Creating New Homes

City & Country, known for their experience in redeveloping heritage sites, including Balls Park in Hertford, propose a predominantly residential development for County Hall. They plan to retain and convert existing buildings, including the Grade II* listed front sections, into apartments. The former council chamber and other significant heritage spaces are intended for community and public functions, such as events and communal areas. The cricket pitch and woodland will be protected and enhanced for recreation.

• Why this matters: The sale of these historic buildings is a major financial decision for the council, expected to generate a significant capital receipt and reduce substantial running costs. For residents, the proposed plans aim to balance development with the preservation of heritage and the provision of community spaces, though concerns about affordable housing and public access were raised during the meeting. The future use of the council chamber, in particular, was a point of discussion, with a commitment to present final terms back to the panel before a delegated decision is taken.

• Learn more: Read the details from the Resources and Performance Cabinet Panel meeting on 02 June 2026.

Hertfordshire's Digital Future: Draft Strategy Endorsed to Drive Growth and Inclusion

The Hertfordshire Growth Board met on Tuesday 02 June 2026 and endorsed the Draft Digital Strategy for Hertfordshire, 2026-36. This ambitious 10-year strategy aims to leverage digital connectivity, data, technology, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to foster economic growth, improve resident inclusion, and attract investment.

Key Ambitions for a Digital Hertfordshire

The strategy outlines four key ambitions:

• Digital Infrastructure: Improving broadband and mobile connectivity, particularly in rural areas and multi-dwelling units.
• Digital Inclusion: Addressing barriers to digital participation, including access, affordability, and skills, with a focus on older residents and those with limited digital literacy.
• Digital Adoption: Encouraging businesses, especially SMEs, to adopt digital technologies and AI to enhance productivity and innovation.

• Digital Development: Attracting investment through initiatives like AI Growth Zones and sustainable data centre development.

• Why this matters: This strategy is crucial for Hertfordshire's future economic competitiveness. By embracing digital advancements, the county aims to create new opportunities for businesses and residents, ensuring no one is left behind in the digital revolution. Concerns were raised about the pace of AI development and the need for sector-specific guidelines, as well as ensuring digital inclusion for all, including older people and those with dementia. The strategy also acknowledges the significant energy and water demands of data centres, highlighting the need for sustainable approaches.

• Learn more: Read the details from the Hertfordshire Growth Board meeting on 02 June 2026.

Fire and Rescue Service Performance and Trading Standards Priorities Reviewed

The Public Health & Community Safety Cabinet Panel met on Thursday 04 June 2026 to review key operational and strategic matters concerning public health and community safety.

Fire and Rescue Service: Operational Cover and Inspection Progress

The panel received an update on the Hertfordshire Fire & Rescue Service's Operational Cover Review, which confirmed that current appliance and station locations provide optimal coverage. The service is also making progress in addressing recommendations from the His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) inspection, focusing on service culture and staff productivity.

• Why this matters: Ensuring the Fire and Rescue Service is well-positioned and effectively managed is vital for public safety. This review and ongoing improvement efforts aim to guarantee swift and efficient response times across the county, protecting residents and their properties.

Trading Standards: Tackling Scams and Product Safety

The panel was updated on the Trading Standards Service's priorities for 2026/2027. Key areas of focus include doorstep crime and scams, food allergens and fraud, product safety, illicit tobacco, underage sales, and animal health. The service faces significant challenges with finite resources but is developing its workplan to address these critical issues.

• Why this matters: Trading Standards plays a crucial role in protecting consumers from fraud, unsafe products, and illegal goods. Their work directly impacts the safety and financial well-being of residents, particularly vulnerable groups who are often targeted by scams and rogue traders.

Resilience and Emergency Preparedness

An update was also provided on the council's resilience and emergency preparedness arrangements. The council continues to work within the Hertfordshire Local Resilience Forum (LRF) to coordinate responses to various risks, from heatwaves and wildfires to supply chain disruptions.

• Why it matters: Robust emergency preparedness is essential for protecting communities during unforeseen events. This ensures a coordinated and effective response to minimise harm and disruption.

• Learn more: Read the details from the Public Health & Community Safety Cabinet Panel meeting on 04 June 2026.

Other matters

The Audit Committee met on Friday 05 June 2026. The meeting was scheduled to consider draft audit plans, statements of accounting policies, and annual assurance statements for Hertfordshire County Council and the Pension Fund. The committee was also due to review its future work programme.

• Why this matters: The Audit Committee plays a vital role in ensuring the council's financial integrity and good governance. Their work provides assurance to residents that public funds are managed responsibly and that robust internal controls are in place.

• Learn more: Details from the Audit Committee meeting on 05 June 2026 are pending.

Upcoming meetings in the next 7 days are listed below. These are included to help you inform readers about what is coming up.

