This week in West Oxfordshire:

Housing Development Refused Amidst Serious Flood Risk Concerns in Ducklington

The Development Management Sub-Committee met on Monday 12 October 2026, and a critical decision saw the unanimous refusal of a reserved matters application for 105 dwellings on land east of Witney Road in Ducklington. This refusal was primarily driven by significant flood risk concerns, with the majority of the site now classified as Flood Zone 3. The Environment Agency maintained its objection, stating that the development had not been satisfactorily demonstrated to be safe for its lifetime without increasing flood risk elsewhere.

Councillor Thomas Ashby, speaking on behalf of Ducklington Parish Council, highlighted that the site, known locally as The Moors, has always been a floodplain and floods significantly every year. He questioned why developers continue to pursue applications on such sites, stating, Why is this even across our desk? Why do they keep coming back? The Parish Council has consistently provided photographic evidence of extensive flooding, including during the 2007 floods, and has challenged the developer's attempts to reclassify the flood risk. The officer's report concluded that the proposal conflicts with seven policies of the West Oxfordshire Local Plan and six policies of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), particularly concerning flood risk and safe development.

The committee also agreed that had the council been in a position to determine an outline application for up to 370 dwellings at Peashell Farm, Downs Road, Curbridge, it would have refused planning permission. The reasons for refusal, which will form the council's case at a public inquiry, relate to unacceptable living conditions due to noise from the A40, the principle of development outside a settlement not well-related to Witney, and the absence of a completed planning obligation. This decision highlights the council's commitment to protecting residents from unacceptable risks, especially those related to environmental hazards like flooding.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Self-Build Housing Development Approved in Aston Despite Parish Council Objections

Despite concerns raised by the Parish Council regarding scale, landscape impact, heritage, drainage, and highway safety, the Development Management Sub-Committee approved an outline application for up to 16 self-build and custom-build plots, including seven affordable Discount Market Sale plots, on land north of North Street Farm in Aston. The committee noted that the council cannot currently demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, and the proposal addresses a significant shortfall in self-build plots.

The approval is subject to a Section 106 agreement and conditions, including the resolution of outstanding ecological surveys. The applicant's agent, Andrew Jones, emphasised the high quality of the scheme, its contribution to housing supply, and the benefits of self-build homes, including lower energy consumption and increased local spending. Councillor Steve Cosier, the local ward member, raised questions about the visual impact assessment and drainage strategy, but the officer clarified that the site is within Flood Zone 1 and the Environment Agency had withdrawn its objection after receiving additional information. The decision reflects the council's need to balance housing delivery with local concerns, particularly in areas where housing land supply is limited.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Asthall Manor Internal Alterations Approved for Energy Efficiency

Listed building consent was unanimously approved by the Development Management Sub-Committee for internal alterations at Asthall Manor, Asthall. The works involve increasing the scope of interior wall insulation using a thin, breathable Aerogel board and lime plaster. Officers and the Conservation Officer considered these works would not negatively impact the heritage asset's significance or the character of the Asthall Conservation Area and Cotswold National Landscape. The proposal was also noted to contribute to long-term sustainability through improved thermal performance. This decision demonstrates a commitment to enhancing the energy efficiency of historic buildings while respecting their heritage value.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Overview and Scrutiny Committee Reviews Infrastructure Funding and Market Performance

The Overview and Scrutiny Committee met on Wednesday 14 October 2026 to discuss several key council functions. A significant item was the Infrastructure Funding Statement (IFS) for 2025/26, which detailed how developer contributions, primarily through Section 106 agreements, were secured, received, allocated, and spent. The council secured nearly £3.4 million in new Section 106 contributions and 272 affordable homes, with a 72% increase in infrastructure spending compared to the previous year. Councillor Liz Leffman, Executive Member for Planning and Infrastructure, explained the legal constraints on redirecting Section 106 funds, highlighting that while CIL offers more flexibility, S106 remains tied to specific development impacts. The committee also reviewed the performance of the Witney and Chipping Norton Charter Markets, managed by Cotswold Markets Ltd since August 2025. The report indicated success, with occupancy rates exceeding targets and positive feedback from traders and customers. The committee noted the report and recommended extending the management agreement.

The committee also discussed the council's fleet decarbonisation strategy and the transition to zero-emission vehicles. The report sought approval for the 2026/27 fleet replacement programme and the adoption of certified Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as a transitional fuel, acknowledging that current heavy vehicle technology and depot infrastructure are not yet mature for large-scale electrification. Concerns were raised about the sustainability of HVO sourcing and the financial implications, but officers assured the committee that certified HVO would be procured with robust assurance frameworks. The committee noted the report.

