Subscribe to updates
You'll receive weekly summaries about Staffordshire Council every week.
If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.
Prefer no ads? Become a Supporter for £3.50/month
County Council - Thursday 8th October 2026 10:00am
October 8, 2026 at 10:00 am County Council View on council websiteSummary
Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Staffordshire and are not the council. About us
The Staffordshire County Council meeting on Thursday 8 October 2026 addressed a wide range of issues, including significant debate on proposed changes to planning regulations and the council's constitution. Key decisions included the approval of changes to the constitution and scheme of delegation to comply with new national planning regulations, and the appointment of new Vice-Chairs for several committees. The council also discussed the ongoing challenges of local government reorganisation and the need for fairer school funding.
Proposed Changes to the Constitution and Scheme of Delegation
A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussing proposed changes to the Council's constitution and scheme of delegation, necessitated by new national planning regulations1 that came into effect on 31 October 2026. These regulations mandate changes to planning committee sizes and introduce a national scheme for planning decisions, aiming to speed up the process by delegating more minor and technical decisions to officers.
Councillor Martin Murray, Leader of the Council, explained that adopting these changes was a legal necessity, not choice,
driven by the Labour government's agenda to centralise planning decisions. He stressed that voting for the changes was not an endorsement but a demonstration of the Council's ability to make difficult decisions to remain legally compliant. Councillor Mike Broom, seconding the motion, echoed these sentiments, describing the regulations as law-making by the back door
that bypasses parliamentary scrutiny and strips power from local people. He highlighted the significant financial risks, including potential judicial reviews and legal costs, if the Council failed to comply.
However, several councillors expressed strong opposition. Councillor Philip White, Leader of the Opposition, argued against accepting the changes, stating it was a terrible, terrible example of government overreach
and urged members to vote against it to give voice to residents. Councillor Ian Cooper voiced frustration at being placed in an impossible position
between surrendering democratic authority and facing legal consequences, questioning the timing of the information provided and demanding greater transparency and a deferral of the vote. Councillor Jeremy Pert proposed an amendment that the Council write to the Secretary of State requesting a deferral and reconsideration of the legislation, which was seconded by Councillor Alex Hunt.
Despite extensive debate and an amendment proposed by Councillor Philip White to delay the vote and seek further information, the amendment was ultimately defeated. The Council then proceeded to vote on the original motion to approve the constitutional changes. The motion was carried, meaning the Council will implement the mandated changes to its planning processes.
Market Supplement Payment Approval
The Council also considered a proposed addition to the Scheme of Delegation concerning Market Supplement Payment Approval. Councillor Paul Jones moved the recommendation to update the Council's Scheme of Delegation to formally include decision-making responsibilities for market supplement payments. These payments are temporary additions to salaries made when there are significant recruitment or retention difficulties due to market pay conditions. Councillor Philip White expressed support for the scheme but raised concerns about the Council's reputation as an employer, citing a poor staff satisfaction survey. He questioned what steps the leadership was taking to improve employee morale. Councillor Martin Murray responded by stating that the disruption caused by Local Government Reorganisation was a primary reason for staff dissatisfaction, not the conduct of Reform councillors. The recommendations were agreed.
Appointment of Vice-Chairmen on Committees
The Council approved the appointment of Councillor Jonathan Pyke as Vice-Chair of the Economy, Infrastructure and Communities Overview and Scrutiny Committee and Councillor Thomas Baker as Vice-Chairman of the Audit and Standards Committee.
Report of the Chair of the Police, Fire and Crime Panel
Councillor Gary Hales presented the report, noting long-standing concerns and challenges regarding insufficient progress on issues previously identified. The report was received.
Corporate Parenting Panel Annual Report 2025/26
Councillor Su Beardmore presented the Corporate Parenting Panel's Annual Report, highlighting the Council's commitment to its role as corporate parents. The report detailed efforts to become more child-centred, strengthen scrutiny, and improve accountability. Key themes included listening to the voices of children and young people through initiatives like the Voice Project and the Children in Care Council. The panel had focused on placement moves and internet/phone use, leading to action plans for improvement. The report also noted positive progress in health services, adoption, fostering, and educational outcomes for children in care and care leavers. The report was received.
Questions
Several questions were raised by councillors to Cabinet Members. Councillor Colin Greatorex questioned the separation of capital and revenue work in highway maintenance, citing examples of resurfaced roads with unrepaired roundabouts. Councillor Peter Mason, Cabinet Member for Strategic Highways, explained the different requirements for roundabout repairs and the backlog of work. Councillor Andrew Clissett asked about the Council's approach to commercial risk in development projects, to which Councillor Robin Hall, Cabinet Member for Economy and Skills, assured that taxpayer money would not be gambled without robust business cases. Councillor Victoria Wilson raised concerns about road closure costs being potentially borne by community funds, which Councillor Mason clarified was not the Council's policy. Councillor James Hodges questioned Staffordshire's underfunding compared to neighbouring authorities, and Councillor Janet Higgins, Cabinet Member for Education and SEND, highlighted the disparity in school funding per pupil. Councillor Andrew Clissett also asked about the urgency and need for college expansion funding.