------ MEETING DATA ------ Children's Social Care Cabinet Panel Wednesday 10 June 2026 00:00 http://opencouncil.network/meetings/105196 FUTURE false 2026-05-01T12:40:57+01:00

Nigel Bell (Leader, Labour Group) (Labour)

Dee Hart (Conservative)

Paula Hiscocks (Conservative)

Anthony Owen (Reform UK)

Mark Pope (Conservative)

Louise Price (Deputy Executive member for Children's Social Care) (Liberal Democrats)

Anthony Rowlands (Executive member for Children's Social Care) (Liberal Democrats)

Caroline Smith-Wright ( (Liberal Democrats))

Miriam Swainston ( (Liberal Democrats))

Kirsty Taylor-Moran ( Leader, Green Group) ( (Green))

Sandy Walkington (Vice-Chairman of the Council) (Liberal Democrats)

Christopher Wright ( (Reform UK))

------ END OF MEETING DATA ------

------ MEETING DATA ------ Environment, Transport & Growth Cabinet Panel Thursday 11 June 2026 00:00 http://opencouncil.network/meetings/105038 FUTURE false 2026-06-02T22:13:01+01:00

Eric Buckmaster (Conservative)

Caroline Smith-Wright ( (Liberal Democrats))

Doug Bainbridge (Leader, Reform Group) (Reform UK)

Mark Pope (Conservative)

Janet Bainbridge (Reform UK)

Ruth Brown (Deputy Executive member for Environment, Transport and Growth; Vice-Chair Standards Committee) (Liberal Democrats)

Matt Fisher (Deputy Leader, Green Group) (Green)

Nigel Taylor (Chair of Development Control Committee) (Liberal Democrats)

Stuart Roberts (Liberal Democrats)

Alistair Willoughby ( Deputy Leader, Labour Group; Vice-Chair of Scrutiny Committee) ( (Labour))

Paul Zukowskyj (Executive member for Environment, Transport and Growth) (Liberal Democrats)

Cllr Tony Kingsbury (Conservative)

------ END OF MEETING DATA ------

------ MEETING DATA ------ Children & Families Cabinet Panel Wednesday 10 June 2026 00:00 http://opencouncil.network/meetings/157897 FUTURE false 2026-06-02T22:12:56+01:00

Nigel Bell (Leader, Labour Group) (Labour)

Dee Hart (Conservative)

Paula Hiscocks (Conservative)

Anthony Owen (Reform UK)

Mark Pope (Conservative)

Louise Price (Deputy Executive member for Children's Social Care) (Liberal Democrats)

Hillary Skoczylas ( Deputy Executive member for Education, SEND and Inclusion) ( (Liberal Democrats))

Miriam Swainston ( (Liberal Democrats))

Kirsty Taylor-Moran ( Leader, Green Group) ( (Green))

Christopher Wright ( (Reform UK))

Tina Bhartwas (Liberal Democrats)

Laurence Brass (Chairman of the Council) (Liberal Democrats)

------ END OF MEETING DATA ------

------ MEETING DATA ------ Hertfordshire Police and Crime Panel Thursday 18 June 2026 00:00 http://opencouncil.network/meetings/157917 FUTURE false 2026-06-02T22:13:05+01:00 Matt Fisher (Deputy Leader, Green Group) (Green)

------ END OF MEETING DATA ------

------ MEETING DATA ------ Cabinet Wednesday 17 June 2026 00:00 http://opencouncil.network/meetings/105415 FUTURE false 2026-06-02T22:12:56+01:00

Chris Lucas (Executive member for Resources and Performance) (Liberal Democrats)

Mark Watkin (Executive member for Education, SEND and Inclusion) (Liberal Democrats)

Hillary Skoczylas ( Deputy Executive member for Education, SEND and Inclusion) ( (Liberal Democrats))

Sally Symington (Deputy Leader of the Council; Executive member for Adult Care Services; Chair Health & Well-being Board; Vice-Chair Employment Committee) (Liberal Democrats)

Adrian England (Executive member for Sustainability) (Liberal Democrats)

Ajanta Hilton (Executive member for Public Health and Community Safety) (Liberal Democrats)

Stephen Giles-Medhurst OBE (Executive member for Highways) (Liberal Democrats)

Steve Jarvis (Leader of the Council; Chair Employment Committee) (Liberal Democrats)

Paul Zukowskyj (Executive member for Environment, Transport and Growth) (Liberal Democrats)

------ END OF MEETING DATA ------

This week in Hertfordshire:

Albury and St Nicholas Schools Face Closure Despite Community Opposition

Hertfordshire County Council's Cabinet met on Thursday 21 May 2026 and confirmed the controversial decisions to close Albury Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School and St Nicholas Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School in Elstree. The decisions were made despite significant opposition from local communities and concerns raised by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.

Albury CofE VA Primary School: Closure Confirmed

The Cabinet confirmed its previous decision to close Albury Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School on 31 August 2026. This followed a referral from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, which had argued that the decision-making process was flawed.

Councillor Mark Pope, the local representative for Bishop's Stortford Rural, argued passionately that the concerns raised by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee had not been adequately addressed. He highlighted issues with how consultation responses were weighed, the impact of consultation-induced decline on the evidence base, the lack of demonstrated consistency with comparable rural schools, and the absence of robust financial modelling for alternatives. Councillor Pope urged the Cabinet to pause the decision until after a Full Council meeting on 21 July, where a cross-party motion to support a recovery period for the school would be considered.

Mark Watkin, Executive Member for Education, SEND and Inclusion, responded that each school must be assessed on its individual circumstances and wider educational requirements. He explained that Albury School's closure was based on declining pupil numbers, persistent financial deficits, and a lack of recovery prospects, making it the most responsible option for ensuring educational quality and prudent use of public funds. Mr Watkin clarified that Full Council does not have the power to decide on school closures; this authority rests with the Cabinet.