Finally, the committee received updates on the Woodford Way housing development in Witney, which aims to deliver up to 60 new social-rented homes. The report proposed allocating Section 106 funding to progress the scheme. The committee noted the report and recommended that the Executive include a trial of the car park layout in future considerations. Discussions also covered updates from task and finish groups and the committee's work programme.

For more details, see the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting.

Other Matters

Applications Determined Under Delegated Powers

The committee noted a report detailing applications determined under delegated powers.

Appeal Decisions

The committee was informed of recent appeal decisions. Notably, an appeal for Forge Garage in Churchill was allowed, with the Inspector finding that the proposal would enhance the conservation area and provide acceptable living conditions, outweighing the loss of employment land. An appeal against an enforcement notice at Chalford Paddocks, Old Chalford, was dismissed, upholding the notice to cease unauthorised residential use of a stable building.

This week in West Oxfordshire:

Village Character Under Threat? Council Refuses Large Housing Development in North Leigh

The Development Management Sub-Committee met on Monday 10 August 2026, and a key decision saw the refusal of an outline planning application for up to 80 new dwellings on land at Common Road, North Leigh. This decision came after significant local opposition, with residents and the North Leigh Neighbourhood Plan Committee raising serious concerns about the scale of the development and its impact on the village's character and infrastructure.

Councillor Roger Faulkner, who proposed the refusal, argued that the development was not limited as required by local policy and would lead to a significant increase in housing without corresponding infrastructure improvements. Councillor Sarah Veasey seconded the motion, echoing concerns about the cumulative impact of development on the village. The refusal reasons cited conflict with policies on development scale, character, landscape impact, and heritage assets.

Local representatives voiced strong opposition. Paul Evans, a resident, highlighted that North Leigh has already seen a 40% increase in housing since 2015, with a further 122 homes already approved. He questioned what had not grown in that time, listing road capacity, water and sewerage provision, school capacity, and local amenities as areas struggling to keep pace. Councillor Andy Clements from North Leigh Parish Council echoed these concerns, stating that the proposed development was contrary to multiple policies in the adopted West Oxfordshire Local Plan 2031 and the emerging Draft Plan, which classifies North Leigh as a Tier 3 village unsuitable for development of this scale.

The applicant's representative, Rachel Bibby, Head of Planning for Lyon Court Group, argued that the scheme had been significantly reduced from 115 to 80 dwellings and would deliver much-needed housing, including affordable homes. She highlighted that the proposals had been refined through collaboration with council officers and statutory consultees, and that heritage assets like Grimm's Ditch would be preserved and enhanced.

However, the committee ultimately sided with the objectors. Councillor Sarah Veasey, in the debate, expressed strong reservations about the cumulative impact, noting that North Leigh has already seen a 40% growth in housing and that this proposal would push it to a 55% increase, with further developments in the pipeline. She argued that the harms, particularly due to inadequate infrastructure and the impact on the village's historic and rural character, significantly outweighed the benefits. The application was refused, a decision that prioritises the preservation of village character and infrastructure capacity over speculative development in an area already experiencing significant growth.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Kingham to See Two New Homes After Planning Approval

The Development Management Sub-Committee also approved an application for two self-build dwellings at Hillside, Station Road, Kingham. The decision, which was unanimous, will see the demolition of an existing dwelling and the erection of a replacement dwelling at the front of the site and a new dwelling at the rear.

Councillor Andrew Beaney, who proposed the approval, described the application as sensible and straightforward. While the Parish Council had raised objections, no one spoke against the application during the meeting. The new dwellings will be constructed using traditional Cotswold stone and slate for the front property, while the rear property will adopt a more contemporary design. The committee also agreed to add a condition to manage noise and dust from stone cutting on-site, addressing a concern raised by Councillor Andrew Beaney regarding potential disruption to neighbours. This approval allows for the creation of new homes while respecting the character of Kingham.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Historic Coach House in Asthall to Undergo Sensitive Alterations

Two applications concerning The Coach House in Asthall were approved by the Development Management Sub-Committee. These included a householder application for alterations and extensions, and a listed building consent application for similar works. The approved plans will see the Grade II listed Coach House and its associated stables brought back into optimal viable use as family accommodation.

