Subscribe to updates
You'll receive weekly summaries about Aberdeenshire Council every week.
If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.
Local Review Body - Friday, 24 April 2026 - 10.15 am
April 24, 2026 at 10:15 am Local Review Body View on council website Watch video of meeting Watch video of meeting Read transcript (Professional subscription required)Summary
Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Aberdeenshire and are not the council. About us
The Local Review Body of Aberdeenshire Council met on Friday 24 April 2026 to consider a notice of review against the refusal of full planning permission for four holiday cabins at Backhill of Drumblair, Forgue, Huntly. The body upheld the review and granted planning permission, allowing a departure from policy on the grounds of appropriate rural tourism and economic contribution.
Backhill of Drumblair Holiday Cabins
The Local Review Body (LRB) upheld a notice of review and granted full planning permission for the change of use of agricultural land and the installation of four cabins for short-term letting accommodation at Backhill of Drumblair, Forgue, Huntly. This decision represented an acceptable departure from policy.
The original application had been refused by the planning authority on several grounds, including that the proposal was not well related to any settlement, lacked adequate viability and sustainable transport plans, and could negatively impact existing tourist accommodations. The refusal also cited a lack of direct, easy, and safe links to local facilities via walking, cycling, or public transport, and the absence of vehicle or cycle charging points.
During the meeting, Councillor Davidson expressed concerns about the remoteness of the site, the lack of local facilities, and the safety of the roads for walking and cycling. She argued that the proposal was too remote and lacked connection to any amenities. Councillor Victor, however, countered that the very remoteness was precisely what rural tourists would seek, wanting to be in the middle of the country
away from shops. Councillor Simpson highlighted the potential attraction of dark skies
for stargazing in such a remote location.
The applicant's submission included a Tourism Demand and Need Statement, a Viability Summary, and economic benefit evidence. They argued that rural tourism policy supports developments in countryside locations where the experience relies on landscape and tranquillity, and that their proposal was small-scale, low-impact, and consistent with rural diversification. They also pointed to previously approved rural tourism developments in Aberdeenshire as precedent. To address concerns about sustainability, the applicant confirmed that cycle storage and electric vehicle (EV) charging facilities would be provided at each cabin.
Ultimately, Councillor Richard Menard proposed a motion to uphold the appeal, citing it as an acceptable departure from policy. The reasons for this departure were that the development was considered appropriate rural tourism, its contribution to the local economy would outweigh the lack of sustainable transport and proximity to settlements, it was viable, and it would not have a detrimental impact on local tourism. This motion was seconded by Councillor Catherine Victor.
Councillor Isobel Davidson proposed an amendment to uphold the planning service's original decision to refuse the application, reiterating her concerns about connectivity and safety. However, this amendment did not find a seconder.
The LRB agreed to grant planning permission by a majority, subject to conditions including the provision of EV charging points and cycle storage, and any other appropriate conditions identified by officers.
The decision to grant permission was based on the finding that the proposal was appropriate rural tourism, would contribute to the local economy, was viable, and would not negatively impact existing tourism. The LRB acknowledged that while the development was not well related to a settlement, the economic benefits and the provision of sustainable transport infrastructure (EV charging and cycle storage) justified a departure from policy.
The meeting also noted outstanding business regarding a notice of review for a material recycling yard at Land to East of Broomiebank, Alford, which was deferred to allow for further information to be gathered on waste management policies and updated noise and air quality assessments. The LRB also approved the draft minutes of their previous meeting held on 27 March 2026.
Delegated decisions linked to this meeting
Decision summaries below are AI-generated from the council’s published record. Check the council source or the full decision page before relying on them.
-
The Local Review Body of Aberdeenshire Council approved the Sederunt, Declaration of Members' Interests on 24/04/2026.
-
The Local Review Body decided to uphold the Notice of Review and grant Full Planning Permission on 24/04/2026. The decision was made on the grounds that the application is an acceptable departure from policy as rural tourism appropriate to the economy, outweighing lack of sustainable transport and proximity to settlements. The decision included conditions regarding the provision of EV charging and cycle storage.