The Council meeting on Thursday, 10 September 2026, addressed the severe financial pressures facing Worcestershire County Council, with a significant portion of the discussion dedicated to the findings of an external assurance review by CIPFA. This review highlighted critical risks in financial management, sustainability, and service delivery, leading to the acceptance of all 30 recommendations made by CIPFA. The council also approved constitutional changes to align with a new national scheme of delegation for planning decisions, a move met with widespread concern from councillors regarding its impact on local democracy.

External Assurance Review

The meeting began with a detailed discussion of the CIPFA External Assurance Review, which examined the council's financial position and governance arrangements. Councillor Adam Kent, Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member with Responsibility for Finance, Corporate Services and Business, introduced the report, emphasizing that it reflected the council's position prior to the current administration taking office. He highlighted the scale of the financial challenges, including a general reserve of £22.8 million (4.6% of the net budget), a projected budget gap of £84.5 million in 2027-28, and a Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) deficit reaching £194.1 million. Councillor Kent stressed that all 30 recommendations from the review had been accepted without qualification.

Councillor Dan Boatright-Green, Liberal Democrat Group Leader and Cabinet Member with Responsibility for Education, SEND and Skills, acknowledged the demanding nature of the situation but pointed to progress in governance and reporting. Councillor Owen Cleary, Councillor Sam Ammar, Councillor Martin Allen, Councillor Alan Amos, Councillor Dave Aubrey, Councillor Alan Bailes, Councillor Sam Bastow, Councillor Satinder Bell, Councillor Roger Bennett, Councillor Dan Birch, Councillor Justin Bowen, Councillor Ian Cresswell, Councillor Mark Crosby, Councillor Andrew Cross, Councillor Mark Dunkley, Councillor Sue Eacock, Councillor Dave Edmonds, Councillor Sam Evans, Councillor Mel Fordington, Councillor Stephen Foster, Councillor Adrian Hardman, Councillor Marcus Hart, Councillor Bill Hopkins, Councillor Michele Hulme, Councillor Seb James, Councillor Matt Jenkins, Councillor Matthew Jones, Councillor Emma Kearsey, Councillor Adam Kent, Councillor Karen May, Councillor Chris McSweeny, Councillor Natalie McVey, Councillor Tony Miller, Councillor Ashley Monk, Councillor Jo Monk, Councillor Dan Morehead, Councillor Richard Morris, Councillor Karl Perks, Councillor Tor Pingree, Councillor Nik Price, Councillor Jabba Riaz, Councillor Josh Robinson, Councillor Linda Robinson, Councillor Hannah Robson, Councillor Jenny Shaw, Councillor Louis Stephen, Councillor David Taylor, Councillor Richard Tudge, Councillor Peter Turner, Councillor Richard Udall, Councillor Anthony Upton, Councillor Malcolm Victory, Councillor Tom Wells, and Councillor Rob Wharton all contributed to the debate, with many expressing concern about the severity of the financial situation and the need for cross-party cooperation. Councillor Amos, speaking for the Reform Group, acknowledged the tough decisions taken by the previous administration but stressed the ongoing need for budgetary control. Councillor James, speaking on behalf of the Conservative group, highlighted the stark nature of the report and the potential for commissioners to be called in if the situation is not addressed. Councillor Hulme, speaking for the Reform Group, criticised previous administrations for kicking the can down the road regarding council tax increases. Councillor Boatwright-Green, speaking for the Liberal Democrats, emphasized the need for a qualified sailor to steer the council through its financial difficulties. Councillor Bastow, speaking for the Conservative group, stated that the financial crisis was built over years of Conservative control and that the current administration was floundering. Councillor Kersey, speaking for the Reform Group, dismissed claims of gutsy decisions by the previous administration. Councillor Josh Robinson questioned the previous Conservative administration's election promises versus their actions regarding council tax. Councillor Cross urged for cross-party working to address the problems. Councillor James echoed Councillor Cross's sentiments, calling for an end to political squabbling. Councillor Pingree highlighted political instability as a key risk. Councillor Jo Monk blamed central government for underfunding and acknowledged inherited bad debt. Councillor Victory, Vice Chair of the Audit and Governance Committee, noted that the committee would review the assurance report and set out a plan in response.

Councillor Kent, in summing up, emphasized the need for pace and delivery, and welcomed the spirit of cooperation from the entire council. The recommendations were noted.

2025-26 Treasury Management Annual Report

Councillor Adam Kent, Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member with Responsibility for Finance, Corporate Services and Business, presented the Treasury Management Annual Report for 2025-26. He thanked officers for their competent management of treasury operations, noting an underlying need to borrow £752.9 million and external borrowing of £725.2 million, with £22.6 million in interest paid. Councillor Kent highlighted that much of the borrowing was for productive assets, but £118 million of borrowing in the last year was for deficit financing. He expressed concern about the government's delay in providing the High Needs Stability Grant, which is costing the council £5 million in interest. Councillor Kent commended officers for achieving an effective in-year interest rate of 3.4% on the council's £725 million portfolio, despite rising bond market rates.

Councillor Adrian Hardman, Conservative Group Leader, formally seconded the report and expressed concern about the need for shorter-term borrowing to secure the best rates, noting that nearly 25% of the council's debt needs refinancing over the next two years. He advised the council to reconsider its assumptions about falling interest rates. Councillor Tor Pingree asked for clarification on paragraph 13 regarding long-term liabilities, noting a £2.9 million increase. Councillor Matt Jenkins, Leader of the Council, explained that this was a technical adjustment due to IFRS 16 coming into effect. Councillor Rook, Chief Accountant, further clarified that it was an accounting standard adjustment. Councillor Kent added that the short-term borrowing position was influenced by the £180 million deficit of the DSG, for which a £162.7 million grant is expected. The report was noted.