Councillor Andrew Walker, who proposed the approval, found the applications sensible and supported the officer's recommendation. The approved works include the relocation of historic stable partitions within the stables building to improve the functionality of the new accommodation. While this relocation results in a low level of less-than-substantial harm to the heritage asset, officers concluded that this harm is outweighed by the public benefits of securing the long-term use and conservation of the buildings. A lightweight link structure will also be created between the Coach House and the stables. This decision demonstrates a commitment to preserving heritage assets while allowing for their adaptation to modern living.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Public Footpath Diversion in Shipton Under Wychwood to Proceed to Consultation

The Development Management Sub-Committee authorised officers to proceed with the statutory consultation process for the diversion of a public footpath in Shipton under Wychwood. This diversion is necessary to enable the construction of an agricultural storage barn, for which prior approval had already been granted.

Councillor Jan Lund raised concerns about the process, questioning whether the footpath could be relocated even if the barn was not ultimately built. Officers clarified that the current step is to allow for statutory consultation, and any objections would be considered by the Planning Inspectorate. This authorisation allows for a formal public consultation, ensuring that all interested parties have the opportunity to voice their opinions before any final decision is made.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Other Matters

Site Visit Agreed for Endstone Housing Application

The committee agreed to a site visit on Thursday 3 September at 9:30 am to an outline application for up to 100 dwellings on the edge of Endstone off Lidstone Road. This visit will take place before the application is determined at a future meeting.

This week in West Oxfordshire:

Major Housing Development in North Leigh Faces Scrutiny Over Infrastructure and Heritage

The Development Management Sub-Committee met on Monday 10 August 2026 to consider a significant outline planning application for up to 80 new homes on land at Common Road, North Leigh. This proposal, which includes vehicular access, public open space, and landscaping, has drawn objections from North Leigh Parish Council and raised concerns from statutory bodies regarding highway safety, flood risk, and the capacity of water and drainage infrastructure.

A key point of contention is the potential impact on Grim's Ditch, a scheduled ancient monument, and the overall landscape. The applicant argues the development is necessary to contribute to West Oxfordshire's five-year housing land supply[^1], a critical factor under the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). However, the scale of the development and its proximity to heritage assets raise questions about whether the benefits truly outweigh the potential harm. The decision will have a direct impact on the character of North Leigh and the availability of essential services for new residents.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Historic Buildings in Asthall Face Alterations Amidst Parish Council Objections

Two applications concerning The Coach House in Asthall were presented to the Development Management Sub-Committee on Monday 10 August 2026. These applications seek permission for alterations and extensions to the Grade II listed Coach House and Stables, including a new link structure.

Asthall Parish Council has objected, citing concerns about the alteration of original features and the impact of the proposed link structure on the setting of these historic buildings. The applicant's agent contends that the proposals are heritage-led and aim to secure the long-term conservation of the buildings. This decision highlights the council's role in balancing the desire for modern adaptation with the imperative to protect listed heritage assets, which are irreplaceable parts of our local history.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Public Footpath Diversion Proposed for Agricultural Barn in Shipton Under Wychwood

A proposal to divert part of Shipton Under Wychwood Footpath No. 343/7/10 was also discussed by the Development Management Sub-Committee on Monday 10 August 2026. The diversion is required to facilitate the construction of an agricultural storage barn.

While the council does not deem the barn itself necessary, the diversion is a procedural step to enable its construction. The proposed new route is shorter than the existing path and is intended to remain accessible to the public. This matter illustrates how planning decisions can involve complex legal and procedural steps, even for seemingly minor changes, to ensure public rights are maintained.

For more details, see the Development Management Sub-Committee meeting.

Other Matters

Applications Determined Under Delegated Powers and Appeal Decisions

The Sub-Committee will also be informed of applications that have been determined under delegated powers and of any recent appeal decisions.

Site Visits

Finally, the Sub-Committee will be asked to agree any site visits that officers believe should be undertaken prior to the determination of future applications.

This week in West Oxfordshire:

Council Approves Local Plan 2043 for Public Consultation Amidst Infrastructure Concerns

The Council met on Wednesday 22 July 2026, making a significant decision to approve the pre-submission draft of the West Oxfordshire Local Plan 2043 for a six-week statutory public consultation. This plan sets out the framework for the district's development until 2043, covering housing, employment, infrastructure, and environmental protection.