The Cabinet discussed the points raised by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, including:

• Weighing Consultation Responses: The Cabinet acknowledged the overwhelming opposition but reiterated that statutory guidance requires decisions to be balanced against factors like financial sustainability and educational standards, not solely based on the number of objections.
• Consultation-Induced Decline: While acknowledging that the consultation accelerated pupil numbers falling, the Cabinet stated the school was already in financial difficulty due to low pupil numbers prior to the consultation.
• Consistency with Comparable Schools: The Cabinet maintained that each school proposal is assessed individually. The presumption in favour of retaining rural schools does not preclude closure if it is a last resort.
• Option Appraisals and Financial Modelling: The report detailed Albury School's five-year deficit and projections of pupil numbers falling as low as four by September 2026, making a sustainable recovery plan unrealistic. Alternative options like federation and joining a Multi-Academy Trust had been explored but found no interest due to viability concerns. The one-off cost of closure (£500,000) was deemed less of a long-term burden than keeping the school open.

Councillor Sally Symington, Executive Member for Adult Care Services, raised concerns about the well-being of children and the impact of uncertainty. Mark Watkin assured that officers would work with parents to ensure a seamless transition for children, including those with SEND.

The Cabinet voted unanimously to confirm the decision to close Albury Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School.

St Nicholas CofE VA Primary School, Elstree: Closure Confirmed

The Cabinet also confirmed its decision to close St Nicholas Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School in Elstree on 31 August 2026. This followed a referral from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, which had, against legal advice, referred the decision to Full Council.

Mark Watkin presented the case for closing St Nicholas, highlighting its urban setting but drastically falling pupil numbers and significant budget deficits. The school currently has 46 pupils with a capacity for 210, operating at 78% under capacity. Only two children had applied for September 2026 enrollment. The school requires improvement according to Ofsted, and pupil outcomes are below county and national averages. The school has a deficit of £372,000, projected to rise to £700,000 by 2027-28.

The Cabinet considered planning and demographic data, which showed a clear and consistent decline in primary school places demand in the Borehamwood and Elstree area. While planned housing growth was acknowledged, its impact was considered to be over a much longer timeframe (10-20 years) than the school could be supported. Officers concluded that there was no new information that materially changed the original assessment.

The consultation process was described as comprehensive, with over 600 responses received. However, the Cabinet noted that decisions cannot be based solely on the number of responses but must be balanced with other critical factors.

The Cabinet voted unanimously to confirm the decision to close St Nicholas Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School. Officers were also requested to formulate a strategy to address the likely impacts of demographic change while ensuring continued access to high-quality education.

• Why this matters: The closure of these schools will have a profound impact on the affected communities, potentially leading to longer commutes for children, job losses for staff, and a loss of community hubs. For families, especially those with children with SEND, the uncertainty and disruption can be immense. The decisions highlight the difficult balance councils face between financial sustainability, educational quality, and community impact, particularly in areas with declining birth rates and changing housing development patterns.

• Learn more: Read the full details in the agenda for the Cabinet meeting on 21 May 2026.

County Council Approves Budget and Council Tax for 2026/27

Hertfordshire County Council held its Annual General Meeting on Tuesday 19 May 2026, approving the budget for the upcoming year and setting the Council Tax.

New Chairman and Vice-Chairman Elected

Councillor Sandy Walkington was elected as the new Chairman of Hertfordshire County Council, and Councillor Stephen Watson was elected as Vice-Chairman. Both received unanimous support.

Budget and Council Tax for 2026/27

The council approved the Budget and Medium-Term Financial Strategy for 2026/27 to 2029/30. This includes a revenue budget of £1,207.5 million and a Council Tax Requirement of £877.3 million. The Band D Council Tax for the coming year will be £1,858.19, an increase from the previous year. The budget also includes a £350,000 reallocation from capital contingency to the Sustainable Hertfordshire programme.

• Why this matters: The Council Tax increase directly affects household budgets for residents across Hertfordshire. The approved budget outlines how council services, from education to adult social care and highways, will be funded. The allocation to the Sustainable Hertfordshire programme signals a commitment to environmental initiatives, which can have long-term benefits for the county's resilience and quality of life.

St. Nicholas CofE VA Primary School Closure Reconsidered

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the called-in decision regarding the proposed closure of St. Nicholas CofE VA Primary School in Elstree. Following a split decision from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, the matter was referred to the full council. An amendment, initially proposed by the Liberal Democrat group and subsequently supported by the Conservative group, was adopted. This amendment calls for a reconsideration of the closure proposal, urging the Cabinet to take a new and clear-eyed look at the decision. Key considerations for this reconsideration include:

• Demographic Trends: Acknowledging that demographic trends relied upon for closure may be temporary and that the latest planning and demographic evidence must be fully considered.
• Future Housing Growth: Taking into account substantial future housing growth planned for Borehamwood and Elstree, alongside uncertainty about long-term demand.
• Coherent County-Wide Strategy: The need for a clear, consistent, and forward-looking strategy for school provision across Hertfordshire, ensuring that decisions are not made in isolation and that communities are put first.
• Community Impact: Ensuring that the process for decisions on school closures is transparent, fair, and equitable, with due consideration given to the views of parents, staff, and the wider community.

The amended motion was carried, meaning the Cabinet will now reconsider the closure of St. Nicholas CofE VA Primary School in light of these factors.

• Why this matters: This decision highlights the council's role in balancing financial pressures with the needs of local communities. The reconsideration of the St. Nicholas closure, driven by concerns about demographic data and future housing growth, shows how local government can respond to new evidence and community concerns, potentially impacting the future of education provision in the area.

Constitutional Revisions Approved

The council approved proposed revisions to Annexes 6, 12, and 28 of the Council's Constitution. These changes, recommended by the Standards Committee, aim to update and clarify the Council's Standing Orders for meetings, the substitution scheme, and standing orders for regulatory committees.