Reports of Cabinet - Decisions Taken

The meeting then moved to consider decisions already taken by the Cabinet. Councillor Jabba Riaz, Deputy Leader of Worcester City Council and County Member, asked about the Shrub Hill development, expressing pleasure that the project was a top priority and inquiring about developer interest and anchor tenants. Councillor Adam Kent confirmed significant interest in the site and that a development partner was being sought. He acknowledged the scale of the project, including a potential three-year demolition process due to contamination and Victorian infrastructure. Councillor Alan Amos, speaking on behalf of the Reform Group, expressed his pleasure that the Shrub Hill development remained a priority, highlighting its potential for job creation. Councillor Chris McSweeny commented on the positive work being done on family hubs, noting the council's best performance in the West Midlands region on a number of measures. Councillor Nik Price asked about the timescale for hearing the results of the tender for Shrub Hill, with Councillor Kent aiming for relevant procedures to be covered within the calendar year. Councillor Karl Perks raised concerns about the deferral of the advertising and sponsorship policy, given the council's financial constraints. Councillor Kent explained that the policy had been re-edited to make it more practical and would be coming to Cabinet on 24 September.

Constitutional Matters

Councillor Matt Jenkins, Leader of the Council, proposed changes to the council's constitution regarding political balance, stating the aim was to avoid further political instability. Councillor Adam Kent seconded the proposal, expressing sympathy for the Assistant Director for Legal and Governance due to the regular need for such reports. Councillor Martin Allen, Chair of the Planning and Regulatory Committee, thanked Councillor Mel Fordington for her dedication as Vice Chair and welcomed Councillor Linda Robinson to the role. Councillor Dan Boatright-Green echoed the thanks to Councillor Fordington. The recommendations were approved.

Worcestershire Pension Fund - LGPS Central Representative Delegations

Councillor Seb James, Chair of the Pensions Committee, introduced the report on representative delegations for the Worcestershire Pension Fund's involvement with LGPS Central. He stated that the report was necessary due to legislation and that Councillor Rook could provide further details. Councillor Adrian Hardman formally seconded the proposal and noted the appointment of the lead officer for the pension scheme on 1 September. The recommendations were approved.

National Scheme of Delegation of Planning Decisions

Councillor Martin Allen, Chair of the Planning and Regulatory Committee, introduced the report on the National Scheme of Delegation of Planning Decisions, explaining that it required constitutional changes to comply with government regulations by 31 October 2026. He stated that the Planning and Regulatory Committee recommended approval of the amendments to the Council's constitution. Councillor Allen expressed personal rejection and regret for these changes, arguing they would lead to unelected officers making decisions without recourse for residents and represented a disgrace to local democracy. He noted that while the impact might be greater on district councils, the county council would also be affected. Councillor Mel Fordington seconded the proposal, also expressing sadness. Councillor Sam Evans concurred with Councillor Allen, stating that councillors get involved because they want to make decisions about their areas, and this was the government stripping powers away. He added that the council had no choice but to vote for the changes to avoid judicial review. Councillor Chris McSweeny, also a member of the planning committee, spoke against the proposal but asked everyone to vote for it due to the legal necessity. He highlighted that officers would have a veto on whether applications went to committee. Councillor James, speaking on behalf of the Conservative group, stated that this was a difficult position where they could not say no, as the government's decision would stand. He described it as an attack on democracy and unfair to officers, who would bear the brunt of public outrage. He noted the council's financial inability to pursue judicial review. Councillor Tor Pingree echoed the sentiments of other councillors, calling the situation appalling and an attack on local government. He questioned whether developers could submit multiple minor applications to circumvent the rules. Councillor Allen responded that legal officers were unavailable but suspected there was nothing stopping developers from doing so, stating that residents were being thrown under the bus. Councillor Kent agreed, questioning if anyone in the chamber supported the changes, suggesting it was only being done out of necessity. He described it as an attack on democracy. Councillor Hart, speaking for the Conservative group, agreed with most contributions, stating that the National Planning Policy Framework was a denigration of democracy. He expressed faith in the council's officers but wondered if this would lead to more legal challenges. Councillor Shaw agreed with most councillors, stating that it was clear everyone believed this was not a good thing. Councillor Miller, Vice-Chairman of the Council, noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion, and that abstaining would not count as a vote for or against. Councillor Oodle, however, argued that the planning system was broken and held back development, and that this change was about economic growth and efficiency, not taking power away from councillors. Councillor Cross argued that the focus should be on building existing permissions and utilizing empty homes, rather than rushing through planning changes. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from those who supported the change, but only Councillor Oodle spoke in favour. Councillor Allen explained that if the changes were not adopted, the planning committee would be bypassed entirely, and that substantial matters would still come before them. Hazel Best, Assistant Director for Legal and Governance, confirmed that if the changes were not adopted, decisions made under existing delegations could be judicially reviewed and unlawful. She proposed a second recommendation for the council to adopt the changes. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent and stated they would make the situation worse. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken and held back development, and that this change was about economic growth and efficiency. Councillor Cross countered that there were already many permissions granted but not built, and that empty homes could be utilized. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from those who supported the change. Councillor Miller stated that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity of adopting the changes. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken and held back development. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions and utilizing empty homes. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity of adopting the changes. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one vote in favour would pass the motion. Councillor Allen explained the legal necessity. Councillor Perks described the changes as abhorrent. Councillor Oodle argued that the planning system was broken. Councillor Cross argued for building existing permissions. Councillor Shaw requested comments only from supporters. Councillor Miller noted that even one