Councillor Helen Williams inquired about the Council's response to growing pressures on adult social care and future plans, with Councillor Martin Rogerson, Cabinet Member for Health and Care, emphasising a multidisciplinary approach and the importance of early identification of carers. Councillor Helen Williams also asked about the Council's approach to ensuring sufficient re-ablement and social care capacity.
Councillor Jones asked Councillor Hall about the need for college expansion funding, and Councillor Rogerson responded regarding the importance of early intervention for SEND children.
Councillor Baker questioned the rationale behind withdrawing membership from the Local Authority Pension Fund Forum (LAPFF), with Councillor Sean Bagguley, Cabinet Member for Finance and Resources, citing financial and principled reasons, including concerns about the LAPFF straying into political territory.
Councillor Humphreyson asked about planning and operational improvements for major roadworks, with Councillor Mason detailing efforts to coordinate works and mitigate disruption. Councillor Pendleton inquired about the Council's support for Rugeley's future economy, and Councillor Hall outlined plans for targeted investment. Councillor Woods asked about SEND reforms and expanding specialist provision, with Councillor Higgins explaining the focus on mainstream inclusion and lobbying for fairer funding. Councillor Parton asked about the Council's correspondence regarding solar farms and battery storage, and Councillor Andrew Mynors provided details of letters sent to the government.
Councillor Hunt asked about fire risks in country parks, and Councillor Anthony Screen, Cabinet Member for Community Safety and Resilience, highlighted human activity as the primary cause and the importance of prevention. Councillor Chapman questioned the Council's support for a Multi-Academy Trust facing potential pay cuts for support staff, with Councillor Higgins stating the Trust is the employer and the Council cannot provide additional funding. Councillor Brown asked about the Council's proactive approach to extreme weather, and Councillor Hayley Coles, Deputy Leader of the Council, outlined existing support arrangements and ongoing investigations into cooling libraries.
Notices of Motion
Councillor Jill Hood moved a motion concerning ANPR camera-based enforcement on Stone High Street, which was seconded by Councillor Jeremy Pert. The motion aimed to improve safety and deter unauthorised vehicle access. Councillor Peter Mason, Cabinet Member for Strategic Highways, argued the motion was premature and that a county-wide approach to moving traffic enforcement powers was being considered. The motion was ultimately defeated.
Councillor Hayley Coles moved, and Councillor Wayne Luca seconded, a motion reaffirming the Council's commitment to corporate parenting responsibilities and giving due consideration to the PATHWAYS trial. This motion was carried.
Councillor Beardmore moved, and Councillor Bob Egginton seconded, a motion expressing concerns about the Peak Cluster pipeline project and its potential environmental and community impacts. The motion called for continued engagement in the consultation process, raising concerns with the government and promoter, and ensuring local representation. This motion was carried.
Councillor Martin Murray moved, and Councillor Hayley Coles seconded, a motion on equality, which was carried.
Changes to the Constitution
The Council approved amendments to its Procedural Standing Orders, including a reduction in the size of the Planning Committee to 13 members, and the adoption of a dress code for Members. Delegated authority was also given to the Monitoring Officer, in consultation with the Leader, to approve changes to Cabinet Support Member Portfolio titles and role descriptions.
Vice-Chairperson Overview and Scrutiny Roles
The Council approved a reduction in the number of Vice-Chairpersons appointed to Overview and Scrutiny Committees from two to one per committee, resulting in an annual efficiency saving.
Questions
Councillor Greatorex asked a supplementary question regarding highway repairs, specifically the separation of capital and revenue work and the long timescales for roundabout repairs. Councillor Mason explained the complexities and funding limitations. Councillor Edgington asked about a pilot scheme for elderly residents to use voice technology, with Councillor Andrew Mynors explaining its benefits in improving connectivity and reducing isolation. Councillor Clissett questioned the Council's exposure to commercial risk in development projects, and Councillor Hall assured that taxpayer money would be protected. Councillor Wilson raised concerns about road closure costs, and Councillor Mason clarified the Council's policy. Councillor Hodges asked about Staffordshire's underfunding compared to neighbours, and Councillor Higgins highlighted the disparity in school funding per pupil. Councillor Jones asked about the urgency of college expansion funding, and Councillor Hall responded. Councillor Doherty asked about identifying unpaid carers early, and Councillor Rogerson outlined the strategy for early identification and support. Councillor Williams inquired about the Council's capacity for re-ablement and social care, and Councillor Rogerson emphasised a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach.
-
The Town and Country Planning (Discharge of Local Planning Authority Functions) (England) Regulations 2026. ↩
Attendees
Topics
Meeting Documents
Additional Documents