Subscribe to updates

You'll receive weekly summaries about Kingston upon Thames Council every week.

If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.

Planning Committee - Wednesday, 16 September 2026 - 7:30 pm

September 16, 2026 at 7:30 pm Planning Committee View on council website

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“What new developments will be approved tonight?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Kingston upon Thames and are not the council. About us

The Planning Committee of Kingston upon Thames Council is scheduled to convene on Wednesday 16 September 2026 to consider two significant planning applications. The meeting will focus on proposals for a Christmas tree nursery and storage facility in Worcester Park, and the demolition and redevelopment of a former children's centre in Kingston Hill into a healthcare rehabilitation centre.

Land at Riverhill Yard, Old Malden Lane, Worcester Park KT4 7PU

The committee is scheduled to consider a planning application for the use of land at Riverhill Yard, Old Malden Lane, Worcester Park, KT4 7PU. The proposal involves the use of the site as a nursery for growing saplings and the storage and distribution of Christmas trees, a use classified as 'Sui Generis'1. The plans also include the installation of a single-storey modular office, storage containers, poly tunnels, landscaping, and the creation of a new vehicle access. This application is part retrospective, meaning some elements are already in place.

The report pack indicates that the application is being brought before the committee due to its classification as a 'Major Development'2. The site is designated as Metropolitan Open Land (MOL)3, and the report outlines that development in such areas is subject to strict policies. The application's principle of development is considered acceptable due to its historical horticultural use and the site's classification as 'grey belt land'4.

Concerns raised by neighbours and consultees include noise from operations, light pollution, increased traffic, and potential harm to wildlife. However, the report notes that the Environmental Health Officer has raised no objection subject to conditions regarding lighting, operating hours, and noise control. The Biodiversity Officer has also raised no objection, subject to conditions ensuring adherence to biodiversity net gain5 requirements and the submission of management plans. The Environment Agency and Lead Local Flood Authority6 have also raised no objections.

The report details extensive planning history for the site, including enforcement notices and previous applications. The proposed development includes elements such as green roofs on storage containers, green walls on the modular office, and a new riverside path accessible to the public. The application also addresses Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)7, aiming for a 10% net gain, with off-site provisions potentially required.

Warren Park Children's Centre, Kingston Hill, Kingston Upon Thames KT2 7LX

The committee is also scheduled to consider a full planning application for the demolition of existing buildings at Warren Park Children's Centre, Kingston Hill, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 7LX, and the erection of a healthcare rehabilitation centre for pre- and post-operative care (Use Class C2). The proposal includes landscaped gardens, amenity space, car and cycle parking, and associated works. The report indicates this is a 'Major Development'8.

The site has a history of use as a children's home and rehabilitation facility. The proposed new centre would provide state-of-the-art rehabilitation services for patients recovering from surgery before returning home. The facility would offer 52 ensuite bedrooms, physiotherapy and gym facilities, a hydrotherapy pool, and various communal areas. It is anticipated that the centre would employ approximately 70 staff and cater to patients with an average stay of 7-10 days.

The application has generated significant public interest, with 22 representations received, predominantly objecting to the proposals. Key concerns raised by residents include inadequate parking provision, increased traffic and on-street parking pressure, the height and bulk of the proposed building in relation to surrounding residential character, potential loss of daylight and sunlight, overlooking and privacy issues, noise and odour from 24/7 operations, and potential harm to trees and biodiversity.

Statutory consultees have provided responses, with the RBK Tree and Landscape Officer raising no objection subject to conditions. The RBK Biodiversity Officer also raises no objection, subject to conditions securing a Construction Environmental Management Plan9 and a Habitat Monitoring and Management Plan10. The Lead Local Flood Authority11 raises no objection, subject to a condition on the drainage system. The RBK Environmental Health Officer raises no objection, subject to conditions on dust, machinery, and odour control. The RBK Heritage Officer raises no objection, noting a neutral impact on heritage assets, including the Grade II listed boundary wall to Richmond Park12 and Richmond Park itself, a Grade I Registered Park and Garden13.

The report details the design evolution of the scheme, influenced by pre-application engagement and feedback from the Design Review Panel14. The proposed building is three storeys high, with a radial footprint designed to reduce its perceived bulk. The architectural approach draws inspiration from local historical buildings. The application also addresses sustainability, aiming for a BREEAM 'Excellent' rating15 and incorporating measures for energy efficiency and renewable energy generation.

The report outlines the proposed car parking provision of 23 spaces, including disabled bays and electric vehicle charging points, and cycle parking for staff and visitors. A Travel Plan16 is included to encourage sustainable travel. The proposal also includes a Delivery and Servicing Plan17 to manage operational traffic.