While the plan was broadly supported for its quality and evidence-led approach, concerns were raised by several councillors, including Councillor Michele Mead and Councillor Liam Walker, regarding the absence of a finalised Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP). They argued that without a clear understanding of how new developments will be supported by essential services, proceeding to consultation was premature. Councillor Liz Leffman, Executive Member for Planning and Infrastructure, assured members that the IDP would be published alongside the consultation documents and reviewed by the executive. The draft plan was ultimately approved for consultation with 25 votes in favour, 3 against, and 11 abstentions. This decision is crucial for shaping the future of West Oxfordshire, impacting everything from where new homes can be built to the availability of schools and healthcare.

You can find more details at the Council meeting.

Witney Car Park Usage to Be Assessed with ANPR Survey

A motion to commission a minimum five-week Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) survey of car park usage in Witney, specifically at Woodford Way and Witton Way, was debated and passed. This data will inform future decisions regarding the potential redevelopment of the Woodford Way car park. Proponents argued that existing parking data was insufficient and that decisions should be based on robust, up-to-date evidence to support local businesses and the town centre economy. Councillor Liam Walker, who put forward the motion, stated, Better evidence should lead to better decisions. The motion passed with 25 votes in favour, 3 against, and 11 abstentions. This move aims to ensure that any decisions about parking provision are based on factual evidence, impacting residents and businesses who rely on these facilities.

You can find more details at the Council meeting.

Council Passes Motion to Strengthen Protection of Precious Habitats

The Council passed a motion calling for strengthened protection of precious habitats in West Oxfordshire. The motion highlighted the UK's status as a nature-depleted country and the urgency of preserving remaining areas of high ecological value, particularly in light of new government legislation that could fast-track housing development. Concerns were raised that developers might be encouraged to damage local environments and compensate elsewhere, potentially putting sensitive habitats at risk. The Council resolved to ask the Leader of the Council to write to Tony Juniper, the head of Natural England, to inquire about the suspension of the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) designation process and to request a temporary approach to planning applications that considers local environmental evidence for at-risk sites. The motion was passed with 40 votes in favour, none against, and no abstentions. This decision reflects a commitment to safeguarding the district's unique natural heritage for future generations.

You can find more details at the Council meeting.

Residents on Managed Estates to Have Double Taxation Issue Investigated

A motion concerning the double taxation faced by residents on new housing estates was debated and subsequently referred to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee for further investigation. The motion highlighted that residents often pay both council tax and mandatory estate management fees to private companies for the maintenance of public green spaces, which was described as an unfair system. The amendment to refer the motion to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee was accepted and passed by the Council with 38 votes in favour, none against, and no abstentions. This referral means that the committee will now explore options for local authorities to adopt new housing estates and investigate potential changes to national policy.

You can find more details at the Council meeting.

Lift Replacement at Marriott's Walk Approved

The Council approved the allocation of funding from building maintenance earmarked reserves for the replacement of lifts at Marriott's Walk in Witney. The existing lifts, installed in 2009, are nearing the end of their operational life and require replacement to ensure health and safety compliance and continued functionality of the shopping centre. This decision is part of the ongoing regeneration efforts for the centre. The Council approved the allocation of funding with 40 votes in favour, none against, and no abstentions.

You can find more details at the Council meeting.

Honorary Alderman Title Conferred on Julian Cooper

In an extraordinary Council meeting on Wednesday 22 July 2026, the Council voted to confer the title of Honorary Alderman on former Councillor Julian Cooper in recognition of his eminent services to the Council. The decision was passed with 32 votes in favour, 4 against, and 6 abstentions, meeting the required two-thirds majority. Numerous councillors spoke in support, highlighting Councillor Cooper's dedication, integrity, and extensive knowledge during his long service to West Oxfordshire.

You can find more details at the Council meeting.

McDonald's Premises Licence Granted in Witney

The Licensing Panel met on Tuesday 21 July 2026 and considered an application for a new premises licence for a McDonald's restaurant on Ducklington Lane in Witney. The application sought to extend operating hours to 24 hours a day for late-night refreshment sales between 11:00 PM and 5:00 AM, restricted to drive-through customers and delivery couriers. Despite representations from local residents, Councillor McCarroll, and Witney Town Council, the panel decided to grant the licence as per the operating schedule, subject to conditions outlined in the operating schedule. The panel noted that the council retains the power to review the licence should any issues arise.

You can find more details at the Licensing Panel meeting.

Other Matters

Miscellaneous Licensing Sub-Committee Meeting Cancelled

The Miscellaneous Licensing Sub-Committee meeting scheduled for Tuesday 21 July 2026 was cancelled.