• Why this matters: These procedural changes ensure the council operates efficiently and transparently. Clearer rules for meetings and decision-making processes can improve public understanding and confidence in local government.

Other Business

The meeting also included the election of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman, confirmation of minutes, and various reports from committees including the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, Health Scrutiny Committee, and the Audit Committee. Motions on notice regarding highways maintenance, supported living programmes, developer contributions, PFAS chemicals, and Violence Against Women and Girls were referred to the relevant Cabinet Panels for further consideration.

• Learn more: Read the full details in the agenda for the County Council meeting on 19 May 2026.

Upcoming Meetings

• Cabinet on Thursday 21 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Development Control Committee on Thursday 21 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Standards Committee on Friday 16 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Health Scrutiny Committee on Friday 15 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Highways Cabinet Panel on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Overview & Scrutiny Committee on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Education, SEND & Inclusion Cabinet Panel on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Cabinet on Wednesday 13 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Children's Social Care Cabinet Panel on Tuesday 12 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Children & Families Cabinet Panel on Tuesday 12 May 2026. Link to agenda

This week in Hertfordshire:

Albury and St Nicholas Schools Face Closure Despite Community Opposition

Hertfordshire County Council's Cabinet met on Thursday 21 May 2026 and confirmed the controversial decisions to close Albury Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School and St Nicholas Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School in Elstree. The decisions were made despite significant opposition from local communities and concerns raised by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.

Albury CofE VA Primary School: Closure Confirmed

The Cabinet confirmed its previous decision to close Albury Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School on 31 August 2026. This followed a referral from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, which had argued that the decision-making process was flawed.

Councillor Mark Pope, the local representative for Bishop's Stortford Rural, argued passionately that the concerns raised by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee had not been adequately addressed. He highlighted issues with how consultation responses were weighed, the impact of consultation-induced decline on the evidence base, the lack of demonstrated consistency with comparable rural schools, and the absence of robust financial modelling for alternatives. Councillor Pope urged the Cabinet to pause the decision until after a Full Council meeting on 21 July, where a cross-party motion to support a recovery period for the school would be considered.

Mark Watkin, Executive Member for Education, SEND and Inclusion, responded that each school must be assessed on its individual circumstances and wider educational requirements. He explained that Albury School's closure was based on declining pupil numbers, persistent financial deficits, and a lack of recovery prospects, making it the most responsible option for ensuring educational quality and prudent use of public funds. Mr Watkin clarified that Full Council does not have the power to decide on school closures; this authority rests with the Cabinet.

The Cabinet discussed the points raised by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, including:

• Weighing Consultation Responses: The Cabinet acknowledged the overwhelming opposition but reiterated that statutory guidance requires decisions to be balanced against factors like financial sustainability and educational standards, not solely based on the number of objections.
• Consultation-Induced Decline: While acknowledging that the consultation accelerated pupil numbers falling, the Cabinet stated the school was already in financial difficulty due to low pupil numbers prior to the consultation.
• Consistency with Comparable Schools: The Cabinet maintained that each school proposal is assessed individually. The presumption in favour of retaining rural schools does not preclude closure if it is a last resort.
• Option Appraisals and Financial Modelling: The report detailed Albury School's five-year deficit and projections of pupil numbers falling as low as four by September 2026, making a sustainable recovery plan unrealistic. Alternative options like federation and joining a Multi-Academy Trust had been explored but found no interest due to viability concerns. The one-off cost of closure (£500,000) was deemed less of a long-term burden than keeping the school open.

Councillor Sally Symington, Executive Member for Adult Care Services, raised concerns about the well-being of children and the impact of uncertainty. Mark Watkin assured that officers would work with parents to ensure a seamless transition for children, including those with SEND.

The Cabinet voted unanimously to confirm the decision to close Albury Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School.

St Nicholas CofE VA Primary School, Elstree: Closure Confirmed

The Cabinet also confirmed its decision to close St Nicholas Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School in Elstree on 31 August 2026. This followed a referral from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, which had, against legal advice, referred the decision to Full Council.

Mark Watkin presented the case for closing St Nicholas, highlighting its urban setting but drastically falling pupil numbers and significant budget deficits. The school currently has 46 pupils with a capacity for 210, operating at 78% under capacity. Only two children had applied for September 2026 enrollment. The school requires improvement according to Ofsted, and pupil outcomes are below county and national averages. The school has a deficit of £372,000, projected to rise to £700,000 by 2027-28.

The Cabinet considered planning and demographic data, which showed a clear and consistent decline in primary school places demand in the Borehamwood and Elstree area. While planned housing growth was acknowledged, its impact was considered to be over a much longer timeframe (10-20 years) than the school could be supported. Officers concluded that there was no new information that materially changed the original assessment.

The consultation process was described as comprehensive, with over 600 responses received. However, the Cabinet noted that decisions cannot be based solely on the number of responses but must be balanced with other critical factors.

The Cabinet voted unanimously to confirm the decision to close St Nicholas Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School. Officers were also requested to formulate a strategy to address the likely impacts of demographic change while ensuring continued access to high-quality education.

• Why this matters: The closure of these schools will have a profound impact on the affected communities, potentially leading to longer commutes for children, job losses for staff, and a loss of community hubs. For families, especially those with children with SEND, the uncertainty and disruption can be immense. The decisions highlight the difficult balance councils face between financial sustainability, educational quality, and community impact, particularly in areas with declining birth rates and changing housing development patterns.

• Learn more: Read the full details in the agenda for the Cabinet meeting on 21 May 2026.

