Subscribe to updates

You'll receive weekly summaries about Aberdeenshire Council every week.

If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“What planning appeals will be reviewed?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Aberdeenshire and are not the council. About us

The Local Review Body of Aberdeenshire Council met on Friday 24 April 2026 to consider a notice of review against the refusal of full planning permission for four holiday cabins at Backhill of Drumblair, Forgue, Huntly. The body upheld the review and granted planning permission, allowing a departure from policy on the grounds of appropriate rural tourism and economic contribution.

Backhill of Drumblair Holiday Cabins

The Local Review Body (LRB) upheld a notice of review and granted full planning permission for the change of use of agricultural land and the installation of four cabins for short-term letting accommodation at Backhill of Drumblair, Forgue, Huntly. This decision represented an acceptable departure from policy.

The original application had been refused by the planning authority on several grounds, including that the proposal was not well related to any settlement, lacked adequate viability and sustainable transport plans, and could negatively impact existing tourist accommodations. The refusal also cited a lack of direct, easy, and safe links to local facilities via walking, cycling, or public transport, and the absence of vehicle or cycle charging points.

During the meeting, Councillor Davidson expressed concerns about the remoteness of the site, the lack of local facilities, and the safety of the roads for walking and cycling. She argued that the proposal was too remote and lacked connection to any amenities. Councillor Victor, however, countered that the very remoteness was precisely what rural tourists would seek, wanting to be in the middle of the country away from shops. Councillor Simpson highlighted the potential attraction of dark skies for stargazing in such a remote location.

The applicant's submission included a Tourism Demand and Need Statement, a Viability Summary, and economic benefit evidence. They argued that rural tourism policy supports developments in countryside locations where the experience relies on landscape and tranquillity, and that their proposal was small-scale, low-impact, and consistent with rural diversification. They also pointed to previously approved rural tourism developments in Aberdeenshire as precedent. To address concerns about sustainability, the applicant confirmed that cycle storage and electric vehicle (EV) charging facilities would be provided at each cabin.

Ultimately, Councillor Richard Menard proposed a motion to uphold the appeal, citing it as an acceptable departure from policy. The reasons for this departure were that the development was considered appropriate rural tourism, its contribution to the local economy would outweigh the lack of sustainable transport and proximity to settlements, it was viable, and it would not have a detrimental impact on local tourism. This motion was seconded by Councillor Catherine Victor.

Councillor Isobel Davidson proposed an amendment to uphold the planning service's original decision to refuse the application, reiterating her concerns about connectivity and safety. However, this amendment did not find a seconder.

The LRB agreed to grant planning permission by a majority, subject to conditions including the provision of EV charging points and cycle storage, and any other appropriate conditions identified by officers.

The decision to grant permission was based on the finding that the proposal was appropriate rural tourism, would contribute to the local economy, was viable, and would not negatively impact existing tourism. The LRB acknowledged that while the development was not well related to a settlement, the economic benefits and the provision of sustainable transport infrastructure (EV charging and cycle storage) justified a departure from policy.

The meeting also noted outstanding business regarding a notice of review for a material recycling yard at Land to East of Broomiebank, Alford, which was deferred to allow for further information to be gathered on waste management policies and updated noise and air quality assessments. The LRB also approved the draft minutes of their previous meeting held on 27 March 2026.

Delegated decisions linked to this meeting

Decision summaries below are AI-generated from the council’s published record. Check the council source or the full decision page before relying on them.

Attendees

Profile image for Councillor Dominic Lonchay
Councillor Dominic Lonchay Reform UK Ward 12 - East Garioch
Profile image for Councillor Isobel Davidson
Councillor Isobel Davidson Scottish Liberal Democrats Ward 09 - Ellon and District
Profile image for Councillor Jeff Goodhall
Councillor Jeff Goodhall Scottish Liberal Democrats Ward 14 - Huntly, Strathbogie and Howe of Alford
Profile image for Councillor Richard Menard
Councillor Richard Menard Scottish Conservative and Unionist Ward 02 - Troup
Profile image for Councillor Colin Simpson
Councillor Colin Simpson Scottish Liberal Democrats Ward 06 - Peterhead South and Cruden
Profile image for Councillor Catherine Victor
Councillor Catherine Victor Scottish National Party Ward 17 - North Kincardine

Topics

Aberdeenshire Council economic impact sustainable transport Backhill of Drumblair Holiday Cabins rural tourism policy rural tourism material recycling yard at Land to East of Broomiebank, Alford Waste management strategies

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet 24th-Apr-2026 10.15 Local Review Body.pdf

Reports Pack

Public reports pack 24th-Apr-2026 10.15 Local Review Body.pdf

Additional Documents

Statement of equalities.pdf
Powerpoint LRB 654 APP 2025 1743.pdf
2026 04 24 Outstanding Business.pdf
2026 03 27 Local Review Body Draft Minute.pdf
06a LRB 654 Planning Service Response PUBLIC.pdf
04 List of Policies Reviews.pdf
06 LRB 654 Applicants Submission.pdf