The committee will also consider the implications for flood risk and drainage, with the site located in Flood Zone 118. The proposal includes a revised sustainable drainage strategy. Environmental health considerations, including air quality, noise, odour, contamination, and lighting, have been assessed, with conditions recommended to mitigate potential impacts. Fire safety measures are also detailed, with a requirement for a Fire Statement19. The development is expected to provide economic and social value through job creation and enhanced healthcare provision.


  1. Sui Generis: A planning term used for uses that do not fit into any of the standard Use Classes Order categories. 

  2. Major Development: As defined in the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order, typically referring to developments of a certain scale or impact. 

  3. Metropolitan Open Land (MOL): Land designated for its open character within the metropolitan area, similar in protection to Green Belt land. 

  4. Grey Belt Land: Land within the Green Belt that is previously developed or does not strongly contribute to the purposes of the Green Belt, as defined in the NPPF. 

  5. Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG): A measure requiring new developments to improve biodiversity by at least 10% compared to the pre-development baseline. 

  6. Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA): The local authority responsible for managing local flood risk, including surface water flooding. 

  7. Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG): A measure requiring new developments to improve biodiversity by at least 10% compared to the pre-development baseline. 

  8. Major Development: As defined in the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order, typically referring to developments of a certain scale or impact. 

  9. Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP): A document outlining measures to minimise environmental impacts during construction. 

  10. Habitat Monitoring and Management Plan (HMMP): A plan detailing how habitats created or enhanced as part of a development will be managed and monitored over time. 

  11. Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA): The local authority responsible for managing local flood risk, including surface water flooding. 

  12. Grade II listed boundary wall: A historic structure of special architectural or historic interest, recognised by statutory listing. 

  13. Grade I Registered Park and Garden: A historic park or garden of exceptional interest, recognised by statutory listing. 

  14. Design Review Panel (DRP): An independent panel of design experts who provide feedback on development proposals to improve design quality. 

  15. BREEAM 'Excellent': A high rating under the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method, signifying excellent environmental performance in a building. 

  16. Travel Plan: A document outlining measures to promote sustainable travel to and from a development. 

  17. Delivery and Servicing Plan: A plan detailing how deliveries and servicing to a development will be managed to minimise disruption. 

  18. Flood Zone 1: Areas identified as having a low probability of fluvial (river) flooding. 

  19. Fire Statement: A document outlining the fire safety strategy for a development, required for major developments under the London Plan. 

Attendees

Profile image for Councillor Olly Wehring
Councillor Olly Wehring Chair - Kingston and North Kingston Neighbourhood Committee Liberal Democrat Norbiton Ward
Profile image for Councillor Elizabeth Park
Councillor Elizabeth Park Liberal Democrat Old Malden Ward
Profile image for Councillor Ian George
Councillor Ian George Conservative Coombe Hill Ward
Profile image for Councillor Mark Beynon
Councillor Mark Beynon Chair - Planning Committee; Chair - Pension Fund Panel Liberal Democrat King George's and Sunray Ward
Profile image for Councillor Lesley Heap
Councillor Lesley Heap Liberal Democrat New Malden Village Ward
Profile image for Councillor Ian Manders
Councillor Ian Manders Liberal Democrat Alexandra Ward
Profile image for Councillor Mark Manners
Councillor Mark Manners Liberal Democrat Kingston Gate Ward
Profile image for Councillor Roger Hayes
Councillor Roger Hayes Liberal Democrat Kingston Town Ward
Profile image for Councillor Sharukh Mirza
Councillor Sharukh Mirza Liberal Democrat Chessington South and Malden Rushett Ward
Profile image for Councillor Lorraine Dunstone
Councillor Lorraine Dunstone Chair - South of the Borough Neighbourhood Committee Liberal Democrat Hook and Chessington North Ward
Profile image for Councillor Stephen Evans
Councillor Stephen Evans Liberal Democrat Kingston Gate Ward

Topics

Flood Zone 1 Design Review Panel (DRP) Kingston upon Thames Council Christmas tree nursery and storage facility in Worcester Park Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) C2 use class Delivery and Servicing Plan Fire Statement demolition and redevelopment of a former children's centre in Kingston Hill into a healthcare rehabilitation centre Grade II listed boundary wall major development Grey Belt biodiversity net gain travel plan Richmond Park BREEAM 'Excellent'

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet Wednesday 16-Sep-2026 19.30 Planning Committee.pdf

Reports Pack

Public reports pack Wednesday 16-Sep-2026 19.30 Planning Committee.pdf

Additional Documents

Planning Committee 16.09.26 Combined Report.pdf