County Council Approves Budget and Council Tax for 2026/27

Hertfordshire County Council held its Annual General Meeting on Tuesday 19 May 2026, approving the budget for the upcoming year and setting the Council Tax.

New Chairman and Vice-Chairman Elected

Councillor Sandy Walkington was elected as the new Chairman of Hertfordshire County Council, and Councillor Stephen Watson was elected as Vice-Chairman. Both received unanimous support.

Budget and Council Tax for 2026/27

The council approved the Budget and Medium-Term Financial Strategy for 2026/27 to 2029/30. This includes a revenue budget of £1,207.5 million and a Council Tax Requirement of £877.3 million. The Band D Council Tax for the coming year will be £1,858.19, an increase from the previous year. The budget also includes a £350,000 reallocation from capital contingency to the Sustainable Hertfordshire programme.

• Why this matters: The Council Tax increase directly affects household budgets for residents across Hertfordshire. The approved budget outlines how council services, from education to adult social care and highways, will be funded. The allocation to the Sustainable Hertfordshire programme signals a commitment to environmental initiatives, which can have long-term benefits for the county's resilience and quality of life.

St. Nicholas CofE VA Primary School Closure Reconsidered

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the called-in decision regarding the proposed closure of St. Nicholas CofE VA Primary School in Elstree. Following a split decision from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, the matter was referred to the full council. An amendment, initially proposed by the Liberal Democrat group and subsequently supported by the Conservative group, was adopted. This amendment calls for a reconsideration of the closure proposal, urging the Cabinet to take a new and clear-eyed look at the decision. Key considerations for this reconsideration include:

• Demographic Trends: Acknowledging that demographic trends relied upon for closure may be temporary and that the latest planning and demographic evidence must be fully considered.
• Future Housing Growth: Taking into account substantial future housing growth planned for Borehamwood and Elstree, alongside uncertainty about long-term demand.
• Coherent County-Wide Strategy: The need for a clear, consistent, and forward-looking strategy for school provision across Hertfordshire, ensuring that decisions are not made in isolation and that communities are put first.
• Community Impact: Ensuring that the process for decisions on school closures is transparent, fair, and equitable, with due consideration given to the views of parents, staff, and the wider community.

The amended motion was carried, meaning the Cabinet will now reconsider the closure of St. Nicholas CofE VA Primary School in light of these factors.

• Why this matters: This decision highlights the council's role in balancing financial pressures with the needs of local communities. The reconsideration of the St. Nicholas closure, driven by concerns about demographic data and future housing growth, shows how local government can respond to new evidence and community concerns, potentially impacting the future of education provision in the area.

Constitutional Revisions Approved

The council approved proposed revisions to Annexes 6, 12, and 28 of the Council's Constitution. These changes, recommended by the Standards Committee, aim to update and clarify the Council's Standing Orders for meetings, the substitution scheme, and standing orders for regulatory committees.

• Why this matters: These procedural changes ensure the council operates efficiently and transparently. Clearer rules for meetings and decision-making processes can improve public understanding and confidence in local government.

Other Business

The meeting also included the election of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman, confirmation of minutes, and various reports from committees including the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, Health Scrutiny Committee, and the Audit Committee. Motions on notice regarding highways maintenance, supported living programmes, developer contributions, PFAS chemicals, and Violence Against Women and Girls were referred to the relevant Cabinet Panels for further consideration.

• Learn more: Read the full details in the agenda for the County Council meeting on 19 May 2026.

Upcoming Meetings

• Cabinet on Thursday 21 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Development Control Committee on Thursday 21 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Standards Committee on Friday 16 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Health Scrutiny Committee on Friday 15 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Highways Cabinet Panel on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Overview & Scrutiny Committee on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Education, SEND & Inclusion Cabinet Panel on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Cabinet on Wednesday 13 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Children's Social Care Cabinet Panel on Tuesday 12 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Children & Families Cabinet Panel on Tuesday 12 May 2026. Link to agenda

This week in Hertfordshire:

Post-16 Transport Policy Overhaul: Personal Travel Budgets to Replace Contracted Transport for Most

Hertfordshire County Council's Cabinet met on Wednesday 13 May 2026 and approved significant changes to the Post-16 Transport to Education and Training Policy. From September 2026, most 16- to 18-year-olds requiring travel support to attend school or college will receive Personal Travel Budgets (PTBs) instead of contracted transport. Existing eligibility criteria will remain the same.

Why This Matters for Young People and Families

This shift aims to make transport provision more cost-effective and sustainable for the council, with projected savings of approximately £800,000 in the first year, rising to £3.2 million by the third year. These savings are intended to be reinvested into the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) service.

However, the decision has sparked concern among some families. A consultation on the proposals revealed that 54% of respondents expressed reservations about receiving a PTB, with worries that the funding might not cover actual travel costs, especially for those with complex journeys or in rural areas with limited public transport. There's a fear that this change could place a strain on families, particularly single parents, and potentially lead to young people missing out on education due to transport challenges.

The new policy will see PTBs calculated at 55p per mile for the home-to-school journey. An additional annual payment of up to £450 will be available for young people in receipt of higher-level Disability Living Allowance or Personal Independence Payment mobility. Families who wish to apply for contracted transport due to exceptional circumstances, such as the lack of suitable public transport, will have their applications considered by senior officers against a set of criteria, with an appeal process available.

Transitional arrangements mean young people currently receiving contracted transport will be eligible to continue if their circumstances don't change. However, new entrants to Year 12 or those changing address or provision in the 2026/27 academic year will be offered a PTB by default.

The Education, SEND & Inclusion Cabinet Panel had previously discussed and recommended these changes on Monday 11 May 2026, noting that while many respondents had concerns, 27% were willing to accept a PTB, and 19% were unsure. The panel acknowledged the need for clear communication and support for families navigating this new system.

• Learn more: Read the full details of the Cabinet meeting on 13 May 2026 and the Education, SEND & Inclusion Cabinet Panel meeting on 11 May 2026.

School Closure Proposals Spark Debate at Overview & Scrutiny Committee

The Overview & Scrutiny Committee met on Monday 11 May 2026 to scrutinise two controversial proposals for school closures: St Nicholas Church of England Primary School in Elstree and Albury Church of England Primary School. The committee's decisions will significantly impact the affected communities.

St Nicholas Church of England Primary School, Elstree: Decision Referred Back to Cabinet

The committee considered the call-in of Cabinet's decision to close St Nicholas Church of England Primary School. Concerns were raised that the decision was based on potentially unstable demographic assumptions and that the evidence base was no longer current due to evolving housing growth plans. The consultation process and the irreversible nature of closure were also points of contention.

Councillor Mark Watkin, the Executive Member for Education, defended the decision, stating that the statutory process had been followed and that the school was not educationally or financially sustainable due to falling pupil numbers.

After debate, the committee voted to refer the decision back to Cabinet for reconsideration. Recommendations included ensuring clarity on how consultation responses are weighed, mitigating consultation-induced decline, ensuring consistency with comparable rural schools, and including financial modelling for all alternatives in option appraisals.

• Why it matters: The closure of a school has a profound impact on a community, affecting not only pupils and staff but also the social fabric of the area. This referral back to Cabinet highlights the committee's role in ensuring decisions are robust, evidence-based, and consider all potential outcomes, especially for vulnerable children who may face disruption to their education and support networks.

Albury Church of England Primary School: Decision Also Referred Back to Cabinet

Similarly, the committee considered the call-in regarding the proposed closure of Albury Church of England Primary School. Lead members for the call-in argued that consultation responses were not meaningfully weighed, the evidence base was distorted by consultation-induced decline, and alternatives were not fully explored. Concerns about financial reasoning and inconsistency in treatment compared to other rural schools, such as Sandon School, were also raised.

Councillor Watkin reiterated that the statutory process had been followed and that the school was not viable.

Ultimately, the committee voted to refer the decision back to Cabinet for reconsideration, with similar recommendations to those for St Nicholas, emphasising the need for clarity on consultation weighing, mitigation of consultation-induced decline, consistency with comparable schools, and comprehensive financial modelling for alternatives.

• Why it matters: The referral of both school closure proposals back to Cabinet underscores the committee's role in scrutinising decisions with significant community impact. For families in these villages, the potential closure of their local school raises concerns about travel, community cohesion, and the disruption to their children's education. The committee's focus on process and evidence aims to ensure these impacts are fully considered.

You can find more details in the agenda for the Overview & Scrutiny Committee meeting on 11 May 2026 and the Cabinet meeting on 13 May 2026.

Health Scrutiny Committee Prioritises Palliative Care, GP Access, and Neighbourhood Health

The Health Scrutiny Committee met on Friday 15 May 2026 to review its work programme for the upcoming year. The committee identified several key areas for in-depth scrutiny, reflecting significant concerns about health service provision across Hertfordshire.

Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Deep Dive Needed

The committee highlighted palliative and end-of-life care as a major priority. Concerns were raised about:

• Out-of-Hours Services: Ensuring adequate support is available outside of standard working hours.
• Hospice Funding: The heavy reliance on voluntary donations for hospices, and the impact of funding cuts.
• Health and Social Care Integration: The need for better coordination between health and social care services to provide seamless support for individuals and their families.

The committee agreed that this complex issue warrants a full-day scrutiny session, involving witnesses from community health providers, NHS providers, adult social care, the Central East ICB, hospices, and importantly, carers and families. The experiences of children requiring palliative care will also be a focus.

• Why it matters: For residents facing end-of-life care, timely, compassionate, and well-coordinated support is essential. This scrutiny aims to improve the quality and accessibility of these vital services, ensuring dignity and comfort for patients and their loved ones.

GP Access and Services: Urgent Concerns Raised

Access to GP services emerged as a significant concern, with councillors highlighting:

• Digital Exclusion: The increasing reliance on online booking systems disadvantages older residents and those without digital access.
• Long Waiting Times: Unacceptable delays for essential services, such as phlebotomy, with residents in Broxbourne reportedly being given appointment dates in June for blood tests.
• Development Delays: A mismatch between developer contributions (Section 106 monies) and the ongoing costs of running new GP surgeries, leading to delays in much-needed facilities.

The committee agreed to seek written updates on GP access and phlebotomy provision, and to investigate the methodology behind GP surgery development funding.

• Why it matters: Timely access to primary care is fundamental to residents' health and well-being. Long waiting times and barriers to access can lead to delayed diagnoses, worsening health conditions, and increased pressure on other parts of the health system.

Neighbourhood Health Framework: A Timely Review

Neil Tester from Healthwatch Hertfordshire presented a proposal for a scrutiny review of the neighbourhood health framework. This initiative aims to clarify the intentions behind neighbourhood health, focusing on service location and care approaches, and ensuring resident experiences inform planning. The committee agreed to take this proposal forward, starting with an update from relevant bodies.

• Why it matters: Understanding and improving neighbourhood health services is key to delivering care closer to home and ensuring services are responsive to local needs. This review will help shape how health services are organised and delivered at a community level.

Other Matters for Scrutiny

The committee also agreed to seek updates and potentially scrutinise:

• Type II Diabetes Provision: Addressing shortages of endocrinologists and long waiting times.
• Mental Health Provision for Children and Young People (CAMHS): Highlighting long waiting lists and their impact.
• Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems: Examining the use of AI in NHS trusts, focusing on benefits, risks, and patient experience.

The committee's next meeting is scheduled for 17 July 2026.

• Learn more: Read the full details in the agenda for the Health Scrutiny Committee meeting on 15 May 2026.

Upcoming Meetings

• Cabinet on Thursday 21 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Development Control Committee on Thursday 21 May 2026. Link to agenda
• County Council on Tuesday 19 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Standards Committee on Friday 16 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Children & Families Cabinet Panel on Tuesday 12 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Education, SEND & Inclusion Cabinet Panel on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Cabinet on Wednesday 13 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Overview & Scrutiny Committee on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Highways Cabinet Panel on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Children's Social Care Cabinet Panel on Tuesday 12 May 2026. Link to agenda

Post-16 Transport Policy Changes: Personal Travel Budgets Introduced

Hertfordshire County Council's Cabinet met on Wednesday 13 May 2026 and approved changes to the Post-16 Transport to Education and Training Policy. From September 2026, most 16- to 18-year-olds requiring travel support will receive Personal Travel Budgets (PTBs) instead of contracted transport. This aims to make transport provision more cost-effective, with projected savings of £800,000 in the first year, rising to £3.2 million by the third year. These savings will be reinvested into SEND services.

The new policy calculates PTBs at 55p per mile for the home-to-school journey, with an additional annual payment of up to £450 for those receiving higher-level Disability Living Allowance or Personal Independence Payment mobility. Applications for contracted transport due to exceptional circumstances will be considered by senior officers, with an appeal process available. Transitional arrangements will allow current recipients to continue if their circumstances don't change.

The Education, SEND & Inclusion Cabinet Panel had previously recommended these changes on Monday 11 May 2026. While a consultation revealed 54% of respondents were unhappy with receiving a PTB, 27% were willing to accept one, and 19% were unsure. Concerns about the funding covering actual costs and the availability of public transport in rural areas were noted. The panel acknowledged the need for clear communication and support for families navigating this new system.

• Why it matters: This policy shift aims to provide greater flexibility for young people and families in arranging travel, potentially promoting independence. However, concerns remain about whether the PTB will adequately cover costs for all, particularly those with complex needs or in areas with limited public transport, potentially impacting their access to education.

• Learn more: Cabinet meeting on 13 May 2026 and Education, SEND & Inclusion Cabinet Panel meeting on 11 May 2026.

School Closure Proposals Face Scrutiny and Referral Back to Cabinet

The Overview & Scrutiny Committee met on Monday 11 May 2026 to scrutinise proposals for the closure of St Nicholas Church of England Primary School in Elstree and Albury Church of England Primary School. Both decisions were referred back to Cabinet for reconsideration.

St Nicholas CofE VA Primary School, Elstree: Decision Referred Back

Concerns were raised that the closure decision for St Nicholas was based on potentially unstable demographic assumptions and that the evidence base was outdated due to evolving housing growth plans. The committee also questioned the consultation process and the irreversible nature of closure. Councillor Mark Watkin, Executive Member for Education, defended the decision, citing falling pupil numbers and financial unsustainability. However, the committee voted to refer the decision back to Cabinet, recommending clarity on how consultation responses are weighed, mitigation of consultation-induced decline, consistency with comparable schools, and financial modelling for alternatives.

• Why it matters: The potential closure of a local primary school has a significant impact on a community. This referral highlights the scrutiny committee's role in ensuring decisions are robust, evidence-based, and consider the potential disruption to children's education and support networks, especially for vulnerable pupils.

Albury CofE VA Primary School: Decision Also Referred Back

Similarly, the committee scrutinised the proposed closure of Albury CofE VA Primary School. Arguments against closure included concerns that consultation responses were not meaningfully weighed, the evidence base was distorted by consultation-induced decline, and alternatives were not fully explored. The committee also noted inconsistencies in treatment compared to other rural schools like Sandon.

Councillor Watkin reiterated the school's lack of viability. The committee voted to refer the decision back to Cabinet with similar recommendations, emphasising the need for clarity on consultation, mitigation of decline, consistency, and financial modelling for alternatives.

• Why it matters: The referral of both school closure proposals underscores the scrutiny committee's role in examining decisions with significant community impact. For families in these villages, the potential closure of their local school raises concerns about travel, community cohesion, and disruption to their children's education.

• Learn more: Overview & Scrutiny Committee meeting on 11 May 2026 and Cabinet meeting on 13 May 2026.

Health Scrutiny Committee Sets Priorities: Palliative Care, GP Access, and Neighbourhood Health

The Health Scrutiny Committee met on Friday 15 May 2026 to review its work programme. Key priorities for the coming year include in-depth scrutiny of palliative and end-of-life care, GP access, and the development of neighbourhood health services.

Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Comprehensive Review

The committee identified palliative and end-of-life care as a major priority, with concerns raised about out-of-hours services, reliance on voluntary funding for hospices, and the integration of health and social care. A full-day scrutiny session is planned, involving community health providers, NHS providers, adult social care, the Central East ICB, hospices, carers, and families. The experiences of children requiring palliative care will also be investigated.

• Why it matters: Ensuring timely, compassionate, and well-coordinated end-of-life care is crucial for residents and their families. This scrutiny aims to improve the quality and accessibility of these vital services.

GP Access and Services: Urgent Concerns Highlighted

Significant concerns were raised regarding GP access, including:

• Digital Exclusion: The increasing reliance on online booking systems disadvantages older residents and those without digital access.
• Long Waiting Times: Unacceptable delays for services like phlebotomy, with residents in Broxbourne reportedly facing June appointment dates for blood tests.
• Development Delays: A mismatch between developer contributions (Section 106 monies) and the ongoing costs of running new GP surgeries is delaying much-needed facilities.

The committee will seek written updates on GP access and phlebotomy provision and investigate the methodology for GP surgery development funding.

• Why it matters: Timely access to primary care is fundamental to residents' health. Long waiting times and digital barriers can lead to delayed diagnoses and poorer health outcomes.

Neighbourhood Health Framework: A Timely Scrutiny

Neil Tester from Healthwatch Hertfordshire proposed a review of the neighbourhood health framework. This initiative aims to clarify the intentions behind neighbourhood health, focusing on service location and care approaches, and ensuring resident experiences inform planning. The committee agreed to pursue this, starting with an update from relevant bodies.

• Why it matters: Improving neighbourhood health services is key to delivering care closer to home and ensuring services are responsive to local needs.

The committee also agreed to seek updates on Type II Diabetes provision and the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in NHS trusts.

• Learn more: Health Scrutiny Committee meeting on 15 May 2026.

Other Matters Discussed

• St Nicholas CofE VA Primary School, Elstree: The Overview & Scrutiny Committee referred the decision on the closure of St Nicholas CofE VA Primary School back to Cabinet for reconsideration. Concerns were raised about demographic assumptions, the evidence base, and the consultation process. Overview & Scrutiny Committee meeting on 11 May 2026.
• Albury CofE VA Primary School: The Overview & Scrutiny Committee also referred the decision on the closure of Albury CofE VA Primary School back to Cabinet for reconsideration, citing similar concerns regarding consultation, evidence, and alternatives. Overview & Scrutiny Committee meeting on 11 May 2026.

Upcoming Meetings

• Cabinet on Thursday 21 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Development Control Committee on Thursday 21 May 2026. Link to agenda
• County Council on Tuesday 19 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Standards Committee on Friday 16 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Health Scrutiny Committee on Friday 15 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Cabinet on Wednesday 13 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Overview & Scrutiny Committee on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Highways Cabinet Panel on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Education, SEND & Inclusion Cabinet Panel on Monday 11 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Children's Social Care Cabinet Panel on Tuesday 12 May 2026. Link to agenda
• Children & Families Cabinet Panel on Tuesday 12 May 2026. Link to agenda

This week in Hertfordshire:

Council Constitution Overhaul: Streamlining Rules for Smoother Operations

The Standards Committee met on Friday 8 May 2026 to consider proposed revisions to the Council's constitution. These changes, developed by a cross-party working group with expert advice, aim to modernise and clarify the rules governing council meetings and procedures. The committee unanimously recommended these changes to full council.

Key Changes to Council Standing Orders

The proposed revisions to Annex 6, the Council's Standing Orders, are extensive and designed to align with the Model Council Procedure Rules. For residents, this means clearer processes for how meetings are run, questions are handled, and decisions are made.

• Meeting Procedures: Standing orders for different types of meetings (Annual, Ordinary, Extraordinary) will be separated for clarity. The timeframe for issuing meeting summonses will increase from five to six working days, giving more notice. The quorum for meetings will be set at one quarter of the total members, ensuring sufficient representation. A new provision will expect sessions not to exceed three hours without a break, aiming for more manageable meeting lengths.
• Questions and Motions: Rejected questions will now be recorded in the minutes with reasons for rejection, increasing transparency. The number of written questions that can be submitted to Full Council meetings will increase, with limits based on political group size. Deadlines for lodging written notice of motions and proposed amendments will be clarified, and the time limit for movers of motions will increase to five minutes.
• Conduct and Conduct: Provisions regarding Members' Conduct and Public Conduct will be clarified. Notably, amendments proposed by Nicholas Moss, an Independent Person, aim to enhance clarity and consistency. These include specifying that Members' conduct applies at meetings of the council, clarifying the application of the code of conduct, and moving the provision about turning off electronic devices to the top of the relevant section. Councillor Ruth Brown raised a point about attendance records for cabinet panels, noting that legal advice indicated these did not count towards attendance. She expressed this was a shame given their public nature, but Quentin Baker, Director of Law and Governance, confirmed that national legislation, the Local Government Act 1972, was clear on the provisions.

Updates to Regulatory Committee Rules and Substitution Scheme

Changes to Annex 12, the Standing Orders for Regulatory and Other Committees, include updating references to reflect the move of meetings to the Stevenage Campus and clarifying that motions must be relevant to the committee's terms of reference. The Chair will also have discretion to allow increased representations to the Development Control Committee.

Annex 28, the Substitution Scheme, will now include a requirement for the Council's Substitution Scheme to be reviewed and approved by full Council each year at the Annual Meeting. This ensures ongoing adherence to legal requirements.

• Why it matters: These changes, while procedural, are fundamental to how local government operates. Clearer rules ensure fairness, transparency, and efficiency, which ultimately benefits residents by making council decision-making more accessible and understandable. For vulnerable groups, this clarity can be crucial in understanding how their needs are being considered and how decisions affecting them are made.

You can find more details about these proposed changes in the agenda for the Standards Committee meeting on 08 May 2026.